Paper ID #23384Early-career Plans in Engineering: Insights from the Theory of Planned Be-haviorTrevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan Trevion Henderson is a doctoral student in the Center for Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. He recently earned his master’s degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University while serving as a graduate research associate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise. Trevion also hold’s a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science and Engineer- ing from The Ohio State University, where he served as a research assistant in
Paper ID #22939Three Examples of a New Industry-authored Flexible Plan B.S. DegreeDr. R. Andrew Schaffer, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Andy Schaffer is Associate Dean for Statewide at Purdue Polytechnic Institute, one of 10 academic col- leges at Purdue University. Andy oversees the nine Location Polytechnic Statewide, which serves ap- proximately 1,200 Purdue students outside of Purdue’s main campus. He also is Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology.John Carlson, Red Gold Four generations of the Reichart family have been producing premium quality tomato products since 1942, when it began producing
Paper ID #21854A Strategic Plan to Improve Engineering Student Success: Development, Im-plementation, and OutcomesDr. Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University Jerome P. Lavelle is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering economic analysis, decision analysis, project management, leadership, engineering management and engineering education.Dr. Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University Matthew Stimpson is the Director of Assessment in the Office of Undergraduate Academic Affairs at NC
served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring How Engineering Internships and Undergraduate Research Experiences Inform and Influence College Students’ Career Decisions and Future PlansAbstractDoes engagement in high impact practices such as technical internships and undergraduateresearch influence engineering students’ career decisions and future plans? And how is learningthat comes from these high impact practices related to “school learning”? These high impacteducational practices have been shown to increase the rates of student engagement and retentionin
Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University in 1994, and a Master’s in Business Administration from Arizona State University in 2000.Anna Tanguma, Science Foundation Arizona Anna Tanguma brings 10 years of STEM strategic planning and program management experience in higher education environments and initiatives. Anna has a history of promoting and increasing enroll- ment in the programs she manages, as well as developing collaborative relationships with corporate and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23780community members. Anna has provided successful direction to federally
, distributed simulation, adaptive control systems, digital signal processing, and integrat- ing technology into engineering education. He has also been an industry consultant on modeling for strategic planning. Professor Elizandro received the University Distinguished Faculty Award, Texas A&M, Commerce and College of Engineering Brown-Henderson Award at Tennessee Tech University. He served as Governor’s Representative for Highway Safety in Arkansas and member of the National Highway Safety Advisory Commission during the Jimmy Carter presidency. He is also a member of Tau Beta Pi, Alpha Pi Mu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon honor societies.Dr. Angelo A. Volpe, Tennessee Technological University Dr.Angelo A.Volpe served as
. Our analysis of these failures showed two majorproblems. First, students do not have experience with how things are made. So, they areunable to produce the detailed designs required by a waterfall planning scheme. Second,they are afraid to start building subsystems, so they delay building until the last moment.This leaves student teams without time to fix failures, revise their plans, and integrate com-ponents. So, we chose to utilize an agile project management technique used extensively inthe software industry. We implemented a variant of scrum project planning, which is basedon starting with a top-level design, start to build subsystems for that design, and modifyyour design as you learn. It is a structured and supervised try–fail–fix
computing and engineering teams on eachclient campus collaborated to expand the pool of women students who apply to, enroll in, andgraduate from their majors; in the past, departments have competed for the same pool of women.Our approach to accomplish this goal included: 1) client departments working together toincrease their pool of potential women students, instead of raiding each other’s limited numbersand 2) client teams collaboratively creating and implementing a strategic recruiting plan andadopting a minimum of two retention strategies.Progress was measured against three objectives: 1. Increases in number and percent of female applicants, admissions, and enrollments 2. Enrollments of women increase in client departments at a faster rate
inequality in the world (African Development Bank, 2007) with aGini coefficient estimated at 0.58 by the 2009/10 household survey, which is one of the highestfigures of any country in the world (World Bank, 2009). The country has an estimated annualGDP per capita of USD 5293. However, it is worth noting that from 1980-1990 Namibia had aGDP per capita which was higher than that of both China and Thailand. But, over the interveningtime both countries’ rate of economic growth have greatly exceeded Namibia’s and, as a result,Namibia’s GDP per capita ratio is currently much smaller than either of those two countries(National Planning Commission, 2012).Despite this disparity in economic growth rates, the country is slowly emerging from thecompounding
engineering self-efficacy (ESE). Students were asked to indicate frequency oftypes of interactions with faculty (e.g., discuss plan of study; discuss future career plans)and extent to which they experienced negative attitudes from faculty. Engineering self-efficacy (e.g., succeed in engineering curriculum; excel in engineering major) was assessedusing items from a published instrument on engineering self-efficacy, and the scaledemonstrated internal consistency. Overall, students who reported more frequentinteractions with faculty (more than once), and lower perceived negative attitudes fromfaculty indicated higher levels of engineering self-efficacy. Further, we examined resultsfor sub-groups of specific underrepresented students (women; transfer
