become increasinglyimportant and will continue to be so in the future. As part of the Southern Association ofColleges and Schools (SACS) accreditation effort at Baylor University, the authors proposed aunique energy literacy class for incoming freshmen as an element of Baylor University’sQuality Enhancement Plan (QEP). The QEP called for the development of several EngagedLearning Groups (ELG) for freshmen (from any major on campus) which met one semester hourfor four semesters. The purpose of this particular ELG was to address the lack of energyawareness on the part of students involved in all majors. Entitled “Energy and Society,” thecourse was also part of the residential learning communities on campus. It revolved around thetopic of energy
engineering design process. A series of preliminary designmeetings were held to develop a set of functional behaviors that included the following:≠ Speech recognition/synthesis capabilities - JagBot, like any tour guide, should be able to greet participants going on a campus tour. A directional microphone and a speaker should provide input/output for the speech synthesis system implemented in software.≠ Autonomous navigation - The robot should be able to determine its position at all times. As landmarks and locations are reached and identified, questions might be posed by the human participants that should be answered by JagBot and/or lead to possible detours from the planned route.≠ Physical interaction with participants - To
AC 2010-289: PROFESSIONAL INTERNSHIPS: A REQUIREMENT FORGRADUATIONJohn Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Internship Coordinator for the Department at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Applied Automation Engineering, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning. Page 15.989.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Professional Internships as a
) is a field of study which focuses on the applications of engineering and modern technology, rather than the theoretical.What does ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) say? ABET describesthe difference between engineering and engineering technology as: "Engineering and technologyare separate but intimately related professions. They differ on the basis of: ≠ “Engineering undergraduate programs include more mathematics work and higher level mathematics than technology programs. ≠ Engineering undergraduate programs often focus on theory, while technology programs usually focus on application. ≠ Once they enter the workforce, engineering graduates typically spend their time planning, while
of early fostering of communication and collaboration skills that are seen by industry as paramount and essential for team based software development [27]. With PBL, students will work as a team, which mirrors the professional behavior of software developers. As a result, students’ teamwork and leadership skills will be developed or improved. 4. Life-long learning is a necessity for software developers due to the rapidly and continually changing nature of the IT industry. PBL can develop students’ self- learning capability, which can help them keep abreast of multicore computing and other new technology.4. Apply PBL to the Multicore Programming Course I plan to apply the guided problem-based
specific focus on theterms A(amplitude) and (angular velocity). There were four primary goals for this project: (1)to open lines of communication between the University Saint Thomas and local PK-12 teachers,(2) to aid in the teaching of trigonometry lessons through the use of hands-on activities created tosatisfy MN Academic Standard #9.2.1., (3) to incorporate engineering content into math lessons,and (4) to hone students’ visual-to-mathematic conversion skills, which has been recognized asan increasingly important skill1 for students to possess. This paper discusses the collaborationprocess and presents a lesson plan that can be replicated by other schools.IntroductionThe engineering department at the University of Saint Thomas was approached by
the identified areas. Thesurvey instrument is unique in that it presents students with a realistic global engineeringscenario, and then prompts them to pick the specific abilities and qualities they think would bemost essential for completing the described assignment. The list of 15 attributes presented torespondents is focused on the professional and global dimensions of engineering practice, and isbased on relevant attributes from Purdue University’s Engineer of 2020 initiative. In addition topresenting aggregate results from the survey, we use demographic data to discuss somesimilarities and differences across different sub-populations. We conclude with a discussion ofongoing and future work, including similar surveys planned for faculty
