Figure 1: This is a caption for the first figure 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of ColumbiaConclusions and Future WorkWe believe that online programming practice tools have a positive impact on student’s learning.We also believe based on our preliminary data that it helps them in their exam grades, as theyhave more opportunities to practice and get immediate feedback. Also they can easily review theproblems where they struggle and reinforce those skills. We plan to expand this work bystudying the effect in multiple sections of the course, as well as including data from otherprogramming courses.References1. Bergin, S. & Reilly, R. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on
, service-oriented learning experience for students to develop communication,collaborative, and critical thinking skills.References1. Sisson, P. From Rust Belt to Brain Belt: Can Former Industrial Cities Turn Into Future Innovation Hubs? Curbed: Urban Planning, 2016.2. Cybulski, J.S., J. Clements, and M. Prakash, Foldscope: origami-based paper microscope. PloS one, 2014. 9(6): p. e98781.Anne SchmitzAnne Schmitz has a doctorate in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering Program atGannon University. She teaches bioengineering lab courses, biomechanics, and researchmethods. Her research focus is computational joint modeling.Nick
Civil Engineering at New York City College of Technology. Karla recently joined the Peer-Led Team Learning organization at her college. The PLTL program has showed her how satisfying and important it is to share your knowledge with peers on a similar path as you. Besides helping others succeed in their college courses, the PLTL program has made her a better individual and student. After graduating with her associates degree, Karla plans to pursue a field inspector position in order to obtain experience for her future career.Dr. Janet Liou-Mark, New York City College of Technology, CUNY Dr. Janet Liou-Mark is a Professor of Mathematics and the Director of the Honors Scholars Program at New York City College of
,BestPracticesandQualitativeDataCultivating225EMIXinternswith15sponsorsovertwelveyearshasyieldedbestpracticestoeffectivelynavigatethechallengesinherentlypresentinthecomplexEMIXinitiative.Anarray of complexities potentially impacts intern success and retention including studenthousing,transportation,andgeographicculture.Practitioners should be forewarned that it can be a challenge to identify appropriatehousinginasafelocationthatwillacceptanaffordableshort‐termlease.Asimportantly,notallinternshiplocationsfeaturepublictransportation,andmanystudentinternsdonothave access to a vehicle. It is advised to inquire about transportation during the studentinterviewprocesstofacilitatetransportationplanningforinterns.Lastly, it can be a challenge to attract a young professional to a very rural geographiclocation unless the company plans to orchestrate weekend activities. It is not necessarythat the location be urban, but undergraduate interns
). Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238–254.13. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. SAGE.14. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0528226015. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4 edition). Boston: Pearson.16. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi
withdeveloping outreach activities and presentations for K-5 students in an economicallydisadvantaged charter school in Detroit. The outreach activities were meant to excite the K-5students about STEM and to provide them with an opportunity to engage in some hands-onactivities. These predominantly African American students had very little prior exposure tocollege students and even less exposure to role models working in STEM.Program Organization:The REU undergraduate student researchers were first told about plans for an outreach activityon the very first day of the REU program. The activity was scheduled on a day during the secondweek of the REU program due to the K-5 academic calendar. Many students initially voicedconcerns at the thought of having to
reported on their career plans and theirexpectations for their future education. Our research team is interested in a number of questionsrelated to describing the motivation and career intentions of current and former engineeringstudents, understanding the ways that the programmatic elements in place support or underminethat motivation, and providing recommendations to guide the development and implementationof future supports for retention in engineering.In the current paper, we focus on factors that underlie students’ feelings of belonging in theMichigan State University (MSU) College of Engineering (CoE). One notable aspect of the MSUCoE is the CoRe Experience, a program that supports first-year engineering studentsacademically, professionally
Paper ID #17775Youngstown State University ”Gateway Project” Rain Garden Design Up-grades and Community EngagementProf. Robert J. Korenic, Youngstown State University Robert J. Korenic earned a Bachelor of Engineering in Civil Engineering and a Master of Science in Environmental Engineering from Youngstown State University. He has approximately eleven years of work experience in water resources planning and management. He also has worked in the wood and light gauge steel roof truss industry. He is currently an Associate Professor and Program Coordinator of the Civil and Construction Engineering Technology at Youngstown State
projects to the class. These would assist the students while they were working on the projects during the semester. Accordingly, this possibly increased the student’s grade in term paper, presentation and prototype categories.These teaching strategy modifications were implemented for CE101 in spring and fall semester2016. There were 3 sections of CE101 each semester. However, the strategies were appliedduring spring and fall 2016 semesters, which was instructed by the author. The author has beenteaching CE101 since spring 2013. The total number of enrolled students in CE101 were 30 and31 for spring and fall 2016, respectively. This class was not considered as a low completion ratecourse.An Assessment Plan and the
of previous preparation Instructor expects us to program like pros Tutorial did helpConclusionWe want to evaluate long-term effects of the project, and to compare the test results of upperdivision classes that require programming skills before and after the introduction of thetutorial/forum. We need to gather more data about this but results from the last two year seem toconfirm the value of using the tutorial.To encourage students, use of the tutorial for longer periods instructors need to spend more timeexplaining the new tools at the beginning of the quarter. We also want to explore the possibilityof doing this tutorial as a one day seminar, this way no class time needs to be compromised. Weare also planning on improving the forum
’ answers to the open ending questions show the following positive feedback on thedesigned web-based training approach: 1) it is possible to attract high-school students in STEMfields by providing interesting mini-projects that are related to their daily life (e.g., bioenergyproduction and waste water treatment); 2) the web-based training approach was effective inconveying the training materials; 3) Skype meetings were helpful but students preferred in-personmeetings; 4) the web-based training approach offered flexibility in students’ schedule; 5) after thetraining, students liked the research in STEM field and planned to find a STEM major for theircollege study. Students also mentioned that this project was suitable for students interested
hours each week to discuss general student concerns, questions,and design issues. In addition, all the students were expected to meet with the course instructorfor 30-45 minutes at least once every week to discuss their progress and submit their individualassignments. On Friday classes the course instructor would provide structured lectures and assistall 12-20 enrolled students to create teams, find project ideas, and establish project plans. Undersuch course structure, each student team was expected to submit a detailed project proposal byWeek 5 of the semester. The students were asked to submit a detailed system design report byWeek 9, and finalize their prototype and documentations, including the final presentation, duringWeek 16.This
activities of the ambassador organization.Twelve of the eighteen program leaders cited leadership skill development as a major benefit toambassadors. In these programs, students take on a variety of leadership positions, includingcommittee leadership or other self-governance positions, as well as acting as the point of contactfor various avenues of activity including precollege visit or tour planning. Program leadersrelayed that the outcomes of leadership experience included confidence, interpersonalcommunication, problem-solving skills, and the development of professional identity.Sub-theme: Civic and community engagement. Three program leaders explicitly mentionedthat the opportunity to participate in the outreach program promoted students
minority students is < 3% in the CEAS programs in a college with a 40% attritionrate. An aggressive retention strategy was created for underrepresented minority students.In order to increase the number of students who persist to complete a bachelors degree, theretention plan includes strategies for making sure that a diverse group of selected students have ahigh probability of being successful throughout their academic careers, are properly motivatedfor that entire span, maintain a sense of comradery and graduate from an engineering program oftheir choice. The Choose Ohio First Program is a collaborative program between CEAS, Artsand Science and Allied Health. The strategies are presented in the order that students will seethem applied.Program
Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Mr. William Michael Anderson, Virginia TechMs. Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year
. I am a former member of Dallas Robotics Group at the Dallas Makerspace, and plan to enroll in the National Stem certification program. I have completed PLTW and Robotics and Automation certificate programs, and attended Ar- duino Project and Raspberry Pie. I have been a mentor for the College Readiness and Leadership Program (CRLP) with the goal of implementing student leadership in our school. In addition, I like to work with 3D printing and design, and am a member of Enabling Hand, a team that creates and assembles prosthetic arm designs.Dr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He
students andsubsequent choice of engineering as a major and career. To develop engineering-specific theories of how engineering identities are formed, thispaper describes the methodological plan for understanding interest and identity development ofthree middle-school populations participating in engineering summer camps offered by theCollege of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno, NV: (1) women in engineering (2)first generation students and, (3) open-enrollment engineering camps. The research designleverages existing quantitative surveys along with focus groups and observations based on aselected set of questions from these surveys.Research Design, Methods and InstrumentsThe research design for this project is based on
development of the MEA curriculum is guided by content experts to ensure that thecurriculum is culturally relevant, connects with the community, aligns with state content standards,and is developmentally appropriate for middle school students.Objective 2: Teacher Professional DevelopmentTeacher professional development (TPD) on the use of CR MEAs is conducted for seven teachersin grades four through six. The TPD is designed to focus on increasing teachers’ knowledge, skilland confidence in using an instructional method that is math and science rich and culturally andcommunity relevant. The TPD is designed to encourage teachers’ collaboration in planning,teaching, observing, revising, and sharing lessons learned from the implemented CR MEAs.Objective
. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Diversity of College Engineering Degrees: The Roles of Geography and the Concentration of Engineering Degree Production Executive SummaryIntroductionTo meet the growing demand for a larger technological and scientific labor force in the UnitedStates, a prominent policy goal is to expand and broaden participation in science and engineeringcollege programs (e.g., [1], [2]). Previous
resulted (last column of Table 1). Some groups that included reactantrecycle reported only minimal improvement in conversion associated with the recycle. In thecase of a vinyl chloride process (performed by two different groups), hydrochloric acid generatedas a by-product of a third reactor was recycled back to the beginning of the process where it wasutilized as a reactant in one of the first two parallel reactions. Besides reactant recycle, threedesign groups included recycling of non-reactant chemicals added for the express purpose ofproduct recovery (triethylene glycol for water recovery, paraffin oil for isobutylene recovery, anddibutyl phthalate for maleic anhydride recovery). In the future, the instructor plans to requestthat the students
accountof the unfolding of their actions and the reactions they elicit.MethodsThe primary question guiding the research in this paper was to understand studentexperience of working with underserved communities. This inquiry was conducted bycollaborating with the students to understand their experiences in their own words. Theresearch plan was to author cases of student experiences of the class and determine whataspects (if anything) from the class were helpful outside the class context. The secondpart of the inquiry was added to identify if the class could satisfy ABET criteria 3h thatrequires that students “to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context”16.GEE has been offered twice so
applied project-based experiences among lower development, etc. In addition, lectures on entrepreneurshipdivision courses causes many students to lose interest and were integrated during Winter quarter to allow students toleave engineering during the first year, without understanding develop a business plan related to the quadcopter project.the importance of rigorous training in math and physical Lab sessions were designed for students to apply thesciences. Many programs implemented innovative first-year technical contents to their project and were co-instructed bycourses to enhance engineering curriculum and increase graduate teaching assistants and laboratory staff. Studentsstudent retention [1
manufactured andtested their design towards a final project showcase. As teams transitioned from their design justexisting in CAD to a physical manifestation of their ideas, they participated in a second designreview where they presented a draft of their educational materials and plans for manufacture.Two out of three of the parents that participated in the first design review returned for the seconddesign review. Figure 3 provides a visual of the parts that were 3D printed for the fuel cell carexample and the final product after manufacture. Figure 3: The 3D printed parts created in the design phase (left) and the final design after fabrication (right). The final design was functional, using the fuel cell for forward movement.MethodsAfter
, 201 – 215.[6] Laanan, F. S. (2001). Transfer student adjustment. New Directions for CommunityColleges, 114, 5 – 13.[7] Young, Jacob TN, and Elizabeth Litzler. "Confirmatory factor analysis of transfer studentadjustment." Community College Journal of Research and Practice 37, no. 11 (2013).[8] Anderson-Rowland, Mary R. "Understanding How the 4.0 Guaranteed Plan Works." In2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2016.
solutionsby way of challenging their opponents. We plan to take advantage of this discovery next time,moving from a formal poster presentation to a managed debate.DiscussionOur use of theatre through role-playing brings together humanistic and engineering learning inthe context of a complex problem within the rapidly expanding, heterogeneous, nineteenth-century context of Worcester, Massachusetts: a city whose heterogeneity in many waysrepresents the challenges that contemporary engineers face. In some cases, students are naturallydrawn to the role-playing activities: some of them have performed in theatrical productions orhave immersed themselves in role-playing games like Dungeons and Dragons. We have seenstudents who embrace the opportunity to
flipped classroomindicated that team-based in-class activities helped them to learn and retain the course contentsbetter than with the traditional classroom approach. While these results were specific to aplastics engineering technology course, similar results have been reported elsewhere in materialsscience courses.9,10 However, the author plans to continue this study by adopting the flippedclassroom approach in other engineering technology courses such as thermodynamics, appliedstrength of materials, and engineering materials. The results of the future studies will furtherelucidate the findings of this preliminary work.References 1. Bishop, Jacob L., and Matthew A. Verleger. "The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research
questioned; teacher is questions; students motivated to inconsistent and unpredictable work by fear and ridicule; may dread studying a subject once passionate about; uncomfortable in the instructor’s presenceClearly, if the student has dread for the subject matter or is fearful of asking questions, thestudents are less likely to excel in the course, which leads to non-mastery of the course material.Self-efficacy is described by Bandura as individuals’ beliefs in their capabilities to plan andexecute activities to achieve an outcome
,theMakersClubstudentswillmakedemonstrationsandwillbeengagedtoinspireunderprivilegedstudents.ThiscanbeconductedbyeitherinvitingstudenttoNSU-LSMSAfacility or our Makers Club participants will make visits to the schools in theunderprivilegedareas.OneofthefutureplansoftheNSU-LSMSAMakersClubistodevelopawebsiteforthecluband incorporate online modules where students can review materials on their own andcomeprepared.Inaddition,thewebsitewilldemonstratetheachievementsoftheclubandpostusefulinformationtothecommunityandotherinterestedgroups.On the financial side, the future plan for the NSU-LSMSA Makers Club to target STEMrelated grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and other organizations topurchase scientific equipment to support research and learning activities for the Makers
SfT initiative provides more than 15 hours ofprofessional development for all of the instructors involved in the program. All instructorsadditionally have access to lesson plans and video tutorials the SfT initiative’s website(www.scientistsfortomorrow.org).Each session includes 10 weekly, 90-minute classes exploring the modules. In each module,the participants develop a final product they can take home, e.g. in “Alternative Energies,” theparticipants build a solar-powered car and in “Physics of Sound and Mathematics of Music”the participants build a monochord with a Pythagorean scale, a major chord wind-chime and awell-tuned Diatonic Xylophone. After the 10 meetings, each out-of-school-time organizationdevelops its own end-of-module