-representedamongthestudentswhoreceivelowgradesinourtargetcourses.Thispresentationwilldiscusstheimpactofourcurricularchangesthusfar.Inaddition,wewillfocusonthesuccessratesoftheflippedclassroomapproachonstudentswithdifferentethnicities.Introduction SanJoséStateUniversity(SJSU),inpartnershipwithCaliforniaStateUniversity-LosAngeles(CSULA)andCaliforniaStatePolytechnicUniversity,Pomona(CPP),wasawardedaprestigiousFirstintheWorld(FITW)grant,fundedbytheDepartmentofEducation[1].GrantactivitieswereinspiredbySJSU’sFourPillarsofStudentSuccessinitiative[2]andrecognitionofthelowerratesofsuccessforunder-representedminoritygroupsamongSTEMstudentpopulations.Inparticular,thegrantfullysupportscollaborativedevelopmentacrossthecampusesofflippedclassroommaterialsforsevengatewaySTEMcoursesidentifiedtohavehighDFWrates(i.e.gradesofDorF,orwithdrawalfromthecourse
alone are insufficient in explaining a disparity in academicachievement between upper and lower income students. Not only do low-income and first-generation students encounter obstacles such as a lack of academic preparation and access toinformation about the college experience [1], but these students may also have internalizedbeliefs that hinder their academic achievements. A culmination of external and internalinfluences has resulted in a lack of representation of socioeconomically disadvantaged and first-generation students throughout academia [2]. Students’ metacognitions about their abilities andfeelings of affiliation with their institutions have been associated with academic performance.While there is much diversity within the population
effort to recruit and enrollunderrepresented minority (URM) engineering students in an effort to broaden participation inengineering [1]. Access to financial resources is essential for many of these students in theirpursuit of higher education since they are disproportionately represented in lower incomebrackets and are more likely to be Pell eligible [2]. In an attempt to recruit these students, theUniversity of Colorado Boulder (UCB) developed a campus-wide “CU Promise” program toassist Pell Grant eligible students with college tuition and fees.The CU Promise program committed to provide enough grants to Pell Grant eligible students tocover the student portion of tuition and fees. However, after students committed to attend theuniversity for
background helps me feel like I belong here/fit in my with program; and as agraduate student, I feel like a fraud. Methods This study sought to understand whether there are differences in international anddomestic majority and minority student perceptions about campus climate focusing on aspects offaculty and peer interactions. As such, the following research question guided this study: (1)CLIMATE AND ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTS 8Are there differences in perceptions of campus climate between international, domestic minority,and domestic majority students? To answer this research question in our study, we used anAnalysis of the
wereexcluded from further analysis. This left us with roughly 800 qualified participants, or 16% of the Cal Polyengineering student population. 13% of respondents reported having been previously diagnosed with amental health condition, and 11% reported that they were in active treatment for a mental healthcondition at the time of taking the survey. 96% of respondents are undergraduates, while the remaining4% are from Master’s programs.A demographic breakdown of respondents is shown in Tables 1-4. To avoid the possibility of singling outor stigmatizing any one population, a breakdown of mental health results by demographic is notincluded in this publication. Table 1. Respondent's year in program. Year in Program
Intersection of Professional and Personal Identity of African American Engineering StudentsLow enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of African American engineering students in theUnited States are a cause for concern [1]. Consequently, over the last decade there has been anupsurge of research identifying factors that have contributed to the problems encountered byAfrican American students in higher education institutions in general, and in STEM fields inparticular [2, 3]. The key factors identified as contributing to the attrition of minority AfricanAmerican students include perceptions of racism on campus, internalization of stereotypes,feelings of alienation and rejection, and inadequate support systems [4, 5]. In this
-disciplinary team lies in qualitative methodologies, cultural theory and the belief that outliers offer great insight into the workings of power. Her research interests include cultural theory, the cultural/historical construction of women’s identities and roles in past and present societies, and most recently, equity issues surrounding gender and underrepresented populations in engineering education. She can be contacted at cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Critiquing the "Underrepresented Minorities" Label: Disrupting InequitySusan E. Walden, Deborah A. Trytten, Randa L. Shehab, and Cindy E. FoorResearch Institute for STEM Education, Gallogly College of
the SOEhas around 1000 students.The report summarized the design of the forum as well as the results generated. The first halfof the forum focused on the expression of the experience of underrepresented students.Students worked in small groups to discuss the following questions: 1. When has there been a time in which your race or gender led to you being treated differently, by either a faculty member, staff, or student? 2. In the School, when have you felt proud or confident as a student of color or woman student? 3. When have you felt ashamed or marginalized as a student of color or woman student? 4. How supported do you feel in the School of Engineering? 5. How accepted do you feel in the School of Engineering
continued growth, serving every student is a realistic possibility.This paper examines student persistence in the VIP course sequence, and provides an overviewof the VIP Program, including common elements across VIP sites, prior research on studentinteractions within teams by race/ethnicity, and aspects of the Georgia Tech implementation ofVIP which may contribute to student diversity within the program. Findings indicate thatstudents of different races and ethnicities persist in the VIP course sequence at equal rates.IntroductionUndergraduate research is recognized as a high impact experience, which means it is correlatedwith higher graduation rates and greater gains in undergraduate learning [1]–[3]. While highimpact experiences benefit all
