Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Academic Progress, Retention, and Mathematics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carrie Francis; Michael Jacobson, University of Northwestern

relationships, and estimate volume with SI units.Students in the engineering program are expected to be ready for calculus I. The calculus courseperquisite is based on student performance in a pre-calculus course, the ACT math, SAT math, orALEKS assessment, with minimum scores set at B-, 26 or 28 (depending on year), 660, and 76,respectively. This study focused on ACT assessment as the most common at this institution.ALEKS is typically used only when the ACT score is insufficient or unavailable.Analysis suggests that ACT performance does not predict student retention and the relationshipof average performance to calculus success is unclear. ACT scores were available for 89students, of whom 65 persisted and 24 left the program. The average ACT math

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Best Paper

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Duncan Davis, Northeastern University; Ciana Winston, Northeastern University

. Pasricha, T. Singh, and P. Churi, “A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 6421–6445, 2021.[12] K. Hylton, Y. Levy, and L. P. Dringus, “Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams,” Comput. Educ., vol. 92–93, pp. 53–63, 2016.[13] B. Christe, “Writing Online Exam Questions That Discourage Dishonesty,” in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, 2003, p. 8.1321.1–6.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Tan, Texas Tech University; Luke LeFebvre, University of Kentucky; Tim Dallas, Texas Tech University; Changxue Xu, Texas Tech University; Jnev Biros

(enhanced by 1.41) was in the skill of “providing a technical evaluation of thestrengths and limitations of a product.” The least improvement (enhanced by 0.13) was in the“interest in starting a career in ‘Engineers in Medicine.’” The self-efficacy survey covered fiveaspects: (A) background research skills, (B) critical thinking and ideation, (C) projectmanagement and teamwork, (D) technical communication skills, and (E) interest in medicalengineering. The improvement of self-efficacy in these five aspects is presented in Figure 2. As perstudents’ self-evaluation, the most confident skill after the training of this course was projectmanagement and teamwork, which was improved from 3.62 to 4.37. The most improved skillwas background research

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Ferekides, University of South Florida; Carol Haden, Northern Arizona University; Gokhan MuMcu, University of South Florida; Ismail Uysal, University of South Florida; Joel Howell; Chung Seop Jeong, University of South Florida; Wilfrido Moreno, University of South Florida; Arash Takshi; Kevin Yee; Paul Spector, University of South Florida

0 1 2 3 4 5 PFE 1 PFE 2 PFE 3REFERENCES[1] Currall, S. C., Frauenheim, E., Perry, S. J., & Hunter, E. M. (2014). Organized innovation: Ablueprint for renewing America's prosperity. Oxford University Press.[2] Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation ofteaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598-642.[3] Kuhl, J. (1992). A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination, and some applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(2), 97-129.[4] Spector, P., Ferekides, C. S., Mumcu, G., Uysal, I., & Jeong, C

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Alex Phan, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego

” forimproving academic integrity (IAI) and “moderately” for improving technical speaking (ITS). (a) (b)Figure 2. The heatmaps (comparison of student responses to two questions related toeffectiveness of oral exams in improving academic integrity and technical speaking for (a) MAE30A Summer 2021 and (b) ECE 65 Spring 2021.Data and analysis of responses to the open-ended questionsIn the end-of-quarter surveys, students were asked about the best aspects of the oral exams andthe areas of improvement for such exams. To analyze the students’ responses to thoseunprompted questions, their comments were thematically assigned researcher-defined opencodes using the ATLAS.ti software. The

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Integrating Design Across the BioE/BME Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa Taylor, University of Washington

impact of disability on innovation, and design for accessibility and the UD principles, including examples of health technologies that illustrated UD principles. In-class activities included two small- group discussions, followed by groups sharing their ideas with the whole class: a. With a partner, share stories of when you could have benefited from UD, or more accessible design. b. With a partner, discuss a task each of you performed or experienced this morning that involved a design solution (e.g., making coffee, cooking an egg, riding the bus). Choose one to focus on as a team, then address: 1. How well does it satisfy each of the 7 UD principles? (refer to

