Enrichment and Professional Development Activities on REU Students”, paper #38362, ASEE 2022 Annual Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 26-29, 2022; accessed at https://peer.asee.org/evaluating-the-impact-of-enrichment-and- professional-development-activities-on-reu-students.pdf (4) Holly C. Gaede, “Professional Development for REU Students”, in ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 1295: Best Practices for Chemistry REU Programs, Chapter 3, pp 33-44 (2018). (5) Anthony Carpi, Darcy Ronan, Heather Falconer, and Nathan Lents, Nathan, “Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM: mentored undergraduate research at a
, Tutoring, and Mentoring (ATM) program was designed andlaunched. Each year, the FS2 leadership team selects peer mentors (one for each cohort of 15freshmen) from top performing, upper-division students in engineering and CS. The peermentors reach out to their cohorts to meet several times a semester. These peer mentors helpnew students build their aspirations and academic confidence by welcoming and orienting themto the campus and its culture, and sharing with them their own academic/personal experiencesand coping strategies.Faculty and peer mentoring are best practices as recognized by the National Research Council,especially for first-generation students and groups underrepresented in STEM.12 The closepersonal relationship that develops between
integration). At her free mobile makerspace for K-12 students and teachers, The MAKE Lab (http://themakelab.wp.txstate.edu), she is currently researching how recurring experiences with these design-based technologies impact visual spatial skills, self-efficacy, and positive attitudes toward failure (e.g. persistence in the face of obstacles; reconceptualization of failure as a paradigm for creative learn- ing) with teachers and K–12 students. These concepts are also part of her research as Co-Director of Bobcat Made, which is the collaborative university makerspace.Dr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD., is Research Associate Professor of Engineering Education in the College of
and retention initiatives, including expansion of graduate programs, and first-year student advising and support. Ms. Sakakeeny is a member of a number of professional organizations, including the American Society of Civil Engineers (Boston Section) and the Society of Women Engineers (Fellow).Dr. Cynthia McGowan, Merrimack College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Implementing National Best Practices to Improve STEM Retention in a Liberal Arts College SettingIntroductionThe Foundation for STEM Success (FS2) program is a model for STEM student success that usesa student-centered approach to academic preparation and learning, and creates an
Paper ID #12268The Impact of a Neuro-Engineering Research Experience for Undergradu-ates Site on Students’ Attitudes toward and Pursuit of Graduate StudiesDr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Linda Hirsch, New
Departments at Rowan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reimagining Civil Engineering Graduate Programs: A Research- to-Practice Approach for Shaping Future Transportation EngineersProject OverviewThe existing curriculum and models for civil engineering graduate programs assume thatgraduating students will primarily pursue career opportunities in research or academia, but recentdata suggests that there will be insufficient positions to meet the number of graduates. The NSFNational Science Board reported that the number of civil engineering Ph.D. graduates increased33% from 2007 to 2017 [1]. However, the Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) predicts only a9
since 1999. His research interests are in modeling and analysis of complex systems and processes, simulation and visualization, and their applications in manufacturing, healthcare, energy, and information systems. He teaches a number of courses in these areas at the under- graduate and graduate levels, and has developed several of these courses. He is currently leading the effort in designing a new undergraduate program in Data Engineering. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Indus- trial and Systems Engineers (IISE). He served in the Board of the Computer and Information Systems Division of IISE, serves as an Associate Editor of IISE Transactions on Healthcare System Engineering, and is an ABET Program Evaluator for
of engineering culture that act as barriers to LGBTQ equality.As recommended by Woodford et al. [45], the program offers an incremental design withsuccessive trainings to address audiences with varying levels of knowledge and awareness. Thecontent of the Safe Zone workshops are tailored for an Engineering/STEM audience byincorporating the findings from our research on LGBTQ in Engineering. This is done by variousmeans such as direct presentation of quantitative results, case studies about experiences ofLGBTQ individuals in STEM, and activities exploring how STEM culture impacts LGBTQindividuals. Upon completion of Safe Zone training, graduates receive a Safe Zone sticker todisplay in their workplace. This simple symbol of LGBTQ
., Orr, M. K., and Ohland, M. W. (2014). The Accidental Engineer. American Society for Engineering Education (under review). Indianapolis, IN. Page 24.32.6Impact on engineering educationProviding the taxonomy developed by the research teach has the potential for impact on bothresearch and practice. Xingyu Chen’s related dissertation research will expand knowledge of thefield.The project team intends to collaborate with Ken Reid at Ohio Northern University on a proposalto study the impact of specific introductory course elements on retention in engineering and inmajor. Dr. Reid and his team have developed a classification scheme for the
that examine the impact of developing systems of care and transforming practices on health care access and utilization, delivery and quality of care, and health outcomes. Third, she assesses the effect of social determinants of health on access to care and pa- tient outcomes. She evaluates the effectiveness of interventions designed to attenuate the effect of social determinants on patient outcomes. She has 15 years of experience leading research teams; designing and implementing research and evaluation; developing protocols for surveys, interviews, and focus groups; collecting and analyzing qualitative data, and programming advanced statistical analyses of quantitative data using Stata. She has served as principal
