. Page 24.984.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Planning Grant: Developing a National Higher Education Student Unit Record Database – NSF REE Grant 1232740Project goalsRetention is the dominant metric in studying student success in engineering education and inhigher education in general, yet available national datasets do not facilitate establishing nationalbenchmarks. This project sought to build on the earlier development of a large longitudinaldataset to design a national, longitudinal, student unit-record database that would make itpossible to calculate retention and other metrics consistently. This resource would permitbenchmarking, peer comparisons, and the design of new
Paper ID #36791Board 334: Master’s Individual Development Plans as an Essential Tool inWorkforce DevelopmentDeborah Silver, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Deborah Silver is the Executive Director of the Professional Science Master’s Program at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. This program offers the Master of Business & Science (MBS) degree which is a combination of a science master’s with courses in business and includes many engineering disciplines. She is also a full professor in the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rutgers. From 2008-2010 she served as Associate Dean of
Paper ID #22173Establishing a Baseline and Future Plans for Exploring Engineering Commu-nity and IdentityDr. Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University Dr. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at Mississippi State University. Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh investigates the formation of engineers during their undergraduate degree program, and the use of computing to measure and support that forma- tion. She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. In 2013, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh was honored as a promising new engineering education
Paper ID #21790Metacognition: Helping Students Plan, Monitor, and Evaluate Study Skillsand StrategiesDr. Muhammad Dawood, New Mexico State University Dr. Muhammad Dawood received his BE degree from the NED University of Engineering and Technol- ogy, Karachi, Pakistan, 1985, and his MS and Ph.D. degrees, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, in 1998 and 2001, respectively, both in electrical engineering. Dr. Dawood is involved in teaching both nationally and internationally since 1995. At present, Dr. Dawood is an Associate Professor at the Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Mexico State University
research interests within computational intelligence include ensemble systems, incremental and nonstationary learning, and various applications of pattern recognition in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. He is a member of IEEE, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu. His re- cent and current works are funded primarily through NSF’s CAREER and Energy, Power and Adaptive Systems (EPAS) programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT OF A WORKSHOP ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN BIOMETRIC SYSTEMSABSTRACTBiometrics is the science of recognizing and authenticating people using theirphysiological features. The global biometrics market has a compound annual
Paper ID #11802A Plan to Diffuse Mobile Hands-On Teaching and Learning in Puerto RicoDr. Juan C Morales, Universidad del Turabo Dr. Juan C. Morales, P.E., joined the Mechanical Engineering Department at Universidad del Turabo (UT), Gurabo, Puerto Rico, in 1995 and currently holds the rank of professor. Dr. Morales was the ABET Coordinator of the School of Engineering for the initial ABET-EAC accreditation of all four accredited programs at UT. He has been Department Head of Mechanical Engineering since 2003. His efforts to diffuse innovative teaching and learning practices derive directly from the outcomes assessment plan
Paper ID #12518Supporting Students’ Plans for STEM Careers: How Prepared are HighSchool Educators in Appalachia to Help?Dr. Cheryl Carrico, Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a Postdoctoral Research faculty member for Virginia Tech. Her current research fo- cus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. Prior to her current role, Dr. Carrico spent over 25 years in the aerospace in- dustry conducting and leading R&D, design engineering, and project management for composite aircraft components. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering
Paper ID #38001Board 309: Impact of RET Summer Program Designs on Teachers’Technological-Content Knowledge and Lesson Plan Development OutcomesDr. Shenghua Zha, University of South AlabamaDr. Na Gong, University of South Alabama Dr. Na Gong is currently Warren Nicholson Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of South Alabama. She received the Ph.D. degree in Computer Science and Engineering from the State University of New York,Erin Bosarge, University of South Alabama ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impact of RET Summer Program Designs on
