Engineering and a Masters of Science in Technical Communication, both from the University of Michigan. Her Doctorate in Education was earned from Southern New Hampshire University.Dr. Elizabeth J Bailey, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering, University of Michigan Dr. Elizabeth Bailey is an Instructional Consultant at the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering at the University of Michigan. She leads programs to prepare graduate students for success in faculty roles and to support new faculty at the College of Engineering. Dr. Bailey earned a Ph.D. in Chemistry at Columbia University. Her work on preparing future faculty and supporting teaching faculty has been published in To
, peer-recommended, and expert evaluated• Develop a menu of practices that focus on high-impact inclusive classroom practices that align with the arc of the course• Evaluate the menu of practices by implementing and monitoring the recommendations in three diverse engineering programs• Create and pilot inclusive learning communities• Assess both students and faculty to create succinct, high- impact recommendations on creating inclusive engineering classrooms 17 “Inclusion is not bringing people into what already exists; it is making a new space, a better space for everyone." George Dei 18Alamy.com
share how we use existing best practices to create andsustain innovative retention programs for undergraduate women, assist ourgraduate students in becoming well-rounded engineers through networkingprograms, and support our women faculty through continued professionaldevelopment. This process engages university constituents as well as K-12administrators, teachers, counselors and students, alumni and Board of Advisorsby utilizing tools, resources, and best practices for student success. 3 Background: Why focus on women? Undergraduate Students Graduate Students T/TT Faculty (Enrolled) (Enrolled
STEM FieldsAbstractAs demand for qualified workers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)fields continues to rise, there is a need to not only consider how to improve engagement andretention, but also an opportunity to strive towards broadening participation. To create a moreequitable workforce, and in particular, one that encourages the enrollment and persistence ofunderrepresented minorities, pedagogy centered around cultivating inclusivity is key. Along theselines, empathy as a construct can play a crucial role in aiding students to consider the impact oftheir own decisions and behaviors on others and society. Given the necessity of embedding theconcept of empathy within post-secondary education, we sought to understand
populations (e.g., Black, Latinx, first-generation students,community college transfer students) [5]. Some of these students enter the university withexisting mental health concerns; others develop mental health challenges during college. Awide range of backgrounds and factors can influence a students’ mental health and wellbeing:living and financial conditions [6], academic preparation [7], student-faculty interactions [8],food insecurity, and family responsibilities [3], and peer relationships [9]. These stressorshave wider impacts on student success [3]: a decrease in a student’s wellbeing can negativelyimpact their educational experiences, leading to academic dissatisfaction, resulting indecreased academic performance or attrition [10]. A
Paper ID #35553Bridging the STEM Gender Gap through Women-focused OutreachMs. Isabel A Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville I am a first-year student at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville studying biomedical engineering and a member of the Chancellor’s Honors Program.Dr. Anne Skutnik, Tickle College of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs, University of TennesseeKnoxville Anne Skutnik received her degree in Educational Psychology from the University of Tennessee Knoxville. The focus of her research is on engineering faculty teaching and instructional design. She works as the Engagement and Outreach Coordinate
ADHD are more likely to exhibit higher levels of creative and divergentthinking relative to their peers without ADHD [3], [7], [8]. This type of thinking is advantageousfor solving real-world interdisciplinary problems and developing innovative solutions, yet notfully appreciated in traditional engineering education [3]. Taylor and coauthors recommend“allowing room for divergent and creative thinking” in engineering education to improveinclusivity [3, p. 13].Our goal is to explore the first-year academic success of college students with ADHD majoringin SEM, with a specific focus on students’ first-year college experiences. Guided by Terenziniand Reason’s [9] college impact model, we will explore how the college experience (classroom,curricular
communication between students. Practitioner A asked ateaching assistant to monitor the chats and participants interactions, whereas Practitioner Bmonitored the chat himself. Practitioner A shared the following: “The TA (teaching assistant) helped a lot by monitoring students’ use of the chat and reaction functions. The TA also ensured that students had cameras on during instruction. Additionally, the TA was instrumental in determining if students were logged on, fully engaged, and completing tasks and assignments.”.”Practitioners C and D were more structured when addressing virtual etiquette expectations. Bothpractitioners instructed students to mute their mics unless speaking, operate with cameras on, andto use the chat only
