(Appendix A), 57 responded to the pre-course survey(Appendix B), and 56 responded to the post-course survey (Appendix C). Demographicinformation was collected from the post-course survey only. Those respondents identified aswhite (30%), Asian (21%), Hispanic/Latinx (4%), Multi-racial (4%), and Black/AfricanAmerican (2%), with a large proportion of students (37%) preferring not to respond or skippingthis item. The respondents were also mostly men (68%), domestic students (84%), and not first-generation college students (54%), mirroring the student population profile of the 2019 first-yearcohort. 3The personal information questionnaire collected information such as students’ pre-collegeexperiences
. M. Paechter and B. Ertl. "Self-Concept and Support Experienced in School as Key Variables for the Motivation of Women Enrolled in STEM Subjects With a Low and Moderate Proportion of Females". Frontiers in Psychology. vol. 10. 2019. Available: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01242 [Accessed 19 January 2021].[8] S. Sinclair. A. Nilsson and E. Cederskär. "Explaining gender-typed educational choice in adolescence: The role of social identity. self-concept. goals. grades. and interests". Journal of Vocational Behavior. vol. 110. pp. 54-71. 2019. Available: 10.1016/j.jvb. [Accessed 19 January 2021].[9] H. Marsh. "The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model.". Journal of Educational Psychology. vol
Do We Know What Works ? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation,” Account. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 319–350, 2016, doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1186547.[8] I. Van de Poel, H. Zandvoort, and M. Brumsen, “Ethics and Engineering Courses at Delft University of Technology: Contents, Educational Setup and Experiences,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 267–282, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0048-0.[9] H. Zandvoort, G. J. van Hasselt, and J. A. B. A. F. Bonnet, “A joint venture model for teaching required courses in ‘ethics and engineering’ to engineering students,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03043790801980003.[10] G. L. Downey, J. C
performance in Calculus I varied (Table 5).Mentees performed below the threshold required to enroll in Calculus I; however, all menteeshad previously passed Pre-Calculus with a “C” or higher, which required that they progress toCalculus I. Overall, the section GPA was 1.60 and only three of the six students earned therequired “C” or higher to progress to Calculus II.Table 5. Mentee math preparedness and Calculus I performance. MPE Score (%) Calculus I Grade Brad N/A B Jack 38.3 D Kyle 52.0
://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/doi/abs/10.1002/j.21689830.2012.tb01122.x.DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01122.x.[3] B. Lutz and M. C. Paretti, "Exploring student perceptions of capstone design outcomes,"The International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, (5), pp. 1521-1533, 2017.Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6927186.[4] J. J. Pembridge and M. C. Paretti, "Characterizing capstone design teaching: A functionaltaxonomy," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, (2), pp. 197-219, 2019. Available:https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/doi/full/10.1002/jee.20259. DOI:10.1002/jee.20259.[5] S. Howe and J. Goldberg, "Engineering capstone design education: Current practices,emerging
an outreach activity, follow up with a discussion delving into the history of Ada Lovelace by using the following questions to scaffold responses. When necessary if discussion lags, ask students to either think-pair-share by sharing their ideas with a partner near them for 2-5 minutes before sharing with the larger class/group or ask students to write their thoughts freely for a 2-5 minutes and then share in conversation with the larger class/group. a. How was Ada Lovelace able to contribute to what would become computer science in 1843? What challenges did she encounter? How did she deal with these challenges? b. Does knowing about Ada Lovelace change
. 20, no. 1, pp. 116–129, Mar. 2020.[10] National Association of Colleges and Employers, Class of 2017 Student Survey Report. Bethlehem, PA: National Association of Colleges and Employers, 2017.[11] “National Survey of Student Engagement,” Oct. 2018, Accessed: Oct. 13, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://bl-educ-cprtest.ads.iu.edu/SAS/rb_nsse.html[12] B. Do, Y. Zhao, D. A. Trytten, and A. W. Lowe, “’Getting an internship… I’m still trying to find that:’Asian American student experiences obtaining engineering internships,” Proc. Asian Pac. Educ. Res. Assoc., 2006.[13] H. Matusovich et al., “Internships and engineering: beliefs and behaviors of academics,” Educ. Train., 2019.[14] Hora, M.T., Lee, C., Chen, Z., & Hernandez, A
