assemble/disassembly. The designdeveloped by the students involved a vertically sliding fit. To secure the arm from sliding out underthe effect of thrust forces, the design relied on the drone body cover, which slides in placehorizontally and is secured by the recess in the drone body, Figure 3. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 (a) (b) (c) Figure 3: Detachable arm design based on sliding fit, (a) and (b) show the groove where the armassembles and the recess where the cover slides preventing the arms from sliding out during flight, and (c) drone arm assembled to the body3.2 Integrated structural
Line A Represents UTK and Line B Represents USMA (neutral axis denoted with red line) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree This course project has increased/improved my... A 17% 13% 17% 17% 38% confidence in my technical competency. B 6% 33% 56% 11% A 4% 21% 25% 17% 33% technical competency. B 28% 61% 17% A
, B., “Managing for the Future in Higher Education: A Case Study on ‘Lean’ Implementation within a UK Business School”. Journal of Business Economics, 4, pp.1133-1139, 2013.[11] Hines, P. and Lethbridge, S.,” New development: Creating a lean university”. Public Money and Management, 28(1), pp.53-56, 2008.[12] Francis, D.E., “Lean and the learning organization in higher education.” Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 158, pp.1-23, 2014[13] Doman, M.S., “A new lean paradigm in higher education: a case study,” Quality Assurance in Education, 19(3), pp.248-262, 2011.[14] Dragomir, C., and Surugiu, F. "Implementing lean in a higher education university." Constanta Maritime
for Engineering and Technology Education.[5] Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2008). The American Community College (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(3), 306–308.[6] Holmes, M.H., Jackson J.L., & R. Stoiko, R. (2016). Departmental dialogues: Facilitating positive academic climates to improve equity in STEM disciplines. Innovative Higher Education. 41(5), 381–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9358-7[7] Hopewell, L., McNeely, C.L. Kuiler, E.S. & Hahm, J.O. (2009). University Leaders and the public agenda: Talking about women and diversity in STEM fields. Review of Policy Research, 26(5), 589-607.[8] Kosloski, M. F., & Ritz, J. M. (2016). Research
% B 20% A A A 10% A A 0% ALG PCAL CA1 CA2 CA3DE Math GroupFigure 3: Grade distribution in math groups for students in 2007-2015 cohort.We then individually looked at the graduation rates by each grade earned in each math group.These
in Figure 1(a). The 22 channels on the fNIRS cap were placed in accordancewith the 10-20 system, shown in Figure 1(b). (a) (b) Figure 1: fNIRS cap on participant (a), prefrontal cortex channel placement (b)While wearing the fNIRS cap, students were asked to complete a word tracing exercise. Thistype of recording is typical among neurocognitive studies [38], [39]. The neuroimaging datacollected during the word tracing excise was used as a baseline level of activation when writingand subtracted from the neuroimaging data when participants were writing their problemstatements. Once the word tracing exercise was completed, students rested for 30 seconds bystaring at a cross hair
Dangerous Software Errors, 2021, Available: https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2020/2020_cwe_top25.html, Accessed February 1, 2022.[7] Cooper, S., Nickell, C., Piotrowski, V., Oldfield, B., Abdallah, A., Bishop, M., & Brynielsson, J., “An exploration of the current state of information assurance education” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(4), 109-125, 2010.[8] ACM Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science 2013, Retrieved from:https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/., Accessed February 1, 2022.[9] Yuan, X., Yang, L., Jones, B., Yu, H., & Chu, B. T., “Secure software engineering education: Knowledge area, curriculum and resources,” Journal of Cybersecurity Education
Scholars would pursue a project to advanceDEI efforts in MEAM, and would become full members of the MEAM DEI Task Force.However, there were so many applicants (19 in total) and good ideas, that another stage wasadded to help narrow down the applicant pool (see Appendix B for follow-up communication).Again, the Task Force was faced with several strong applications that could be roughly sortedinto three themes: 1) Mentoring programs, 2) A DEI minor, and 3) Recruiting & communitybuilding. The Task Force decided to award three $2,500 scholarships to the three strongestapplicants (DEI Scholars) but also chose to award smaller grants of $250 each to one or more“DEI Associates” whose proposals fell in the same general thematic area as the DEI