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Best of Works in Progress

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine King, University of California, Irvine; Jasmine Wang, University of California, Irvine; Sriram Rao, University of California, Irvine; Rahul Sreedasyam, University of California, Irvine; Abhishek Kulkarni, University of California, Irvine; Shaan Braich, University of California, Irvine; Ishaan Sharma, University of California, Irvine; Dalton Salvo, University of California, Irvine

, June 26, 2016, New Orleans, Louisiana. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi:10.18260/p.26393.[2] J. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, S. Sood, J. Greene Ryan, A. Attaluri, and R. Hirsh, “ClinicalImmersion and Team-based Design: Into a Third Year,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition Proceedings, June 24-28, 2017, Columbus, Ohio. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER,Doi: 10.18260/1-2—28040.[3] W. H. Guilford, M. Keeley, B. P. Helmke, and T. E. Allen. "Work in Progress: A ClinicalImmersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, June 15, 2019, Tampa, Florida. [Online]. Available: ASEE PEER, Doi: 10.18260/1-2—33581.[4] C. Holden and A. Moser, “Survival Guide for Clinical Engineering Millennials

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Elif Kongar, Fairfield University; John Drazan, Fairfield University; Isaac Macwan, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski

microcontroller. The Arduino Uno has 14 digital input/output pins, 6analog inputs, a resonator, a USB connector, a power, and a reset button. It completely supports themicrocontroller. a. Power: The Arduino Uno can be powered via the USB connection or with an external power supply (AC-to-DC adapter or battery). Leads from a battery can be inserted in the Gnd and Vin pin headers of the power connector. The board can operate on an external supply of 6 to 20 volts. b. Input/Output: Each of the 14 digital pins on the Uno can be used as an input or output. This can be done using the pinMode, digitalWrite and digitalRead functions [8]. They operate at 5 volts. In addition, some pins have specialized functions. c. Communication

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Gentry, University of California, Davis; Rachel Altovar

commented specifically on their SeniorDesign experience, which could not run experiments in 2020. Similarly, it was not surprising tosee the comments that programming skills were a supplement for experiments and “researchestimation during the pandemic when less physical contacts are suggested.” a) Changing importance of programming due to COVID-19 "More important now" "Not changed" "Diminished [importance]" 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 b) Themes addressed when reflecting on COVID-19 effects Supplement for in-person work Career Inadequate level of knowledge

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Perspectives on Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder

,” International Journal of Ethics Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 215–238, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40889-021-00121-7.[10] D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, and N. Verloop, “Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 107–128, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.[11] D. B. Knight, I. T. Cameron, R. G. Hadgraft, and C. Reidsema, “The Influence of External Forces, Institutional Forces, and Academics’ Characteristics on the Adoption of Positive Teaching Practices across Australian Undergraduate Engineering,” p. 17.[12] M. Polmear, A. R. Bielefeldt, D. Knight, C. Swan, and N. Canney, “Exploratory Investigation of Personal Influences on Educators’ Engagement in

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yalda Afshar, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Emily Marasco, University of Calgary; Jalal Kawash, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat, University of Calgary; Mahmood Moussavi, University of Calgary

studies will focus on how software engineering courses should be taught in classrooms.As future work, we would like to expand our work by integrating multiple courses in softwareengineering curriculum such as software architecture, requirements engineering, testing, anddatabases together. We would also like to investigate the effect of providing the problem area tothe students before they even start the project on project’s efficiency.References [1] E. L. Ouh, B. K. S. Gan, and Y. Irawan, “Did our course design on software architecture meet our student’s learning expectations?” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–9. [2] V. H. Subburaj, A. S. Subburaj, and J. E. Urban, “Introduction to computing

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder

their professional services.” [2] 2020 Completely changed the code moving from canons to a hierarchical stakeholder model, placing obligations to society (public, humanity) first, the natural and built environment second (e.g., adhere to principles of sustainable development), the profession third, clients and employers fourth, and peers fifth. The environmental considerations were significantly strengthened, moving from should and try to “a. adhere to the principles of sustainable development; b. consider and balance societal, environmental, and economic impacts…; c. mitigate adverse societal, environmental, and economic effects; and d. use resources wisely while minimizing resource

