Spr. 06 03 ASUR 6395 Topic in GIS Spr. 06 03 B+ACG 5005 Financial Accounting Sum 06 02 ACGN 6905 Special Problems in Civil Engineering Sum 06 02 AData Collection ProceduresThe IHE Fellowship Program Directors are to develop a spreadsheet including eachcandidate’s name, gender and ethnic background, e.g., American Indian or Alaskan,Asian or Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic American, person with disabilities,and other. Other developed spreadsheets are to include course lists of candidates withpossible graduation dates, work schedules, regular meeting schedules, work progress on adaily, weekly, monthly and
teach- Page 11.989.7 ing.” Innovative Higher Education, 50, 168–174.10. Millis, B. J. and Kaplan, B. B. (1995). “Enhancing teaching through peer classroom observations.” Improving College Teaching, P. Seldin, ed., Boston, MA, Anker Publishing, 137–149.11. Estes, A. C. and Ressler, S. J. (2001) “ExCEEd teaching workshop: Fulfilling a critical need.” Pro- ceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Albuquerque, NM, June, CD-ROM.12. French-Lazovik, G. (1975). Evaluation of college teaching: Guidelines for summative and formative
sun in order toexpose a solar panel to maximum radiation at any given time is the main purpose of a solartracking PV system. Page 11.406.2Figure 1 (a). Illustration of the summer and winter solsticesFigure 1 (b). Sun Path Diagram for 400 N Latitude During Winter and Summer SolsticesFor many years, several energy companies and research institutions have been performing solartracking for improving the efficiency of solar energy production. A variety of techniques ofsolar energy production used have proven that up to 30% more solar energy can be collectedwith a solar tracker than with a fixed PV system1. The cost of such systems is however still
success before college exist, prolonging or evenprecluding their graduation from college.One at-risk factor associated with pre-college students is academic under preparedness. Hick’sresearch indicates that pre-college students may be perceived as having (a) poorer academic andsocial preparation, (b) lower self-confidence, and (c) inadequate parental support.6 These issueswere carefully examined in first generation students. Another at-risk factor associated with pre-college students is their unrealistic picture of what college entails. It is believed that inaccurateperspectives about the university’s complex systems can be a devastating and challengingexperience, particularly for African Americans and other minorities entering STEM fields. 3
experimentation and project use. Based on the suggestions from thestudents, the CETHC11EVB2 has several modifications over its predecessor CETHC11EVBand providing several advantages:• CETHC11EVB2 uses an HC24 port replacement unit to gain access to Port B and Port C I/O pins control.• There is no need to change the HC11’s mode. The CETHC11EVB2 always remains in Expanded Mode.• CETHC11EVB2 has full access to external 8K or 16K RAM (Jumpers: J4, J5, & J6 selectable) while maintaining control over all I/O pins. This makes the system flexible enough to accept different RAM chips based on the availability.• CETHC11EVB2 can be used as a full target system development tool. The only required changes in the developed software are the
studies and b) how thesecourses work together to help students develop engineering skills. Assessment instrumentsincluded beginning, middle, and end-of-design experience questionnaires, videotapes of studentpresentations, and a reflective letter to their parents. Through the data collected, the paperanswers the following questions: a) Are real-life student design projects an effective means ofintegrating different courses? b) Did the real-life student design projects provide better studentunderstanding of engineering in general? c) Did the exercise of designing and presentingprojects, stimulate student interest in science and engineering careers? This pilot assessmentplan will be used to improve the program as well as to assess student learning
RFID Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is a technology where individual components (or partsin the case of manufacturing systems) are attached to high frequency read/write tags which allow Page 11.1274.6the product to be tracked along a system. This way the history of every product can be traced andstored in a database, allowing for part, process and person tracking and web-based monitoring of (a) (b) Figure 5: a) The Ethernet network and the various field buses; b) SafetyBus p network (a) (b)Figure 6: a) An
2006-242: A PROTOCOL FOR EVALUATING WEB-BASED RESOURCES TOINTEREST GIRLS IN STEM CAREERSKaren White, Purdue University Karen F. White is a graduate student in the Department of Organizational Leadership in the College of Technology, Purdue UniversityMara Wasburn, Purdue University Mara H. Wasburn is Assistant Professor of Organizational Leadership in the College of Technology, Purdue University. Page 11.104.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Protocol for Evaluating Web-Based Resources to Interest Girls in STEM Careers There is a quiet crisis
