American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Integrating Cyber Infrastructure with Physical LaboratoriesAbstract Laboratories are indispensible components for engineering and technology curricula.Through systematically designed experiments, students can gain hands-on experience, enhanceclassroom learning, and cultivate career interests. However, traditional laboratories are oftenrestricted by space, scheduling, staffing, etc. Thus, how to effectively organize laboratories andmaximize the utilization of limited resources has gained many researchers’ attention. In recentyears, integrating cyberspace with educational technology has achieved significant progress. Tofacilitate the needs of research and education, lots of laboratory
improving undergraduate level introductory biology and chemistry lab- oratory courses through curriculum and professional development. Dr. Schwartz has designed a course for college science teaching. This course emphasizes the integration of inquiry, nature of science, and subject matter through active learning strategies in STEM classrooms. Page 23.1269.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education with 3D Virtual LaboratoryAbstractWe have been developing a unique set of 3D virtual laboratory
Page 23.1357.7 client is built into all versions of Windows. To connect to virtual computer, student needs to enter the IP address of the remote computer, and it asks you for the login and password. Total machining process simulation that includes selecting the workpiece, zeroing the workpiece, select and measure tools, select the right operation mode for the machine and clearing all the alarms can be performed virtually using Swansoft software. One of the difficulties teaching in ET-mechanical laboratory is that students may not be able to see what the instructor showing on the machine control panel especially when the class size is big. This problem is overcome by using simulation package of Swansoft CNC (SSCNC), which
with a joint appointment in the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering in the Ira A. Schools of Engineering and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation in the Mary Lou Fulton Teacher’s College.Dr. Tim Frank, South Mountain Community College Page 23.1146.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching Linear Circuit Analysis Techniques with ComputersAbstractWe describe recent progress in the development of a step-based computer-based tutoring systemto aid in the teaching of introductory linear circuit analysis courses, and
, and misalignment of machine tool elements.Geometric errors are also affected by the thermal state of the machine tool structure. Henceprocess and structural factors affecting part accuracy in machining processes are quitecomplicated. CNC machine tools only minimizes a small portion of these errors since CNC oftendoes not utilize sensor data to compensate for geometric-thermal errors and errors generated bythe cutting process. Therefore, we must provide our students, through our curriculum, with anadequate level of expertise through new programs, courses and support laboratories.This paper is focused on description of new laboratory modules, teaching materials, practicalexperiments and projects developed as an integrated educational
engineering course that provides in-depth coverage ofmicro and nanoscale microscopy (including atomic force and electron microscopy) intandem with coverage of special topics in nanoscience/nanotechnology. The coursestructure is modular, allowing faculty from any of five departments who participate in thenano collaboration to co-teach. The special topic has ranged from self-assemblednanostructures for sensors, solar cells and nanoelectronics in the first two offerings tobionanomaterials (in preparation). Individual, hands-on training in nanoscale microscopyhas been designed to complement the special topics coverage duringthe studio laboratory portion of the course. Students are provided at least two hours perweek of supervised instruction on the
Paper ID #5993Connecting Research and Teaching Through Product Innovation: Quality ofLife Technology RET SiteMs. Mary R Goldberg, University of Pittsburgh Mary Goldberg, M.Ed. received her bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Spanish and a Master’s of Education in Administrative and Policy Studies from the University of Pittsburgh. She has been the Lead Education and Outreach Coordinator at the Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology and Human Engineering Research Laboratories since 2007, where she has served as co-PI on four training programs in the field of assistive technology for undergraduates, veterans
Paper ID #6716Collaborative Development of Internet-Accessible, Interactive, Medical Imag-ing Teaching Courseware and Application to Undergraduate CurriculaDr. Weizhao Zhao, University of Miami Dr. Weizhao Zhao’s fields of study include medical imaging and image processing, image-guided surgical intervention, medical imaging simulation for BME training. At the University of Miami, Dr. Zhao has been the director of the Bioimaging Laboratory; the co-director of the Medical Physics Graduate Program; and an associate professor of Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Radiology.Ann G Bessell PhDDr. Nurgun Erdol, Florida Atlantic
/Champaign under the direction of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. Her areas of research include design of optoelectronic materials, devices, and systems; optical spectroscopy; high heat load packaging; and electrical engineering pedagogy.Mr. Justin Adam Cartwright, Virginia Tech Page 23.842.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Lab-in-a-Box: Strategies to Teach Online Lab Courses While MaintainingCourse Learning Objectives and OutcomesThe Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech has institutedseveral nontraditional on-campus laboratory courses during the
Paper ID #7863Just-in-Time-Teaching with Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (JiT-TIFFF or JTF) for Cyber Learning in Core Materials CoursesProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of engineering education design, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, misconceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept In- ventory for assessing