Paper ID #8617Forming a Coalition to Decrease Freshout Rampup Time in the EngineeringWorkplace: A Business Plan for an Academic, Industry, and GovernmentPartnershipDr. Steven W Villachica, Boise State University Steve Villachica is an Associate Professor of Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) at Boise State University. His research interests focus on leveraging expertise in the workplace in ways that meet organizational missions and business goals. He is currently working on an NSF grant to increase engineer- ing faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices [NSF #1037808: Engineering Education
Paper ID #42108Board 295: HSI Planning Project: Integrative Undergraduate STEM Educationat Angelo State University (I-USE ASU Grant #2122828)Dr. Brittany Paige Trubenstein, Angelo State University Dr. Paige Trubenstein (or Dr. T) is an Angelo State alumna who graduated from ASU in 2015 with her Bachelor of Science in psychology. She attended the University of California, Riverside, where she obtained her master’s degree in developmental psychology in 2017 and her Ph.D. in developmental psychology in 2020. She eagerly returned to ASU as a faculty member in the fall of 2019, and she teaches multiple undergraduate and
Paper ID #43153Board 370: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation: Literature Reviewand Research Plan for an Engineering Specific Empathy ScaleDr. Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University Dr. Emmabeth Vaughn is an Assistant Professor in the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy Department at Austin Peay State University. Before join faculty at Austin Peay, she worked in industry as a Product Development Engineer for a commercial roofing manufacturer. She holds a bachelors degree from the University of Tennessee in Materials Science and Engineering. She earned her PhD from the University of Pennsylvania
implementable lesson/exercise, as well as dissemination of newlyacquired knowledge at annual teacher summit and/or online presentation. The participants alsosummarized their studies and shared their posters with other research students and teachers fromdifferent RET/REU programs. The expected outcomes of this program would be the transferringof acquired practical knowledge and skills to excite, empower, and educate students through newclass/lab activities. Funding from industry allowed additional equipment for schools and havingmore teacher participants in this program. The three-year program achieved most of the planned objectives. The program recruitedand trained a diverse cohort of participants, most teachers managed to grow their
inequities and inclusive leadership is crucial toensuring these commitments lead to real change [3], [4]. As a result, this executive summary aimsto characterize the exemplars’ intentions by identifying and examining the institutional values andDEI commitments declared in the strategic plans and other relevant institutional documents. Weorganized the executive summary around three topics—project overview, year three research andeducation activities, and critical insights from the document analysis.Project OverviewUsing a multi-case research design framed by Kotter’s Leading Change theory and Acker’sInequality Regimes as theoretical foundations [5], [6], this CAREER award aims to uncover thechange strategies institutionalized by six exemplary COEs to
students on their course projects. He was given an Outstanding Advising Award by USF and has been the recipient of numerous teaching awards at the department, college, university (Jerome Krivanek Distinguished Teaching Award) and state (TIP award) levels. Scott is also a member of the executive com- mittee of a Helios-funded Middle School Residency Program for Science and Math (for which he taught the capstone course in spring 2014) and is on the planning committee for a new NSF IUSE grant to trans- form STEM Education at USF. His research is in the areas of solution thermodynamics and environmental monitoring and modeling.Dr. Sylvia W. Thomas, University of South Florida Dr. Sylvia Wilson Thomas is currently an
)represent a unique yet understudied student group that comprises substantial numbers of thosehistorically underrepresented and underserved in STEM (i.e., due to race, ethnicity, gender, socialclass, ability, orientation, etc.). The individual diversity reflected by SVSMs, as well as theirtechnical interests, leadership and teamwork skills, maturity, life experience, and self-discipline,highlight SVSM as promising candidates for helping the field of engineering meet 21st centurySTEM workforce diversity goals [1,2].Project Goals and Work PlanThe overall goal of this NSF CAREER project is to advance full participation of SVSM within higherengineering education and the engineering workforce via two complementary work streams: aresearch plan and an
research, relate thisknowledge to each teacher’s independent project, and translate this knowledge and experienceinto a new lesson plan for their high school classroom. These lesson plans were disseminatedbroadly through the web (http://agpa.uakron.edu/p16/ret.php), workshops to local K-12educators, and national conference symposia.The targeted participants were high school science teachers (e.g. chemistry, physics, biology) inthe Akron hub of the Ohio STEM Learning Network within a one hour drive of the University ofAkron.1 This encompasses Summit county and four surrounding counties (Portage, Stark,Wayne, and Medina counties).The intellectual focus of this site was polymeric films and interfaces, but branched out after itsinception to encompass
teachers, pre-service STEM teachers, andcommunity college faculty participated in an immersive summer experience under the guidanceof engineering and science faculty members of the Functional Materials and ManufacturingInstitute (FMMI) at the University of South Florida (USF). Products produced by participantsincluded a research poster (presented at an annual REU/RET Symposium) and a lesson plan(Teach Engineering format) for academic year implementation in their classrooms.The RET focus on functional materials was chosen for three reasons. First, Materials Scienceand Engineering is a highly interdisciplinary field that can be addressed in many differentsubjects covered in high school and community colleges. Second, having a common focusallowed the
into STEM courses andcareers. A pilot program in its home county began in June 2013 with an intensive all-dayworkshop at Hillsborough Community College’s Brandon Campus for local and regionaleducators. Attendees were invited to submit implementation plans for a program in their schoolusing the strategies learned at the workshop and an implementation plan template provided byFLATE. This poster and paper will cover the details of the workshop content and activities andthe projects which schools and teachers have begun in order to boost their female enrollments invarious STEM programs. FLATE is particularly focused on supporting the manufacturingworkforce, and schools working in related disciplines will be highlighted.Collaborate, Encourage, Lead
Anatomy, Biology, Environmental Science, and even Spanish. Participantsreceived 20 hours of professional development credit.The program was structured into two workshop sessions. The first session, during the summer of2012, consisted of three days of hands-on instruction. It focused on several instructional topics,including (a) Overview of Cloud Services, (b) Storing and Sharing Data in the Cloud, (c) Cloudsin Education and Collaboration in and out of the Classroom, (d) Cloud-based Tools for Real-timeCollaboration, (e) Course Management using Piazza, (f) Standards-based Lesson Planning andPost-workshop Assignment, (g) Creating a Lesson Plan, and (h) Using Public Data SetsAvailable in Amazon’s Cloud. At the end of the three-day workshop
paper discusses the developments during Year 2 of a project concerned with analyzing thecurricula of engineering programs in the United States to understand the structural barriersembedded in degree requirements that could push out diverse groups of students. We are usingan emerging method for quantifying the complexity of these programs called CurricularAnalytics. This method involves treating the prerequisite relationships between courses as anetwork and applying graph theoretic measures to calculate a curriculum’s complexity. In Year 1,we collected 494 plans of study representing five engineering disciplines (i.e., Mechanical, Civil,Electrical, Chemical, and Industrial) across 13 institutions - spanning a decade. To ensure thedataset is as
schedule, participantsworked on faculty supervised research projects for half their time, and the rest was reserved forclassroom unit plans that participants would work on developing. Different from the first year,participants were assigned management roles during the summer. Also, each participant preparednew lesson plans and classroom activities that align with the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS). The academic year class activities from first year were debriefed and learned lessonswere generated. In this paper, we will give the details about the RET Site’s management anddiscuss our experiences from our second year with the improvements and their effects. We hopethat our shared experiences (struggles, accomplishments, mistakes, etc.) will
increase in the number of applications in the second year of theprogram with teacher referral and broader dissemination.We recruited ten faculty members in the College of Engineering to participate as facultymentors. They also recruited one of their graduate students to participate as student mentors.Two faculty mentors were replaced in the second year of the program due to their unavailability.An Industry Advisory Board (IAB) was formed for the program to provide guidance andfeedback on the program activities, especially those related to industry engagement, to ensure theteachers are well-informed of the workforce needs in the data analytics space, which can bereflected in their lesson plan development.Pre-Program ActivitiesWe designed a two-week
emphasis on the industrial control components required to maintain facility operations. Tour concludes with a discussion of the NOVA Data Center Operations program. NOVA Fab Lab Tour Tour of the digital fabrication lab and NOVA’s engineering In-person, 4 hours technology classrooms. Facilitators introduced NOVA’s degree programs formally, then conducted a group discussion of how to better reach students with opportunities. Plan of Action Participants create a plan explaining what they learned from Asynchronous, 2 hours the externship, how they will
Ph.D. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Howard University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University. He is currently serving as professor and chairper- son of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at one of the nation’s preeminent public urban research institutions, Morgan State University. His career spans over twenty-eight years of progres- sive scholarly experience in such areas as research administration/ implementation, pedagogical inno- vation, international collaboration, strategic planning, promoting community engagement and academic program development. He instructs courses in computer vision, computer graphics, electromagnetics and characterization of semiconductor
led by experienced NSF ATE principal investigators from various technologydisciplines. Topics covered during the workshop included components of an NSF ATE proposal;results of prior support; rationale; goals, objectives, activities, and deliverables; one-pagesummaries; the review process; mock panels; timelines; management plans; budgets and budgetjustifications; evaluation plans; sustainability plans; dissemination plans; the Research.govsubmission platform; and resources such as ATE Central and Mentor-Connect. Participants weregiven assignments each night such as preparation for the mock panel reviews. Following the2022 cohort, the leadership team and mentors decided to keep the workshop virtual for theremainder of the grant period to
interested facultymembers wanted to learn making techniques and makerspace equipment to facilitate their classes(and for personal curiosity). The first semester (Fall 2017) involved faculty attending three half-day workshops to learn maker tools and instructional strategies to support the integration ofmaking and design. Workshops were held in two makerspace areas, 1) Bobcat Made - theuniversity makerspace and 2) The Make Lab, low-tech mobile makerspace in the College ofEducation. Upon attending the workshops, faculty were asked to develop a lesson plan thatintegrated making and design into one of their courses for the following spring. Facultyparticipated in online forum discussions and received mentoring from program staff throughoutthis process
Mentor-focused Professional Development for Investigators Initiating Discipline-based Educational Research (DBER) in Biomedical EngineeringAbstractOur work (NSF PFE: RIEF Award 1927150) initiates a discipline-based educational researchstudy of student design self-efficacy in an undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME)program. A key component of this work focuses on our own professional development asengineering education researchers, which contributes to our abilities to undertake current andfuture engineering education studies. Our professional development goal is to establish andfollow a mentoring plan that facilitates our development of engineering education research skills.We targeted three areas for
the following goals for this 3-yearcycle: (1) Excite, empower, and educate 30 undergraduate participants in traditional/advancedmetrology and NDI, (2) for the undergraduate participants to experience an immersive research-training through a related transformative project, (3) to mold the undergraduate participants asboth independent/collaborative researchers capable of effective communication, (4) for theundergraduate participants to learn to ask the right questions, formulate plans, pragmaticallyinterpret data, and (5) inspire and enable the undergraduate participants to pursue advanced studyand related STEM careers. This site was a direct response to a recurring concern raised byindustry partners and technical workforce recruiters about the
Institutions was added last fall.The program features an Academic Success and Professional Development class which includesinformation on resumes, portfolios, elevator speeches, how to work a career fair,interest/research papers, reducing stress, graduate school, and career planning for 10 years pastthe baccalaureate degree. The underlying academic support is the Guaranteed 4.0 Plan. Theprogram has proven successful with a graduation rate of 95% and 50% of the students goingright on to graduate school for the scholarship students. These rates are much higher thannational averages.The lessons learned through developing the program and working with the students are bestpractices that could benefit any engineering student program.IntroductionIn 2002, the
plan comprises a ResearchPlan to develop deeper understandings about how SVSM participate, persist, and produceprofessional identities in engineering education, and an Education Plan to place newunderstandings into practice through collaborative development, implementation, dissemination,and sustainment of targeted anti-deficit, assets-based educational and support resources forundergraduate SVSM in engineering.The research plan builds from existing cross-sectional, transition-focused research with studentveterans, documented in the engineering and higher education literature, using a longitudinal,narrative inquiry research approach [5] and an innovative, two-strand theoretical framework.The theoretical framework centers social theories of