present their names and pronouns, beingmore mindful of dynamics at play in group work, and being flexible and accommodating with deadlines. Many of these conversations and community-voiced concerns have informed the work of the DEIAmbassadors in developing their Theater-Based Workshops to build a more inclusive and safe community.F. Theater-Based Workshops In our previous work, we have observed that it is challenging to engage undergraduate students inDEI themed workshops and other activities if they are offered as an extracurricular activity. On the otherhand, faculty are frequently reluctant to cover DEI topics in classes, either because they view them as notrelated to the course material, because they feel uncomfortable or unqualified to
throughout their graduate school career. We also note that students’ expectations of themselves are likely to be interwoven with theirown perception of what it means to be successful in graduate school. For this reason, we have cho-sen here to focus primarily on expectations that relate to requirements set by either the departmentor the advisor, as these connect directly to degree completion. However, it is difficult to separatewhich expectations stem from the advisor, and which of them are impacted by the student’s ownsense of what they need or ought to accomplish. In the same vein, it is conceivable that students’expectations of themselves are affected by their background and their social identities. Futurework studying this question can engage
. Romance is Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic Univer- sity (FAU) and a graduate faculty member in both the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the College of Science at FAU.Her research interests address meaningful learning in complex STEM do- mains, applying a learning sciences lens in addressing issues ranging from building elementary teachers knowledge and skill in teaching science to coordinating learning communities addressing mathematics curriculum as a persistent barrier impacting student success and retention in undergraduate STEM pro- grams. She is currently OI on a NSF DR K-12, Co-PI on a USDOE Title III Hispanic Serving Institution, internal evaluator
. Mentors useprofessional and personal knowledge to guide their mentees 4 . These relationships aremulti-dimensional, complex, and can be long-term 5 . In academic institutions, mentoringrelationships are crucial as mentors transmit knowledge that cannot be obtained from formalcourses 6 . Implementation of mentoring programs that target undergraduate students has spreadacross college campuses 1 . However, research on the impact of face-to-face mentoring programs isstill scarce 1 , and even more so on technology-mediated mentoring programs. This research voidbecame obvious when, nationwide, social distancing restrictions were put in place to address the2020 pandemic. Academic institutions that remained open adjusted with either a hybrid(face-to-face
women make up more than 50% of university students. 6 Purpose of Research The University started a Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) mentoring program in Fall 2019, and continued it through the pandemic, during the Spring and Fall 2020, and Spring 2021 terms. The purpose of this presentation is to provide mentoring program best practices that we applied and assessed that had a positive impact on women’s feeling of community, connectedness, and engagement in the mentoring program
services," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 247-266, 2006.[4] J. T. Decuir-Gunby and M. R. Williams, "The Impact of Race and Racism on Students' Emotions. A Critical Race Analysis.," Emotion in Education, pp. 205-219, 2007.[5] C. T. Gloria and M. A. Steinhardt, "Relationships Among Positive Emotions, Coping, Resilience, and Mental Health," Stress & Health, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 145-156, 2014.[6] E. O. McGee, "Devalue Black and Latino Racial Identities: A by-product of STEM college culture?," American Educational Research Journal, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1626-1662, 2016.[7] R. Pekrun and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, "Academic emotions and student engagement," in Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 2012.[8
panel discussion on “Social Justice in STEM” with Drs. Greg Larnell,[Name], [Name], and [Name]. During the summer, a networking event was hosted based on thefeedback from program participants. Finally, also during the summer an affinity group meetingamong the women was also hosted by the director Dr. Lilley. Informal feedback was collectedfrom the students using one-on-one mentoring conversations, from Slack Channel conversationsand from seminar discussions. For example, the Slack Channel was created for the group withthe program team also enrolled based on the request of one program participant and readilyadopted as the platform for communication among the participants. To date, students are engaged and part of the program planning has
