Information Administration(a) (2022). Energy and the Environment. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/energy-and-the-environment/.4. United States Energy Information Administration(b) (Nov.23, 2022). Electricity Explained. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/use-of-electricity.php5. Fasching, E. (2022). Use of energy explained. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/use-of- energy/homes.php6. Zhang, Z., Huang,Y., Huang Q., and Lee,W. -J. "A Novel Hierarchical Demand Response Strategy for Residential Microgrid with Time-Varying Price," 2020 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 2020, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/IAS44978.2020.9334895.7. Zhang, Z., Chen Z., and Lee, W. -J (2922
- tracking,” Renewable Energy, 29, 393–402, 2004.14. Away, Y., and Ikhsan, M., “Dual-axis sun tracker sensor based on tetrahedron geometry,” Automation in Construction, 2016.15. Abdallah, S., and Nijmeh, S., “Two axes solar tracking system with PLC control,” Energy Conversion and Management, 45 (11–12), 1931–1939, 2004.16. Sun, A.J., Wang, R., Hong, H., and Liu, Q., “An optimized tracking strategy for small-scale double axis parabolic trough collector,” Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016.17. https://www.larsonelectronics.com/Emad ManlaDr. Manla currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at West Texas A&M University. Hisresearch interests include Renewable Energy Systems, Power Electronics, Electric
prediction of students’ academic failure in introductory programming courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 73:247–256, 2017. ISSN 0747-5632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.047. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563217300596. [9] Muhammad Adnan, Asad Habib, Jawad Ashraf, Shafaq Mussadiq, Arsalan Ali Raza, Muhammad Abid, Maryam Bashir, and Sana Ullah Khan. Predicting at-risk students at different percentages of course length for early intervention using machine learning models. Ieee Access, 9:7519–7539, 2021.[10] Kilian Q Weinberger, John Blitzer, and Lawrence Saul. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. Advances in neural information processing systems
ClinicalImmersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, June 15, 2019, Tampa, Florida. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi: 10.18260/1-2—33581.[10] C. E. King and D. Salvo, "Work in Progress: Development of virtual reality platform forunmet clinical needs finding in undergraduate biomedical engineering design programs," in 2022ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[11] C. E. King, K. R. Feeney, Q. Tang, M. Das, and D. Salvo, "Work in Progress: PhysiologicalAssessment of Learning in a Virtual Reality Clinical Immersion Environment," in 2023 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, June 25, 2023, Baltimore, MD, 2023.[12] C. E. King, C. M. Hoo, W. C. Tang, and M. Khine
from the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEMEquity (CERSE, pronounced like the words “SIR”-”see”). We are here with CERSE Director Dr.Liz Litzler, Associate Director Dr. Erin Carll, and thank our collaborator Senior ResearchScientist Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran who is not able to be here today.40 minutes totalSlide 1-5: 4 minutesSlide 6: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlides 7-11: 4 minutesSlide 12: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlide 13-14: (Audience Engagement) 10 minutes DIYSlide 15: Takeaways – 1-2 minutesSlide 16: 10 minutes final Q&A 1 Topics for Today Why use logic models? What are the components of a
and Audio Signal Processing. Wiley, 2000.[5] E. Petajan, “Automatic lipreading to enhance speech recognition,” in IEEE Conference on Communications, 1984.[6] J. Smith and M. Johnson, “Visual speech recognition in education: Opportunities and challenges,” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 45–59, 2010.[7] G. Hinton et al., “Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 82–97, 2012.[8] W. Chan, N. Jaitly, Q. Le, and O. Vinyals, “Listen, attend and spell: A neural network for large vocabulary conversational speech recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustic Speech and Signal Processing, 2016.[9] J. S
students is only 32%.The program tried to contact the students after graduation and 38 students responded. Out ofthese 38 scholarship recipient students graduated, all of them are Employed in their professionalfield or entered Graduate school upon graduation, 100% success.3.4. Analysis of Student SurveyThe students’ self-evaluation or assessment can be taken as another instrument to measure theeffect of the scholarships and academic supports provided through this NSF grant on the studentsuccess, retention, and graduation. For this reason, a student survey was conducted among 33NSF scholarship recipient students, and a partial list of survey questions are shown in Table 3.Table 3. Partial list of Questionnaire from Student Survey. Q# Student
