Paper ID #37204Comparing Access and Participation Outcomes of SchoolsEngaged in a Multi-school CS and CybersecurityIntervention (Evaluation)Monica McGill (President & CEO) Dr. Monica McGill is the Founder, President, and CEO of CSEdResearch.org, a 501(c)(3) non-profit focused on improving K-12 Computer Science education for all children by enabling and disseminating exemplary, evidence-driven research.Angelica Thompson (Senior Education Researcher)Leigh Ann DeLyser (Executive Director)Stephanie B Wortel-London (Director of Research)Luronne Vaval © American Society for Engineering Education
, pp. 188–243.[12] J. A., Mejia, R. A. Revelo, I. Villanueva and J. Mejia, “Critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit and liberative approach,” Education Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 158, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040158[13] B. M. J. Brayboy, “Towards a tribal critical race theory in education,” The Urban Review, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 425-446, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y[14] R. V. Pieri et al., “Pre-engineering collaboration as a tool to facilitate decolonization of Native American students,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020.[15] A. J. Huff-Lohmeier, A. Hennig, and D. Lamoreaux, “Teacher "thinking circles" reveal protective and
to support students by helpingthem identify the code error and provide hints and clues to solutions. Firewalls and blocksSome schools have restrictions on the devices given to the students, which suppose to protect thestudents from unwanted content. However, these protections could fail the CircuitPython OnlineIDE. For example, some white-list systems will block websites that are not on the list. One of theschools we worked with also blocked access to USB drives on the student’s Chromebooks which isneeded when connecting the microcontroller to the computer. It is important to contact the school (a) Smart Night Light (b) Sensor Interface Figure 4: Circuits of other programs designed according to the
, satisfaction, and academic success among international and American students," Iowa State University, 2012. 2. G. D. Caruth. "Student engagement, retention, and motivation: Assessing academic success in today’s college students," Participatory Educational Research, 5(1), 17-30. 2018. 3. A. W. Astin. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. 1999. 4. E. A. Okwilagwe. "Undergraduate students' perceived academic environmental characteristics as correlates of learning outcomes," Makerere Journal of Higher Education, 1, 85-93. 2004. 5. J. B. Biggs. "Assessing student approaches to learning," Australian Psychologist, 23(2), 197-206. 1988. 6. J. B. Biggs. "Approaches to the enhancement of
enter the program, which can shape their engineering identity development during theirmentored undergraduate research training. In this study, we assess the following researchquestions: RQ 1.How do students make sense of their engineering identity in the context of their experiences in an REU summer internship program? RQ 2.What academic and non-academic factors influence their engineering identity development?B. Conceptual FrameworkMilem et al.’s [21] campus racial climate framework informs our study. Building on Hurtado etal.’s [8]-[9] seminal work, Milem et al. [21] posit a campus climate consists of the observations,perceptions, and attitudes of individuals as well as the institutional context. An institution’s
who are otherwisereluctant to be open to discussions about gender and social justice. The next step of this project isto develop interventions to raise gender awareness and examine the effectiveness of theinterventions through constant feedback from stakeholders and community.References [1] W. Radford, L. B. Fritch, K. Leu, and M. Duprey, “High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS: 09) Second Follow-Up: A First Look at Fall 2009 Ninth-Graders in 2016. ,” National Center for Education Statistics , 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018139.pdf. [Accessed: 24-Jan-2022]. [2] L. McGuire, K. L. Mulvey, E. Goff, M. J. Irvin, M. Winterbottom, G. E. Fields, A. Hartstone-Rose, and A. Rutland, “Stem gender
Insights and Experiences in STEM Fields,” 2021.[16] B. Guy and A. Boards, “A seat at the table: Exploring the experiences of underrepresented minority women in STEM graduate programs,” J. Prev. Interv. Community, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 354–365, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1617383.
, such as teaching, research, andservice commitments. This situation reflects on the mentees who expressed concern about thetime availability of their mentors due to other professional obligations. Regardless, we concludethat the goal of the mentoring program proposed to promote a sense of belonging in mentees duringtheir years of study was accomplished.AcknowledgmentsThe National Science Foundation supported this research under Award No. 1833869. Anyopinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] W. Evans, M. Kearney, B. Perry, and J. Sullivan, “Increasing Community College Completion Rates Among
Paper ID #37107Preparing Prospective Engineers for Artemis: Analyzing theEfficacy of MOOCs in a Specific Area of Expertise (WIP)Joselyn Elisabeth Busato Undergraduate Student Bucknell Class of 2024Elif Miskioglu (Assistant Professor) I am an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. I hold a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University. My early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector
suggest that thestudents have benefited at least by 12% increase in their overall grade because of the reviewsession (see the large difference between the overall and final exam grades for groups II and III).The results from the two-item survey undertaken by students in group III (Fall 2021) providedadditional information and clarity on the value of the review sessions. The first question in thesurvey was a multiple-choice question asking “the review sessions of the assignments were:”with five choices of “very helpful, helpful, it was ok, Not that much helpful, waste of time”.Figure 1.b shows that 22 out of 36 students have found the review part was very helpful and 9more responded as helpful. Only one student claimed it as a waste of time and
helpful for student teams that struggle with mutualtrust and communication. Additionally, we find that instructors play a critical role in managingteam functioning. Successful implementation of these strategies may require instructor guidancethrough the prescriptive use of team reflection exercises that match the team’s developmentaltrajectory.AcknowledgmentSpecial thanks to the Design Thinking and Communication Faculty and Staff, and the Office ofUndergraduate Engineering in McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern University,Ordel Brown, and Kiki Zissimopoulos for their thoughts and input to this work.References[1] Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Stanne, M. B., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). Impact of group processing on achievement
education in terms of engineering content.Claudia Elena ZapataEdward Kavazanjian (Professor) Dr. Edward Kavazanjian, Jr. is Director of the Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG) at Arizona State University, a National Science Foundation Gen-3 Engineering Research Center. He is a Regents' Professor and the Ira A. Fulton Professor of Geotechnical Engineering. He joined ASU in 2004 after 20 years in engineering practice. He was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2013 and became a Distinguished Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in 2018. He is recipient of the 2009 Ralph B. Peck Award, 2010 Thomas A. Middlebrooks Award, and the 2011 Terzaghi Award from ASCE and was
] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.[3] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366–395, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20121.[4] M. A. Hutchison-Green, D. K. Follman, and G. M. Bodner, “Providing a Voice: Qualitative Investigation of the Impact of a First-Year Engineering Experience on Students’ Efficacy Beliefs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 177–190, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00966.x.[5] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue
adolescent negative peer interactions within the whole of their offline and online peer interactions, Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.00714. Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15 (1), 20-33.15. Quinlan, K. (2016). How emotion matters in four key relationships in teaching and learning in higher education. College Teaching, 64(3), 101-11116. Solis, Oscar J. & Turner, Windi D. (2017). Building Positive Student-Instructor Interactions: Engaging Students through Caring Leadership in the Classroom. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 1 (1), 23-3717. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and
Hackathons to Drive Product Innovation. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://freshaccounts.amtd.com/blog-details/2015/4-Companies- Using-Hackathons-to-Drive-Product-Innovation/default.aspx 4. Hall, B., & Gibson, D. (2004). University–industry research partnerships in the United States. In C. Jean- Pierre & M. V. Heitor. 5. ICID conference website, 2022 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://icid-conference.org/ 6. Kiron D., (2007): Why Your Company Needs More Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/why- your-company-needs-more-collaboration/ 7. Leifer, L., Mabogunje, A., Sonalkar, N., (2016): Design Thinking: A New Foundational Science for Engineering. In
Paper ID #36559“But I’m not an Engineer”… Collaboration between aLibrarian and an Upper Division Project-Based EngineeringProgramHeidi Southworth I am the Digital Initiatives Librarian and Associate Professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato and manager of Cornerstone, our University's Institutional Repository. My position provides leadership and direction for the development, growth and maintenance of Cornerstone and Scholar Profiles (AKA SelectedWorks). I am a member of the Archives and Preservation Team within the Library Services Department. I am the liaison to the departments of Automotive and
California. This article solelyreflects the opinions and conclusions of its authors and not the Viterbi School of Engineering,the University of Southern California, or the individuals associated with these organizations.References[1] B. Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso books, 2006.[2] A. El-Alayli, A. A. Hansen-Brown, and M. Ceynar, “Dancing Backwards in High Heels: Female Professors Experience More Work Demands and Special Favor Requests, Particularly from Academically Entitled Students,” Sex roles, vol. 79, no. 3–4, pp. 136– 150, 2018.[3] G. L. Downey, “The engineering cultures syllabus as formation narrative: Critical participation in engineering
Paper ID #37812A Comparative Study of Collaborative and Inclusive SkillsDevelopment in Capstone Design Teams at Three DifferentEngineering InstitutionsCourtney Pfluger (Teaching Professor) Dr. Courtney Pfluger took a position in Fall 2011 as an Assistant Teaching Professor at Northeastern University as a part of the First Year Engineering Faculty and affiliated Faculty in the Chemical Engineering Department. Dr. Pfluger redesigned and piloted the first-year curriculum which included engineering design and computational problem solving using the Engineering Grand Challenges as real-world applications of global
Paper ID #38142The Third Path: a New Approach to Industry-basedUndergraduate Engineering and Technical Education in theUnited States.Darrell K. Kleinke (Director of Graduate Professional Programs) Current: Professor of Mechanical Engineering, University of Detroit MercyShuvra Das (Professor) Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in
-319- 69914-1_3.[22] A. Maleki and S. Sajjadi, “The Role of Non-linear Methods in Teaching English for Medicine: Example of Storytelling,” J. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1972–1977, 2012.[23] B. Rammstedt and O. P. John, “Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 203–212, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.[24] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” in Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), 2016, p. 14814.[25] N. Loorbach, O. Peters, J. Karreman, and M. Steehouder, “Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation
Paper ID #36476Creating a collaborative cross-institutional culture to supportSTEM women of color and women with familyresponsibilities at four midwestern research institutionsCinzia Cervato Dr. Cinzia Cervato is the lead PI of the NSF-funded ADVANCE Midwest Partnership project and Morrill Professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences. She has served as faculty fellow for early career and term faculty in the Office of the Provost and faculty fellow for strategic planning in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. She earned a doctor of geology degree from the University of Padova (Italy), and a Doctor of
Students in this program for four years. The objectives of the S-STEM project were to attract talented Students, particularly women and minorities, into this newprogram and increase the number of engineering graduates trained in interdisciplinaryengineering through financial help, mentoring, improved Student support, and retention efforts.The long-term strategy included several components: (a) working with the extensive pre-college 6program that the college already sponsors to increase the interest of students in engineeringdisciplines, (b) working with high schools, FIRST Robotics teams and community colleges toattract more students into engineering
Invention Bootcamp at Portland State University. Invention Bootcamp is a four-week summer camp designed to expose high school students to the invention process and thereby stimulate their interest in attending college to prepare for a career in STEM and entrepreneurship. The camp serves 25 students that are recruited with help from Oregon MESA, and actively seeks participants from populations traditionally underrepresented in STEM. Eight undergraduate engineering and computer science students are near-peer mentors and technical problem-solvers for the camp participants. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
technology degree programs.To develop the Four Pillars the originators referenced the 2012 ABET accreditationcriteria for manufacturing programs [8], and the topics in the 2010 SME body ofknowledge for the certification of manufacturing engineers and manufacturingtechnologists [9]. Nearly a decade later, both of these criteria have been updated [10],[11], although the Four Pillars have not followed suite. The EAC 2022-23 ABET criteriafor manufacturing programs require that programs must include curricular content in thefollowing areas:(a) materials and manufacturing processes: design of manufacturing processes that resultin products that meet specific material and other requirements;(b) process, assembly and product engineering: equipment, tooling
program. Results revealed that students had relatively high levelsof all four variables: (a) autonomy (M = 4.39, SD = 0.87), (b) competence (M = 4.92, SD = 0.87),(c) relatedness (M = 5.24, SD = 0.82), and (d) intrinsic motivation (M = 4.75, SD = 1.39). Table 1: Zero-Order Correlation Matrix for Study Variables Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Autonomy ---- 2. Competence .57** ---- 3. Relatedness .50** .55** ---- 4. Intrinsic Motivation .40** .46** .33** ---- 5. Gender -.07 -.17* -.28** -.13 ---- 6. Race/Ethnicity -.03 .00 -.09 .01 .23** ---- 7. # of Projects
; Learning, 17(3), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.14434/v17i3.22600.22. Orique SB, and McCarthy MA (2015). Critical thinking and the use of nontraditional instructional methodologies. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(8), 455–459. https:// doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150717-06.23. Miri B, Ben-Chaim D, and Zoller U (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher- order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353– 369. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2.24. Yue M, Zhang M, Zhang C, and Jin C (2017). The effectiveness of concept mapping on development of critical thinking in nursing education: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Nurse education today, 52, 87
Paper ID #37349Low-Cost Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ Cluster forMosquito Research via Capstone ProjectByul Hur Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2016, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011 to 2016 at the University Florida previously. His
support student learning in an integrated STEM learning environment,” Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.22.[2] J. Vahidy, “Enhancing STEM learning through technology,” echandcurr2019.pressbooks.com. https://techandcurr2019.pressbooks.com/chapter/enhancingstem/ (accessed Jan. 30, 2022)[3] M. Menekse, S. Anwar, and S. Purzer, “Self-efficacy and mobile learning technologies: A Case study of CourseMIRROR,” in Self-Efficacy in Instructional Technology Contexts, C. B. Hodges, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 57–74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99858-9_4.[4] A. B. Raupp, “How video games help students level up stem learning,” Forbes.com. https
students pre behavioral engagement and pre-cognitive engagement aredirectly related to increase in students’ application engagement. However, there was a non-significant correlation between other dimensions of Pre Course_Eng and all dimensions of post-Course_Eng with EdApp_Eng.To understand the relationship between students’ course and app engagement, we conductedsimple linear regressions between the dimensions of Course_Eng and EdApp_Eng. The results ofthe regression analysis are presented in Table 2. We used dimensions of Course_Eng as anindependent variable and EdApp_Eng as the dependent variable.Table 2 Results of regression analysis between Course_Eng and EdApp_Eng Estimate R2 F(1,117) B SE t
. Results showed that there was an increase inthe utilization of DfAM in design concepts. The work will contribute to the field of DfAMintegration in engineering education curriculum and will improve student self-efficacy in DfAM.AcknowledgementWe acknowledge the first-year faculty members, Dr. ChangHoon Lee, Dr. Charles Roche, Dr. J.Benner, Dr. R. Gettens, Dr. A. Kwaczala, Dr. A. Santamaria, Noah Pare, and Roberto DuranBrea for their help in the execution of the experiments.References[1] ISO/ASTM, “ISO/ASTM 52900: Additive manufacturing - General principles - Terminology,” Int. Stand., vol. 5, 2015.[2] B. Motyl and S. Filippi, “Trends in engineering education for additive manufacturing in the industry 4.0 era: a systematic