Conference Session

ERM: Identity Impacts (Identity Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cristián Vargas-Ordóñez, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

mentoring: Does the name matter?,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1267–1281, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9366-7.[28] P. Willis, “The ‘things themselves’ in phenomenology,” Indo-Pacific J. Phenomenol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2001, doi: 10.1080/20797222.2001.11433860.[29] S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation., 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 2014.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chi-ning Chang, The University of Kansas; Guan Saw; Laura Malagon-Palacios

), a Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimator was implemented. Allthe SEM models were performed in Mplus 8.6 [13].ResultsRemote Learning Challenges during the COVID-19 PandemicFor engineering faculty, we found that women faculty members experienced more technologicalchallenges in transitioning to remote learning (b=.128, p< .05) and more challenges in adaptingcourse design to remote learning (b=.251, p

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doris Espiritu, Wright College; Ruzica Todorovic; Bridget O'Connell

. 11. INTRODUCTIONSeveral factors have been identified to contribute to the uneven pursuit and completion of engineering andcomputer science degrees based on race and ethnicity: (a) the lack of exposure to engineering or computerscience as fields of study or as career opportunities [1], (b) the lack of professional identity (inability tosee oneself as a professional) [2], (c) an impaired sense of belonging [3, 4], and (d) the lack of self-efficacy (how well one can execute a course of action to deal with a prospective situation) [5]. Thedemands of an engineering and computer science curriculum contribute to high dropout rates [6], evenhigher for underrepresented students [3, 7, 8]. Early failure in math and science courses pose a barrier

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

binbin shao, Zhejiang University; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University; Liang Wang

, grade level, short-term entrepreneurial experience, entrepreneurialcourses, entrepreneurial competition experience, and entrepreneurial family members,as shown in Table 2. Male students comprised 53.7% of the sample, and 7.4% of thosesampled had some short-term entrepreneurial experience. Additionally, more than halfof the students had taken entrepreneurship courses on campus. Fewer than half (43%)of the students had participated in entrepreneurship competitions, with more than halfof those students participating more than once. Approximately 14.5% of the studentsindicated that a family member was an entrepreneur.Table 2. Sample composition Category Total N (%b

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcia Gail Headley, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Haritha Malladi, University of Delaware

assessment in computer engineering," presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2015.7344227[2] A. W. Eberhardt, O. L. Johnson, W. B. Kirkland, J. H. Dobbs, and L. G. Moradi, "Team- based development of medical devices: an engineering–business collaborative," Journal of biomechanical engineering, vol. 138, no. 7, 2016.[3] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, "Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, 2003. https://peer.asee.org/11855[4] N. Mentzer, "Team Based Engineering Design Thinking

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra

advisory board members Jennifer Cromley, AllisonGodwin, and Nicola Sochacka for feedback on the research design and analysis. The authors alsothank the students for participating in the survey.References[1] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, "Effects of COVID-19 on Engineering Students’ Baseline Stress," in Proceedings of the AAEE2020 Conference, 2020.[2] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, "Major differences: Variations in undergraduate and graduate student mental health and treatment utilization across academic disciplines," Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, pp. 23- 41, 2016.[3] K. Jensen, S. R. Vohra, J. F. Mirabelli, A. J. Kunze, I. Miller, and T. E. Romanchek

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brad Wambeke, United States Air Force Academy

feels that FERL is a winning combination foreveryone that truly embodies the educational concepts of culturally sensitive design and servicelearning. This faculty feel this unique program better prepares future officers and civil engineersto meet challenges both in the classroom and in practice, and that others could considerestablishing a similar program.References:[1] Vander Schaaf, Reid, and Ronald Welch. "Using Summer Programs to Excite Interest inEngineering." In ASEE 2003 Annual Conference, pp. 8-1259. 2003.[2] Buchholtz, Sean, and Reid Vander Schaaf. "Shaping the Battlefield to Increase Enrollmentsin Civil Engineering." In ASEE 2003 Annual Conference, pp. 8-1012. 2003.[3] Jenkins, S. Rod, James B. Pocock, Patrick D. Zuraski, Ronald B

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vicki May, Dartmouth College; Diana Kardia

that will be sent to faculty and staff every three months to monitor the climateand culture in engineering. The Pulse Check includes the questions listed in Table 1. Table 1. Pulse Check questions1. Rate your level of agreement with the following (consider your actions over the past 3 months): strongly disagree neutral agree strongly disagree agree a. I am able to bring my true self to work. b. Norms and policies are clearly communicated. c. I am respected at work. d. I find ways to be inclusive. e. I have

Conference Session

Computers in Education 11 - Modulus 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patriel Stapleton, University of Florida; Jeremiah Blanchard

  Informatics (ICEEI), Jul. 2019, pp. 284–289. doi: 10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019.8988786. [19]  J. Keengwe and T. T. Kidd, “Towards Best Practices in Online Learning and Teaching in  Higher Education,” vol. 6, no. 2, p. 9, 2010. [20]  “Exam Day: What to Expect,” ProctorU. https://support.proctoru.com/hc/en‐ us/articles/360043565051‐Exam‐Day‐What‐to‐Expect‐ (accessed Jan. 28, 2022). [21]  C. Auerbach and L. B. Silverstein, Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis.  NYU Press, 2003. [22]  “Compare Online Proctoring Features Across Our Products,” ProctorU.  https://www.proctoru.com/compare‐proctoring‐features (accessed Apr. 10, 2021). [23]  K. Mukhtar, K. Javed, M. Arooj, and A. Sethi, “Advantages, Limitations and

Conference Session

ERM: Find Out More About Faculty!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Orton, University of Missouri - Columbia; Fan Yu, University of Missouri - Columbia; Johanna Milord; Lisa Flores, University of Missouri - Columbia; Rose Marra, University of Missouri - Columbia

strengthen structures, analysis and testing for reinforced concrete frames under disproportionate collapse, and risk and reliability analysis of bridges and offshore structures. She is a registered professional engineer in Missouri.Fan Yu Fan Yu is a doctoral student at the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri-Columbia. She is originally from China. Fan received her MS in Elementary Education Science and a graduate certificate in Curriculum and Instructions in 2017. She worked as a K12 educational products developer for four years. Fan’s research interests include STEM education and UX design in learning technologies. She concerns about how learning technologies encourage

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanaz Motamedi, University of Florida; Mckenzie Landrum, University of Florida; Tara Ippolito, University of Florida; Austin Hayes

students' confidence for each. a. Statistics Self-Efficacy: The survey asked questions gauging the student’s comfort level with statistics and whether they are interested in learning more about the topic or pursuing it in their career. b. RStudio Self-Efficacy: The survey asked questions related to the student's confidence with working in RStudio. The questions include whether the student can write syntactically correct statements, understand, identify, and correct errors, correctly interpret output, and understand basic problem-solving approaches within RStudio. c. Theory Self-Efficacy: Separate from

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - the Best of NEE

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Wodin-Schwartz, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kimberly Lechasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Adam Powell, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Yihao Zheng, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sneha Prabha Narra, Carnegie Mellon University

well as the contribution of each learning activity.MeasuresIndependent Variables. The instructor of each student’s course was indicated, as was themodality of the course: a) in-person pre-pandemic, b) virtual in Year 1 of the pandemic, or c) in-person in Year 2 of the pandemic. These modalities were included in the dataset as controlvariables due to evidence of their significant effects on student outcomes in earlier analyses ofthis course at the university (Author A & Author B, 2021).The influence of learning activities on student learning was captured in three variables. Studentswere asked, “How much did each of the following aspects of this Statics class help yourlearning?” for a series of learning activities and course design elements

