instructors recognize some of the learning struggles that students must overcome. • Multiple grading scales provide course assessment possibilities that can accurately reflect student mastery of the covered material in spite of their learning style(s).TAARs • The process of working through quizzes individually first and then in carefully arranged teams seems to be a very good mechanism for facilitating active discussion and peer teaching among students. • Embracing TAARs as a primary teaching tool does require the instructor to give up some lecture time, so courses need to be planned accordingly to fit nicely within the semester schedule; text and class material that are used should be accessible for students
would be packaged in mission-specific HA/DR kits for partner nation use; 3. Develop modular, scalable, expeditionary housing systems that possess "green" electric power and water generation, waste and wastewater disposal, hygiene, and food service capabilities. Systems should be designed to blend in to natural/native surroundings and with minimal footprint; 4. Continued investigation and exploration into the realm of the possible with respect to “Immersive” training technologies. Objective is to flood the training audience environment with the same STIMULI that one would experience during actual mission execution. Where possible full sensory overload is desired much the same as experienced in combat. Specific S&T areas for
considered relevant information to thecourse. Thus, team-at-a-distance teaching supports experiential learning techniques and moreeffectively incorporates the knowledge and life lessons provided by the non-traditional studentsinto the content of the course.In a distance broadcast learning environment, the team-at-a-distance approach further supports alearner centered environment and diffuses impressions of hierarchy that can arise between“originating” and “receiving” or “satellite” sites. With an instructor(s) present at eachparticipating site (each regional campus), all sites enjoy a perception of equal importance andstature, and a mutual sense of support. Periodically throughout the course, all sites, at times, willbe originating and, at other
/survey/staying_course [4] J. T. Bell, H. S. Fogler, “Virtual Reality Laboratory Accidents”, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. [5] J. Harward, T. T. Mao, I. Jabbour, iLab Interactive Services – Overview, 2006. http://icampus.mit.edu/iLabs/Architecture [6] University of Houston, SMSL-Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory. http://rsmsl-1.me.uh.edu/ [7] A. Valera, J. L. Diez, M. Valles, P. Albertos, “Virtual and Remote Control Laboratory Development”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 35- 39, Feb 2005. Page 22.1663.8
for your teaching. Table 2 Participant Ratings of the Quality of the SLIs 2007 2009 Indicator of Quality N Mean N Mean Overall quality of course 9 3.67 6 4.16 Preparation of the instructor(s) 9 3.78 6 4.33 Level of participant engagement in the session 9 3.89 6 4.33 Time for participants to ask questions and/or share 6 4.16 9 4.00 comments Usefulness of information for your teaching 9
Foundation under GrantDUE-0939823. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1 Pimmel, Russ and Sheryl Sorby, “Writing Proposals to Meet NSF’s Expectations,” Workshop at 2008 ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22, 2008.2 Olds, Bar: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94,No. 1, pp. 13-25 (2005)3 National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Scientific Research in Education, Richard Shevelson and Lisa Towne, Editors, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2002)4 National Research Council
.Sheppard S., Macatangay K., Colby A., Sullivan W. M. (2009), “Educating engineers: designing for the future of thefield, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Base3.Felder R.M., Brent R. (2003),” Designing and Teaching courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 92, No 1, pp7-25.4.Thomas, J.W. 2000. A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.5.Savage R., Chen K., Vanasupa L. (2007),” Integrating Project-based Learning. New York, NY: Routledge Publisher6.Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway E., Marx R.W., Krajcik J.S., Guzdial M, Palinscar A. (1991),”Motivating Project-BasedLearning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning,” Education Psychologist, Vol. 26, pp. 369-3987.Brito C
subject of on-goingefforts.Bibliographic Information1. McDonald, D., “Data Acquisition in a Vehicle Instrumentation Course,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.2. Zhang, Y., S. Cui, Y. Wang, and C. Akujuobi, “Taking Action: Enhancing Engineering Technology Laboratories with LabVIEW-Based Graphical Development Tools,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.3. Lohani, V., P. Delgoshaei, and C. Green, “Integrating LabVIEW and Real-Time Monitoring into Engineering Instruction,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.4. Delgoshaei, P., V. Lohani, and C. Green, “Introducing Dataflow Programming in a
Librarianship 36:158-165, 2010.7. Meyers, KL, SE Silliman, and NL Gedde, A comparison of engineering students’ reflections on their first-year experiences, Journal of Engineering Education 99:169-178, 2010.8. Angelique, H, K Kyle, and E Taylor, Mentor and muses: new strategies for academic success, Innovative Higher Education 26:195-209, 2002.9. Khazanov, L, Mentoring at-risk students in a remedial mathematics course, Math and Computer Education 45:106-118, 2011.10. Rodger, S, and PF Tremblay, The effects of a peer mentoring program on academic success among first year university students, Canadian Journal of Higher Education 33:1-18, 2003.11. Thorsheim, H, H LaCost, and JL Narum, Peer mentoring of undergraduate research in
