Paper ID #32932WIP: Student Training in Data Analytics Approaches for BioprocessingThrough Co-Curricular ActivitiesDr. Maryam Mobed-Miremadi, Santa Clara University Dr. Maryam Mobed-Miremadi is a Senior Lecturer at Santa Clara University. She is a chemical engineer (B Eng, M Eng, McGill University Canada) by training with an emphasis on transport and microencapsu- lation technologies for bioengineering applications. She graduated from McGill University with a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering having conducted her research at the Artificial Cells and Organs Research Centre. Following graduate school she spent 12 years in the
, 2017.[7] C. Stanford, R. Cole, J. Froyd, C. Henderson, D. Friedrichsen, and R. Khatri, “Analysis of Propagation Plans in NSF-Funded Education Development Projects,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 418–437, Aug. 2017.[8] C. Stanford, R. Cole, J. Froyd, D. Friedrichsen, R. Khatri, and C. Henderson, “Supporting sustained adoption of education innovations: The Designing for Sustained Adoption Assessment Instrument,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, Dec. 2016.[9] M. B. Miles, H. A. Michaek, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook Edition 3. 2017.
average of correct answers thateach student had in each of the methods. A. Instructor Guided Method: The assessment for the Instructor Guided Method was completed by 22 students. On average, students got 2.4 out of the 5 questions correct. Figure 6 shows the percentage of students that had a certain number of correct answers in this assessment overall. For example, 13.6% of students did not get any questions correct and 4.5% got all the questions for this module correct. Per question type, 56.8% of the students got the correct answers for the theoretical questions and 42.4% of students got the correct answers for the RStudio questions. B. Think-Pair-Share Method: The assessment for the Think-Pair-Share Method
captured in this paper. We also acknowledge the financial support for thelarger study by Quanser, National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), andOntario Graduate Scholarships program.References[1] B. Johnson, “Reflections: A Perspective on Paradox and Its Application to Modern Management,” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 206–212, 2014.[2] W. K. Smith and M. W. Lewis, “Toward a Theory of Paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 381–403, 2011.[3] G. Calabresi, The Future of Law & Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.[4] H. Nowotny, P. Scott, and M. Gibbons, Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the public in an age of
Paper ID #32340Using Quizzes Effectively: Understanding the Effects of Quiz Timing onStudent Motivation and Knowledge RetentionMajor John Case, United States Military Academy JOHN CASE is a U.S. Army Officer in his 12th year of active duty service and is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He holds master’s degrees in Operations Research from Virginia Tech and Engineering Management from the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He is in the Operations Research functional area of the Army and has research interests in operations research, data
Paper ID #34736Differences in Perceptions of Instructional Support between U.S. andInternational Students Before and During COVID-19Dr. Ziyan Bai, University of Washington Ziyan Bai holds a Ph.D. in educational leadership and policy studies with foci on higher education and mixed-method education sciences. She has over seven years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a
and fears that impactedtheir mental health and reduced learning and performance.3. Adaptation Strategies: Adaptation strategies improved STEM learning(a) Relaxation Strategies: Seventy-seven percent (77%) of RPs tried to reduced stressesthrough relaxation strategies such as working out, taking breaks, meditation, reflection sheets,movies, family support, self-leniency, mental wellness visits, and other mental health strategies.One RP noted that, “Yeah, so, you know, I kind of, I forced myself to, uh, to at least get somephysical activity. Even If I didn't want to or not, I just knew I'd feel a little better, I was able tofocus a little better if I did."(b) Peer Collaboration: Seventy percent (70%) of RPs connected with their peers