. O'Brien, “Low size, weight and power quantum key distribution system for small form unmanned aerial vehicles,” Proc. SPIE 10910, Free-Space Laser Communications XXXI, 1091014, March 2019.[9] W. Miller, A. DeCesare, R. Snyder, D. Carvalho, P. M. Alsing, D. Ahn, (2020). Toward mobile free space optical QKD: characterization of a polarization-based receiver, Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 11391, id. 1139105 10 pp., 2020.[10] H.-Y. Liu, X.-H. Tian, C. Gu, P. Fan, X. Ni, R. Yang, J.-N. Zhang, M. Hu, J. Guo, X. Cao, X. Hu, G. Zhao, Y.-Q. Lu, Y.-X. Gong, Z. Xie, and S.-N. Zhu, “Optical-Relayed Entanglement Distribution Using Drones as Mobile Nodes,” Physical Review Letters, 126, 020503, 2021.[11] F. Khoshnoud, L. Lamata, C. W
. 23% 10I enjoy discussing course ideas online. 26% 11I receive credit (or a bonus) for participating in discussion. 5% 2Table 4. Mediating factors that inhibit participation.Q2 Which of the following factors influence your decision NOT TO USE (TO IGNORE) thediscussion board? (I.e., which of these factors dissuade you from participating. Statements mayrefer to posting questions or replies.)Question Response Item % Responding N RespondingReading other students' Q&A postings is enough. 30% 13I do well in class and have no questions. 5% 2I
partners. Metropolitan Universities Journal; 20(2), 87-103. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Why+Faculty+Promotion+and+Tenure+Matters+to+Community+Part ners&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C10&as_sdtp=on4. Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.5. Glass, C. R., Doberneck, D. M., & Schweitzer, J. H. (2011, March). Unpacking faculty engagement: The types of activities faculty members report as publicly engaged scholarship during promotion and tenure. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(1), 7-31
we can obtain the grade of membership of a set in regard toanother set; in our case, the grade of membership of an individual profile with respect to an ideal Page 24.1009.8profile. We assimilate those grades as truth values that are in the interval [0,1]. Relationships arerepresented through rules “if ... then”; thus, truth values can be calculated with some T-normsor S-norms, as these kind of relationships (p → q) can be represented in terms of ∧ and ∨,respectively.13In this work, we use some fuzzy implications in order to find the values of the compliance levelof a common node from both trees, individual profile and ideal profile. This
&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDkQFjAA&url=htt p%3A%2F%2Fifap.ed.gov%2Ffsahandbook%2Fattachments%2F0910FSAHbkVol2Ch1School.pdf&e i=ZRnCUt_INYmuyQHu54HACw&usg=AFQjCNG_lqxZvURlglb4- 01XQlI_kydtvA&bvm=bv.58187178,d.aWc 4. IUPUI Institutional Reports. (2013). Retrieved December 28, 2013, from http://reports.iupui.edu/render.aspx/INSTITUTIONAL%20DATA/RSPINC/IUPUI 5. Indiana Commission for Higher Education. (2013). Retrieved December 28, 2013, from http://www.in.gov/che/ 6. Pande, P., Neuman, R., and Cavanagh, R. (2002). The Six Sigma Way: Implementation Guide for Process Improvement Teams. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill 7
on the course shell at http://devryu.net7. Daniel Cross-Cole, ‘Construction Notes for Robotic Car’ document, DeVry University, available on the course shell at http://devryu.net8. Embedded Microcomputer Systems – Real Time Interfacing, 3rd ed., Valvano, J. © 2012 Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning9. Totally Autonomous Binary Yaw (TOBY) car, report by Aaron Wright, Arturo Torres and Juan Rodriguez in their project manual, October 201310. The Black Dragon (Line Following Robot), report by Malcolm Q Guidry Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Course Requirements for ECET- 365, October 2013 Page 24.1012.11
. Network motif analysis is light-weightsolution that is capable of evaluating large amounts of educational data in educational platformsthat cater to the need of many students (such as MOOCs) and rely on the participation of masses(Q&A sites and online communities). The proposed approach will resolve some assessmentchallenges in examining student participation across different bodies of social groups and onlineengineering spaces. In online environments that host thousands of engineering learners, networkmotif analysis will offer descriptive accounts of recurring interaction patterns between novicesand experts, as well as consistent forms of interactions between groups of engineering learnersthat is indicative of sustained participation in
? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers. J Res Comput Educ. 2001;33(3):235 – 250.12. Scott JB. The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning. Tech Commun Q. 2008;17(4):381–412.13. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Characterizing Students’ Use of Design Ethnography in a Capstone Design Course. Int J Eng Educ. 2014. In Press.14. Zoltowski CB, Oakes WC, Cardella ME. Students ’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design. J Eng Educ. 2012;101(1):28–59. Page 24.1126.915. Creswell J. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
havebeen on Tuesdays. Those Tuesday slots were converted to “open office hours”, in that theinstructor would be available in the classroom, with OLI access, to answer questions. The OLImodule quizzes (typically two each week) were scheduled to straddle the Tuesday Q&A and theThursday recitation sessions. This provided convenient opportunities every week for thestudents to get answers to their questions shortly after each OLI quiz.The students were required to buy the two textbooks used in previous years. One was atraditional statics textbook; the other was an economical book of distilled concepts and workedproblems. The students had required readings from both books, aligned with each module.Assigned homework problems came from both textbooks
aseriousness in listening to the oral presentations beyond what the instructor has seen forconventional term paper oral presentations. The peer review exercise coupled with the highlyinvolved term project provided added technical depth to the course. A higher level of interactionamong students in the classroom was observed as compared to a conventional classroom. Thehigh level of interaction was particularly evident during Q&A session of the oral presentationswhere familiarity with manuscript content was apparent.In addition, the peer review promoted improved student writing skills (and personal reflection ofthese skills) that benefitted students for activities following the class including entering industryworkforce or pursuing graduate education
W = power (kW, 1, 300)Heat Exchangers log10 (purchased cost ) 4.6 0.8 log10 A 0.3log10 A2 A = heat exchange area (m2, 20, 1000) Estimate the area based on Q UAT with U = 5000 W/m2·ºC for a feedwater heater U = 500 W/m2·ºC for the condenser U = 25 W/m2·ºC for the high temperature heat exchangerTurbine log10 (purchased cost ) 2.5 1.45 log10 W 0.17 log10 W2 W = power (kW, 100, 4000)Utility Costs Electricity $0.06/kWh Cooling Water $0.354/GJEquipment Cost FactorsTotal Installed Cost = Purchased
and graduate students through interactions withresearchers from CAEFF researchers (a graduated NSF Engineering Research Center) workingcollaboratively with industrial researchers from Hoowaki LLC, a small-business involved ininnovative research. AcknowledgmentsThis work was primarily supported by National Science Foundation under Award EEC‐1128481and made use of ERC Shared Facilities supported by the National Science Foundation underAward Number EEC-9731680. References1. Zhang, Z-Z.; Xue, Q-J.; Liu, W-M.; Shen, W-C; Friction and Wear Behaviors of Several Polymers Under Oil-Lubricated Conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 68, 2175–2182.2. Samyn, P
can’t breathe.” 40. Kraig: “Because there’s no air. Why would you need air?” 41. Unidentified student: “To speak.” 42. Unidentified student: “To hear.” 43. Kraig: “Why do you need air to talk?” 44. Q: [Inaudible.] 45. Kraig: “What’s that, Q?” 46. Q: “It transports a voice.” 47. Kraig: “Because it transports a voice. Sure. Okay, how?” 48. Q: “Sounds...” 49. Unidentified student: “Through the air.” 50. Kraig: “Right, sound waves through the air. That’s right.”Additional examples from Kraig’s second class on the day of the Thought Cloud’s rollout—hishonors class—provide further contrast between the instructional approaches he took with
engineering education.Prof. Dimitrios Peroulis, Purdue University Dimitrios Peroulis received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor in 2003. He has been with Purdue University since August 2003 where he is currently leading a group of graduate students on a variety of research projects in the areas of RF MEMS, sensing and power harvesting applications as well as RFID sensors for the health monitoring of sensitive equipment. He has been a PI or a co-PI in numerous projects funded by government agencies and industry in these areas. He has been a key contributor in two DARPA projects at Purdue focusing on 1) very high quality (Q>1,000) RF tunable filters in mobile form factors
Computer Assisted Learning 20, 81-94 (2004).6. Draper S., Cargill, J. & Cutts, Q. Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Education Technology 18, 13-23 (2002).7. Freeman, M., Blayney, P. & Ginss, P. Anonymity and in class learning: the case for electronic response systems. Australian Journal of Education Technology 22, 568-580 (2006).8. Pradhan, A., Sparano, D. & Ananth, C. V. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: An application to resident education. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193, 1827-1830 (2005).9. Schackow, T. E., Chavez, M., Loya, L. & Friedman, M. Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medicine