connections.• Boeing is working with several airports, airlines and other partners in developing tools such as SARA (Speed & Route Advisor) for “tailored arrivals”.• SARA delivered traffic within 30 seconds of planned time on 80% approaches at Schiphol airport in Holland compared to within two minutes on a baseline of 67%.• At San Francisco Airport, more than 1700 complete and partial tailored arrivals were completed between December 2007 and June 2009 using the B777 and B747 aircraft. The tailored arrivals saved an average of 950kg of fuel and ~ $950 per approach. Complete tailored arrivals saved approximately 40% of the fuel used in arrivals. For one year period, four participating airlines saved more than 524,000 kg of fuel and
Research Projects Technical Expertise USDOT Validate use of GIS ØGIS and RS technologies for ØRemote Sensing major corridor planning ØData/Image Visualization ØData/Sensor Fusion ØScientific Modeling ØHigh Performance Computing ØSystems Engineering Pixel’s ØSatellite Engineering Spectral reflectance Reflectance Clutter Target
Research Projects Technical Expertise USDOT Validate use of GIS ØGIS and RS technologies for ØRemote Sensing major corridor planning ØData/Image Visualization ØData/Sensor Fusion ØScientific Modeling ØHigh Performance Computing ØSystems Engineering Pixel’s ØSatellite Engineering Spectral reflectance Reflectance Clutter Target
in graduate school in engineeringor computer science at ASU, the student is supported for a maximum of four semestersby a second CIRC program funded by an NSF S-STEM grant (#0728695).Through the CIRC/METS program, transfer students in the Fulton Schools ofEngineering can apply for and receive a $4,000 scholarship per academic year. Therequirements for the scholarship include: U.S. citizenship or permanent residency, full-time student in engineering or computer science, a cumulative GPA of at least 3.0, andunmet financial need according to FAFSA. Each semester six workshops are held withmultiple meeting times for each. The topics include the “Guaranteed 4.0 Plan”14,resumes, interviews, how to use computer data bases for research papers
mobile robot programming for ER1 Mobile Robot49Universidad Catolica autonomous navigationde ChileAugsburg College CS course on robot history and theory Robix Manipulator, instructor- created vehicle50Course FormatThe first offering of the IMR course was in spring 2007 and it quickly became apparent that theproposed topics were too ambitious. The topics included simulation, actuators, effectors,locomotion, kinematics, sensors, control, navigation, localization, path planning, computervision, image processing, human-robot interaction and GUI design. The problem was that someof these topics were entire courses in themselves (i.e. computer vision, human-robot
to single individuals,”6. Furthermore, the team itself performs cognitive tasks inthat “they detect and recognize pertinent cues, make decisions, solve problems, rememberrelevant information, plan, acquire knowledge, and design solutions or products as an integratedunit.”7. This is not to say, however, that team cognition is a natural outcome of working on ateam. In fact, it requires a lot of effort and is a distinguishing feature of high-performance teams8 . Team members come with differing perspectives, backgrounds, and expectations and from thisdiversity a shared mental model must emerge9.An individual’s mental model is an “internal conceptual representation of an external systemwhose structure maintains the perceived structure of that
information from this assignment revealed student attitudes aboutcivil engineering. The course included additional assignments on sustainability (2009 only),ethics, a team West Point Bridge Designer project, a curriculum plan to graduation at CU with aB.S. in CVEN, a paper on a significant event or structure related to civil engineering (such as theThree Gorges Dam, the flooding in New Orleans from hurricane Katrina, etc.), and a shortsummary of a professional society meeting that they attended (such as ASCE or AGC). In thefinal assignment of the semester the students wrote a reflective essay that instructed them to statewhether or not they planned to remain a civil engineering major and why/why not. The studentswere also instructed to comment on
and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include work-life spillover among faculty and issues confronting underrepresented groups in the STEM fields. Catherine has served as the Coordinator of Special Projects for the Office of the Provost at Virginia Tech focusing on faculty work-life issues, diversity efforts, excellence in undergraduate education, and coordinating university planning activities and served as a doctoral intern with the State Council of Higher Education.Sam Conn, Virginia Tech Prior to joining Virginia Tech's Institute for Distance and Distributed Learning as Director, Sam served as Assistant Professor and Chair of the Department of Computer Information