provide a rich design problem yet be financiallyfeasible. The argument presented in this paper is that unlike hardware which can be (a) easilybroken by a novice, (b) so underpowered as to provide little interesting challenges or (c)dangerously powerful; a visual simulation can provide a rich learning environment. Fortunately,UTEP has recently been admitted as a PACE partner [3] and one important benefit to thispartnership is that UTEP students and faculty have a virtually limitless supply of certain types ofreal world engineering software. MSC.Adams is one of the software packages that is available.The basic idea described in this paper is to use simulation in the lecture to allow students to do areal design on what appears to be a realistic
Assignments to Foster Learning: Revisiting Writing Across the Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 73-78.6. Burrows, V. A., B. McNeill, N. F. Hubele and L. Bellamy, 2001, “Statistical Evidence for Enhanced Learning of Content through Reflective Journal Writing,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. Page 11.875.9 4, pp. 661-667.7. Turns, J., W. Newstetter, J. K. Allen and F. Mistree, 1997, "Learning Essays and the Reflective Learner: Supporting Reflection in Engineering Design Education," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI
assigned. Each of these three 12. Repeat steps 9, 10, & 11 until completethemes were discussed repeatedly in class 13. Documentation- Without talking to you,throughout the duration of the assignment. how can someone: (a) use your innovation; Page 11.1041.4 (b) build another one? On the first day of class, students were Table 4 Project assignmentsgiven a survey to complete (Figure 1). Theanswers were used to form ten groups of four 1. What is a swamp cooler? How doesstudents apiece. There were several criteria for it work?forming groups
): p. 158-165.3. Qamhiyah, A.Z. and B. Ramond, Internationalization of the undergraduate engineering program Page 11.969.5 (Part 2): Application example. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 21(2): p. 257-261.4. Grandin, J.M., Thomas J. Kim. The International Engineering Program at the University of Rhode Island. in Navigating the New Engineering World: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Engineering Education. 1998. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.5. Buckeridge, J.S.J.S., A Y2K Imperative: the Globalisation of Engineering Education. Global Journal of Engineering Education
estuaries of Oregon (OR) and Washington(WA). Presently, observation efforts concentrate on five estuaries South Slough in Coos Bay,OR; Columbia River, OR-WA; Willapa Bay and Grays Harbor, WA; and Puget Sound, WA;and on three littoral cells Columbia River; Rockaway, and Netarts, OR. The NANOOS-Piloteffort is specifically focused on the role of climate change and anthropogenic activity on: (a)estuarine water quality; (b) estuarine ecosystem management and restoration; and (c) coastalstorms and erosion, and objective scientific information on status, trends and susceptibility ofestuaries and shorelines are essential to address each issue.One example of a NANOOS component that has an impact on coastal engineering practice isthe establishment of a
, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Utah StateUniversity.In 2002, The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) established the Center for theAdvancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) to “promote the technologicalwelfare of the nation10.” The CASEE recently held a workshop entitled, “Social Dynamics ofCampus Change: Creating an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda.” The purpose of this workshopwas “to examine how to promote the diffusion of innovation in engineering education.”Innovations in undergraduate engineering education and successful K-12 engineering outreachare intimately coupled because a) many of the future leaders of K-12 engineering outreachprograms will be graduates from engineering education programs, b) innovations
2006-2632: A MATHEMATICAL MODEL TO IDENTIFY PRE-TURNOVERMINDSET IN SOPHOMORE STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITYErick Jones, University of Nebraska-LincolnAnn Koopman, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Page 11.66.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 “Measuring STEM Attrition in an Engineering College” Erick C. Jones, Ph.D. Ann Koopman Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department University of Nebraska LincolnABSTRACT Academic institutions seek to understand why Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(STEM) students are leaving