meet the demands of STEM industries for qualified workers at all levels. While there has been a drastic increase in the number of advanced degrees awarded in STEMin the U.S. in recent years, research and development, a key component of increasing nationalcapacity for innovation, largely requires a population with advanced degrees, and specificallymaster’s degrees (NSF, NSB, 2022). Creating a sustainable pipeline and institutionalizing best practices for the recruitment,retention, and timely graduation of master’s students who will directly go into industry aftergraduation is crucial. To expand this pipeline, an environment that attracts, supports, and retainshistorically or traditionally marginalized or minoritized and diverse
experiences. Incorporating HIPs into courses canincrease student engagement and learning. The only way HIPs can significantly impact a courseis if the faculty are equipped with the proper pedagogical tools to adopt them in theirclassrooms. Towards this goal, the New York Institute of Technology Center for Teaching andLearning conducted a 5-day summer Course Design Institute (CDI). During the CDI, facultyparticipants read the book [3], designed or redesigned courses built on learner-centered designprinciples, developed a revised final or near-final syllabus, and learned how to apply research-based teaching and learning principles to course design. Nine faculty members from theDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Department of
Paper ID #42584Board 235: Design and Implementation of a Professional Development Coursefor Interdisciplinary Computational Science Graduate StudentsProf. Satchi Venkataraman, San Diego State University Satchi Venkataraman, Ph.D., is a Professor of Aerospace Engineering. He has served as Graduate Advisor for the Aerospace Engineering program (17 years) and as an Associate Director at the Computational Sciences Research Center at San Diego State University (11 years). His expertise is in computational mechanics and optimization applied to design of lightweight and durable composite aircraft structures. He has extensive
Courtney Lambeth, North Carolina A&T State UniversityDr. Robin Guill Liles, North Carolina A&T State UniversityDr. Narayan Bhattarai, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Narayan Bhattarai is an assistant professor of Bioengineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His research areas are Biomaterials, Tissue Engineering and Nanotechnology. He teaches Biomaterials and Nanotechnology to undergraduate and graduate students. Page 23.690.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 IMPACTING UNDERGRADUATE NANOSCIENCE AND NANOENGINEERING
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department on the campus of NDSU. Theresearch team, graduate student mentor, and other faculty members provide support to teachersto enhance the knowledge and skills gained throughout the program. This support is provided ina variety of ways, including refresher courses in math and science content, pedagogicalworkshops, engineering design activities, lab work, and curriculum writing. Four follow-upworkshops are conducted through the year to provide sustained support throughout the schoolyear. By participating in the program, the teachers gain a personal insight to research-basedclassroom instruction that follow best practices in K-12 engineering education, STEM learning,active learning instruction, and project
developed the RED Start Up Session, a half-day workshop that establishes bestpractices for RED teams’ work and enables early successes in these five year projects. As the RED Participatory Action Research team (REDPAR)—comprised of individualsfrom Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the University of Washington—we have takenthe research data collected as we work with RED teams, as well as the research literature onacademic change, and translated it into practical strategies that can benefit RED teams and otherchangemakers as they embark on their change projects [5]. In the RED Start Up Session (offeredfor new RED teams preceding the annual RED Consortium Meeting), attendees are introduced tothese best practices through interactive
Paper ID #42046Board 301: Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Summative Evaluation of ParticipantSkills, Perceptions, Confidence, and Research Products from a QualitativeResearch InstituteDr. John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia Dr. Morelock is an Assistant Professor of Practice with an emphasis on engineering education research, and the Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis
Oklahoma State University regents distinguished research, Halliburton outstanding college of engineering faculty, and Fulbright-Tocqueville distinguished chair awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessing Impact of an REU program on Student’s Intellectual Growth and Interest in Graduate School in Cybermanufacturing Pavan K. Moturu, Bimal Nepal, Prabhakar Pagilla, Satish Bukkapatnam Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.AbstractAdvancements in information technology and computational intelligence have transformed themanufacturing landscape, allowing firms to produce highly complex and customized product in arelatively short amount of time
Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Sustaining Change: Embedding Research Outcomes into School Practices, Policies and NormsWith an NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments (RED) grant, theSchool of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering seeks to create (1) a culturewhere everyone in the CBEE community feels valued and that they belong, and (2) to create alearning environment that prompts students and faculty to meaningfully connect curricular andco-curricular activities and experiences to each other and to professional practice. We aim tohave students connect what they learn to the context of their lives, identities, and emergingcareers. We want CBEE graduates to be
supportin seeking and obtaining internships and research experiences.Augsburg serves a significant transfer population. About 40% of STEM students with 60 or morecredits (junior or senior class standing) are transfers. Despite this, at the time of the first grant,there were not many institutional supports designed specifically to meet the needs of transferstudents. One of the goals of the project was to better understand the experiences and academicpathways of STEM transfers within our institutional context.The program supported approximately 20 scholars each year who met the AugSTEM eligibilityrequirements (below). Scholars received funding for up to five semesters. Each year, newscholars were selected to fill slots created by graduating scholars