area that needed to be changed in the next workshop. The workshop organizersthen ranked the changes that needed to be made according to their priority for change and thendesignated people were responsible for making changes for the next workshop. This processprovided a continual improvement plan for the workshops and a second source of data for ourholistic assessment of changes in the faculty that attended the workshop.Focus groups At the closing banquet each university was asked to give their perspective on threequestions. The first question asked what was the most important thing they had gained from theworkshop; the second question asked them to indicate in what class they were planning onimplementing the program; and the third
growth requiresthoughtful planning.” Almost all leading colleges and universities have recognized this fact andcontinuously participating in an ongoing discussion on assessment. Therefore, one recognizesthe fact that any strategic plan for continuous ongoing assessment should have a clear vision ofwhat the university needs to assess and how the process will be implemented. In reality, themethodology used in designing a continuous assessment plan should actually direct and raisequestions about the significance and effectiveness of instructional delivery techniques. Gregorc Page 15.215.2and Ward (1977) are of the opinion that instructors should
, team management, market assessment and benchmarking, user needsassessment, product exploration, a development plan, and the target specifications. We expectothers who adopt FEED to modify it according to their own views, as we probably will in thefuture also.This process is then assessed through an early design review to make sure it was done well. It isthen followed by the familiar solution development stage, and that is followed by a criticaldesign review. Throughout these stages, we use a new concept of design validation to show theway in which both the design process and the product ideas are continually subject to validationand ultimately to testing, manufacture, use, and disposal. This is aimed at teaching design as athoughtful
to fulfill (demonstrate accomplishment of) an expanded list of equally desirablefuture CE program outcomes.7 Since the CE Program at UT Tyler could not properlyassess either ABET a-k or their own nine outcomes as written (multiple requirementslumped under a single outcome; i.e., mathematics, science, and engineering science inABET outcome 3.a as well as in UT Tyler PO 1 in Table 1), the outcomes were brokeninto a larger number of smaller outcomes for their assessment plan. This type ofexpansion of outcomes is mirrored in the BOKII outcomes such that ABET Outcome 3ais broken into three separate outcomes.The UT Tyler CE curriculum (Figure 1) provides a broad undergraduate experience asenvisioned by the Body of Knowledge (BOKI) and implied in
to Know • What are your research and educational objectives? – This is what directs your proposal to the appropriate program • What is your approach? – Outline — just a few sentences • What is the specific research contribution you will make to the knowledge base (the intellectual merit)? • If successful, what will be the benefit to society (the broader impact)?Thank You!Backups 12 Steps to a Better Proposal 1. Know yourself ‐ strengths/weaknesses 2. Know the program from which you seek support 3. Read the program announcement and GPG 4. Formulate clear and appropriate research and education objectives 5. Develop a viable plan 6. State your objectives up front in your proposal 7. Frame your
rural broadband coverage Infrastructure for National Priorities •Directs NTIA and FCC to collaborate in a plan to make spectrum available Technology Highlights in FY 2011 BudgetHarnessing Technology and Innovation to Transform the Economy Small Business •Extends by one year the 50% deduction Invest in the Building for qualifying investments Blocks of American Initiative Innovation •Extends by one year the $250,000 writeoff for qualified investments Spur Productive Regional
2008 2009 2010FY 2009 figures include Recovery Act appropriations. Research includes basicresearch and applied research.FEB. '10 OSTP President's Plan for Science and Innovation, FY 2006-2017 (budget authority in billions of current dollars) $20 $15 ARRA $10 NIST labs
to Know • What are your research and educational objectives? – This is what directs your proposal to the appropriate program • What is your approach? – Outline — just a few sentences • What is the specific research contribution you will make to the knowledge base (the intellectual merit)? • If successful, what will be the benefit to society (the broader impact)?Thank You!Backups 12 Steps to a Better Proposal 1. Know yourself ‐ strengths/weaknesses 2. Know the program from which you seek support 3. Read the program announcement and GPG 4. Formulate clear and appropriate research and education objectives 5. Develop a viable plan 6. State your objectives up front in your proposal 7. Frame your