Paper ID #5792Live Energy: An Initiative for Teaching Energy and Sustainability Topicswith the most Up-to-date and Relevant ContentDr. Christine Ehlig-Economides, Texas A&M University Dr. Ehlig-Economides has been full professor of petroleum engineering at Texas A&M University in the Albert B. Stevens endowed chair since 2004. Before that she worked for Schlumberger for 20 years in well test design and interpretation, integrated reservoir characterization, modern well construction design, and well stimulation. She has worked in more than 30 countries and authored more than 60 papers. Dr. Ehlig- Economides has
minutes. The students in the classroomsaw the same SEM images as the operator, with a real time view of the sample preparation tableand the laboratory environment. At all times they could converse with the laboratory instructorand ask questions.Figure 2: This is the actual implementation of the system. Photo was taken during an actualclassroom teaching. Page 23.295.5Since it is a mobile system, it can be easily moved into any other laboratory, such as fordemonstrating an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) or Transmission Electron Microscope(TEM). We have also used it for conducting virtual tours of a cleanroom nanofabricationlaboratory, where the
present in textbooks.11 Page 23.780.2The current investigation has aimed to integrate some aspects of research into a geotechnicalengineering laboratory course with limited impact on the existing content of the course (i.e.,maintaining emphasis on conventional geotechnical engineering testing). This experience is notintended to be production-level research, but instead an introduction to research methodologyand perspective for undergraduate students. Various teaching methodologies have beenincorporated to the introductory geotechnical engineering laboratory at California PolytechnicState University, a primarily undergraduate institution. The
applications for the TI hardware tools. It includes compilers for each of TI’sdevice families, source code editor, project build environment, debugger, profiler, simulators,and many other features.The laboratories are weekly 3-hr long sessions. The students are assigned a pre-lab exercise,which usually consists of prerequisite reading material, such as going through user manuals,datasheets, and other time-consuming but necessary activities. They work collaboratively ingroups of two or three per experimental station, and are supervised by a teaching assistant.However, each lab requires an individual submission of a number of deliverables, clearly identi-fied in the lab manuals. Typically, the deliverables themselves require the successful completionof
: Comparison of Industrially-situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 540–573.3. Gilbuena, D., B. Sherrett, E. Gummer and M. D. Koretsky. (2011). Understanding feedback in an authentic, ill- structured project through discourse analysis: interaction between student and instructor objectives. 2011 Research in Engineering Education Symposium: Program and Proceedings, 2011, 700-709.4. Johnson, G.R. (1979). Verbal Interaction in Junior/Community College and University Classrooms: Do Disciplines and Settings Differ? Research in Education, Aug 1979.5. Bostian, C.W. (1991). The Mechanics of Effective Classroom Teaching. Engineering Education, 81(1), 9-11.6. Felder, R.M. (2002). The
environmental sensors and sustainable bioremedi- ation processes. Since joining the University of Toledo in 2008, he have been teaching water resources engineering as well as water supply & treatment courses for both graduate and undergraduate students.Mr. Christopher Mark Hessler, University of Toledo Christopher Hessler holds a master’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Toledo and is currently completing his doctorate. He possesses nearly a decade of experience in process and wastewater engineering, centered around oil recovery and waste treatment. He currently is the Custom and Treatment products manager at QED Environmental Systems in Ann Arbor, Michigan, where he leads a team of engineers in
networks, among other areas. He also focuses on enhancing recruitment and retention of underrepresented minorities in the STEM areas in general, engineering in particular.Dr. Deborah Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Deborah Walter is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in circuits, electromagnetics, and medical imaging. Before joining academia in 2006, she was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for eight years. She worked on several technology development projects in the area of X-ray CT for medical and industrial imaging. She is a named inventor on nine patents. She has been active in
engineeringclassrooms across the United States2.In order to prepare our future engineers with competencies well beyond those expected of pastengineers, as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) say we must, engineering education itself must change andbecome more effective and efficient3, 4. We must draw on available engineering educationresearch to improve our classrooms and our teaching both now and into the future. Page 23.252.2This is not a simple task, as there are many barriers to overcome. Some are barriers of individualfaculty members, and others reflect their work environment. Some examples of
Outstanding Teaching, RIT’s premiere teaching award. Dr. Kim has directed numerous undergraduate research projects and undergraduate and graduate research competitions in the 2012 GPEC (Global Plastics Environment Conference; Division of Society of Plastics Engineers). Page 23.1268.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Transforming Undergraduate Curriculum for Green Plastics Manufacturing Technology (GPMT)Student-Centered Learning and POGIL ApproachAll learning involves knowledge construction in one form or another; therefore, it is aconstructivist process.1,2
the same, the way, order and relevance of contentused varies as much as the variation of the instructors teaching this course. There is also theadditional task of creating content that is flexible enough to be incorporated in courses atmultiple universities. Having both the Tempe Cell and oedometer-type pressure plate laboratory materialavailable to the instructor relates directly to the flexibility we feel is important while developingthis learning module. Ramirez, for example, has been conducting tests on soil samples prevalentin the United States Southwest. This sample type, however, may not be as readily available whenone is teaching in the Midwest, Northeast or the South. With that in mind we found it isimportant to offer the