., Beichner, R., Bernold, L., Burniston, E., Dail, P., Fuller, H., “Update on IMPEC, an Integrated Firt- Year Engineering Curriculum at North Carolina State University”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, June 1997.16. Mickelson, S.K., Jenison, R., and Swanson, N., “Teaching Engineering Design through Product Dissection”, Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 1995.17. Carlson, B., Schoch, P., Kalsher, M., Racicot, B., “A Motivational First-Year Electronics Lab Course”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 357-362, October 1997.18. Demetry, C. and Groccia, J., “A Comparative Assessment of Students’ Experiences in Two Instructional Formats of an Introductory Materials Science Course”, Journal of
where course content and requirements are unique for each specific major. • It does not impose a common interdisciplinary “introduction to engineering” course, in which all students participate in the same lectures and laboratories5-8, thus maintaining the diversity of each department’s teaching and scheduling resources. • It involves course content change only; thus, there is no impediment to implementation caused by administrative changes to degree plans, graduation requirements, and the like. • It provides a balance between the conflicting needs of (a) offering enough technical content to allow a student to evaluate her or his choice of major and (b) showing the student what the
. Trigwell (1999). "Understanding Learning and Teaching." The socity for Page 11.91.17 research into higher education and Open University Press.Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright 2006, American Society for Engineering Education 6. Dochy, F., M. Segers, et al. (2003). "Effects of Problem Based Learning: A Meta Analysis." Learning and instruction Vol 13: pp 533-568. 7. Duch, B. J., S. E. Groh, et al. (2001). "The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Sterling." 8. Felder, R. M. and B. R. (2003). "Learning by Doing
individuals. From a pedagogical stand pointhowever, Northeastern University’s model of an integrated Capstone Senior DesignProject provides an almost perfect implementation of ABET’s “a through k, GeneralCriteria for Students and Graduates” as summarized in Table 1. Table. 1. ABET's GENERAL CRITERIA No.1: Students and Graduates a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, tech., skills and modern tools of their disciplines, b. an ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging appl.s of math., science, engineering and technology, c. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve
categorize respondents into demographic/characteristic groups. Thesecond set of questions was designed to assess student satisfaction with the resources they needto perform research. These questions were divided into three categories: office space (Block B),lab space (Block C), and computers (Block D). The third set of questions (Blocks E and F) wasdesigned for student self-assessment of preparedness to perform EnvE research successfully.These questions examined how prepared students felt they were for research when they beganthe program, how well the program has prepared students for research, and how well a laboratory Page 11.130.10course has
Experiments, (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 2005) 6th ed., pp.325-350.8 Arons, A.B., Teaching Introductory Physics, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1997), pp.188-214 and 333- 339.9 McDermott, L.C., et.al., Physics by Inquiry, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1996).10 G.Brizuela and A. Juan, “Planck’s constant determination using a light bulb,” Am. J. Phys 64 (6), 819-821 (1996).11 I. R. Edmonds, “Stephan-Boltzmann Law in the Laboratory,” Am. J. Phys. 36, 845 (1968).12 B. Prasad and R. Mascarenhas, “A laboratory experiment on the application of Stefan’s law to tungsten filament lamps,” Am. J. Phys 46 (4), 420-423 (1978
system provides another means for the students to askquestions and share ideas and problems many of which may not have been expressed due to thegeneral student-professor comfort levels. The PAL system is a good educational method toincorporate into a laboratory setting and greatly facilitated the learning process.Bibliography1. ABET: Engineering Criteria (http://www.abet.org/criteria.html).2. Martin, D, Arendale D et al. (1992). Supplemental Instruction: Improving First Year Student Success in HighRisk Courses. University of South Carolina Monograph Series, No. 7.3. McCarthy, A, Smutus, B and Crosser, M. (1997). Assessing the Effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction: acritique and a case study. Research into Higher Education, 221-231
