Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Russell Pimmel, University of Alabama (Emeritus); Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Norman L. Fortenberry, American Society for Engineering Education; Brian Yoder; Rocio C Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

culture of science education at research universities; Science 331:152-153. Available at http://www.physics.emory.edu/Faculty/weeks/journal/anderson-sci11.pdf.2. Angelo. T. (1999). Doing academic development as though we valued learning most: transformative guidelines from research and practice; HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, p 1-11. Available at http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/1999/pdf/Angelo.PDF.3. Barab, S. and M. Thomas. (2001). Online learning: from information dissemination to fostering collaboration; J. Interactive Learning Res.12: 105-143. Available at http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:z38SW2yk6aEJ:scholar.google.com/+barab+online+lear

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel University; Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng.); Vladimir Genis, Drexel University (Tech.); M. Eric Carr, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

over the chip. The camera plugs into the USB portof a PC and produces videos (30 frames/s) of fluid flow. The magnification ranges from 10X to500X. Other camera types and set-ups are of course workable as well, including higher-endconsumer CCD cameras. The quantification of flow rate can be made adding a graduated scale inthe image, such as with a thin plastic ruler placed along the flow channel which shows theposition of the flow front in each frame along with the time for that frame. From this analysis,the flow velocity can be accurately determined as a function of time. A common analysisobjective is to determine the pressure drop ∆𝑃 between two points as a function of flow rate Q orfluid velocity v. ∆𝑃 = 𝑓

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University; Madina Yermagambetova, Al-Farabi KazNU; Peter John Schwalbenberg

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

hydrogel was removed from the microscope slides. 10. The hydrogel was placed in DI water for 24 hours to rinse off any possible residual monomer solution that did not polymerize.Tensile TestingMaterials • Synthesized hydrogels • Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution, pH 2.2, 6.8. • 2N Shimpo Force Guage, Model:FGV-0.5XY • 1000N Shimpo Force Guage, Model: FGV-200 HX • Shimpo Tensometer • Vaseline ® • Q-tips • 3M Fine grain sand paper with fabric base • Clamp Base • Tensile Clamps • PC with Estand ® Software Page 23.167.5 • Superglue gel   Procedure 1. Hydrogels with various formulations

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amod A. Ogale, Clemson University and Hoowaki LLC; Sarah Kelley Hulseman, Hoowaki LLC; Andrew Hampton Cannon, Hoowaki LLC; Byron S. Villacorta, Clemson University; Ralph Allen Hulseman, Hoowaki LLC

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

and graduate students through interactions withresearchers from CAEFF researchers (a graduated NSF Engineering Research Center) workingcollaboratively with industrial researchers from Hoowaki LLC, a small-business involved ininnovative research. AcknowledgmentsThis work was primarily supported by National Science Foundation under Award EEC‐1128481and made use of ERC Shared Facilities supported by the National Science Foundation underAward Number EEC-9731680. References1. Zhang, Z-Z.; Xue, Q-J.; Liu, W-M.; Shen, W-C; Friction and Wear Behaviors of Several Polymers Under Oil-Lubricated Conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 68, 2175–2182.2. Samyn, P

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Kenyon M Richardson; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, S. R. (2011, Oct). Teaching practices of engineering faculty: Self-reported behavior and actual practice. Proceedings of the 2011 International Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain.3. Finelli, C. J., & Millunchick, J. M. (2013). The teaching circle for large engineering courses: A cohort-based model for faculty development. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.4. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.5. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and education methods. Qualitative

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Wolsky, WGBH Educational Foundation; Christine Andrews Paulsen, Concord Evaluation Group; Tamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Meridian.23. Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunck, DH. (Eds.) (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1-38.24. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, Vol 312, 26 May, 2006.25. Yun, J., Cardella, M., Purzer, S., Hsu, M. & Chae, Y. (June, 2010). “Development of the Parents' Engineering Awareness Survey (PEAS) According to the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Framework.” In the Proceedings of the 2010 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiwen Mao, Auburn University; Yingsong Huang, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University; Yihan Li, Auburn University; Prathima Agrawal, Auburn University; Jitendra K Tugnait, Auburn University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, 2005.[10] J. R. Anderson, L. M. Reder and H. A. Simon, “Situated learning and education,” Educational Researcher, vol.25, no.4, pp.5–11, May 1996.[11] J. Lave, Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Every Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.[12] G.J. Minden, J.B. Evans, L.S. Searl, D. Depardo, R. Rajbanshi, J. Guffey, Q. Chen, T.R. Newman, V.R. Petty, F. Weidling, M. Peck, B. Cordill, D. Datla, B. Barker, and A. Agah, “An agile radio for wireless innovation,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.45, no.5, pp.114–121, May 2007.[13] Y. Huang, P. Walsh, Y. Li, and S. Mao, "A GNU Radio testbed for distributed polling service-based medium access

