. Students worked in the lab up to 6 hours per week during the semester buildingpolymer actuators and a physiologically relevant dynamic testing setup (Figure 1). The cohortexperience formed a supportive community for students inside and outside the lab. In the lab,students collaborated to develop pneumatic and cable-driven biopolymer actuators and testingplatforms to inform biocompatible and wearable robotic devices. In addition to lab work, thegroup met weekly for structured mentoring sessions, performed outreach in the college ofengineering and attended external conferences and workshops throughout the year. Figure 1. Student lab work including (a) a student demonstrating hydrogel behavior during bending, (b) hydrogel-based actuators, (c
Deep Learning and cloud computing. ● The GPSS team from the World Bank, for providing access to the data sets, expertise in architecture and community outreach, and assistance with the documentation of the overall projects.ReferencesAbadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P., … Zheng, X. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), 265–283. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdfAmazon
curriculum. Exploring eKSO development from makerspaceworkshops or maker community engagement rather than makerspace integrated EM courseprojects could provide more detailed knowledge of makerspace impacts on the development ofan entrepreneurial mindset.Acknowledgements:This research was supported through the Engineering Unleashed Fellowship program, funded bythe Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network. A special thanks to Dr. Margot Vigeant forserving as mentor throughout the makerspace project implementation and educational researchprocess, and colleague Brian Marks for his deployment and support from the College ofBusiness.References:[1] Longo, A., Yoder, B., Chavela Guerra, R. C., & R. Tsanov, “University Makerspaces: Characteristics and
think I would give myself a strong six. And I think one of the reasons why I have a lot more improvement to do is - and we talked about this in the past - because of the time limit that I have with the kids. The discussion for each individual student or with each [...] group [about] bringing their funds of knowledge isn’t as big of a discussion as I would like because sometimes it’s just rushing to get from point A to point B. And I put a lot more of the load on students because there’s only one me and there’s -- let’s say we have six groups, for example.As indicated by Rosario, the number of classrooms or groups she managed, plus the curriculumlimited the time she was able to spend with each individual
some limitations: (1) Results are based on studentretrospectives containing the reflections of students regarding their teamwork experience. (2) Wecould not interview students, so all results are based on students’ reflections of teamwork. Futurework should explore this further with control groups to better identify if it is online instructionthat lends itself to improved teamwork.References[1] K. S. Koong, L. C. Liu, and X. Liu, “A Study of the Demand for Information Technology Professionals in Selected Internet Job Portals,” vol. 13, p. 9.[2] M. P. Sivitanides, J. R. Cook, R. B. Martin, B. A. Chiodo, and F. Landram, “Verbal Communication Skills Requirements for Information Systems Professionals,” J. Inf. Syst. Educ
did not electto participate (control 1.6/7, treatment 2.05/7 where 7 indicates the subject would always find areason to excuse poor ethical behavior). The only category that seemed to be impacted by attendingthe cancer seminar was moral expansiveness, which counterintuitively, showed a decrease in thetreatment group (Fig. 3D). This was somewhat counterintuitive; however the absolute change isalmost negligible so the result is hard to interpret.Figure 3. Results of the survey instrument indicate that the self-selection of treatment had no effect on ethicalleanings (n=15 for treatment and n=17 for control). A) There was no difference between research perspectivetaking, scored out of 5. B) Students who self-selected into the treatment group
students accepted this invitation, including five White men,one Middle-Eastern woman, one Black woman, and one Latina. Engineering majors of the FGparticipants included three from Mechanical Engineering, two from Electrical Engineering andComputer Engineering, two from Civil Engineering, and one from Chemical Engineering. To serve as facilitators, students were trained in: (a) explaining the purpose of the FGsand the PAR process of listening to all voices and developing action steps for change; (b)building rapport through creative ice-breakers; (c) encouraging all FG members to voice theirthoughts and concerns; (d) listening without judgement and establishing trust; (e) responding tocomments with appropriate follow-up questions; (f
the relationship easily characterized? (a) (b) Figure 4. Experiment setup on transmission line impedance matching and various termination scheme (a) Tee-connection on source end (b) Termination with 100 Ω on load endThen we turn the waveform to 1 MHz and change the oscilloscope termination to 50 Ω. Thestudent should observe that the amplitude measured drops to 2.5 V, even if the functiongenerator shows a 5 V output. The student should then repeat the experiment as previouslydescribed; however, the student will now observe different behavior at high frequencies. Thestudents should now answer: • Why does the oscilloscope now