, planning, marshaling, implementing people and implementingfinance) with our two independent variables (gender and family role model). Our results showthat overall, students with an entrepreneur in their family reported higher ESE for all the fiveconstructs than students who did not have an entrepreneur in their family. However, statisticallysignificant differences and interactions with gender were found for only searching, marshalingand implementing finance constructs. For searching, both the independent variables (family rolemodels and gender) were noted as significant predictors. In contrast, only presence of family rolemodels was found to be a statistically significant predictor for marshalling. Similarly, onlygender was significant predictor
look into theinherent value of STEM learning and provided them the opportunity to engage in businessdevelopment activities such as idea generation, fast pitch, design thinking and business planning.In addition, lean start up approach provided students ways to interview potential customers andquickly make pivots in their plan for delivering a product or solution to potential customers fastand efficiently. According to data collected in the project, such entrepreneurship practices wellenhanced the overall STEM learning experiences of students. As a design and development project, research questions in STEM-Inc frame formative datacollection and analysis to address aspects of the design that worked and others that requirerevision. Summative
Engineering and Applied Sciences (CEAS) and remains a flagshipprogram to promote diversity in STEM at the University [8].WISE Honors fits the definition of an academic program as defined by Lattuca and Stark: “aplanned group of courses and experiences designated for a specific group of students” [9, p.127]. The Program has both planned courses and a set of experiences for high achieving womenstudents pursuing degrees in STEM. No other institution of higher education offers such aprogram, with its strongcurricular focus in addition to 16 14research, service, leadership, 12and internship. The curriculum 10consists of a sequenced 8academic plan that
mission and goals.Next, the students spent several weeks drawing the existing building in a building informationmodeling software program, while also completing a thorough building code study. Studentswere tasked with completing a building design that was both functional and aestheticallypleasing. Students also had to develop a one word concept, which could be seen in alldimensions of the project. Figure 2 provides an example of a concept board, as created by onestudent.Figure 2: Example of Student Conceptual WorkOnce the students completed a building code study, to ensure code compliance, the class metwith the community partner to present preliminary color plans. Students received critique fromthe client regarding both positive and negative
), and onebrave sophomore (1).BackgroundAs described by Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick in a work in progress at ASEE in 2017 [16], thecourse that these students participated in was organized around objectives that included studentlearning about working in teams and collaborating while building drones.The output of each team was a jointly-constructed drone and a team-designed plan for a “pro-social drone”—that is, a design that would somehow have a positive impact on society. Studentswere challenged to wrestle with what it means for something to be pro-social. In the syllabusstudents were alerted to the ways that this class was likely to be different than others that theyhad taken before.As Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick describe it, the course was
students from underrepresented groups (URGs) at community collegeswho have the opportunity to transfer to engineering programs. We are specifically investigatinghow their experiences in community college influence their plans for future education andcareers. While the diversity of 4-year universities has remained stagnant, the diversity ofcommunity college student populations is actually increasing. Therefore, community collegesrepresent a potential source of talent for future engineers from diverse backgrounds. We arecurrently in the first year of data collection where we have piloted the study at one of the datacollection sites. Five students from traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering havebeen interviewed. We use a narrative
ISO 9000 standards, evolution andimportance of ISO 9000 standards, the basic structure of ISO 9000, and the seven qualitymanagement principles that the ISO 9000 series are based on. At the completion of this learningmodule, students should be able to (a) describe what ISO 9000 series standards are and why it isimportant in both industries and service sectors; (b) describe the differences of the ISO 90001987, 1994, 2000, 2008, and 2015 versions and the key changes and the content structure of ISO9000:2015; and (c) understand and discuss the seven quality management principles and howthey are related to ISO 9000.2) Mid-level: This module will cover the major sections of ISO 9001:2015 including context ofthe organization, leadership, planning
participant’s experiencewith the project, but also included some demographic questions. Table 1 lists the questions andtheir respective research questions. A selection of the results organized around three researchquestions from the study is given below:How did the students view this type of activity?For many of the participants, this activity was a new experience for them. Someparticipants revealed that they had prior experience co-planning projects or activitieswith other content areas, however a majority stated that they had limited experience co-planning such intense design projects between content areas. The overall feelings aboutthe project were positive, and the students listed several benefits of the assignment.What problems did the students
your work and then work your plan. [2] FED-101 is a one semester long, 2-credit course,which lasts for a duration of about 15 weeks. In light of the compact period, a very detailed plan Figure 1: PERT chart for the Reverse Engineering project is vital. PERT and Project Plan are introduced as the tools of project management to accomplish the RE projects on schedule. Apart from managing the time- bound RE projects, the freshmen benefit by learning hands-on time management skills, which is essential
PlanThe activities of the ASEE Diveristy Committee have been guided by a communal vision andhave informed and been informed by (a) the task force charge in 2009, (b) initial plans developedby the committee in 2011-12, (c) and a formal strategic action plan developed in 2015-16. TheASEE statement on diversity and inclusion describes the Society’s vision as to create and foster environments where every individual is respected and no one feels marginalized. ASEE believes that this can be achieved by supporting the education, recruitment, retention, and advancement of these groups in engineering education, engineering technology education, and the engineering profession. While ASEE recognizes that steady gains have been