sequential/global) of a learning style model formulated by [5]. The instrument wasdeveloped and validated by [11]. Users answer 44 a-b questions with 11 questions for each of thefour dimensions. After answering the question students get a score for each of the fourdimensions that ranges from 0 to 11. A score between 8 to 11 in the active/reflective dimensionplaces the student in the activist category whereas a score of 0 to 3 on this dimension places thestudent in the reflective category. The placement is similarly calculated for the other dimensions.The active/reflective dimension speaks to how students prefer to process information. Activelearners learn by doing something with information. They prefer to process information bytalking about it and
/p.25559. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org/25559.AppendixSurvey questions were as follows: 1. Assume that you have two versions of a lab assignment that will be done in MATLAB. The work you’re expected to do is identical, but in one, you have instructions in a LiveScript. In the other, you have a separate document with instructions. Which do you think will take longer to do? (a) The version with separate instructions will take longer. (b) They would both take the same amount of time. (c) The version with instructions in the LiveScript would take longer. 2. Please comment on why you answered the previous question the way you did. 3. Now, for this same
undergraduate research programs,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 683–713, 2013.[2] C. M. Kardash, “Evaluation of undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 92, no. 1, p. 191, 2000.[3] J. K. Petrella and A. P. Jung, “Undergraduate research: Importance, benefits, and challenges,” Int. J. Exerc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, p. 91, 2008.[4] M. Fechheimer, K. Webber, and P. B. Kleiber, “How well do undergraduate research programs promote engagement and success of students?,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 156–163, 2011.[5] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, “Benefits of undergraduate research experiences,” 2007.[6] W. B
systematic review," PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no. 4, p. e0221765, 2019.[4] T. O. Howard, M.-A. Winkelmes and M. Shegog, "Transparency Teaching in the Virtual Classroom: Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Transparency Teaching Methods with Online Learning," Journal of Political Science Education , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 198-211, 2019.[5] M. L. Bernacki, L. K. Vosicka and J. C. Utz, "Can a brief, digital skill training intervention help undergraduates “learn to learn” and improve their STEM achievement?," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 765-781, 2019.[6] R. Baker, B. Evans, Q. Li and B. Cung, "Does inducing students to schedule lecture watching in online classes improve their academic
course. This example illustrates how early classes introduce lower-level tasks like dataacquisition, and instrumentation procedures, which allows later classes to focus on data analysisand model evaluation.Figure 1: Experimental systems demonstrating (a) solar power, (b) fan-powered vehiclerotational dynamics, (c) motor control, (d) temperature measurement and control, and (e) groundvehicle position, velocity, and acceleration.2.1 Hardware and Software RequirementsTo facilitate integrated experiments, a streamlined data collection and control environment wassought out. An ideal environment would be universal, meaning that it can meet all datacollection and control needs across the curriculum. This requirement is key for prioritizingscarce
,” Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal. 7(1):13-22, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298200700103[6] P.G. Koles, A. Stolfi, N.J. Borges, S. Nelson, D.X. Parmelee, “The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance,” Acad Med. Nov;85(11):1739-45, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed[7] E. Haase, B.N. Phan, H.R. Goldberg, “Molecules and Cells: Team-based and Multi- modal Learning Improves Comprehension and Increases Content Retention,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28685[8] M. Ahmed, B. Indurkhya, “Investigating cognitive holding power and equity in the flipped classroom,” Heliyon, 6(8), e04672
students and the (final)predicted DL from experts in Figure 3 (a), along with standard deviation error bars. Thecorrelation plot of the same data is shown in Figure 3 (b) with a trend line only for the APFconstruct. The separated plots for each construct with standard deviation error bars and trendlines are shown in the Appendix. (a) (b)Figure 3 (a) A comparative plot and (b) a correlation plot between the measured DL and the average final predicted DL for the 15 summative assessment questions, separated by construct. The error bars on plot (a) are standard deviations for the average predicted DL. (Note: DL1 = easiest to DL5 = hardest)From
/17415651211284011.[3] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity‐ based motivation: Connections between first‐year students’ engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[4] B. D. Jones, C. Ruff, and M. C. Paretti, “The Impact of Engineering Identification and Stereotypes on Undergraduate Women’s Achievement and Persistence in Engineering,” Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 471–493, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11218-013-9222-x.[5] Engineering Criteria 2000, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore (November, 1997)[6] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, “Review
-assessment, students completed a labactivity on torsional testing. The lab activity consisted of each group testing samples of metallicrods (aka, a dog-bone sample) using an ADMET material testing system (Figure 2.a) with astraight line drawn across the gauge length of the undeformed A36 steel specimen–a ductilematerial (Figure 2.b); material testing concluded at failure (Figure 2.c). a b c Figure 2: Equipment and testing results of torsional loading. (a) Displays the ADMET material testing system. (b) shows an undeformed sample; the green line provides students a visual representation prior to deformation. (c) an image of a deformed sample with the green line providing
exceed the nine values specified in the lab manual. The current andvoltage can be found by applying Kirchhoff’s Law on the simple circuit equivalent of a PV cell(Figure 2) using Equations (1) and (3). Based on the values given from the laboratory manual, forexample, the above equations can be implemented in Unity VR model as follows: Figure 4. Unity-3D VR programming incorporating solar cell physics behavior (a) (b) Figure 5. (a) Simulated current-voltage (IV) curve and (b) Power-voltage (PV) curve and maximum power point (MPP) by VR Solar Cell Model.The proposed simulation VR model has been adapted to include real world support. The modelcomposed of the
B 6 10 8 -5, slightly unsuccessfulThe FTSS is intended to be a self-evaluation measure of individual transition into theprofessoriate, and as such, it is predicated on what each respondent believes about themselvesand their interactions with others in the academic workplace. It is recognized that both startedtheir new positions during the COVID-19 pandemic, which might have had direct and indirectinfluences on their responses to the questionnaire. For example, respondent B mentioned that allhis courses were online during his first semester as a new faculty member. This shift ininstructional mode was difficult and time-consuming because his prior teaching experience wasface-to-face in a traditional
. This hour-long event includes three maincomponents: introductions, mentor/mentee training, and goal setting. The MPC reiterates theprogram goals and shares ways that participants in the past have found success such asconsistently attending meetings, coming with questions, and sharing personal stories and advice.This training is limited, as participants are generally already involved in other mentoringrelationships (as graduate advisors/advisees) and receive some training in these roles. Goalsetting includes mentees thinking about what they want to complete by the end of this program.The MPC offers goal suggestions: a) short-term goals, such as working on a research elevatorpitch or updating application statements and b) long-term goals, such
Paper ID #37773The DesignSpine: Evolution of an Authentic Project-BasedIntegration of Design in an Engineering CurriculumKenneth Reid (Associate Dean and Director of Engineering) Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co
NetsBlox and RPCs, consider the following 7-blockprogram that display atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations as measured by the NOAAA onMauna Loa (Figure 1). The call to the getCO2Trend RPC of the MaunaLoaCO2Data Servicereturns a 2-column matrix: each row is a pair of time and measured CO2 in parts per million(ppm). This can be directly passed to the draw RPC of the Chart Service that returns an imagewith the plot. The optional second argument to the draw RPC is a list of property-value pairs thatmodify the appearance of the plot. The returned image can be passed to the switch to costumeblock that changes the appearance of the sprite as shown. (a) (b)Figure 1
-publications/publications/college- profiles/2017-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics.pdf[4] M. Bahnson, D. Satterfield, M. Wyer, and A. Kirn, (under review). Interacting with ruling relations: Engineering graduate student experiences of discrimination and bias. [Manuscript submitted for publication].[5] B. A. Burt, A. McKen, J. Burkhart, J. Hormell and A. Knight, “Black men in engineering graduate education: experiencing racial microaggressions within the advisor–advisee relationship,” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 88, pp. 493–508, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.4.0493[6] B. A. Burt, K. L. Williams, and G. J. M. Palmer, “It takes a village: the role of emic and etic