their codesof ethics is provided in Appendix B. Third, students were provided with one-page summaries ofthe same six ethical theoretical frameworks previously listed in the first approach (ethicalegoism, fairness or justice theory, Kantianism, rights theory, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics).These “one-pagers” are provided in Appendix C. As the final pre-work step, students wererequired to take a quiz on the ethical frameworks to ensure they could recognize general tenets ofeach framework. Sample questions from this quiz are provided in Appendix D.Under Approach 2 students were individually required to research and write ethical analyses ofengineering disasters that they chose separately based on a common theme (e.g., another themecould be
L. Benson, "Engineering Students' Perceptions of Problem Solving and Their Future.," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 87–112, Jan. 2018.[15] E. L. Usher, C. J. Ford, C. R. Li, and B. L. Weidner, "Sources of math and science self-efficacy in rural Appalachia: A convergent mixed methods study," Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 57, pp. 32–53, Apr. 2019.[16] S. Y. Yoon, M. G. Evans, and J. Strobel, "Validation of the Teaching Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale for K-12 Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 463–485, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20049.[17] T. T. Williams, S. D. McMahon, and C. B. Keys, "Two Ecological Models of Academic Achievement Among Diverse Students With and
pedagogy in Fall 2020. We have conducted afollow-up study at the end of Fall 2020 and the results of this additional study, as well as thecomparison with the analysis in this paper, will be presented in future publications.References[1] S. Eaton, B. Brown, M. Schroeder, J. Lock, and M. Jacobsen, “Signature pedagogies for e-learning in higher education and beyond.”[2] Z. Akyol and D. R. Garrison, “The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence.,” J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks, vol. 12, no. 2–3, pp. 3–23, 2008.[3] A. Gillis, and L.M. Krull, “COVID-19 remote learning transition in Spring 2020: Class
Paper ID #33603Liberatory Potential of Labor Organizing in Engineering EducationJoseph Valle, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Joseph ’Joey’ Valle is a Ph.D candidate in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Michi- gan - Ann Arbor. His thesis includes both technical and engineering education research components. His engineering education research focuses on understanding and seeking ways to undo oppression based harm in engineering. He holds a B.S.E in materials science and engineering from MIT and a M.S.E in materials science and engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, with a focus on
aware of the policy making process in regards to climate change, and how difficult it is, compared to my previous perspective that countries need to/can easily stop polluting the environment.” B “This course showed me the complexities in addressing climate change. Before the course, I thought solving climate change was a simple matter of reducing emissions. However, now I understand addressing climate change involves not only mitigation but adaptation and loss and damage as well. I also learned about equitable climate policy, the differences in the opinions of developed and developing countries, economics, rhetoric, etc. All of this showed me that climate
.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asf&AN=103651915&site=ehost-live[3] Christe, B., & Feldhaus, C. (2013). Exploring Engineering Technology Persistence andInstitutional Interventions: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Engineering Technology,30(2), 44-53.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asf&AN=101808357&site=ehost-live[4] Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five Major Shifts in 100 Years ofEngineering Education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344-1360.DOI:10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167[5] Frase, K. G., Latanision, R. M., & Pearson, G. (2016). Engineering Technology Education inthe United States. Retrieved from Washington, DC
components toprogramming coursework [2]. This study is limited by participation bias and a limited ability tocompare student responses to performance in the course. Improvement in the latter would enablevaluable, quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of this teaching strategy in both virtual andF2F modalities. This will be addressed in future work by collecting student demographicinformation and paired course academic data as part of the analysis.References[1] B. G. Hawkins and J. Eason, "Laboratory Course Development for Biomedical Signals and Systems," in ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Meeting, Los Angeles, 2019.[2] A. Alammary, "Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review," PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no
output of thecontroller is connected to the duty cycle of the DC-DC buck converter. The effects of changes insolar irradiance, temperature, and load on output power based on the two MPPT algorithms canbe studied. Figure 10 shows the response of PV power to the step and gradual changes in solarirradiance. It can be seen that both algorithms provide good dynamic and static responses.FractionalOCV method provides more stable power but it relies on accurately selecting theproportionality constant. Due to the perturbation nature of P&O method, the instantaneous powerfluctuates, which can be eliminated with filtering techniques. (a) (b) Figure 10 The response of PV array power to the gradual and
(June 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/33863647. C. Girvan, C. Conneely, and B. Tangney, “Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58 (2016), 129–139.8. Scratch Block Coding. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [online] https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/406640/9. Alice Programming Language, [online] https://www.alice.org/about/our-history/10. Sphero Robots, [online] https://sphero.com/11. B. Heinemann, D. Rawitsch, and P. Dillenberger, The Oregon Trail (video game) MECC.12. A. S. Bryk, L. Gomez, A. Grunow, P. Lemahieu, Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, 201513. Baldrige Foundation, 2021
, “Gender, values, and occupational interests among children, adolescents, and adults,” Child Development, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 778–796, 2010. [8] S. Cheryan and V. C. Plaut, “Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest,” Sex roles, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 475–488, 2010. [9] U. Kessels, “Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects,” European journal of psychology of education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 309–323, 2005.[10] P. M. Niedenthal, N. Cantor, and J. F. Kihlstrom, “Prototype matching: A strategy for social decision making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, no. 3, p. 575, 1985.[11] M. B. Setterlund and P. M. Niedenthal
, June 2011.[6] D. Socha, V. Razmov, and E. Davis, “Teaching reflective skills in an engineering course,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, June 2003.[7] C. Reidsema and P. Mort, “Assessing reflective writing: Analysis of reflective writing in an engineering design course,” Journal of Academic Language & Learning, vol. 3 (2), pp. A-117 - A-129, 2009.[8] J. A. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Altman, “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.[9] C. M. Badenhorst, C. Moloney, and J. Rosales, “New literacies for engineering students: Critical reflective
. , pp. 692–700, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.129.[11] S. Niles, S. Contreras, S. Roudbari, J. Kaminsky, and J. L. Harrison, “Resisting and assisting engagement with public welfare in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 491–507, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20323.[12] A. F. McKenna, “Adaptive Expertise and Knowledge Fluency in Design and Innovation,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 227–242.[13] S. D. Brookfield, “Self-directed learning: A conceptual and methodological exploration,” Stud. Educ. Adults, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 1985.[14] J. L. Bishop and M. A
/2515127419870266 [8] G. Secundo, V. Ndou, and P. Del Vecchio, “Challenges for Instilling Entrepreneurial Mindset in Scientists and Engineers: What Works in European Universities?” International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, vol. 13, no. 5, oct 2016. [9] D. Ridley, B. Davis, and I. Korovyakovskaya, “Entrepreneurial Mindset and the University Curriculum,” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, vol. 17, no. 2, apr 2017. [Online]. Available: https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JHETP/article/view/1569[10] J. M. Haynie, D. Shepherd, E. Mosakowski, and P. C. Earley, “A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 217–229, 2010. [Online
of extracting the automatic conference call transcript. Oncethe transcripts were cleaned up for readability and personally-identifying information of theinterviewees was removed, the recordings were deleted. Since the author acted as the soleresearcher on this study, no other person was able to access or view these recordings. Allinterviewees digitally signed a consent form following UB IRB policy.The semi-structured interviews lasted between 45 and 60 minutes; no follow-up questions weregiven to interview participants after the interview session. The interview questions themselves(Appendix B) were modeled after the questions used during the Ithaka S+R study on teachingbusiness. There were some key differences, however. The Ithaka study had
words,applying a systemic approach to CPS, which requires non-linear and divergent thinking might beconsidered counterintuitive. However, research substantiates the effectiveness and benefits offormal CPS training. Several studies show that CPS training can enhance solution quality andoriginality [7], increase individuals’ fluency and flexibility of ideas [8], and lead to increasedcreative behavior [9]. Incorporating CPS skills into existing programs and classes requires atheoretical understanding of CPS processes. Osborn [10] provided one of the first frameworks todefine the processes of CPS. According to Osborn, a CPS process involves three consecutivestages regardless of the domain of the problem: (a) fact-finding, (b) idea finding, and (c