models, and on the rapidly developing web-based social networking and contentmanagement tools. It utilizes virtual communities of practice (VCP) to help faculty membersunderstand and implement research-based instructional approaches.The two goals of the project are: (1) to develop a sustainable VCP model for facultydevelopment that will enable relatively inexperienced faculty members to gain an understandingof research-based instructional approaches and to implement these approaches in theirclassrooms and (2) to identify VCP best practices by developing approaches for characterizingthe operation of VCP implementations and relating these to VCP effectiveness. This paper firstsummarizes the literature that underlies the VCP approach; then it
exclusively on CC students, INSET effectively promotesearly engagement in STEM research, providing opportunities for active learning activities thatmay increase retention and degree completion, while at the same time drawing a diverse studentpopulation.INSET was designed to expose this traditionally under-engaged pool of students to theexcitement of scientific discovery, innovative engineering, and the societal impact of science andtechnology. This is achieved in part by immersing students in a university research environment,giving them first-hand experience on cutting-edge original research in a discipline of theirinterest and with the mentorship of a UCSB student just a step or two ahead of them. The CCinterns make original contributions to this
(UK) where he is currently a Professor in the Department of Chemistry and an Associate Director of the Center for Applied Energy Research. At UK he leads a research group focusing on biofuels and environmental catalysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Enhancing graduate education by integrating research and professional skill development within a diverse, inclusive and supportive academy1. Background1.1. Challenges faced by graduate education and training in engineering and the sciencesGraduate education and training often take a monodisciplinary approach that is not informed bybest educational practices, ignores the needs and
thefindings from our research on LGBTQ in Engineering. This is done by various means such asdirect presentation of quantitative results, case studies about experiences of LGBTQ individualsin STEM, and activities exploring how STEM culture impacts LGBTQ individuals. Uponcompletion of Safe Zone training, graduates receive a Safe Zone sticker to display in theirworkplace. This simple symbol of LGBTQ alliance has been shown to benefit LGBTQ studentsand faculty in powerful and meaningful ways [24].Safe Zone workshops were first introduced at the ASEE Annual Conference in 2014 and offeredagain at the 2015 Annual Conference [31]. Through this project we redesigned the Safe Zoneworkshops for a STEM audience. Since 2016 we have offered multiple Safe Zone
teaching awards, two Professorships, two national ASEE teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Promoting Research and Entrepreneurship Skills in Freshman Engineering Students: A Strategy to Enhance Participation in Graduate and Enrichment ProgramsAbstractThis paper describes the structure, implementation strategy, and early results of an undergraduateNSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) Programaimed at: (a) increasing the number of graduating engineers with research and entrepreneurshipexperience, (b) preparing students for the future needs
, most crucially, an activedesign studio. The course set is taught under the aegis of an established cross-university, cross-disciplinary entity - the Coastal Community Design Collaborative. The overarching objective isto model effective trans-disciplinary collaborative research and design in teaching, learning, andproductivity.Specifically, the research asks: What pedagogic tools, curricular support, and teaching strategiescan foster trans-disciplinary collaboration among students from engineering, architecture, andscience programs? It seeks to evaluate impacts on students’ short- and long-term career interestsand it asks: What shifts in focus and methods are required for faculty toeffectively lead a trans-disciplinary design studio?The most
for supporting S-STEM student retention and graduationA recent self-study at Stevens Institute of Technology revealed that our 2nd and 3rd year retention ratesfor low-income STEM students are lower than those for our non-low income STEM student body. Toaddress this finding, the goal of our S-STEM program is to implement evidence-based best practices toincrease retention and graduation rates of low-income academically talented STEM students to levels thatmatch our overall STEM population. To accomplish this goal, we are seeking to: 1. implement best-practices with regards to cohort development and faculty, peer, and alumni mentoring programs to support the ADAPT Scholars, 2. develop targeted enrichment and mentoring activities
College and her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Illinois under the supervision of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. She worked as a member of technical staff at Lytel, Inc., following graduation. At Polaroid, she was appointed a Senior Research Group Leader, responsible for the design of laser diodes and arrays. After leaving Polaroid, she was employed at Biocontrol Technology. She moved into academia full-time in 1997 and worked at the University of Denver, West Virginia University, and Virginia Tech. She is currently the director of the University of Glasgow-University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Electronics and Electrical Engineering programme. While at Virginia Tech, she collaborated with Dr. Robert
Paper ID #37329Board 394: Sustaining and Scaling the Impact of the MIDFIELD project atthe American Society for Engineering Education (Year 1)Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan Lord is Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions
, and student and faculty demographics. Research is needed to advance our scholarly un-derstanding of cultural factors in engineering that impede and promote LGBTQ equality, whichin turn will allow us to contour the content and best practices of Safe Zone workshops to be mosteffective for engineering audiences. Our research plan is based on a transformative mixed meth-ods design [27] using surveys of engineering deans, faculty and students as well as ethnographicparticipant observations of Safe Zone workshops to answer research questions that include: Howare engineering faculty and staff disadvantaged by heteronormativity and heterosexism? • What aspects of engineering culture serve as impediments to LGBTQ equality? • How can Safe Zone