Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 751 - 780 of 1749 in total
Conference Session
Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee University; Mandoye Ndoye, Tuskegee University; David Shannon, Auburn University; Ryan Pippins, Tuskegee University; Eugene Thompson; Adrian Carter, Tuskegee University; Stephen Baker, Tuskegee University; Brandon Guiseppi, Tuskegee University
assemble/disassembly. The designdeveloped by the students involved a vertically sliding fit. To secure the arm from sliding out underthe effect of thrust forces, the design relied on the drone body cover, which slides in placehorizontally and is secured by the recess in the drone body, Figure 3. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 (a) (b) (c) Figure 3: Detachable arm design based on sliding fit, (a) and (b) show the groove where the armassembles and the recess where the cover slides preventing the arms from sliding out during flight, and (c) drone arm assembled to the body3.2 Integrated structural
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Changing How We Teach: Flipping, Project-Based Learning, and More!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Retherford, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah Mobley, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Brad McCoy, United States Military Academy; Aaron Hill, United States Military Academy
Line A Represents UTK and Line B Represents USMA (neutral axis denoted with red line) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree This course project has increased/improved my... A 17% 13% 17% 17% 38% confidence in my technical competency. B 6% 33% 56% 11% A 4% 21% 25% 17% 33% technical competency. B 28% 61% 17% A
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Mirth, St. Cloud State University
, B., “Managing for the Future in Higher Education: A Case Study on ‘Lean’ Implementation within a UK Business School”. Journal of Business Economics, 4, pp.1133-1139, 2013.[11] Hines, P. and Lethbridge, S.,” New development: Creating a lean university”. Public Money and Management, 28(1), pp.53-56, 2008.[12] Francis, D.E., “Lean and the learning organization in higher education.” Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 158, pp.1-23, 2014[13] Doman, M.S., “A new lean paradigm in higher education: a case study,” Quality Assurance in Education, 19(3), pp.248-262, 2011.[14] Dragomir, C., and Surugiu, F. "Implementing lean in a higher education university." Constanta Maritime
Conference Session
Inclusivity at Two Year Colleges
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kimberly Luthi, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide
for Engineering and Technology Education.[5] Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2008). The American Community College (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(3), 306–308.[6] Holmes, M.H., Jackson J.L., & R. Stoiko, R. (2016). Departmental dialogues: Facilitating positive academic climates to improve equity in STEM disciplines. Innovative Higher Education. 41(5), 381–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9358-7[7] Hopewell, L., McNeely, C.L. Kuiler, E.S. & Hahm, J.O. (2009). University Leaders and the public agenda: Talking about women and diversity in STEM fields. Review of Policy Research, 26(5), 589-607.[8] Kosloski, M. F., & Ritz, J. M. (2016). Research
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Academic Progress, Retention, and Mathematics
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas; Heath Schluterman, University of Arkansas; Leslie Massey, University of Arkansas; Brandon Crisel; Candace Rainwater, University of Arkansas
% B 20% A A A 10% A A 0% ALG PCAL CA1 CA2 CA3DE Math GroupFigure 3: Grade distribution in math groups for students in 2007-2015 cohort.We then individually looked at the graduation rates by each grade earned in each math group.These
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 4 Best in DEED
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tripp Shealy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; John Gero, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Paulo Ignacio Jr., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
in Figure 1(a). The 22 channels on the fNIRS cap were placed in accordancewith the 10-20 system, shown in Figure 1(b). (a) (b) Figure 1: fNIRS cap on participant (a), prefrontal cortex channel placement (b)While wearing the fNIRS cap, students were asked to complete a word tracing exercise. Thistype of recording is typical among neurocognitive studies [38], [39]. The neuroimaging datacollected during the word tracing excise was used as a baseline level of activation when writingand subtracted from the neuroimaging data when participants were writing their problemstatements. Once the word tracing exercise was completed, students rested for 30 seconds bystaring at a cross hair
Conference Session
CIT Division Technical Session #2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cheryl Resch, University of Florida; Christina Gardner-McCune, University of Florida; Keyna Wintjen, University of Florida
Dangerous Software Errors, 2021, Available: https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2020/2020_cwe_top25.html, Accessed February 1, 2022.[7] Cooper, S., Nickell, C., Piotrowski, V., Oldfield, B., Abdallah, A., Bishop, M., & Brynielsson, J., “An exploration of the current state of information assurance education” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(4), 109-125, 2010.[8] ACM Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science 2013, Retrieved from:https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/., Accessed February 1, 2022.[9] Yuan, X., Yang, L., Jones, B., Yu, H., & Chu, B. T., “Secure software engineering education: Knowledge area, curriculum and resources,” Journal of Cybersecurity Education
Conference Session
How Communities and Systems Influence Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dustyn Roberts, University of Pennsylvania; Robert Carpick, University of Pennsylvania; Igor Bargatin, University of Pennsylvania
Scholars would pursue a project to advanceDEI efforts in MEAM, and would become full members of the MEAM DEI Task Force.However, there were so many applicants (19 in total) and good ideas, that another stage wasadded to help narrow down the applicant pool (see Appendix B for follow-up communication).Again, the Task Force was faced with several strong applications that could be roughly sortedinto three themes: 1) Mentoring programs, 2) A DEI minor, and 3) Recruiting & communitybuilding. The Task Force decided to award three $2,500 scholarships to the three strongestapplicants (DEI Scholars) but also chose to award smaller grants of $250 each to one or more“DEI Associates” whose proposals fell in the same general thematic area as the DEI
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies I
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yael Gertner, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Juan Alvarez, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Benjamin Cosman, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jennifer Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
sequential/global) of a learning style model formulated by [5]. The instrument wasdeveloped and validated by [11]. Users answer 44 a-b questions with 11 questions for each of thefour dimensions. After answering the question students get a score for each of the fourdimensions that ranges from 0 to 11. A score between 8 to 11 in the active/reflective dimensionplaces the student in the activist category whereas a score of 0 to 3 on this dimension places thestudent in the reflective category. The placement is similarly calculated for the other dimensions.The active/reflective dimension speaks to how students prefer to process information. Activelearners learn by doing something with information. They prefer to process information bytalking about it and
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering: Design and Labs
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diane Peters, Kettering University; Austin Nash, Kettering University
/p.25559. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org/25559.AppendixSurvey questions were as follows: 1. Assume that you have two versions of a lab assignment that will be done in MATLAB. The work you’re expected to do is identical, but in one, you have instructions in a LiveScript. In the other, you have a separate document with instructions. Which do you think will take longer to do? (a) The version with separate instructions will take longer. (b) They would both take the same amount of time. (c) The version with instructions in the LiveScript would take longer. 2. Please comment on why you answered the previous question the way you did. 3. Now, for this same
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Lee, University of California, Santa Cruz; Dustin Palea, University of California, Santa Cruz
undergraduate research programs,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 683–713, 2013.[2] C. M. Kardash, “Evaluation of undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 92, no. 1, p. 191, 2000.[3] J. K. Petrella and A. P. Jung, “Undergraduate research: Importance, benefits, and challenges,” Int. J. Exerc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, p. 91, 2008.[4] M. Fechheimer, K. Webber, and P. B. Kleiber, “How well do undergraduate research programs promote engagement and success of students?,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 156–163, 2011.[5] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, “Benefits of undergraduate research experiences,” 2007.[6] W. B
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division: Developing Lab and Research Skills for BioE/BME Students
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin Hawkins, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
systematic review," PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no. 4, p. e0221765, 2019.[4] T. O. Howard, M.-A. Winkelmes and M. Shegog, "Transparency Teaching in the Virtual Classroom: Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Transparency Teaching Methods with Online Learning," Journal of Political Science Education , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 198-211, 2019.[5] M. L. Bernacki, L. K. Vosicka and J. C. Utz, "Can a brief, digital skill training intervention help undergraduates “learn to learn” and improve their STEM achievement?," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 765-781, 2019.[6] R. Baker, B. Evans, Q. Li and B. Cung, "Does inducing students to schedule lecture watching in online classes improve their academic
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 5: Remote, Hands-On Laboratories
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Robinson
course. This example illustrates how early classes introduce lower-level tasks like dataacquisition, and instrumentation procedures, which allows later classes to focus on data analysisand model evaluation.Figure 1: Experimental systems demonstrating (a) solar power, (b) fan-powered vehiclerotational dynamics, (c) motor control, (d) temperature measurement and control, and (e) groundvehicle position, velocity, and acceleration.2.1 Hardware and Software RequirementsTo facilitate integrated experiments, a streamlined data collection and control environment wassought out. An ideal environment would be universal, meaning that it can meet all datacollection and control needs across the curriculum. This requirement is key for prioritizingscarce
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division: Developing Lab and Research Skills for BioE/BME Students
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eileen Haase, The Johns Hopkins University; Natsuki Furukawa, The Johns Hopkins University; Brooke Hardesty, The Johns Hopkins University; Akash Patil, The Johns Hopkins University; Amanda Ruci, The Johns Hopkins University
,” Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal. 7(1):13-22, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298200700103[6] P.G. Koles, A. Stolfi, N.J. Borges, S. Nelson, D.X. Parmelee, “The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance,” Acad Med. Nov;85(11):1739-45, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed[7] E. Haase, B.N. Phan, H.R. Goldberg, “Molecules and Cells: Team-based and Multi- modal Learning Improves Comprehension and Increases Content Retention,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28685[8] M. Ahmed, B. Indurkhya, “Investigating cognitive holding power and equity in the flipped classroom,” Heliyon, 6(8), e04672
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nutnicha Nigon, Oregon State University; Dana Simionescu, Oregon State University; Thomas Ekstedt, Oregon State University; Julie Tucker; Milo Koretsky, Tufts University
students and the (final)predicted DL from experts in Figure 3 (a), along with standard deviation error bars. Thecorrelation plot of the same data is shown in Figure 3 (b) with a trend line only for the APFconstruct. The separated plots for each construct with standard deviation error bars and trendlines are shown in the Appendix. (a) (b)Figure 3 (a) A comparative plot and (b) a correlation plot between the measured DL and the average final predicted DL for the 15 summative assessment questions, separated by construct. The error bars on plot (a) are standard deviations for the average predicted DL. (Note: DL1 = easiest to DL5 = hardest)From
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Program Descriptions and Learning Analytics
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan Aurand, Dunwoody College of Technology; Peter Walls
/17415651211284011.[3] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity‐ based motivation: Connections between first‐year students’ engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[4] B. D. Jones, C. Ruff, and M. C. Paretti, “The Impact of Engineering Identification and Stereotypes on Undergraduate Women’s Achievement and Persistence in Engineering,” Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 471–493, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11218-013-9222-x.[5] Engineering Criteria 2000, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore (November, 1997)[6] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, “Review
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Grondin, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Michael Swart, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Fangli Xia, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Mitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin - Madison
-assessment, students completed a labactivity on torsional testing. The lab activity consisted of each group testing samples of metallicrods (aka, a dog-bone sample) using an ADMET material testing system (Figure 2.a) with astraight line drawn across the gauge length of the undeformed A36 steel specimen–a ductilematerial (Figure 2.b); material testing concluded at failure (Figure 2.c). a b c Figure 2: Equipment and testing results of torsional loading. (a) Displays the ADMET material testing system. (b) shows an undeformed sample; the green line provides students a visual representation prior to deformation. (c) an image of a deformed sample with the green line providing
Conference Session
Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Tzu-liang Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Michael Mauk; Irina Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University; Tam Phi, Drexel University
exceed the nine values specified in the lab manual. The current andvoltage can be found by applying Kirchhoff’s Law on the simple circuit equivalent of a PV cell(Figure 2) using Equations (1) and (3). Based on the values given from the laboratory manual, forexample, the above equations can be implemented in Unity VR model as follows: Figure 4. Unity-3D VR programming incorporating solar cell physics behavior (a) (b) Figure 5. (a) Simulated current-voltage (IV) curve and (b) Power-voltage (PV) curve and maximum power point (MPP) by VR Solar Cell Model.The proposed simulation VR model has been adapted to include real world support. The modelcomposed of the
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 6: Monitoring, Evaluating and Research
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohammed K. Faris, University of Mosul / Iraq; Charles Pierce, University of South Carolina; Muwafaq Awad; Inthuorn Sasanakul
B 6 10 8 -5, slightly unsuccessfulThe FTSS is intended to be a self-evaluation measure of individual transition into theprofessoriate, and as such, it is predicated on what each respondent believes about themselvesand their interactions with others in the academic workplace. It is recognized that both startedtheir new positions during the COVID-19 pandemic, which might have had direct and indirectinfluences on their responses to the questionnaire. For example, respondent B mentioned that allhis courses were online during his first semester as a new faculty member. This shift ininstructional mode was difficult and time-consuming because his prior teaching experience wasface-to-face in a traditional
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Morgan Broberg, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Baishakhi Bose, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Raul Pineda-Mendez, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Rachel Gehr, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Camila Garcia Jange, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jacqueline McDermott, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Michael Loui, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jessica Eisma, The University of Texas at Arlington; David Devine, Cleveland State University
. This hour-long event includes three maincomponents: introductions, mentor/mentee training, and goal setting. The MPC reiterates theprogram goals and shares ways that participants in the past have found success such asconsistently attending meetings, coming with questions, and sharing personal stories and advice.This training is limited, as participants are generally already involved in other mentoringrelationships (as graduate advisors/advisees) and receive some training in these roles. Goalsetting includes mentees thinking about what they want to complete by the end of this program.The MPC offers goal suggestions: a) short-term goals, such as working on a research elevatorpitch or updating application statements and b) long-term goals, such
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 9 - Design Across the Curriculum
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis; George Ricco, University of Indianapolis; David Olawale, University of Indianapolis; Md Rashedul Sarker, University of Indianapolis
Paper ID #37773The DesignSpine: Evolution of an Authentic Project-BasedIntegration of Design in an Engineering CurriculumKenneth Reid (Associate Dean and Director of Engineering) Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Akos Ledeczi, Vanderbilt University; Veronica Catete; Devin Jean, Vanderbilt University; Marnie Hill, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Shuchi Grover; Brian Broll, Vanderbilt University; Tiffany Barnes, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Lauren Alvarez, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Isabella Gransbury, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Gordon Stein, Vanderbilt University
NetsBlox and RPCs, consider the following 7-blockprogram that display atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations as measured by the NOAAA onMauna Loa (Figure 1). The call to the getCO2Trend RPC of the MaunaLoaCO2Data Servicereturns a 2-column matrix: each row is a pair of time and measured CO2 in parts per million(ppm). This can be directly passed to the draw RPC of the Chart Service that returns an imagewith the plot. The optional second argument to the draw RPC is a list of property-value pairs thatmodify the appearance of the plot. The returned image can be passed to the switch to costumeblock that changes the appearance of the sprite as shown. (a) (b)Figure 1
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elan Hope, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Derrick Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Anitra Alexander; Alexis Briggs; Laila Allam, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
-publications/publications/college- profiles/2017-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics.pdf[4] M. Bahnson, D. Satterfield, M. Wyer, and A. Kirn, (under review). Interacting with ruling relations: Engineering graduate student experiences of discrimination and bias. [Manuscript submitted for publication].[5] B. A. Burt, A. McKen, J. Burkhart, J. Hormell and A. Knight, “Black men in engineering graduate education: experiencing racial microaggressions within the advisor–advisee relationship,” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 88, pp. 493–508, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.4.0493[6] B. A. Burt, K. L. Williams, and G. J. M. Palmer, “It takes a village: the role of emic and etic
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Academic Progress, Retention, and Mathematics
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Na'imah White, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Karoline Evans, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Douglas Correa Ospina, University of Massachusetts Lowell
the project manager (PM) was given to upper-level engineering students that passed a recruitment process. PMeligibility including receiving a B in the intro course and processing effective communication skills. Interested students apply to be aPM with a short essay on why they are interested in project management and leadership. An optional interview is conducted if thecourse instructor has not worked with the student previously. Project managers are responsible for leading, planning, and monitoringtasks within groups to effectively execute larger projects. Literature on the role of the PM states that the PM serves as a mentor and abridge between the disconnect of professors and students in terms of teaching and support [28], [29
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering: Assorted Topics
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University
, E and % A, E. Table 7. Assessment results as % M, A, E and % A, E aligned with ABET Student Outcome 7 sub-outcomesWhile the instructors communicate frequently there are often differences in motivations andconstraints between students who select daytime sections (instructors M and K) and studentswho select evening sections (instructor B). Trends presented should not be considered conclusivefindings.All data in these semesters can be assumed to be influenced by COVID-19. LTU started theFall 2020 and Spring 2021 semesters in-person before transitioning to online. However, in bothsemesters the transition to online occurred after project one was completed. The Fall 2021semester was conducted in-person
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua Wyrick, York College of Pennsylvania; Alison Kennicutt, York College of Pennsylvania; Bridgette Hagerty, York College of Pennsylvania; JESSICA NOLAN, York College of Pennsylvania; Karl Kleiner, York College of Pennsylvania; Most Tahera Naznin, York College of Pennsylvania
collecting and analyzing data, developing contextual solutions, and communicating theirfindings to the students and faculty in subsequent courses in different semesters. The faculty, incoordination with the college’s administration and facilities department, developed an outline for theserelay paths which will drive the implementation of a large-scale restoration and maintenance plan forthe stream. The type of projects and reports that stem from these courses include, but are not limitedto: (a) macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity analyses, (b) stormwater swale restoration plans, (c)riparian restoration and beautification plans, (d) flood hazard mitigation plans, (e) longitudinal waterquality analyses, (f) channel morphology analyses, and (g
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Prashanth Asuri, Santa Clara University; Shraddha Chaplot; Navid Shaghaghi; Julia Scott
a focus on the intersection ofengineering and healthcare, to expose and prepare high school students for career pathways inthis evolving field. Through this partnership, we expect the following outcomes: (a) provide highschool students exposure to real-world applications and university level experiences, (b) provideuniversity students an opportunity to mentor high school students, and (c) equip high school anduniversity students with technical and interpersonal skills that prepare them for their futurecareers. Participant evaluations will be used to measure the success of these outcomes, as well asto guide continuous quality improvements. Success will be confirmed by student reports that theexperience informed them of their career path in
Conference Session
Unassigned (6 available)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jill Heemstra, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Luis Rodriguez; Anna-Maria Marshall, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Erin Cortus, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Classen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jacek Koziel, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Alison Deviney
Paper ID #36928Competencies for Graduate Student Training inTransdisciplinary FEWS ResearchJill HeemstraAnna-Maria Marshall (University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign) Anna-Maria Marshall is an associate professor of Sociology and Law at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She is a co-PI on the NSF-funded INFEWS-ER Virtual Resource Center supporting transdisciplinary graduate education in food-energy-water systems; a co-PI in the EngageINFEWS RCN on research on community and stakeholder engagement; and a co-PI in the Science and Technology Center, Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gordon Hoople, University of San Diego; Diana Chen, University of San Diego; Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Joel Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio
Foundation (NSF) grant 1836504. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do notnecessarily reflect those of NSF.Bibliography[1] B. Momo, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, J. A. Mejia, and S. M. Lord, “Broadening the engineering canon: How Culturally Responsive Pedagogies can help educate the engineers of the future,” Murmurations Emerg. Equity Educ, vol. 2, pp. 6–21, 2020.[2] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[3] G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, S. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, F. Bilow, and J. A. Mejia, “An Integrated Approach to Energy Education in Engineering,” Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9145
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Wilson, University of Kentucky; Joseph Hammer; Melanie Miller; Courtney Wright, University of Kentucky; Lucy Hargis; Ellen Usher
. Spiker, “Dimensionality, Reliability, and Predictive Evidence ofValidity for Three Help Seeking Intention Instruments: ISCI, GHSQ, and MHSIS,” Journal ofCounseling Psychology, vol. 65, pp. 394-401, 2018.[7] J. H. Hammer, M.C. Parent, and D. A. Spiker, “Mental Help Seeking Attitudes Scale(MHSAS): Development, reliability, validity, and comparison with the ATSSPH-SF andIASMHS-PO,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 65, pp. 74-85, 2018[8] J. H. Hammer, D. A. Spiker, and P. B. Perrin, “Physician referral to a psychologist: Testingalternative behavioral healthcare seeking models,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 75, pp.726-741, 2019.[9] D. A. Spiker, E. C. Berney, J. H. Hammer, and K. C. Jensen, “Maintaining the relationship:Relational