educator. It is through quality education that we prepare individuals for thechallenges of today and those of tomorrow.Bibliography 1. Free Management Library, Problem Solving, downloaded on February 19, 2007 from http://www.managementhelp.org/prsn_prd/prob_slv.htm. 2. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 7, 1997 – 1998. 3. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’s Press. 4. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of
the CET department at DeVry Institute of Technology (Long Island City, N.Y.). He worked as a researcher for NASA - Langley Base in Hampton, Va., for two years. His research activities include embedded systems, software development for embed- ded systems with real time simulation, real time gaming simulation programming, and web application programming.Dr. Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology Andy S. Zhang earned his master’s in mechanical engineering from the City College of New York in 1987 and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in 1995. Zhang’s research area includes materials testing, product design and prototyping, CAD/CAE, and
Sketch-up to complete course work [6]. In a recent study, procedures of using bothAutodesk Revit and Vico Virtual Construction Software Suite [7] to fulfill specific body ofknowledge (BOK) for the ConE education were presented [8].However, there are few studies conducted to investigate how one BIM solution can fulfill ConEBOK. This is a significant constraint hindering the use and adoption of the BIM technology inConE curricula.To address this issue, this paper is to answer the following main research questions: 1. What are the limitations of most widely used BIM software packages? 2. How to use the selected BIM software package(s) to fulfill specific body of knowledge (BOK) for the ConE education?MethodologyIn this study, a BIM model
publicly funded process that serves privateindustries. Recommendation: The comments should be read to gain further insight to the quantitative survey responses and better understanding of other perspectives.References1. Jack, H., “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Education”, An SME Technical Paper, November 20052. Danielson, S, Georgeou, T, “The State of Manufacturing Engineering Technology Education”< ASEE AnnualMeeting, 2007.3. Wells, D., Bennett, R, Radtke, C., “On the Structure and Character of Graduate Education in Manufacturing”,ASEE Annual Meeting, 2007.4. Jack, H., "Perceptions in the Manufacturing Education Community", ASEE Annual Meeting, Louisville, KY,June 2010.5. Wells, D., “Challenges and Responses Over a
specific student had what perception(s). The questions were: 1) Do you believe the incorporation of narration will help / has helped your learning of the course material? (strongly agree / agree / disagree / strongly disagree) Please explain. 2) Do you believe the incorporation of narration will provide / provided useful background for your mini-labs and labs? (strongly agree / agree / disagree / strongly disagree) Please explain. 3) Do you believe the incorporation of narration will provide / provided useful background for your Project Test Plan? (strongly agree / agree / disagree / strongly disagree) Please explain. 4) Do you feel comfortable participating in narration during class? (strongly agree / agree / disagree
Creates New Products and Patents for Students. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas, June 14-17, 2009.4. Cliver, R., Leonard, W., Dell, E., & Merrill, R. (2011), ABET Report Generation. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.5. Microsoft Access: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/access-2010-database-tasks- HA101829991.aspx#_Toc2547800706. CATME website: https://engineering.purdue.edu/CATME7. Schneider, S. (2011), Developing an Application to Manage and View ABET Course Material. Proceedings of
Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Bangkok, Thailand, 7-10 February 20019. Using Design, Build, and Test Projects to Teach Engineering, Elger, D.F.; Beyerlein, S.W.; Budwig, R.S.,Frontiers in Education 30th Annual Conference, 2000, Volume 2, Issue , 2000 Page(s):F3C/9 - F3C1310. Flight Test Engineering-An Integrated Design/Laboratory Course, Abbitt, J., Carroll, B., Fearn, R., and Rivers,R., ASEE Journal 1996, Vol. 1811. http://aero.tamu.edu/information-for/current-students/undergraduate-program/undergraduate-courses12. An Engineering Flight-Test Course Emphasizing Flight Mechanics Concepts, David F. Rogers, Journal ofAircraft 2002, Vol.39 no.1 (79-83)13. http://www.flightgear.org/14. http://www.x-plane.com/desktop/landing/15. http
and Compression," The Physics Teacher, pp. 54-55, 2002.[6] David Rosengrant, "Impulse-Momentum Diagrams," The Physics Teacher, pp. 36-39, 2011.[7] James E. Court, "Free-Body Diagrams Revisited – II," The Physics Teacher, pp. 490-495, 1999.[8] James E. Court, "Free-Body Diagrams Revisited — I," The Physics Teacher, pp. 427-433, 1999.[9] A. Collins, J. Brown, and S. Newman, "Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics," Hillsdale, NJ, 1987. Page 25.1464.9
conference for the learning sciences- Volume 3 (p. 51–53). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1599936.1599960.8. Knowles, M. (1996). Adult Learning. In Robert L. Craig (Ed.), The ASTD Training and Development Handbook (pp. 253-264). NY: McGraw-Hill.9. Knowles, Malcolm S., Elwood F. Holton III, and Richard A. Swanson (1998). The Adult Learner. Houston: Gulf Publishing.10. Kobulnicky, P., Ruby, J. A. (2002). EDUCAUSE Quarterly. Third Annual EDUCAUSE Survey identifies Current IT Issues by Paul Kobulnicky, Julia A. Rudy and the EDUCAUSE Current Issues Committee, 252.11. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New
Professional Development (ECPD and today’s ABET)quickly implemented changes that resulted in a shift from the practical aspects of engineeringthat were taught in the laboratory to an increased emphasis on theory and basic science.2In the 1970’s with the completion of the moon mission and the cancellation of major engineeringprojects such as the supersonic transport, engineering education saw a significant decline infunding and as a result, many schools reduced laboratory requirements to save money. At thesame time, industry demanded more practical skills and in response, many education institutionsdeveloped technology programs. The boundaries between engineers and technologist becameblurred and so ECPD began to accredit two and four year programs
school.AcknowledgementThis project is funded by a grant received by the Department of Education under theMinority Science and Engineering Improvement Program. The findings and the viewsexpressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positionof the United States Department of Education.References 1. Lopatto, David. “Undergraduate Research Experience Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning” Life Sciences Education, Vol. 6, pp. 297-306. 2. Hu, Shouping, Kuh, George D., and Gayles, Joy G., “Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research Activities: Are Research Universities Doing a Better Job?” Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 32, pp.167-177 3. Zydney, Andrew L., Bennett, Joan S., Shahid, Abdus
5[1] M. Somerville, et al., “The Olin Curriculum: Thinking Toward the Future,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, no 1, pp 198-205, February 2005.[2] P. Wojahn, J. Dyke, L. A. Riley, E. Hensel & S. C. Brown, “Blurring Boundaries between Technical Communication and Engineering: Challenges of a Multidisciplinary, Client-Based Pedagogy”, Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 10, Issue 2, 2001.[3] Petroleum Institute Homepage. Arts & Sciences Program – Communication Course Description. Accessed on Jan 2, 2012: http://www.pi.ac.ae/PI_ACA/cor/communication/comcourse.php Page 25.1179.7
Bloom’s Taxonomybefore embarking on the course design process. Many if not most instructors are already versedin the taxonomy but it is important to ensure that there is training available for those who are not.It is essential to have this vocabulary in course design.Getting StartedBefore working on the CDM, it is important to get organized: • Organize lectures in sequence • Organize classroom activities in sequence • Organize assignments, projects and exams • Arrange materials into tentative weekly modulesModule Title, Summary StatementThe module title provides the main theme(s) for the module and the summary statement providesa sentence about each topic covered in the module. A sample module title and summarystatement are
, J. Digital Communications, 2nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill (1995).2. Couch, L. Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 5th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall (197).3. Lathi, B. Moderm Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 3th Edition, New York: Oxford University Press (1998).4. Roden, M. & Carpenter, G. Electronics Design, 3rd Edition, California: Discovery Press (1997).5. Huelsman, L. An introduction: Active and Passive Analog Filter Design, New York: McGraw-Hill (1993).6. Soliman, S. & Srinath, M. Continuous and Discrete Signal and Systems, 2nd Edition, New York: Prentice Hall (1998).GEORGE EDWARDSGeorge Edwards received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering form the University of SouthFlorida
. Working Model, Knowledge Revolution Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1998. 5. Jong; I., Onggowijaya; S., Animated programming with QuickBASIC to aid the teaching kinematics, ASEE conference proceeding, 1998. 6. Microsoft Qbasic Bible, Microsoft Press, Richmond, WA, 1990. 7. Kumar; Ratan, Teaching dynamics in engineering technology through software tools, ASEE conference proceeding, 1998. 8. Boronkay; T, Earley; R, Simulation software in a dynamics laboratory, ASEE conference proceeding, 1998. 9. Sprague, M., Using Visual Basic, South-Western Educational Publishing, 1997. 10. Prusak; Zbigniew, Simulation using spreadsheets in the engineering technology curriculu
efforts of Professors T. Fritz, J. Sullivan,S. Chakrabarti and H. Spence, from the Center for Space Physics, have supported many of thespacecraft student design projects and helped bring about the STARS curriculum project.Bibliography1. http://www.bu.edu/satellite/ Boston University TERRIERS satellite homepage2. http://www.wff.nasa.gov/pages/studentlaunch.html Homepage for NASA Student Launch Program3. http://www.bu.edu/csp/SPECTRE SPECTRE project homepage4. Ruane, M.F., ’SPECTRE: A Student Sounding Rocket Project’, ASEE 1999 Annual Meeting, Charlotte, NC, June 1999.5. http://www.bu.edu/csp/mmm Nanosat Magnetosphere Mapping Mission homepageBiographyMICHAEL RUANE is Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer