Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Victor E. Lugo Vélez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus; Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus; Jose Fernando Vega-Riveros, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus; Carmen M. Bellido, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony, “A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America,” in Journal of Engineering Education, [Online] 1995.[11] J. W. Thomas, “A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning,” The Autodesk Foundation, San Rafael, California. [Online] 2000.[12] M. Gagné and E. L. Deci, “Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation,” in Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 26: 331-362. [Online] 2005.[13] D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed,” in Educational Psychologist, vol. 47(4): 302-314, [Online] 2012.[14] S. Viswanathan, “Implementation of Effective Capstone Projects in

Conference Session

Assessment in Multidisciplinary Learning Environment

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

] Donaher, S., & Dancz, C. L. A., & Plumblee, J. M., & Gordon, A. S., & Patel, K. (2017,June), Reviewing the Current State of Grand Challenge Scholars Programs Across the UnitedStates Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.10.18260/1-2--28806[4] Dancz, C. L. A., & Plumblee, J. M., & Bargar, D., & Brunner, P. W., & High, K. A., &Klotz, L., & Landis, A. E. (2016, June), A Rubric to Assess Civil Engineering Students' GrandChallenge Sustainable Entrepreneurship Projects Paper presented at 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26432[5] Carter, D. F., Ro, H. K., Alcott, B., & Lattuca, L. R. (2016), Co-Curricular Connections

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joanne Kay Beckwith, University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Seven students agreed to participate.Table 1 contains the demographic information for the seven participants. Students weredeidentified and assigned a pseudonym A-G. All students are considered “in-state” and lived oncampus at the time of the interview. All seven participants were 18-24 years old and single,never married. None of the participants had religious affiliations. There was one femaleparticipant and six male. Student B identified as Asian-American and the other six participantsidentified as Caucasian. None of the seven participants were first-generation college students. Allof the students had two parents with bachelor's degrees or higher and reported a householdincome of over $40,000.Table 1: Demographic information for the seven

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David S. Pixton, Brigham Young University; Jared Aaron Landetta, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

Paper ID #34701The (Augmented) World Is Our CampusMr. David S. Pixton, Brigham Young University David Pixton is a subject liaison at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. In this role, he is responsible for providing research training and assistance to students and faculty within the majority of engineering and technology fields offered at the university. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Library and Information Science. David’s current research is focused on improving learning in a library environment, including the use of augmented reality for educational purposes, and a pedagogical

Conference Session

TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

300 pharmaceutical, chemical,biotechnology, and medical device companies. His remarkable productivity in medical field hasearned him a nickname of “Edison of Medicine” [21]. Another pioneer, Donald A. B. Lindberg was committed to his visionary ideas ofapplying computer technology to healthcare. A pathologist by his medical training he was avisionary and became a leader in the use of computers in medicine. He was instrumental inestablishing the American Medical Informatics Association and became the Founding President.His pioneering work in biomedical research and health information has contributed globally inmedical informatics, patient care, cancer research, molecular biology, and other educationalprograms. He served as a director of

Conference Session

Computers in Education 9 - Technology 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Beevers, Pennsylvania State University; Qi Dunsworth, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

and pressure at the end must be known. For the exitsin a reservoir or a tank, the final elevation is considered to be on the surface of the fluid. B. Difficulty selection.Before a system could be generated, different difficulty levels needed to be identified to ensurethat a student new to the topic would receive a reasonable problem, and a more practiced studentcould be given a more challenging problem [6], [7]. There are several factors that affect thedifficulty of these problems. First, problems with either an unknown flow rate or an unknownpipe diameter are the most difficult since they require an iterative approach to finding the Darcyfriction factor, with having an unknown diameter being somewhat more difficult than anunknown flow rate

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico; Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #32964The Educative Design Problem Framework: Relevance, SociotechnicalComplexity, Accessibility, and Nondeterministic High CeilingsDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological En- gineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments

Conference Session

Computers in Education 3 - Modulus I

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sabrina Grossman, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jason Freeman, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jason Brent Smith, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tom Berry, Amazon Future Engineer

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

stereotypes around computing and computer science, particularly when it comes to creatingcode [5].To counter these stereotypes and to increase interest and diversity in computing, new courses andopportunities that infuse computing with creative disciplines, such as the arts, have beendeveloped and made available to K-12 audiences [6-8]. In this paper, we describe a competitionpiloted in the 2019-20 school year using EarSketch [9, 10], a learn-to-code through musicremixing platform where high school students were invited to submit original remixes of songsby Grammy award-winning R&B artist Ciara. Students coded in Python or JavaScript andcreated entries that conformed to the competition rules. In this paper, we present the details ofthis pilot

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tamaike Brown, State University of New York at Oswego; Bastian Tenbergen, State University of New York at Oswego

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

of the QA strategy,engineering choices, and conclusions. Learning outcomes pertaining to analysis (see above) are hence assessed by assignment sheets,and learning outcomes pertaining to design and development are assessed by the project. Amidterm and a final exam assess a selection of all learning outcome categories. In the face-to-facecourse, all exams were completed on paper, while projects and assignments sheets were preparedand submitted digitally. In-class examples were facilitated using a combination of digital slidesand physical dry erase board, as appropriate. B. HyFlex Implementation Approach The SQA course taught during fall 2020 enrolled 17 students. Course meetings took placeTuesdays and Thursdays for 1 hour and 20

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tiffiny Antionette Butler, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Katherine C. Chen, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kimberly Lechasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

picture” Proceedings of the annual meeting of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference a, 12 – 15 June, Portland, OR,2005.[6] R.M. Marra and B. Bogue, “Women engineering students' self efficacy-a longitudinalmultiinstitution study”. Women in Engineering ProActive Network, 2006.[7] R.M. Marra, K.A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women engineering students andselfefficacy: A multi‐year, multi‐institution study of women engineering student self‐efficacy,”Journal of engineering education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27 – 38.[8] J. Moore, C. D. Lovell, T. McGann, and J. Wyrick, “Why involvement matters: A reviewof research on student involvement in the collegiate setting,” College Student Affairs Journal,vol 17, no. 2, pp

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Douglas E. Melton, Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network; Heather Dillon, University of Washington Tacoma; Mark L. Nagurka, Marquette University; Mary Murphy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Proceedings, 2002, pp. 7.528.1-7.528.14, doi: 10.18260/1-2--10558.[5] B. Mertz, H. Zhu, A. Trowbridge, and A. Baumann, “Development and Implementation of a MOOC Introduction to Engineering Course,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Jun. 2018, vol. 2018-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30317.[6] C. Brozina and D. Knight, “Credentialing MOOCs: A Case Study,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2014, pp. 24.340.1-24.340.9, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 20231.[7] J. Green and A. Cohen Sherman, “Leveraging MOOCs to Bring Entrepreneurship and Innovation to Everyone on Campus,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2014, pp. 24.864.1-24.864.12, doi: 10.18260/1

Conference Session

Socially Responsible Engineering I: Context, Innovation, and Reflection

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia; Rachel Sinclair, University of Virginia; Araba Dennis, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E

Conference Session

WEDNESDAY PLENARY: Featuring Best Zone and PIC Papers & Corporate Member Council Keynote Speaker, Sponsored by EngineeringCAS

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Samara Rose Boyle, Rice University ; Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University; Yvette E. Pearson P.E., Rice University; Reginald DesRoches, Rice University; Stephen P. Mattingly, The University of Texas at Arlington; Anne Nordberg, University of Texas at Arlington; Wei Wayne Li, Texas Southern University; Hanadi S. Rifai P.E., University of Houston

Tagged Topics

Corporate Member Council

Paper ID #35663BEST OVERALL DIVERSITY PAPER WINNER - An Exploratory Study ofIntentionality Towards Diversity in STEM Faculty HiringMs. Samara Rose Boyle, Rice University Samara is an undergraduate studying neuroscience at Rice University in Houston, TX. She works as a research assistant for Dr. Yvette E. Pearson in the George R. Brown School of Engineering. Her primary research focus is the advancement of diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education.Dr. Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice UniversityDr. Yvette E. Pearson P.E., Rice UniversityDr. Reginald DesRoches, Rice UniversityProf. Stephen P. Mattingly, The University of

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session - Robotics and Manufacturing

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hayder Zghair P.E., Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

stands for the positionformat which describes the position data. The third describes the feed rate of the code for the giveninstruction block. This could be programmed for 1 to 100% for any feed rate programmed into therobot. Finally, the fourth describes the positioning path that the robot will take depending on themotion format being either labeled as FINE or CNT. Defining the variables for motion programming canbe resulted to analyze the cycle times and consistency variables.3. Results and AnalysisIn this study, two factors were considered, the speed of the manipulator (factor A) and the terminationbath (factor B). The levels of interest for factor (Speed A) have been used as follows: 1000 mm/sec aslow level, and 2000 mm/sec as high level

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Jeffrey Collins; Giovanni Loreto, Kennesaw State University; Tran Duong Nguyen, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering

such as cost, schedule, structural member sizing, etc.MethodologyThere was a total of 30 students in the temporary structure class. For a specific assignment wasprepared to introduce parametric software, students were tasked with designing the formwork fora slab. For this project, the thickness of the concrete slab was given 6 inches, the slab's length (L)292.33ft, and the width of the slab (W) 123.33 ft. For designing concrete formwork, studentsneeded to make some assumptions such as temperature, rate of placement, and other concreteproperties. Four components were considered as part of the slab formwork design as shown inFigure 1: A) SJ- sheathing (plywood panel); B) Joist – horizontal structural member supportingsheathing; C) Stringer