suitable to thecourse. However, there were some advantages to using the ASME Student Design Competitionas the project. Some additional motivation was achieved by offering the opportunity to attendthe District Competition. This came at some cost to the professors leading the activity as muchguidance was needed to prepare the students for the competition. Traditionally, a Q&A forum isprovided to the students in this course when they are working on design projects. An advantageof using the ASME Competition is that this forum is provided by ASME given that the problemis not modified to fit the course. Students who attended the District Competition had anetworking opportunity that would not otherwise have occurred.Bibliography[1] P. R. Neal, M. Ho
.!,#&!-1/.%&!8'%&4!/*13!%,',&46!$3,&.3'0!-/..$-/0'.!3&&4:!!!"#&%&!'.&\! U:! =,/4&3,%!B$00!'**0(!,&-#3$-'06!&35$3&&.$356!'34!%,',$%,$-'0!%C$00%!,1!-.&',&!%10/,$13%!,1!.&'09 B1.04!*.180&)%!2'-&4!8(!=,:!J1/$%!%,'.,/*%:! O:! =,/4&3,%!B$00!&35'5&!$3!*.12&%%$13'0!-1))/3$-',$13!B$,#!)&)8&.%!12!,#&!01-'0! &3,.&*.&3&/.$'0!&-1%(%,&):! Q:! =,/4&3,%!B$00!21%,&.!8/%$3&%%!.&0',$13%#$*%!'34!8/$04!0'%,$35!-133&-,$13%!B$,#!01-'0! %,'Ch&.%:! ]:! =,/4&3,%!B$00!8&!&E*1%&4!,1!,#&!=,:!J1/$%!&3,.&*.&3&/.$'0!-1))/3$,(!'34!8&!'80&!,1
Technology, 58(1), 504-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487[2] Dai, Y., Chai, C. S., Lin, P., Jong, M. S., Guo, Y., & Jian-jun, Q. (2020). Promoting students’well-being by developing their readiness for the artificial intelligence age. Sustainability, 12(16),6597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166597[3] Chiu, T. K. F. and Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificialintelligence education: a self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568[4] Cavanagh, T. B., Chen, B., Lahcen, R. A. M., & Paradiso, J. (2020). Constructing a designframework and pedagogical approach for adaptive learning in higher education: a practitioner'sperspective. The International Review of
Development, vol. 4, no. 1., 2002.[8] J. A. del Alamo et al., “Reasserting U.S. Leadership in Microelectronics: A White Paper on the Role of Universities,” MIT, 2021.[9] P. Patel, “Building a U.S. Semiconductor Workforce,” IEE Explore, pp. 28–35, Jun. 2023. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10147079[10] J. Wilson, A. M. Krakowsky, & C. I. Herget, “Starting early: Increasing elementary (K-8) student science achievement with retired scientists and engineers,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, 2010.[11] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, & X. Fan, “Planning for early careers in science,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5777, 2006. doi: 10.1126/science.1128690[12] A. J. Crawford et al
Paper ID #37522Understanding the Impact of an LSAMP Scholar ProgramDr. Yang Lydia Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Educa- tion, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida Inter- national University. Her research interest include quantitative educational research design and statistical analyses, Q methodology, and recruitment and retention in STEM fields.Dr. Brenee King, Kansas State UniversityDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is the Assistant Dean for Retention
, culturally relevant/ sustaining workshop designs. Author 1, had to rely onthe high school mentors’ knowledge and input because they are experts and participants in youthculture. Author 2 “To provide a more comfortable and safe environment for participants to share their ideas and thoughts, we told them all their ideas would be [anonymized post-workshop], and we don’t judge any ideas, we just share and learn. To encourage them to express more, we use a storytelling session instead of the traditional Q&A session to learn about participants’ background experiences with AI/ML and their attitude/perspective of teaching AI/ML. That was a successful attempt. Participants shared more
; Exposition, 2009, p. 14.223. 1- 14.223. 18.[5] S. D. Hart, “Applying the ExCEEd Teaching Model in a Flipped Classroom Environment,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[6] J. Q. Retherford and J. K. Amoah, “Incorporating ASCE’s ExCEEd Principles in Capstone Project and Other Active Learning Courses,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Southeast Section Conference, 2014.[7] R. W. Welch and C. B. Farnsworth, “Using the ExCEEd Model for Distance Education,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011, p. 22.1645. 1-22.1645. 22.
Recognition Workshop (AIPR)2016 IEEE, pp. 1-5, 2016[33] Wilensky, U., Resnick, M., 1999. Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach toMaking Sense of the World, Journal of Science Education.[34] M. Tubaishat, Q. Qi, Y. Shang and H. Shi, "Wireless Sensor-Based Traffic Light Control,"2008 5th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2008, pp. 702-706, doi:10.1109/ccnc08.2007.161.[35] Ana L. C. Bazzan. A distributed approach for coordination of traffic signal agents.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 10(2):131– 164, 2005.