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University; Mary Staehle, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University; Tom Merrill, Rowan University; Robi Polikar, Rowan University; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

then meas-ure the temperature change of heated water pumped through the artificial skin. The rate of heat transfer isproportional to the exposed surface area (q=hA∆T). Yet, students tend to equate surface area with vol-ume, limiting their ability to enhance heat transfer by increasing surface area. Therefore, in addition tostudying the heat transfer across the artificial skin, the students will also create a second skin with an un-branched channel of an approximately equal volume, and then compare the resulting heat exchange. Atthis level, the module can be completed by lowerclassmen in our lower-level Engineering Clinic se-quence. In specialized heat transfer courses (e.g. junior-level Heat Transfer Processes), we will also in-corporate

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J Skromme, Arizona State University; Qiao Wang, Arizona State University; Paul Rayes, Arizona State University; John M Quick, Arizona State University; Robert Kenneth Atkinson, Arizona State University; Tim Frank, South Mountain Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

generate and solve linearcircuit analysis problems, which accepts a rich variety of student inputs. Three tutorials usingthe software have been implemented. Laboratory based studies show a statistically significantand large (~1.21 standard deviation) increase in student learning as a result. Further work willfocus on expansion and completion of this system.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the TransformingUndergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Program underGrant No. DUE-1044497. We thank Daniel Sayre of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for providing thetextbook copies used in our laboratory experiment.References1 C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, and B. J. Skromme, “Automated

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jana Fattic, Western Kentucky University; Andrew N.S. Ernest, Western Kentucky University; Joseph Lee Gutenson, University of Alabama

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           13 Manning, A., Brueck, T., Isbell, M., & Brink, P. (2008). Workforce planning for water utilities - successfulrecruiting, training, and retaining of operators and engineers. Denver, Colorado: AWWA Research Foundation.Retrieved from http://www.waterrf.org/PublicReportLibrary/91237.pdf14 Lacey, M. & Boepple-Swider, T.M. (2008). A regulator’s perspective on workforce issues: Water andwastewater operators. Journal: American Water Works Association, 132-135. Retrieved fromhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CD4QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.workforwater.org%2FWorkArea%2Flinkit.aspx%3FLinkIdentifier%3Did%26ItemID%3D307&ei=kTHmUNCnEcjY2gWQzoGYBA&usg

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa G. Huettel, Duke University; Michael R. Gustafson II, Duke University; Joseph C. Nadeau, Duke University; David Schaad, Duke University; Michael M Barger; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, Duke University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

relationships and in particular how the brain supports processes of vision and attention.The assignment was to read the provided materials and submit three or more questions for Dr.Appelbaum, who was the guest speaker in class the following week. Dr. Appelbaum’s lecture,“Reverse Engineering the Brain: Primer for EEG and BCI approaches”, provided an introductionto electroencephalography (EEG) signal and data collection, and brain computer interfacetechniques. In addition to providing some general technical background and a discussion of someof the challenges often encountered, Dr. Appelbaum discussed some of his research on visualattention. The lecture was followed by a lively Q&A session.Stage 2 (Restatement) and Stage 3 (Relation to Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

DeLean A Tolbert, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

.    The   equipment  must  be  constructed  in  less  than  2  months.       Please  explain  your  solution  as  clearly  and  completely  as  possible.    From  your  solution,   someone  should  be  able  to  build  your  playground  without  any  q uestions.    Your  work  should   contain  a  detailed  description  of  your  design  and  any  relevant  diagrams  and  calculations.   Provide  a  drawing  of  your  design  with  final  dimensions  of  equipment  and  the  playground   layout.  Estimate  both  the  costs  and  the  benefits  associated  with  your  design.  Please  clearly   state  all  assumptions  which  are  needed  in  your  analysis