MS TS programs. Page 11.42.7Bibliography1. Kauffmann, Paul and William Peterson. “Assignment of Importance to Engineering Economy Topics by Master of Engineering Management Students.” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2001.2. Farragher, Edward J., Robert T. Kleiman, and Anandi P. Sahu, “Current Capital Investment Practices,” The Engineering Economist, Vol. 44, No.2, 1999, (pp. 137-150).3. Klammer, T., B. Koch, and N. Wilner, “Capital Budgeting Practices – A Survey of Corporate Use,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, Fall 1991, (pp. 113-130
Engineering Technology Education: Phase I - Senior Capstone Experience”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal. 3. Pocock, James B. and Peter A. Ridilla, (2002) “Project-Based Construction Education”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal. 4. Tener, Robert K. (1996), “Industry-University Partnership in Construction Engineering Education”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 156-162. 5. ASCE (2005) “Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry into the
2006-2340: BUILDING THE ENGINEER IN ME: DESIGNING A SEMINAR FORFIRST-YEAR FEMALE ENGINEERING STUDENTSSusan Donohue, University of Virginia Susan Donohue is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Systems and Information Engineering. Her degrees include a B.A. in Political Science from Marquette University (1980) and an M.E. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (2000). Her academic honors include Phi Beta Kappa, Alpha Sigma Nu, and Omega Rho. She is a student member of IEEE and ASEE. Her main research interests include software QA/QC and engineering education. She is a volunteer researcher for the Center for Diversity in Engineering.Carolyn Vallas, University of Virginia
temperature as a function of time. From this information, theytested various scaling laws until they arrived at the one that seemed to work the best. A largegroup share was conducted during the last ten minutes of class to discuss the various results fromeach group. Note that three professors and a graduate student were used during this class toprovide guidance and general coaching directions, where required, to each group.Class 3: Why Am I Taking the Classes I am Taking / Math DayThe first part of this class was devoted to answering the generic question “Why do I have to take to become a chemical engineer?” At the beginning of class, the motivating questionwas asked, “I want to make chemical C by mixing chemical A and B. All I need to worry about
Wisconsin-Madison No. RED-9452971).6. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., & Dietz, E.J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering studentperformance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 3-17.7. Isaacs, B., & Tempei, P. (2001). Student projects that celebrate engineering: A path to diversity in the profession.ASEE/IEEE Proceedings- Frontiers in Education Conference, 3, S1F/1-4. Reno, NV.8. Williams, R. (2003). Education for the profession formerly known as engineering. The Chronicle of HigherEducation, 49, B12-13.9. Ettema, R. (2000). A drift in the curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education andPractice, 126, 21-26.10. Beder, S. (1999). Beyond technicalities: Expanding engineering thinking
screen of the HMD (as shown in Figure 4).Analysis of Objective Data In an initial analysis, all known effects, including student, system, and the interaction betweenstudent and system, were considered. Analysis results for the effects of each factor are shown inFigure 6. Figure 3. Anaglyphic glasses in use Figure 4. HMD in use Page 11.127.8 Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2006, American Society for Engineering Education (a). Problem 1 (b). Problem 2
, last accessed 1/14/2006.5. http://www.ece.uiuc.edu/ugrad/neweeintro.html, University of Illinois Department of ECE Undergraduate Advising and Curriculum webpage, last accessed 1/14/2006.6. http://eeclass.stanford.edu/e40/, Stanford University, E40: Introduction to Electronics homepage, last accessed 1/14/2006.7. http://www.ece.cmu.edu/users/shared/courses/ecedescript.php#18-100, Carnegie Mellon University online course descriptions, last accessed 1/14/2006.8. Shuman, L. J. et al. (2002). “The Future of Engineering Education,” Proc. 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.9. Olds, B. and Miller, R. (2004). “The Effect of a First-Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student
Chair and Director of Training as the operating platform of choice.Equipment decisionsA list of media arts equipment and software was collected (See APPENDIX B: SME LabWorkstation Original Wish List). Based on the studio specifications, a series of quotes weresolicited from multimedia equipment vendors located in New Mexico, California and Arizona.Each quote contained a procurement requirement that all equipment required to construct thestudio be supplied by a single vendor. Additionally each vendor was required to provide ademonstration of a like-kind studio and a two-day training seminar would be contain in the quote Page 11.1152.7and final bid