Experimental Groups, Fall 2020 and Spring 2021. Figure 6b shows that the control groups obtained significantly lower final grades, considered in relation to the evaluation of almost all competencies, except in the "Use of Technology" which is a skill developed by all engineering students regardless of treatment that they receive, which corroborated our hypothesis that technology is an enabler but not a cognitive tool. Fig.6. a) Correlation between Final Scores and PostTest assessment. b) Final Scores and Skills assessment in each group.Rubrics were used with the intention of evaluating and discussing learning related to thestudents' interdisciplinary skills, not the grading. These rubrics allowed positioning thelearning within a
. 437‒452, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1080/13504620701581539.[5] J. C. Stephens, M. E. Hernandez, M. Román, A. C. Graham and R. W. Scholz, “Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts,” Int. J. Sustain. High., vol. 9., no. 3, pp. 317‒338, Jul. 2008.[6] The Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering, Executive Yuan, Promotion and prospect of national environmental education, Proceedings of Environmental Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, Taipei, Taiwan.[7] S. N. Jorgenson, J. C. Stephens and B. White, “Environmental education in transition: A critical review of recent research on climate change and energy education,” J Environ Educ., vol. 3., no. 50, pp. 160-171, May. 2019.[8] J. Boeve-de Pauw
instance,real fluidized beds would experience hysteresis shown in the shift in pressure drop and bedheight as the superficial velocity decreases back down from fluidization to fixed bed regime. Theuser can understand fluidized beds and the extent of material properties affecting the fluidizedbed from this combination of modules. 5Figure 5. The MatLab interface of the two modules; user inputs are within the red box. When theuser inputs are changed, the graphs on the right will update accordingly.Figure 6. CAD drawing of the fluidized bed where the side view of the set up is shown in A,isometric bottom view in B, and isometric top view in C with all associated parts labeled asshown. A cohort
shortenedtimeframe (compared to individual students) due to the competition deadlines. a) Building Enclosure Design (truly multi-disciplinary performance based) b) Structural PT Concrete Gravity Design (Isolated building system design) c) Ceiling Plenum Coordination (multi-disciplinary agreement on sharing space)Figure 7: Team vs Individual Student Results Examples (taken from final submitted student works)Discussion of Trends for Takeaways Upon analyzing the results from student conversational feedback, final design projectoutcomes, team observations, and administered surveys, this study determined that students weremore aware of, capable of using, and were likely to use documentation, communication
Paper ID #33656The Critic as Designer: How Metacognition Makes TransdisciplinarityPossibleAndrea L. Schuman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Andrea is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma. Her research interests include culturally relevant pedagogy, teaching and learning in ECE, and international engineering education.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director
Paper ID #32533Virtually Speaking: Perspectives on ABET Virtual ReviewsDr. Camilla M. Saviz P.E., University of the Pacific Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis. She joined Pacific in 1999 and is a registered Professional Engineer in California.Dr. Audra N. Morse, Michigan Technological University Dr. Audra Morse, P.E., is a
regardless of which LMS is adopted.References[1] Chang, S., Kuo, A.C. (2021) Indulging interactivity: a learning management system as a facilitative boundary object. SN Soc Sci 1, 62 . doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00069-x[2] Prince, M., (2004), Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-231[3] Reed, B. (2018). Active Learning Success by Partnering Across the Institution. Proceedings ACM SIGUCCS User Services Conference, pp. 69. doi:10.1145/3235715.3235718[4] Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., (2017) Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education : A literature review, J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–29.[5] O’Hara, S
-94-007-6350-0.[07] Adams, Maurianne, Lee Anne Bell, and Pat Griffin (Editors), Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice: A Sourcebook, Routledge, 2nd Ed., 2007.][08] The National Academy of Engineering Center for Engineering Ethics and Society https://www.nae.edu/26187/CEES. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.[09] The Ohio State University, Advancing Technology That Promotes Social Justice for Humanity. https://hevcp.engineering.osu.edu/. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.[10] Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace network. http://esjp.org/. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.[11] "Intelligent Machinery, Identity, and Ethics" course website https://intelligentmachinerycourse.com/. Accessed 19 Apr. 2021.[12] Johnson, K., & Leydens, J. A., & Moskal, B