the project manager (PM) was given to upper-level engineering students that passed a recruitment process. PMeligibility including receiving a B in the intro course and processing effective communication skills. Interested students apply to be aPM with a short essay on why they are interested in project management and leadership. An optional interview is conducted if thecourse instructor has not worked with the student previously. Project managers are responsible for leading, planning, and monitoringtasks within groups to effectively execute larger projects. Literature on the role of the PM states that the PM serves as a mentor and abridge between the disconnect of professors and students in terms of teaching and support [28], [29
, E and % A, E. Table 7. Assessment results as % M, A, E and % A, E aligned with ABET Student Outcome 7 sub-outcomesWhile the instructors communicate frequently there are often differences in motivations andconstraints between students who select daytime sections (instructors M and K) and studentswho select evening sections (instructor B). Trends presented should not be considered conclusivefindings.All data in these semesters can be assumed to be influenced by COVID-19. LTU started theFall 2020 and Spring 2021 semesters in-person before transitioning to online. However, in bothsemesters the transition to online occurred after project one was completed. The Fall 2021semester was conducted in-person
collecting and analyzing data, developing contextual solutions, and communicating theirfindings to the students and faculty in subsequent courses in different semesters. The faculty, incoordination with the college’s administration and facilities department, developed an outline for theserelay paths which will drive the implementation of a large-scale restoration and maintenance plan forthe stream. The type of projects and reports that stem from these courses include, but are not limitedto: (a) macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity analyses, (b) stormwater swale restoration plans, (c)riparian restoration and beautification plans, (d) flood hazard mitigation plans, (e) longitudinal waterquality analyses, (f) channel morphology analyses, and (g
a focus on the intersection ofengineering and healthcare, to expose and prepare high school students for career pathways inthis evolving field. Through this partnership, we expect the following outcomes: (a) provide highschool students exposure to real-world applications and university level experiences, (b) provideuniversity students an opportunity to mentor high school students, and (c) equip high school anduniversity students with technical and interpersonal skills that prepare them for their futurecareers. Participant evaluations will be used to measure the success of these outcomes, as well asto guide continuous quality improvements. Success will be confirmed by student reports that theexperience informed them of their career path in
Paper ID #36928Competencies for Graduate Student Training inTransdisciplinary FEWS ResearchJill HeemstraAnna-Maria Marshall (University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign) Anna-Maria Marshall is an associate professor of Sociology and Law at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She is a co-PI on the NSF-funded INFEWS-ER Virtual Resource Center supporting transdisciplinary graduate education in food-energy-water systems; a co-PI in the EngageINFEWS RCN on research on community and stakeholder engagement; and a co-PI in the Science and Technology Center, Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability
Foundation (NSF) grant 1836504. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do notnecessarily reflect those of NSF.Bibliography[1] B. Momo, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, J. A. Mejia, and S. M. Lord, “Broadening the engineering canon: How Culturally Responsive Pedagogies can help educate the engineers of the future,” Murmurations Emerg. Equity Educ, vol. 2, pp. 6–21, 2020.[2] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[3] G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, S. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, F. Bilow, and J. A. Mejia, “An Integrated Approach to Energy Education in Engineering,” Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9145
. Spiker, “Dimensionality, Reliability, and Predictive Evidence ofValidity for Three Help Seeking Intention Instruments: ISCI, GHSQ, and MHSIS,” Journal ofCounseling Psychology, vol. 65, pp. 394-401, 2018.[7] J. H. Hammer, M.C. Parent, and D. A. Spiker, “Mental Help Seeking Attitudes Scale(MHSAS): Development, reliability, validity, and comparison with the ATSSPH-SF andIASMHS-PO,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 65, pp. 74-85, 2018[8] J. H. Hammer, D. A. Spiker, and P. B. Perrin, “Physician referral to a psychologist: Testingalternative behavioral healthcare seeking models,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 75, pp.726-741, 2019.[9] D. A. Spiker, E. C. Berney, J. H. Hammer, and K. C. Jensen, “Maintaining the relationship:Relational