Paper ID #7239IMPACTING UNDERGRADUATE NANOSCIENCE AND NANOENGINEER-ING EDUCATIONDr. Dhananjay Kumar, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Dhananjay Kumar is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His teaching interests are courses related to Materials Science, Thin Film Technology, Nanoscience, and Nanoengineering. He is actively associated with developing and teaching new courses at North Carolina A&T under the NSF-funded Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education (NUE) project.Dr. Devdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State UniversityMiss
the growingbiofuels and bioprocessing industries. A highly successful aspect of this program wasimplementation of Summer Teaching and Learning Institutes for pre- and inservice educators -primarily those in secondary agriculture programs in the state. The Institutes focused on thescience, technology, engineering, mathematics, and agriculture of sustainable biofuelsproduction and bioprocessing in the Southeast US. A major component of the Institutes wasextensive hands-on instruction including fabrication, field and laboratory modules that utilizedengineering and laboratory equipment that were provided to each participating inservice educatorfor use in his/her school. A total of 33 inservice and preservice educators participated in theSummer
Paper ID #6663Incorporating Engineering into the High School Chemistry ClassroomMs. Lisa Arnold, Alma High School, Alma, MI Lisa Arnold has a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from Alma College with emphasis in Mathematics and Natural Science and a Master of Arts from Central Michigan University in Secondary Education with an emphasis in Mathematics. She has also obtained M.A. +30 with emphasis in Curriculum and Instruction. Lisa has been teaching chemistry at Alma High School for the past seventeen years.Mr. Ze ZhangDr. Tolga Kaya, Central Michigan University Dr. Tolga Kaya currently holds a joint assistant professor
design.Dr. Robi Polikar, Rowan UniversityDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Dr. Kevin Dahm is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from WPI in 1992 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998. His primary areas of pedagogical scholarship are teaching design, process simulation in the curriculum, assessment of student learning and teaching engineering economics. He has received the 2011 Mid-Atlantic Section Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005 Corcoran Award, the 2004 Fahien Award and the 2003 Martin Award from ASEE.Prof. Robert M Nickel, Bucknell University Robert. M. Nickel received the Diplom-Ing. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Rheinisch- Westflische Technische
access to the PHY and MAC as enabled by the programmable wireless platforms.• To integrate the SDR experiments and projects with traditional wireless communications courses to enhance teaching and student learning.• To develop a new SDR laboratory course for junior and senior level wireless engineering students. The objective is to expose undergraduate students to the advanced SDR technology with a hands-on approach, and to train the future wireless workforce with the much needed SDR expertise.The proposed project will enhance student learning and improve the quality of our undergraduateeducation, specifically, enhancing Auburn University’s ABET-accredited Bachelor of WirelessEngineering (BWE) program, first-of-its-kind in the nation. The
21st century of digital learning, and technology integration. Yang’s latest research focuses on employing an innovative synergis- tic approach to prevent/eliminate misconceptions from forming with first-year engineering students, and teaching STEM disciplines in online environments.Dr. Inanc Senocak, Boise State University Dr. Inanc Senocak is an associate professor with the Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineer- ing at Boise State University. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Florida in 2002. Dr. Senocak served as a postdoctoral research associate at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and Stanford University prior to joining Boise State in 2007. Dr. Senocak
department, college, and university level. He has been recognized as an outstanding faculty member by both Eta Kappa Nu and the Mortar Board. His research activities are focused in the areas of computer networks, communications, and digital design. Prior to joining Kansas State University as a faculty member, Dr. Gruenbacher was a member of the senior staff in the Space Department of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory from 1994 to 1997 and from 1989 to 1990. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering in 1989, a master’s degree in 1991, and a doctorate in 1994, all from Kansas State. Dr. Gruenbacher has also completed engineering internships with both Motorola Inc. and IBM.Dr. Noel N
be animportant step towards a fully virtual classroom setup, where the students will be guided by aremote instructor and they will able to undertake a self-paced study. Page 23.445.12AcknowledgmentThis work was sponsored by the NSF TUES phase 3 grant award no. 0817596.Bibliography1. Lipsitz, L., “The Computer and Education,” Educational Technology, no. 9, 1973.2. Wolfe, C., Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web, Academic Press, 2001.3. Spanias, A., and Venkatraman A., “Interactive online undergraduate laboratories using J-DSP,” IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 735-749, 2005.4. The Khan Academy, available online at
Paper ID #6745A Grand Challenge-based Framework for Contextual Learning in Engineer-ingDr. Lisa G. Huettel, Duke University Dr. Lisa G. Huettel is an associate professor of the practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University where she also serves as associate chair and director of Undergraduate Studies for the department. She received a B.S. in Engineering Science from Harvard University and earned her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests are focused on engineering education, curriculum and laboratory development, and applications of
, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. He serves as editor of the Journal of Engineering Education and as a member of the College Teaching and Accountability in Research editorial boards. He is a Carnegie scholar and an IEEE fellow. Professor Loui was associate dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at M.I.T. in 1980.Renata A Revelo Alonso, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Page 23.719.1 c American Society for Engineering