females (F=4.67, p=0.03) and males (F=35.32, p<0.0001), though the effect was much stronger for males. We also found that the number of pre-enrollment credits had a significant correlation with chemistry course grade (F=28.56, p<0.0001) for the overall population, although this conclusion was only true for males (F=33.63, p<0.0001) and not for females (F=1.14, p=0.29). Figure 1 shows linear regressions of this data. Positive slopes in this figure indicated students with greater numbers of pre-college credits tended to have higher chemistry course grades and first semester GPAs. (a) (b)Figure 1. Correlations Between Pre-matriculation College Credits and (a) GPA and (b
," Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 516-528, 2016, doi: 10.1002/ase.1608.[3] D. C. Haak, J. HilleRisLambers, E. Pitre, and S. Freeman, "Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology," Science, vol. 332, no. 6034, pp. 1213-1216, June 3, 2011 2011, doi: 10.1126/science.1204820.[4] S. L. Eddy and K. A. Hogan, "Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?," Cbe-Life Sci Educ, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 453-468, September 21, 2014 2014, doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050.[5] B. Hanks, L. Murphy, B. Simon, R. McCauley, and C. Zander, "CS1 students speak: advice for students by students," ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 19
fivelevels of liminality to describe both students’ transdisciplinary knowledge, and instructors’ andTAs’ observations of students learning of transdisciplinary knowledge concepts. Each code hascorresponding distinct indicators. For example, students’ statements were coded as preliminal ifthey signified no prior knowledge or first encounter, while liminal indicates confusion or conflictin understanding, etc. The indicators were used by four coders to identify levels of: (a) students’self-assessed views of transdisciplinary knowledge as applied in engineering during pre and post-course semi-structured interviews; and (b) instructors and TAs’ assessments of students’transdisciplinary knowledge as manifested and observed during the class, pre- and post
disagree; 5: strongly agree) and two open-endedquestions. The survey questions were designed to examine the impact of the curricular interventiondescribed herein on enhancing the students’ a) level of understanding of the course content and itsreal-world applications, b) motivation to learn about the implications of contemporary policydecisions from science, engineering, economic, and environmental perspectives, and c)recognition of the importance of cross-disciplinary interactions in solving real-world problems.Results and DiscussionThe multidisciplinary curricular intervention impacted 134 students in the computer applicationsclass (CE 251) and 116 students in the microbiology class (MCRO 224) over the period of twoacademic quarters. These
, Technology and Engineering, andMathematics) subjects and related careers, was modified to include a section related tocomputational thinking, in line with our research objectives. The final administered survey(Appendix A) was divided into four sections (Math, Science, Engineering and Technology, andComputational Thinking) and consisted of 45 five-point Likert scale (coded as: StronglyDisagree: -2; Disagree: -1; Neither Disagree or Agree: 0; Disagree: 1; Strongly Agree: 2)questions.The thirteen-week intervention consisted of pre-surveys, design, build, and automation activities,post-surveys, and semi-structured interviews with randomly selected students and the classroomteacher at the conclusion of the intervention (Appendix B includes a classroom
Business Venturing22: 566-591.13. Edwards, L. J. and E. J. Muir (2005). "Promoting entrepreneurship at the University of Glamorgan through formal and informal learning." Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development12(4): 613-626.14. Ghazali, A., B. C. Ghosh, and R. S. T. Tay. “The determinants of self-employment choice among university graduates in Singapore.” International Journal of Management 12 (1995): 26-26.15. Kourilsky, M. L., and W. B. Walstad. “Entrepreneurship and female youth: Knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices.” Journal of Business venturing 13, no. 1 (1998): 77-88.16. Phan, P. H., P. K, Wong, and C. K. Wang. “Antecedents to entrepreneurship among university students in
] solution for [that homework problem] to the solution posted on [the course learning management system]. Identify each mistake you [the student] made (if any) and classify the reason for the mistake as (a) not identifying the problem as testing the validity of rate expression, (b) not determining the reactor type, (c) not correctly writing the reactor mole balance, (d) not correctly substituting the rate expression into the mole balance, (e) not integrating the mole balance (if necessary) (e) not linearizing the equation correctly, (f) not calculating the variables in the equation correctly for each data point, not fitting a straight line to the model correctly, (g) not analyzing the results of