homework,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1333–1345, April 2012.[6] J. A. Holdener and B. D. Jones, “Calculus homework: A storied approach,” PRIMUS, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 21–42, May 2019.[7] L. Pogačnik and B. Cigić, "How To Motivate Students To Study before They Enter the Lab," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 1094–1098, July 2006.[8] M. Rollnick, S. Zwane, M. Staskun, S. Lotz and G. Green, “Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 23, no.10, pp. 1053-1071, Oct. 2001.[9] G. O’Brien and M. Cameron. "Prelaboratory activities to enhance the laboratory learning experience," in Proceedings of The Australian
10 .920 4.26 (1.13) Preferred Learning Situationsc 11 .869 5.42 (1.56) Learning Strategies used in class (general)d 15 .890 5.35 (1.43) MSLQ- Motivation - Task Valuee 6 .909 5.71 (1.21) MSLQ – Critical Thinkinge 5 .888 5.05 (1.46) MSLQ – Self-Regulatione 11 .821 5.049 (1.45) MSLQ – Time and Student Environment Management e 8 .491 4.87 (1.61) a=5-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree…5=Strongly Agree) b=7-point scale (1=Not at all important …7=Extremely important
, “Perfectionism and academic burnout: Longitudinal extension of the bifactor model of perfectionism,” Pers. Individ. Dif., 2021.[6] R. Tobin and D. M. Dunkley, “Self-critical perfectionism and lower mindfulness and self- compassion predict anxious and depressive symptoms over two years,” Behav. Res. Ther., vol. 136, 2021.[7] M. M. Smith, S. B. Sherry, C. Ray, P. L. Hewitt, and G. L. Flett, “Is perfectionism a vulnerability factor for depressive symptoms, a complication of depressive symptoms, or both? A meta-analytic test of 67 longitudinal studies,” Clinical Psychology Review. 2021.[8] S. Guise, How to be an imperfectionist: The New Way to Self-Acceptance, Fearless Living, and Freedom from Perfectionism. Selective
] B. E. Rincón, É. Fernández, and M. C. Dueñas, “Anchoring comunidad: how first- and continuing-generation Latinx students in STEM engage community cultural wealth,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 840–854, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09518398.2020.1735567.[6] A. Ali and I. Cuervo, “Applying Design Thinking in Evaluation,” AEA 365, Sep. 28, 2018. https://aea365.org/blog/applying-design-thinking-in-evaluation-by-asma-m-ali-and-isabel- p-cuervo/.[7] ASEE, ASEE Webinar Series: Engineering Inclusive Classrooms. 2020.[8] Pellet Productions, “ATE TV Multicultural Video Series,” 2016. https://www.atetv.org/watch-videos/.[9] “Basic Needs and
,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2012.[3] C. J. Scott, P. A. James, Y. Astatke, “Useful Strategies for Implementing an OnlineUndergraduate Electrical Engineering Program,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June2012.[4] D. L. Millard, “Interactive learning modules for electrical engineering education,” 2000Proceedings 50th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, May2000.[5] B. Vogel-Heuser, K. Land and F. Bi, “Challenges for Students of Mechanical EngineeringUsing UML - Typical Questions and Faults,” 2020 6th IEEE Congress on Information Scienceand Technology (CiSt), June 2021.[6] J. Huang, “Successes and Challenges: Online Teaching and Learning of Chemistry in
) students,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, June, 2018.13. Y. Jung and K. M. Vernaza, “A comprehensive design & prototyping platform for rapid hw/sw development classes,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, June 2019.14. S. J. Dickerson, “Preparing Undergraduate Engineering Students for the Internet of Things,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, June 2016.15. D. M. Etter and J A. Ingber, “Engineering problem solving with C++,” 4th Edition, pp. 106, Pearson, 2017.16. Z. S. Roth, H. Zhuang, V. Ungvichian and A. Zilouchian, “Integrating design into the entire electrical engineering four year experience,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, June 2019.17. D. Berkey and B. Vernescu, “A model for vertical integration of real-world