, and identity. Her latest work at ASU focused on exploring the racial identity of Black engineering students while navigating their professional space and exploring the transition of marginalized students from community college to higher academia and professional fields.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab that aspires to elevate the experiences of marginalized populations, dismantle systematic injustices, and transform
amonth was immediately challenged and transformed into a virtual model. The support and resourcesprovided through the program were even more critical, as many students were and will continue to beadversely impacted by COVID-19 learning disruptions. The separation from brick-and-mortar constraintsquickly yielded a level of program versatility that had not yet been realized. As most Ab7G mentors leftcampus and returned to their homes across the country, a virtual program framework was developed toengage our student cohorts. Thus, allowing us to complete the academic school year and offer theinaugural 2020 Ab7G six-week summer virtual camp. With the conveniences and resources of on-campusgathering taken away, a revised approach to engagement was
domestic students? RQ3: How can engineering schools better support international and all students based on this information?Instances of exclusion that particularly affected international students included the languagebarrier and social isolation. International students’ persistence strategies mainly consisted ofvarious ways students adapted or conformed themselves to the domestic environment, eitheralone or with the help of others. In the conclusion, we use our results to make recommendationsfor initiatives to improve the international student experience. These include more activelearning, collaborative learning, and multicultural and group communication education for allstudents.Theoretical frameworkThe theoretical framework
; [and in particular] ▪ to provide academic, professional https://eng.vt.edu/ceed/about- and personal support programs. ceed.htmlFrom our quick overview, you can see that CEED takes a multi-pronged approach toits mission and welcomes new ideas from its leadership and constituents to bridgegaps in this programming and to connect and engage students, faculty andprofessionals, and the community. A Step to the Doctorate was created in responseto one of the gaps identified in existing programming, bridging betweenundergraduate and graduate programs. The program aims to support the mission ofCEED and selected CEED objectives and goals, namely "to increase the
developed fromCollins’ (2018) BSSI model by addressing ways in which faculty conceptualize STEM identity andseek to strengthen the STEM identity of their students, particularly their undergraduate womenstudents in the classroom.Virtual interviews were administered one-on-one. They averaged 60 minutes in length and weredigitally recorded for transcription.The four-stage process of phenomenological data analysis as outlined by Moustakas (1994) was thenfollowed including epoche, horizonalization, imaginative variation, and synthesis.Multiple verification strategies were included to ensure the findings were trustworthy (Lincoln &Guba, 1985; Nowell et al., 2017). Strategies employed include thick, rich descriptions with facultyquotations, engagement
Engineering ProgramsAbstractLongitudinal analysis of nationwide single and multi-institutional data shows the positiverelationship between student educational outcomes and a diverse student population. Variousposition papers and empirical studies have raised awareness about the importance of diversity inhigher education within the academic community and policy makers over the past half century.However, lack of participation by underrepresented students in higher education remains achronic and multidimensional problem. Mitigating any particular factor and expecting broadbased impact has not worked and will not work. The U.S. Department of education suggestedsome proven, over-arching principles for institutions of higher education to increase diversity
, & Lee (2019) used UVIs to improvealgebra performance for community college students. Although they note that UVIs were moreeffective for improving men’s scores than women’s, the men in the sample were also lowerperforming than women, suggesting a positive impact for students most in need of help. Andwhile research in engineering specifically remains limited, Turoski & Schell (2020) implementedUVIs in an engineering design course and their preliminary findings point to increases in studentinterest and motivation related to engineering. UVIs thus represent a potentially high-impactpractice with a relatively low barrier to entry.We focus on UVIs here because as researchers have noted, UVIs tend to benefit students whomight be more likely