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Developing Lab and Research Skills for BioE/BME Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Ankeny, Northwestern University; Amy Adkins, Northwestern University; David O'Neill, Northwestern University

in averages = 0.2%; p=0.83) as shown in Figure 1 below.Fig. 1 Achievement Improvement Over Quarter There was a small but statistically significantincrease in report scores between Module 1 and Module 2 (p<0.001, n=18) during the firstquarter as shown in panel A. During the second quarter, there was no difference betweenaverage report scores between Module 1 and Module 2 as shown in panel B (n=24).Correlation between Reflection Scores and AchievementFor the first quarter using only reflective surveys, we saw a statistically significant positivecorrelation between individual reflection survey scores and individual final exam scores wherethe Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.64 (p=0.02, n=12) as shown in the dotted trendline ofFig. 2A

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hoo Kim, LeTourneau University

by Qeexo. To ensure thecontest participants had more direct support in using new ML technology and tools, students whotook the course were required to participate in the contest as a part of their class term projects. Thecontest was open to all LETU students, publicized by advertisements and announcements. As acontest design, selected 10 teams were invited to enter the final round to demonstrate their works.All team’s works were judged by judges from B and C industry and judges from LETU. Qeexosponsored all prizes and technical guidance in the contest, and LETU’s marketing team providedsupport by inviting local media and advertising the contest to the public [11, 12].Year 2 Collaboration: With the 1st year experience, the ENGR 4963: Machine

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 1: Online or Remote Teaching and Curricular Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Weiying Zhu, Metropolitan State University of Denver

” functionunder “Moderate This Quiz” in Canvas was used to check student actions during an online test.As an example, four versions of a problem in an online test for this online course is shown inFigure 2, which partially shows how some of the strategies discussed above were implemented inour design of every online test. By including different ARM addition instructions (circled in ablue circle in Figure 2), we made sure that the solutions and answers to this problem in eachversion are significantly different from that in the other three versions. These four versions wereadded into the question bank created for Problem B. During this online test, one of these fourversions was randomly picked by Canvas for a student to solve. Meanwhile, students

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Merriweather, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Niesha Douglas; Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Anna Sanczyk

, “Qualitative case study methodology: Study design andimplementation for novice researchers,” The Qualitative Report, vol. 13, no. 3, Article 2, 2008.[20] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures forDeveloping Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, 1998.[21] B. Glaser, and A. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for QualitativeResearch. Aldine, 1967.[22] C. Howell, K. Villanueva, & N. Douglas, A. Sanczyk, and L. Merriweather, “Doctoralmentoring relationships in STEM programs: Faculty perspectives,” The Chronicle of Mentoring& Coaching, vol. 5, no. 14, pp. 435-441. October 18-22, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.mentor-cmc.com/cmc/cmc2021/MobilePagedReplica.action?pm=2&

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Lee Singleton; Todd Haskell; Kathryn Rupe, Western Washington University; Leslie Glen

," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459-480, 2009.[3] M. Steiff and D. Uttal, "How Much Can Spatial Training Improve STEM Achievement?," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 607-615, 2015.[4] S. A. Sorby and B. J. Baartmans, "The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 301-307, 2000.[5] R. Gorska and S. Sorby, "Testing Instruments for the Assessment of 3-D Spatial Skills," in Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Pittsburg, PA, 2008.[6] S. Metz and S. Sorby, "Panel: Implementing ENGAGE Strategies to Improve Retention: Focus on

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #10

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University; Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley University; Janis Raje

; Jimenez, M. A., & Santiago, N. G., & Cardona-Martinez, N., & Suarez, O. M. (2021, July), Work in Progress: Building Career Goals and Boosting Self-efficacy in Engineering Students Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.[20] de Campos, D. B., de Resende, L. M. M., & Fagundes, A. B. (2020). The Importance of Soft Skills for the Engineering. Creative Education, 11, 1504-1520.[21] Karimi, H., & Pina, A. (2021). Strategically Addressing the Soft Skills Gap Among STEM Undergraduates. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 7(1), 21–46.[22] Tucker, T., & Vernooij