number of male and female students with a variety of learning Page 15.711.4challenges, including students that qualify for (Individualized Education Plans) IEPs and thosewho are English Language Learners (ELLs). There were also a number of students that were ator below grade level in mathematics and who have had limited success in previous educationalsettings.This Legacy Cycle was written to be used in Grades 9–12, but could easily be modified for usein Grades 6–8. The students were not expected to have prior knowledge for the project––in factmost of the students had never been exposed to the terms introduced during the lesson.The Legacy Cycle
technology. The rest of the total of 21 creditscan be filled from the approved class list, including 2nd-year, 3rd-year, 4th-year, andgraduate-level classes. Each engineering department is to offer classes in their field forsuch requirements. For this study the graduate educator will be helping teach the threeintroductory classes.The Graduate Educator: Future Faculty in EngineeringWe utilize a set of bright, eager-to-learn, and energetic graduate students to teach theseclasses. These students are selected from among those who are planning to be ineducation and become future engineering faculty. These students are likely to haveopportunities to teach technical classes within their department or their program. Thatexperience is very valuable and
an optimization of thelearning experience that balances the needs of students and faculty alike.New faculty members entering the classroom for the first time have several daunting tasksincluding: teaching, research, service, and grantsmanship. The need for self-discipline and timemanagement was clearly established by Samples but the execution of the plan that results in abalance is always in question since it varies from person to person. Some faculty members cometo the classroom with a charge to be a great teacher and are challenged to use many of thestudent-centered techniques described in the literature. It may be expected that they areimmediately successful in implementing paradigm shifts within colleges and schools that taketeaching
students mentioned above whose academic backgrounds aresignificantly different, 2) to customize a curriculum that will enable the students in dual major tocomplete the degree within one additional year without compromising the integrity of theprogram, and 3) to offer an innovative curriculum so as to attract students to this new degreeprogram under tight budget constraints. In this paper, we discuss how we plan to address some ofthe issues through the design of our unique undergraduate Computational Mathematicscurriculum. Page 15.160.2BackgroundFaculty at our institution has been active in research related to Computational Sciences for manyyears
Page 15.1320.3tasks encountered in the delivery process for construction projects9.In the past, there has been a wide variation in the level of technology used in the MEP coordinationprocess. At the low-tech end of the spectrum, specialty contractors drafted plan-views ontranslucent media and prepare section-views when necessary. At the other extreme, progressivecontractors have used three-dimensional (3-D) computer-aided-design (CAD) software to improvethe process. With the recent development of BIM technology software, the process has gravitatedtoward the use of BIM technology as BIM is becoming standard practice now for large-scaleprojects and is able to provide more efficient coordination, scheduling, and cost estimating.BIM has been
and activities thatimpact student graduation from our programs. Specific activities were inventoried, analyzed, andevaluated based on the utility and effectiveness of various parts of the process that lead to desiredresults. The Task Force communicated to and involved other school stakeholders in its importantwork. Key outcomes included strategies and recommendations to guide implementation efforts tomaintain, enhance, or improve school-based activities that contribute to student success.This paper describes the purposes, processes, and perspectives associated with this planning andimprovement initiative. Each component of GREAT will be explained, and examples of bestpractices and indicators of performance will be identified. How to involve
managethe development of a prototype exam. The contract was officially in place in late 2007.Exam Development ProcessWith funds in hand, a five person project management team representing the Association, theIEEE, and the SME was assembled, and the team, under direction of the SME, fashioned aproject plan that would produce a prototype exam in approximately one year. The plan includedfive major elements: Recruitment of members of the ECETDHA to serve as content experts, Development of a „body of knowledge‟ defining the field or electrical/electronic technology, Generation of exam questions covering „body of knowledge‟ topics, Independent review of questions for accuracy, appropriateness, and difficulty, and Exam