Conference Session

Computational Tools & Analysis

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Charles Pringle PE P.E., Central Washington University; Craig Johnson P.E., Central Washington University; Jeunghwan Choi, Central Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

Appendix B). This formula rewards levers that werelightweight and fail at the target value, 30 pounds. There is an initial penalty of 20% for anylever that fails under 30 pounds. As the failure load diverges from 30, and the heavier the leveris, the greater the penalty. The students were attempting to achieve a tolerance range of minuszero to plus three pounds for the best possible score.1) In the first lab (Lab 3a), the students were provided with the design criteria for the lab (SeeAppendix A). The crux of the design is the students were attempting to have the lever fail asclose to a 30 lb. load as possible without going under. Each student arrives at a design (whichthey hand sketch only) after completing their analysis calculations. Analysis

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Mechatronics, Robotics, and Technology

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lei Miao, Middle Tennessee State University; Tanzeena Karim, Middle Tennessee State University; Tamir Shahir Hussain; Cen Li, Middle Tennessee State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Tennessee Board of Regents for supporting the summerprogram.References[1] Miao, L. and Li, C. “Engaging Minority and Underrepresented Engineering Students to Fight“Sophomore Slump” through a Summer Research and Enrichment Program (Research)”, 2021ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference, July 2021[2] Wood, B., and A. Ganago. "Using Arduino in Engineering Education: Motivating Students toGrow from a Hobbyist to a Professional." ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt LakeCity, Utah. 2018.[3] Hopkins, M. A., and Kibbe, A. M., 2014, "Open-source hardware in controls education,"ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.[4] Parker, J. M., and Canfield, S. L., 2013, "Work-in-progress: using hardware-basedprogramming experiences to

Conference Session

Innovative and Impactful Engineering Leadership Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University, Bozeman; Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

, and G. B. Forsythe, "Leadership development for engineering managers," Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 38-41, 1997.[2] B. Van Knippenberg, D. Van Knippenberg, D. De Cremer, and M. A. Hogg, "Research in leadership, self, and identity: A sample of the present and a glimpse of the future," The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 495-499, 2005.[3] C. J. Atman et al., "Enabling Engineering Student Success: The Final Report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. CAEE-TR-10-02," Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (NJ1), 2010.[4] E. Erikson

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, 2018, pp. 125–131.[2] N. Labonnote, A. Rønnquist, B. Manum, and P. Rüther, “Additive construction: State-of- the-art, challenges and opportunities,” Autom. Constr., vol. 72, pp. 347–366, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026.[3] P. Pradhananga, M. ElZomor, and G. S. Kasabdji, “Identifying the Challenges to Adopting Robotics In the U.S. Construction Industry,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 2021.[4] P. Wang, P. Wu, J. Wang, H. L. Chi, and X. Wang, “A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 6, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061204.[5] A. Shepherd and B

Conference Session

Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University; Nataliya Grigoryan, San Jose State University; Radha Aravamudhan, San Jose State University; Joseph Rodriguez, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

discussionbefore, during and at the end of the semester.The final course grades are also compared between the CBL offering in Fall 2020 and the previousFall 2019 offering (traditional approaches). Figure 2 shows the percentage in grade distributionbetween the two offerings. The chart shows that the percentage of “A” and “B” grades was similar,but fewer students failed the course (corresponding to a grade of “D”, “F” or “W” – students areallowed to withdraw from the class at any point during the semester) in Fall 2020 when CBL wasimplemented with respect to the previous offering. Our experience of CBL pedagogy particularlysupports the weaker students, by focusing on their learning of the fundamental class topics.Figure 2. Course grade distribution (in

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Mayra S. Artiles , Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

Paper ID #32258Minority Student Experiences in Engineering Graduate Programs:Socialization and Impact on Career TrajectoriesDr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Amelink is Associate Vice Provost for Learning Systems in the Office of the Provost at Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles , Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering

Conference Session

Virtual Instruction of Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christopher James Panebianco, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; James C. Iatridis, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Jennifer Weiser, The Cooper Union

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

discussed theresults in the context of established metal corrosion mechanisms. The discussion emphasized thations present in the low salt condition would increase the rate of metal corrosion and the lack ofdissolved oxygen in the saturated salt condition would decrease the rate of metal corrosion [31].To conclude, students completed a post-test and post-survey to assess how their knowledge ofbiomaterials and attitudes towards STEM changed as a result of the experiment, respectively(Appendices A & B). Figure 1: Representative data demonstrating successful paperclip corrosion and quantitative fatigue bendingtests. (A) Example of a corroded paperclip after incubation in salt water. (B) Schematic representation of paperclip fatigue bending test