Institute of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. from the Ohio State University and a MBA from Urbana University.Prof. Adedeji B. Badiru, Air Force Institute of Technology Prof. Badiru is Dean and senior academic officer for the Graduate School of Engineering and Management at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). He has oversight for planning, directing, and controlling operations related to granting doctoral and master’s degrees, professional continuing cyber education, and research and development programs. He was previously Professor and Head of Systems Engineering and Management at the AFIT, Professor and Department Head of Industrial & Information Engineering at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, and
Paper ID #22582Using Design Challenges to Develop Empathy in First-year CoursesJordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. learning sciences student and lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assistant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering De- partments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design Based Research
assembled in AY17 and empowered to work with collegeleadership to envision, develop, and resource infrastructure and communication needs to engageall college employees in our culture change process. The work of the Change Team has emergedas essential to advancing our goals in relation to community. We will discuss inception andevolution of the Change Team, profile five projects launched in AY18, and summarize some ofthe challenges that still remain.BackgroundThe efforts described in this paper are enabled to a great extent by the broader university-levelcontext. The most important initiatives supporting work within the College of Engineering(COE) are highlighted below. We also provide a brief overview of the college’s strategic plan,which for the
measures have started totaper in recent years [2]. To meet current and future workforce demands for more STEMprofessionals in the United States, we must be creative about how to move beyond this ceilingeffect; and, great potential exists among the growing population of students who begin theirpursuit of a higher education at institutions other than 4-year public/private colleges [11].The purpose of this research project is to increase understanding of engineering transfer studentsand their experiences at both sending and receiving institutions. Research sites include four ofthe top ten producers of U.S. Hispanic/Latino engineers; the framework of transfer studentcapital was used to organize the project’s data collection and analytical plan (Figure
worked extensively in the domain of welding, specifically in the area of weld- ing technology and training. He has a deep appreciation for the importance of the welding field and plan to continue pursuing research projects that benefit the welding community.Ms. Audrey Fyock, Iowa State University Audrey Fyock is a senior in Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering and first year Master of Business Administration student at Iowa State University. This is her first year doing an undergraduate research assistantship with the IMSE Department, where she is studying the impacts of undergraduate research on retention rates and graduate school.Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University Devna Popejoy-Sheriff is
addition, the SOE along with Science faculty ran a pilot workshop in the fall onways of teaching for diversity and inclusion. This workshop was based on the Bryn MawrCollege Teaching to Increase Diversity and Equity in STEM (TIDES) workshop. To encouragefaculty to attend future workshops on diversity and equity, the SOE had a raffle for staff andfaculty who took the implicit bias tests found at the Harvard site: Project Implicit:https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html.The formal response addressed each of the students’ recommendations. In some cases, wewere able to inform the students of activities already in process of which they were unaware. Inothers, we shared plans to address their issues, and in one case, we had to redirect some
. Table 2: Selected REU participants’ survey results (in percentage) Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 TotalOverall experience: Excellent/Very Good/Good 67/22/11 64/27/9 55/36/9 64/27/9Interested in going to grad school: 67/33/0 73/18/9 46/54/0 62/35/3increased/same/decreasedInterested in research career: increased/same/decreased 78/22/0 64/27/9 64/36/0 68/29/3Highest degree planned to obtain: 44/56/0 36/55/9 36/64/0 42/55/3increased/same/decreasedAlthough the overall satisfaction/impacts are almost same in the three years, REU participantsthemselves realized significant improvements in different aspects in different
their householdincome.The agenda (see Figure 1) for the camp provides scaffolded activities throughout the morning toallow students to build background knowledge and understanding of engineering concepts. In theafternoon, students are given adequate time to collaborate and utilize the engineering designprocess to complete an engineering challenge based on a book that identifies a real-worldproblem that needs to be solved.Scaffolding activities are selected to support the larger activity that is planned for the afternoon.Scaffolding activities break down the components of the larger activity enough that a focus canbe made to gain perspective and mastery before having to manage doing all of the elementstogether. Scaffolding activities are similar
university-level engineering [31]. Given the context of theclassroom in the camp, as well as the challenge of teaching engineering in a politicallycomplicated and highly regulated environment, we followed a course methodology based onrecent studies about education in fragile contexts and previous experience from the researchers inteaching engineering [32] [33] [34]. Also, we designed our intended outcomes, content,assessment, and pedagogy with the goal of fostering social responsibility so that the coursewould be meaningful and applicable to students’ local community. For example, we consideredexisting engineering problems in the community and pedagogical constraints in the classroom aspart of our course planning based on democratic basis
wasacceptable at both time points (T1 α = .715, T2 α = .91). Items were averaged so that higherscores indicated greater confidence in abilities to work in teams.Education intentions. Three questions (Estrada et al., 2011) assessed participants’ educationplans in engineering. Questions were answered on a scale from 1 (Very unlikely) to 6 (Verylikely) indicating students’ plans to attend an MS program in engineering, a PhD program, and togain experience working in an engineering lab. Items were averaged such that higher scoresrepresented greater intentions to pursue additional education and were analyzed individually.Career intentions. A 7-item measure (Estrada et al., 2011; Schultz & Estrada, 2010) evaluatedstudents’ career intentions in the field