, regional, and local levels and authored journal articles, book chapters, policy briefs, and other publications on Latina/o student success.Ms. Mackenzie Sissel, Iowa State UniversityRonnia Estes, Iowa State UniversityDr. Erin Doran, Iowa State University Dr. Erin Doran is an Assistant Professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018LATINAS ENGINEERING IDENTITY 1 Engineering Identity for Latina Undergraduate Students: Exploring Development and Intersecting Identities Latina/o students remain underrepresented in the engineering industry
and interacting set of studentperceptions arose from the data For example, a commonly expressed theme in the focus groupswas the relative sense of gender parity in our engineering programs, but participants across theboard consistently shared experiences of gendered microaggressions. The findings suggestavenues for future research, as well as provide insights for interventions to improve the climateand experiences of underrepresented students.IntroductionResearch on student choice of and persistence in engineering majors emphasizes the importanceof students’ identification with a major or career in motivating their persistence and success [1-3]. Despite durable myths that students leave engineering primarily due to the difficulty of
gender disparity in final grades for the course in which female studentsunderperformed relative to male students1 persisted over several years (see Figure 1). Although1 Due to the existing data set, this paper is focused on binary gender. We hope that futurestudies will allow for the study of non-binary gender as well.this gap was not always statistically 3.50significant, it was nonetheless cause for #concern. Furthermore, engineering faculty 3.00 *** Womenwere concerned that - beyond the gender
Paper ID #21493Examining the Computing Identity of High-Achieving Underserved Comput-ing Students on the Basis of Gender, Field, and Year in SchoolMs. Atalie GarciaDr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida In- ternational University, holds a doctoral degree in engineering education from Purdue University. Her research interests are focused on broadening participation in computing and engineering through the ex- ploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity; and 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform
priority of achieving diversity of sexual identity came later to nationalconsciousness and has been more difficult to promote. Only four years ago, ASEE drewbitter criticism when its official magazine, Prism, published a letter expressing anti-gayopinions. The incident prompted not just criticism of the editorial staff but alsoobservations that the community of engineering educators remains timid about discussingthese most difficult topics of difference and inclusion.1 Such timidity, some engineeringeducators argued, discourages necessary change to support greater inclusivity within theengineering profession. In recent years, however, ASEE has dramatically altered itsstance on issues pertaining to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and
, and tools for interrupting implicit bias. In addition, the curriculum incorporates ethics in engineering and engineering social responsibility. The paper will describe our experiences, strategies, and challenges in developing and implementing diversity and inclusion curriculum within the engineering living and learning programs, and discuss ways to consider incorporating diversity and inclusion programs and practices in various engineering contexts. 1 The mission and vision of the Women in Engineering Program at the University ofMaryland College Park (UMD) is to cultivate inclusive and diverse
Communication Management SkillsTestimonials & DataTestimonials & Data Participants by Gender, Spring 2003-Spring 2018500450400350300250 434200150100 50 48 0 Female Male Participant Numbers Ethnicity by Gender 250 200 191 157 150 100 50 44 21 22 19 15 4 7 1 1
pipeline” (Pell, 1996; Wickware, 1997) and a “chilly climate” (Flam, 1991) in thephysical sciences more generally. For LGBTQ+ individuals, however, claims about underrepresentation inengineering cannot be made because there is no baseline with which to compare. This study providesone small window into the underrepresentation of LGBTQ+ individuals in engineering by investigatingthe following research questions: 1. Are LGBTQ+ students underrepresented in engineering within a large, public, Midwestern university system context based on campus climate survey response rates? 2. How do LGBTQ+ engineering students’ experiences within that university system inform our understanding of their relative representation?MethodThis study
approximately 1000 cadets (students) withfour engineering majors; approximately 40% of the Cadet Corps (student body) graduateswith an engineering degree. The CGA educational experience emphasizes leadership,physical fitness and professional development. Our cadets go directly into positions ofleadership in service of others in the Coast Guard. For this reason, leadership is a focalpoint in cadet development. The CGA works to ensure our leaders are developed in aninclusive and supportive environment. This environment is cultivated through sevendiversity councils made up of members of the Cadet Corps. These councils (1) promote aculture of respect that values a broad spectrum of skills and perspectives while ensuringsupportive and rewarding learning
interests include parallel computing. He has worked with ten different departments and several private companies with research funding from several agencies. He has also served as the Chief Scientist for Balihoo, a Boise software company. He holds a PhD in Computer Science from the University of Central Florida and a B.Tech. in Computer Science & Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi.Dianxiang Xu, Boise State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 CoNECD ASEE Conference April 29-May 1, 2018 The Computer Science Professionals’ Hatchery at Boise State University: Incorporating