Conference Session

Making in Design Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kate Youmans, Colorado School of Mines; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Louis Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

model to be applied in an educational setting [35]. Papert’s model focusesmore on the ways in which technology and media may be used to facilitate student learningchoices and promote life-long learning [34]. Two essential components of the constructionistlearning theory are further explored below.These two essential principles of the learning theory are identified by Kafi [6] as : (a) knowledgeconstruction and (b) learning culture. Elements of these components are highlighted in Figure 1. Knowledge Learning Construction Culture •Object •Teacher as Guide

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Potpourri

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian D. Tedeschi, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Julia K. Miller, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nancy L. Denton P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

-winning outreach activities, teaching, and learning in the technical environment andsuccess in teaching in the online environment, and volunteering with kids of all ages. Drawingon that expertise, they were able to address the following questions through programdevelopment and execution. 1. What demographic would benefit most from a virtual STEM camp program? a. How do you interact with participants using similar materials and a range of ages? b. How do you engage with these students who may be experiencing video burnout? c. What timing works best to achieve the goal of fun but an educational program? 2. How does the program timing affect the impact of the material and engagement?MethodsOne hundred fifty participants from

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Jacob Roarty

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

the PD. Collaborative design activities undertaken by the counselors allowed them topractice key traits of engineers, including problem-solving, design thinking, creativity,innovation, and collaboration. Participants were prompted to build a tower out of spaghettinoodles (Figure 1a), construct a rain shelter from newspaper (Figure 1b), and construct a roboticarm (Figure 1c). Examples of participants’ work are presented in figures below. A B C Figure 1. Sample projects from the PD program: a) spaghetti tower, b) newspaper shelter, and c) robotic armPhase III of the PD program involved sharing information about engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

Paper ID #33437Inclusive Writing: Pre- and Post-COVID-19Dr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts ed- ucational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. One component of her research focuses on the role

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Shaffer Brown, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

. 144–152, 2013.[10] I. Drewelow, “Exploring graduate teaching assistants’ perspectives on their roles in a foreign language hybrid course,” System, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1006–1022, 2013.[11] J. Paulsen and A. C. McCormick, “Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020.[12] K. Sobel, S. Avery, and I. J. Ferrer-Vinent, “Teaching Them to Teach: Programmatic Evaluation of Graduate Assistants’ Teaching Performance,” Public Serv. Q., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–213, 2016.[13] B. C. O. Neal, M. Wright, T. Perorazio, and J. Purkiss, “The Impact of Teaching on Student Retention in the Sciences,” 2002.[14] B. Melton and Y. Bodur, “Effects of a

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

James Righter, The Citadel; David S. Greenburg, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, Fundamentals of Quality Control and Improvement, 3rd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 2008.[7] S. Eppinger and T. Browning, Design structure matrix methods and applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2012.[8] B. Nassersharif and C. Rousseau, “Best Practices in Assessing Capstone Design Projects,” 2010.[9] B. Morkos, S. Joshi, and J. D. Summers, “Investigating the impact of requirements elicitation and evolution on course performance in a pre-capstone design course,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 30, no. 4–5, pp. 155–179, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09544828.2019.1605584.[10] R. H. Todd, C. D. Sorensen, and S. P. Magleby, “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers,” J. Eng

Conference Session

Supporting Biomedical Engineering Students in Holistic Development

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, University of Michigan; Annie AnMeng Wang, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

/biomedical engineering education and career development: Literature review, definitions, and constructive recommendations,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 990–1011, 2008.[10] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad, and B. Belmont, “What is biomedical engineering? Insights from qualitative analysis of definitions written by undergraduate students,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[11] R. A. Linsenmeier, “What makes a biomedical engineer?,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 32–38, 2003.[12] D. Gatchell and R. Linsenmeier, “VaNTH Biomedical Engineering Key Content Survey, Part Two. The 2nd Step in a Delphi Study to determine the core undergraduate BME curriculum,” Am

Conference Session

Academic Success and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Oluwafemi J. Sunday, Washington State University; Ebenezer Rotimi Ewumi, Washington State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Muhammad Asghar P.E., Utah State University; Candis S. Claiborn, Washington State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

variables added statistically significantly to the prediction, p < .05. Regressioncoefficients and concomitant statistics can be found in Table 2 (below).Table 2. Multiple regression results for Academic achievement goals Academic B 95% CI for B SE B  R2 ΔR2 achievement goals LL UL Model .49 .24*** (Constant) 5.16*** 2.57 7.76 1.32 Academic motivation .899*** .69 1.11 .11 .35*** Confidence at .316*** .20 .44 .06 .21*** completing a degree