CAFECS (Chicago Alliance for Equity in Computer Science), a NSF-funded Research Practice Partnership, for almost two years. She completed her Ph.D. in Literacy Education in 2017 with a minor in Qualitative Research Methods. Her research interests are equitable pedagogy, racial equity, culturally relevant pedagogy, and identity. Her latest work at ASU focused on exploring the racial identity of Black engineering students while navigating their professional space and exploring the transition of marginalized students from community college to higher academia and professional fields.Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Julia Brisbane is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education
]. Thus, mentorship and co-curricular support for minoritizedstudents typically represent minor theories of change because they serve institutional efforts tosatisfy quantitative metric student success indicators [31] without requiring that institutions makechanges to their underlying structures that maintain oppression.Social Justice Education and Liberative Pedagogy as Major ReformsIn recent years, Colorado School of Mines has developed two upper-division,humanities-focused elective courses for engineering students, Engineering and Social Justice andIntercultural Communication [32]. Engineering and Social Justice focuses on questioning andchallenging meritocracy and depoliticization in engineering through personal reflection andhistorical and
how administrators’responsibility includes creating public spheres that provide opportunities for students to becomeactive and engaged participants in their communities. Social media has been proven a helpfulmechanism to disseminate plans and establish a sense of community on college campuses. Thereis much research on student activism, but there is not much insight into the role of institutions inthe U.S. in social-political movements of today, such as Black Lives Matter. First, we willprovide an overview of the Black Lives Matter Movement (BLM) and discuss higher education’sutilization of social media. Following, we will discuss the utilization of a “movement framing”theory and the methodology for which tweets were collected for this study
equity, which is reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University Samantha Ray is a Computer Engineering PhD student at Texas A&M University. Her research focuses on creating intelligent systems for tasks that require human-like levels of understanding. She has previously worked on human activity recognition (HAR) systems for promoting healthy habits and educational tools using sketch recognition and eye tracking.Ms. Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University Donna Jaison is a PhD student under Dr. Karan Watson in the Multidisciplinary Engineering Depart- ment at Texas A&M College Station. She is a
our learningobjectives based on our “beliefs and assumptions about what students do and should know andwhat they can and should be able to do” [37]. Our culture and perception of diversity, roles,student needs, and students’ prior knowledge can block progress toward inclusivity [39]–[41],and silence challenges to the status quo [42]. Training programs could help student-facingfaculty and staff critically examine their practices through an ableism lens [43]. Communities ofpractice could be established to help faculty and staff interrupt and challenge their assumptionsand beliefs. If such programs are not yet available, as is commonly the case, I would recommendinstructors, advisers, administrators, and staff engage with andragogical coaches
identifying as URM,we sought to answer the following research question: What impact does use of the career-forward curriculum have on self-efficacy, identity as an engineer and commitment to anengineering career, and in particular, for students identifying as female or URM?For our purposes it is important to clearly define how the terms persistence and commitment areconceptualized and measured, both of which are consistent with the Mediation Model ofResearch Experience (MMRE) [5], which served as the theoretical framework. Commitment isdefined as the student’s willingness to persist towards a specific long-term goal, in this case anengineering career and was measured as an outcome variable through a set of items that loadeddirectly to the construct
Paper ID #35649Transformational Resistance and Identity Development: A Case Study of anAsexual Woman EngineerVivian Xian-Wei Chou, University of Texas at Austin Vivian Chou is a first year Master student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. They are conducting research on how successful communities are established within LGBTQ+ student or- ganizations. Vivian is an advocate for marginalized students and seeks to be a voice for their LGBTQIA+ peers.Jerry Austin Yang, Stanford University Jerry A. Yang is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at Stanford University pursuing a PhD
Paper ID #35582Retention Strategies for Educators from Women STEM Graduates of the1970’s & 1980’sDr. Kathleen Buse, Advancing Women in the Workforce Kathleen Buse is a business leader whose work focuses on helping organizations be more successful through the development of engaged and inclusive work cultures. As President and Founder of Advancing Women in the Workforce, she helps employers recruit, retain, and advance women. Kathleen’s experience includes 25 years in industry, beginning as an engineer and advancing to executive leadership. She spent ten years in academia where she became an award-winning researcher and