, T. L. Doolen, and B. Tang, “A decision tool for accelerated bridge construction,” PCI J., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 48–63, 2013, doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012013.48.63.[2] T. Duggan and D. Patel, “Design-Build Project Delivery Market Share and Market Size Report,” 2014.[3] G. P. Moynihan and C. Harsh, “Evolution and Current State of Construction Project Delivery Methods: A Two-State Investigation,” Int. J. Constr. Proj. Manag., vol. 8, no. June, 2016.[4] D. D. Gransberg and J. S. Shane, “Defining best value for construction manager/general contractor projects: The CMGC learning curve,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000275.[5] D. D. Gransberg, “Early
and Exposition, Austin TX, USA, June 14-17, 2009. Paper 2009-571.[5] K. Davis and D. B. Knight, "Impact of a Global Engineering Course on Student Cultural Intelligence and Cross-Cultural Communication," Journal of International Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, Article 4, 2018.[6] https://www.ewh.org/[7] https://www.stevensinitiative.org/[8] C. B. Gibson and J. L. Gibbs. "Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation." Administrative science quarterly, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 451-495, 2006.[9] https://www.jaipurfoot.org/[10] https://support.google.com/edu/classroom[11] Stevens Initiative
-minute video on how to do something? Students often learnmaterial more deeply by teaching other people the material.” Students in 3-4 person teamsgenerated two videos on programming 1 material and one improvement video at the end of thesemester. This allows students to be value creators within this course and even create some of thecourse content. Students’ sign-up for the topics from instructor generated lists (figure 3) on afirst-come, first-serve on a CMS online forum during the second week of semester. Topic List A Topic List B Arrays Defining and Using Pointers 2D Arrays Arrays and
and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24066.[9] E. T. Mullen, “Teaching an engaged analysis class through active learning,” Primus, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 186–200, 2012, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2010.497957.[10] A. J. Kalkstein, “Passing the test : Is self-grading a viable option at west point ?,” 2011.[11] P. Linford, J. Bluman, G. Freisinger, J. Rogers, and B. Novoselich, “The self-evaluation and revision method for homework : a homework method for metacognition improves post- secondary engineering students ’ attitudes towards homework The self-evaluation and revision method for homework : a homework method for metacognition,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference
Paper ID #33847CAREER: Learning from Students’ Identity Trajectories to ActualizeLatent DiversityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clem- son University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
).Recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We also express our sincere thanks to thefaculty at Cal Poly who helped us deploy the surveys and to the students who agreed to take thesurvey.References[1] R. R. McCrae and O. P. John. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journalof Personality, 60(2):175–215, 1992.[2] S.D. Gosling, P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Swann. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6):504–528, 2003.[3] A.L. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly. Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and
. Stud. Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–19, May 2006, doi: 10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ- AN4W.[5] R. S. Hathaway, B. (Ratnesh) A. Nagda, and S. R. Gregerman, “The Relationship of Undergraduate Research Participation to Graduate and Professional Education Pursuit: An Empirical Study,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 614–31, 2002.[6] A. Dollar and P. Steif, “Learning Modules for Statics,” undefined, 2006. /paper/Learning- Modules-for-Statics-Dollar-Steif/fafc31154b0409f7fdf8e601691f6bc2e4879f97 (accessed Mar. 03, 2021).[7] G. Lemons, A. Carberry, C. Swan, L. Jarvin, and C. Rogers, “The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design,” Des. Stud., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 288–309, May 2010
researchers (2nd ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications.[12] Flick, U. , von Kardorff, E. , & Steinke, I. (Eds.). (2004). A companion to qualitativeresearch (B. Jenner, Trans.). London, England: Sage.
science and politics? Why? that we saw this uneasy relationship? Is the relationship between science and Did the relationship become stronger politics the same globally? Has the over the years? What helped? and relationship between science and who were some key players in politics been the same through history? making it happen? Do politics define science, or does Can you speak to the role of trust in science define politics? the intersection of science and a. Does this vary depending upon politics? people and place? What can we do (as scientists and b. Should it
forCollege Students: Validity Evidence for the Basic Needs Satisfaction at College Scale,” Measurement andEvaluation in Counseling and Development, vol. 48 no. 4, 266–284, 2015.[17] J. D. Stolk, Y. V. Zastavker, and M. Gross, “Gender, Motivation, and Pedagogy in the STEM Classroom: AQuantitative Characterization,” in Proc. 125st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June,2018.[18] E. L. Deci, R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, and R. M. Ryan, “Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 26 no. 3&4, pp. 325-346, 1991.[19] M. Vansteenkiste, E. Sierens, B. Soenens, K. Luyckx, and W. Lens, “Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation
Paper ID #34720Online Sharing Platform for Course Modules: Understanding Materials Useand EffectivenessDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu earned her BEng in Engineering Mechanics from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and her Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University, with a focus on computa- tional solid mechanics. Dr. Zhu is a Senior Lecturer of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU) and the recipient of the Ful- ton Outstanding Lecturer Award. In this role, she focuses on designing the curriculum
assumptions does not consider oradequately capture. For instance, a mission critical item that is only used once during theevaluation period can be classified as a Class C item, but based on the importance of the item forthe system, in fact, the item may have to be reclassified as a Class A or Class B item. Similarly,the verb dream was used to capture System Improvement. The verb be was used to capture ABCAnalysis, which is not surprising due to the structure of the poem and also because the studentshad to include an additional line at the end of the poem to communicate the supply chain conceptthey decided to write their poem about. These observations suggest that verb choices may influencethe students’ selection of the supply chain concept to
, 2011.[7] J. Haidt, The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York,NY: Vintage Books, 2012.[8] J. Graham, J. Haidt, & B. A. Nosek, “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moralfoundations,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1029-1046, 2009.[9] O. P. John, E. M. Donahue, & R. L. Kentle, The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54.Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research,1991.[10] D. P. McAdams, M. Albaugh, E. Farber, J. Daniels, R. L. Logan, & B. Olson, “Familymetaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives,” J. Pers. Soc.Psychol., vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 987-990, 2008.[11] J. Haidt, J
successoffices. In the event a participant’s efforts to remediate their GPA within the probationary periodfailed, the student was dropped from the program, and a suitable replacement was sought fromthe scholarship application pool of applicants.IV. Scholarship Program ActivitiesThe implementation activities associated with our scholarship programs include various ways toengage the scholars with the engineering profession in support of nuclear-related industry. Afterthe completion of each outreach and recruiting cycle, the annual program participant activitiesincluded the following: a. New student orientation, student advising and registration b. Mentoring & PBL/research activities to engage students c. Extracurricular
exclusion. Poor children and poor youth not only lack the resources to afford education, they also have to get busy seeking work for sustenance of self and family. Without education they remain unable to move up the economic ladder and the cycle of exclusion continues from one generation to another. b. Limited Access to Technology: Historically, first world countries have always enjoyed the technological advantage. New technology, whether it is the smartphone or internet access, has spread in first world countries much faster. With the world of education rapidly moving into a digital realm this is creating a new source of exclusivity. c. Limited Social Status: Status in society whether it is due to the
the professional field they arepursuing; b) Through the solution, students develop the desired level of competency mastery,and c) students should realize that to generate a solution, they need the disciplinary knowledgeprovided in the course. Our educational model delivers this in what we call a learning block [1].Under the new educational model, the curricular structure of undergraduate programs consists ofthree phases: exploration, focus, and specialization. While in the exploration phase (which laststwo or three semesters, depending on the area), academic programs of the same area have a corecurriculum. For example, programs in the Social Sciences area, such as Economics, InternationalRelations, and Governance and Public Transformation
://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/17/half-of-americans-think-young-people- dont-pursue-stem-because-it-is-too-hard/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).[3] S. Han, R. Capraro, and M. M. Capraro, “How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1089–1113, 2015.[4] Y. Doppelt, M. M. Mehalik, C. D. Schunn, E. Silk, and D. Krysinski, “Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context.,” J. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 22–39, 2008.[5] B. Reynolds, M. M. Mehalik, M. R. Lovell, and C. D. Schunn, “Increasing student
: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014, pp. 3-13.[6] M. A. Mekinda and B. J. Hirsch, "After-school programs," in Handbook of youth mentoring, D. L. Dubois and M. J. Karcher Eds., 2 ed. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014, ch. 15, pp. 221-232.[7] B. J. Hirsch and V. Wong, "After-school programs," in Handbook of youth mentoring, D. L. Dubois and M. J. Karcher Eds.: Sage Publications, 2005, ch. 24, pp. 364-375.[8] C. Gartland, H. Hawthorne, and C. M. McLoughlin, "Discourses, identities and learning: implications for the training of student ambassadors in engineering," presented at the Inspiring the next generation of engineers Engineering Education, 2010.[9] P. Jacobs, "Computing MATTERS: Building pathways to
Scale 1, or ESES1” included 4 items in which participantsresponded using a 10-point Likert scale ranging from “No Confidence at all” (0) to “CompleteConfidence” (9). Participants rated their confidence in their ability to perform well in courses.Sample items include, “complete all of the ‘basic science’ requirements for your engineeringmajor with grades of B or better” and “excel in your engineering major over the next semester.”The other scale by Fantz and colleagues “Engineering Self-Efficacy Scale 2 or ESES2” included9 items, with an 8-point Likert scale that ranged from “Strongly Disagree” (0) to “StronglyAgree” (7). Sample items include, “I’m confident I can understand the basic concepts in myengineering classes” and “I’m certain I can
humanitarian engineering topics in research. Currently, she is investigating the connections between humanitarian engineering projects, professional formation, and views of diversity and inclusion.Courtney Deckard, Lipscomb UniversityHannah Duke, Lipscomb University Hannah Duke is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Hannah is studying mechanical engineering and plans to continue on to graduate school, following the completion of her undergraduate degree, to get a master’s degree in Architectural Design. She is currently researching the effects of humanitarian engineering projects on views of diversity and inclusion and professional development.Makenzie CohnNatalie
as lifestyle and a meritocracy of difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.[3] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, "“I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp. 103-115, 2007.[4] E. Godfrey, A. Johri, and B. Olds, "Understanding disciplinary cultures: The first step to cultural change," Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, pp. 437-455, 2014.[5] D. Eisenberg and S. K. Lipson, "The Healthy Minds Study 2018-2019 Data Report," 2019.[6] A. Danowitz and K
Paper ID #33671Work-in-Progress: The Design and Implementation of EFRI-ResearchExperience in Mentoring Catalyst InitiativeDr. Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Olgha B. Qaqish, Ph.D. is a engineering educator and researcher, who has experience working with stu- dents at all levels in science, math, engineering, and technology (STEM). Dr. Qaqish is an author of a mathematics textbook: Algebra Essentials. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at NC State. Courses that she’s taught in the last couple of years include BME 210: Biomedical Electronics and BME 490: Research in Engineering. In
Paper ID #34520”Asking ’why’ instead of ’how’”: Outcomes of an interdisciplinaryDegree Program in Engineering StudiesDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Co-Director of the Hanson Center for Inclusive STEM Education at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the