and Technology in Vietnam in 2009. She has taught at Cao Thang technical college since 2009. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Insights on Diversity and Inclusion from Reflective Experiences of Distinct Pathways to and through Engineering EducationAbstractThe topic of diversity and inclusion has been a longstanding topic of exploration within theengineering education community. There are several well-known issues such as 1) thepercentage of female students remains low and unchanged for decades despite the desire toinfluence a change, 2) the typical demographics of engineering students, and by effect futureengineering professionals, also do not reflect the demographics of
the persistence and retention of underrepresented minority students in engineering (NSF-RIGEE). For the past three years, he has co-led the ”Engineering for Development Workers” summer study abroad course at UNCC, focused on undertaking Civil Engineering projects in rural communities in Andean Peru. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Interactions with Faculty and Engineering Self-Efficacy Among Underrepresented Engineering Persisters Monica E. Allen1, Sandra L. Dika2, Miguel A. Pando3, & Brett Q. Tempest3 1 Seidman College of Business, Grand Valley State University, Grand Valley
by 1) “strengthen[ing] and deepen[ing] areflexive, pedagogical community within STEM fields at Cal Poly that will focus on thepromotion of a culture of increased equity, diversity, and inclusivity”; and 2) creating “allieswithin their departments” so that participants were more “supported in proposing, enacting, andexamining changes within their pedagogical practices” by purposely selecting pairs of facultywithin departments. The goal, as noted in the 2011 proposal, was to “achieve both breadth indisciplines represented (to have the widest impact) and simultaneously the creation of allyrelationships with departments (to have the most depth of impact).”Overall, as co-constructed with participants, the “Fostering a Culture of Equity, Diversity
engineeringexperiences to over 20,000 children since 2007 through the Summer Engineering Experience forKids (SEEK) program, which is hosted in cities across the nation. In providing this magnitude ofoutreach, SEEK has developed a model for effectively increasing access to high-quality out-of-school engineering learning opportunities for youth in low-income communities. The aim of thispaper is to 1) provide a detailed overview of the strategies used by NSBE that increase thelikelihood of reaching students from low-income households via SEEK, and 2) examine thechallenges in leading large-scale outreach efforts and lessons learned over time. IntroductionAs science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields
Formorethanhalfacentury,researchersandeducatorshavegrappledwiththephenomenaofgenderinequitiesinvariousSTEMdomains(science,technology,engineering,andmathematics).WhileallstudentscontinuetoshowdecreasedinterestinSTEMbeginninginthemiddleschoolyearsandcontinuingbeyond,thiscrisisisaffectinggirlsdisproportionatelytoboys[iii,v]. 1 Further,thiscrisisisaffectinggirlsdifferentlyacrossthevariousdisciplinesandsub-disciplinesofSTEM[ii].Avarietyoffactors,fromsocietalstereotypestofamilialexpectationsandeducationalstructures,contributetothisdecreaseingirls’STEMengagement,resultinginnotonlydecreasedmotivationthroughouttheirschoolyearsbutinanunder
Support from the Theories of Liberatory Pedagogy and IntersectionalityI. IntroductionWithin conversations on broadening participation in engineering, there is a longstandingrecognition of the need for and importance of institutional support for students fromunderrepresented demographic groups [1]. This support comes from many sources, such asinstitutional offices, programmatic initiatives, and informal mentoring by faculty and peers. Keyinstitutional programmatic interventions include bridge programs, recruitment incentives,scholarship support, and safe space communities for marginalized and underrepresented identitygroups. These initiatives act as a front line for addressing diversity and equity in engineering.Their importance has been
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 1 Non-technical Conferences: Impact on Female Engineering Students Mayari I. Serrano 1,2 , Suzanne M. Zurn-Birkhimer 1 , Rachel Baker 1,3 1 Women in Engineering Program, 2 Polytechnic Institute, 3 Multidisciplinary Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA Abstract—In academia, it is widely held that attendance at graduate female engineering students were awarded funding totechnical conferences is
-residentialprograms.We are living in an era where technology drives breakthrough discoveries acrossvarious disciplines. The U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics projects a 20-33% increase inscientific and technical occupations within the coming decade [1]. There is a criticalneed for computationally trained STEM professionals who will fuel the nation’seconomic growth. There is also a need to increase diversity in the STEM pipeline, whichcurrently has a low share of minority and women participation. Reports by thePresident's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and the U.S. Department ofCommerce, point to the critical importance of recruiting and training additional diverseindividuals for STEM fields [2]. The nation faces a large discrepancy between
attracts large numbers of women, a acquired is continually accelerating and yet this data issignificant number of students from UR groups, and has useless without someone to process and analyze it.compelling needs for CS technology. The interdisciplinary In addition to suffering from a dearth of interestedprogram is training the next generation of innovators in students, the field of CS suffers from a lack of diversity inthe biological sciences who will be prepared to cross its workforce. In 2014, only 18% of bachelor degrees in CSdisciplinary boundaries. The program consists of the were award to women, only 7% to African Americans, andfollowing: (1) computer