Paper ID #33208Academic Writing at the Doctoral and Professional Level in Engineering:The Current State of the Field and Pathways ForwardMs. Kate Caroline Batson, University of Georgia KateBatsonis a PhD candidate within Language and Literacy Education at the University of Georgia. Her research is centered around writing practices at the doctoral and professional levels within engineering. Previously, she served as an instructor in the Intensive English Program (IEP) at The University of Missis- sippi, where she taught 18 different courses and served as the IEP Operations Coordinator. She was also the IEP in-house
student learning, three assessments have been implemented at the endof the project: (1) self-assessment, (2) peer-assessment, and (3) industrial review panelassessment. From the assessment results, the new teaching efforts have fulfilled the ABET’srequirements and been highly evaluated by both the students and the industrial reviewers.In the self-assessment, all the senior students are required to complete a self-assessment of theirability to attain the educational outcomes of the Chemical Engineering Program. A short answerwith a score would be given for each ABET student outcomes as below: a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and
Paper ID #33789Civil Engineering Master’s Programs: Requirements and OutcomesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned
Paper ID #32839The Perception of Sustainable Design and Construction: Case Study ofConstruction Students at Two UniversitiesDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He has completed Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with a total of 18 years academic experience at five different universities. He
Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Information Security Analysts. Available: https://www.bls.gov./ooh/computer-and- information-technology/information-security-analysts.htm. [Accessed February 10, 2021].[3] A. Slaughter, E. Weingarten, “The National Security Issue No One Is Talking About.” April 12, 2016. http://time.com/4290563/women-in-cybersecurity/. [Accessed March 3, 2021].[4] B. Siwicki, “Why Diverse Cybersecurity Teams Are Better at Understanding Threats, Patient Needs.” Women in Health IT. September 28, 2017. Available: http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/why-diverse-cybersecurity-teams-are- betterunderstanding-threats-patient-needs. [Accessed March 24, 2019].[5] National Centers of
and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291-324. [10] Zhu, Q., & Zoltowski, C. B., & Feister, M. K., & Buzzanell, P. M., & Oakes, W. C., & Mead, A. D. (2014, June), The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision Making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--23130[11] Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The delphi method (pp. 3-12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.[12] Reed, J.,Streiner, S., Burkey, D., Cimino, R., Pascal, J., & Young, M., "Mapping the Landscape of First
] T. Samad, “Intelligent Control: An Overview of Techniques,” in Perspectives in Control Engineering Technologies, Applications, and New Directions, IEEE, 2010.[3] K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Zhang, and Y. J. A. Zhang, “The Roadmap to 6G: AI Empowered Wireless Networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019.[4] D. Bradley, D. Russell, I. Ferguson, J. Isaacs, A. Macleod, and R. White, “The Internet of Things - The future or the end of mechatronics,” Mechatronics, vol. 27, pp. 57–74, Apr. 2015.[5] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, 2018 – 2019 | ABET.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting
Paper ID #33291Sustainability Incorporation in Courses in Mechanical, Civil andEnvironmental Engineering: Insights from AASHE STARS DataMs. Joan Kathryn Tisdale, University of Colorado Boulder Joan Tisdale holds degrees in both Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering from Auburn University and MIT, respectively, and is pursuing a PhD in Civil Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has worked in renewable energy at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and has taught STEM related courses both at the high school and college levels.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is
Paper ID #32965Lessons Learned from Evaluating Three Virtual Research Experiences forTeachers (RET) Programs Using Common Instruments and Protocols(Evaluation)Dr. Jean S. Larson, Arizona State University Jean Larson, Ph.D., is the Educational Director for the NSF-funded Engineering Research Center for Bio- mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG), and Assistant Research Professor in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer