Paper ID #37021Mapping Graduate Student Workshops to Career Readiness FrameworksSeth Vuletich, Colorado School of Mines Seth Vuletich is the Scholarly Communications Librarian the Colorado School of Mines. Seth provides specialized support to graduate students through all stages of the research lifecycle. Prior to entering the field of librarianship, Seth was a professional woodworker and earned a bachelor’s degree in geology from the University of Colorado, Boulder. Seth earned his Master’s in Library and Information Science from the University of Denver in 2021.Ms. Brianna B. Buljung, Colorado School of Mines
from knowing who would be completingthe survey (e.g., individuals with non-technical backgrounds may not feel comfortable answeringspecific questions). However, each multiple-choice question received at least 194 responses fromthe 201 participants. The open-ended questions relating to the survey content received aminimum of 122 responses with the “Next steps” questions (those designed to assist with thesnowballing distribution method) receiving a minimum of 53 respondents.The survey was created using Google Forms and consisted of eight sections: an introduction tothe survey (including Graphic 1 shared in Appendix B), career connection to engineering,student education, course specifics, course logistics, course value, everyday use, and next
CiteScore were extracted and reformatted. In the reformatted tabular structure as inTable 1 of Appendix B, column headings were thousands of topics as predictors and CiteScore;each row (also called observation) represented a publication record. The value of each topic waseither 1 or 0, indicating whether each publication contains a certain topic or not. Linearregression was employed to predict CiteScore using topics as predictors. The threshold of theoccurrence of each topic was set to 0.1% of the total number of publications, resulting in 538unique topics. The selection of threshold values has trade-offs. If the threshold value is too small,overfitting in linear regression would occur because there would be a large number of topics aspredictors
. In Procedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1996; Vol. 4, pp 187--194.(4) Zieffler, A.; Garfield, J.; Alt, S.; Dupuis, D.; Holleque, K.; Chang, B. What Does Research Suggest About the Teaching and Learning of Introductory Statistics at the College Level? A Review of the Literature. J. Stat. Educ. 2008, 16 (2), 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2008.11889566.(5) Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness. Cognit. Psychol. 1972, 3 (3), 430–454.(6) Konold, C. Informal Conceptions of Probability. Cogn. Instr. 1989, 6 (1), 59–98.(7) Shewhart, W. A. Economic
-basedevaluation of factors like organization, description and critique of current state of the art,discussion of current debates, and recommendations for future research. An IL-related item isincluded for References, but the description is much higher level than the customized VALUErubric used for the study, since it is only one of many factors on which the students’ grades arebased. The full assignment prompt is included in Appendix B. Provided the reports and otherdata were gathered as part of regular class activities, and no student identifying information wasconnected to any of the results, IRB approval was not required for this study.The initial VALUE rubric for this project had previously been customized from AACU’soriginal version for a prior
Association Conference, Jun. 18-21, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/14145[12] P. Sharma, K. Kumar, and P. Babbar, “Embedded librarianship: Librarian faculty collaboration,” Journal of Library & Information Technology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 455-460, Nov. 2014.[13] M. Stoeckle, B. Lenart, and J. E. Murphy, “A Text Analysis of Four Levels of Librarian Involvement and Impact on Students in an Inquiry-Based Learning Course,” Partnership, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6574.[14] B. Pati, and S. Majhi, “Pragmatic implications of embedded librarianship in academics: A review of eminent literatures,” Library Hi Tech News, vol
practices and promotion of open data in science,” Sci Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.6087/kcse.149.[2] D. R. Berg and K. E. Niemeyer, “The case for openness in engineering research,” F1000 research, vol. 7, pp. 501–501, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3SH2PpQ[3] A. Johri, S. Yang, M. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, “Perceptions and Practices of Data Sharing in Engineering Education,” Advances in engineering education, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3Ur54hJ[4] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9 September, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone
and Arts students’ search processes. We mayexpect that undergraduate students experience cognitive complexity with more advanced searchtechniques, like proximity searching, truncation, wildcards, or Boolean expressions, for example.However, analysis reveals that undergraduate students experience cognitive complexity in basicelements of library research: a) deciding which terms to use, b) knowing if they are searching inthe right place, c) examining each article to weed out less relevant articles, and d) evaluating thequality of a source. Our findings reveal a sizable disconnect between what librarians may expectare basic elements of the search process and what students experience as cognitively complex.Introduction As public internet
] C. Wapner, “3D Printing Policy Considerations through the Library Lens,” OITP Perspectives, no. 3, 2015, https://www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/advleg/pp/pub/perspectives- 3D_Library_Policy-ALA_OITP_Perspectives-2015Jan06.pdf .[11] E. Lenton and C. Dineen, “Set it and Forget it (Almost): How We Make DIY 3D Printing Work in Our Library,” Public Services Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 179–186, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/15228959.2016.1168725.[12] S. B. Nagle, “Maker Services in Academic Libraries: A Review of Case Studies,” New Review of Academic Librarianship, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 184–200, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/13614533.2020.1749093.[13] C. Benjes-Small, L. M. Bellamy, J. Resor-Whicker, and L
. 27, 2023).[22] M. Tsugawa, B. Webster, S. Solanki, A. Cuellar, and C. M. Spence, “Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structures that Limit Access to Engineering Education through Narratives,” American Society for Engineering Education, Aug. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/collections/2022-asee-annual-conference-exposition[23] M. E. Spencer and S. B. Watstein, “Academic Library Spaces: Advancing Student Success and Helping Students Thrive,” portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 389– 402, 2017, doi: 10.1353/pla.2017.0024.[24] B. E. Eshbach, “Supporting and engaging students through academic library programming,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 46, no. 3, p
Paper ID #38580Using Decision-based Learning to Develop Expert Information LiteracyBehaviors in Engineering UndergraduatesMr. David Pixton, Brigham Young University David Pixton is a subject liaison at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. In this role, he is responsible for providing research training and assistance to students and faculty within the majority of engineering and technology fields offered at the university. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing and Library & Information Science. David’s current research is focused on improving learning in a library environment, including the
andpublishing patterns.Journal articles and conference proceedings were originally planned as the formats to beexamined but as the research proceeded it was determined that a) there was sufficient material toexamine the patterns focusing only on the journals and b) that publishing in conference venueswas potentially different enough to warrant a separate study. Finally, as neither of the authorswas fluent enough in other languages to warrant including them, only articles published entirelyin English were included, i.e. an English abstract alone was insufficient for a study to beincluded. This filter was applied inconsistently by the database vendors so some of the originalnumbers include papers that were written in a language other than English but
. Conf. 2019, Minneapolis, MN,USA. B. Steiz, Ed. https://doi.org/10.26207/9z0c-7955.[13] X. Lei, “The impact of emotion management ability on learning engagement of collegestudents during COVID-19,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Aug. 2022,https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967666.[14] K. Phillips, “IF I APPLY: Identifying Bias and Resource Credibility,” Penn State UniversityLibraries, 2019. https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/IFIAPPLY.[15] R. S. Nickerson, “Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises,” Rev. ofGeneral Psychol., vol. 2, no. 2, 175-220, 1998.[16] E. Roles, K. Phillips, and S. Thomas, “LibGuides: IF I APPLY - a source evaluation tool:Home,” IF I APPLY - A source evaluation tool, 2016. https://libguides.marshall.edu
extracurricular nature of these research opportunities. Bibliography[1] B. P. Chang and H. N. Eskridge, “What Engineers Want: Lessons Learned from Five Years of Studying Engineering Library Users,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.1721.1-26.1721.17. Accessed: Feb. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-engineers-want-lessons-learned-from-five-years-of-studying- engineering-library-users[2] J. de la Cruz, A. Winfrey, and S. Solomon, “Navigating the Network: An Exploratory Study of LGBTQIA+ Information Practices at Two Single-Sex HBCUs | de la Cruz | College & Research Libraries,” Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.2.278.[3] F. Albarillo, “Information
, [Online]. Available: https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/123097[2] B. H. Sababha, E. Al-Qaralleh, and N. Al-Daher, “A New Student Learning Outcome to Strengthen Entrepreneurship and Business Skills and Mindset in Engineering Curricula,” in 2021 Innovation and New Trends in Engineering, Technology and Science Education Conference, IETSEC 2021, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., May 2021. doi: 10.1109/IETSEC51476.2021.9440489.[3] V. Garousi, G. Giray, E. Tuzun, C. Catal, and M. Felderer, “Closing the Gap Between Software Engineering Education and Industrial Needs,” IEEE Softw., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 68–77, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MS.2018.2880823.[4] T. Hynninen, A. Knutas, and M. Hujala, “What can we
Conservation Lab Condition Assessment, which are essentially reports that explain the types of damage that could be seen in ranges of books (these sometimes also point out certain call numbers). However, the majority of time it will just be a range of books and you will have to pull what you think looks damaged within that range. 2. Types of damage you will see in the reports and what you are looking for i. Binding/Spine Damage 1. 2. 3.ii.Headcap Damage 1. 2.iii. Red Rot - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_rot 1. 2.iv. Brittle Pages, Loose Pages, or Pages Falling Out 1. 2. b
, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.002.[11] L. Qiu, E. Zhou, T. Yu, and N. Smyth, “Data analytics and research evaluation,” Libr. Hi Tech News, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1108/LHTN-11-2018-0073.[12] L. Costello, “Survey of Canadian Academic Librarians Outlines Integration of Traditional and Emerging Services,” Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 184– 186, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.18438/eblip29789.[13] A. J. Adetayo, M. A. Asiru, and I. B. Omolabi, “Building Ambidexterity in Libraries: Role of competitive intelligence,” Libr. Philos. Pract., vol. 2021, pp. 1–19, 2021.[14] G. Murphy, B. Plann-Curley, and K. Bilello, “High Impact at Low Cost: Initiating a Citation Analysis Program,” Ref. Libr., vol. 63
summer 2022 and were completed in early 2023; photos are included in Appendix B. Theresponses from the survey for the fourth floor indicated that the students wanted the space to feelarousing, exciting, social, collaborative, friendly and uncrowded. As a note, the adjectivedimensions social/unsocial and collaborative/self-reliant were statistically correlated, meaningthat as the score for collaborative increased, so did the score for social. The fifth floor wasdesired to be more arousing and exciting and uncrowded as the fourth floor; also responsesindicated an ideal space would have more playful and collaborative features. Table 5 lists thesurvey recommendations for each floor.Table 5. Floor renovation recommendations based on survey responses
Engineering Education (ASEE) [1]. World War II curtailed the activities of bothgroups. After the war, however, the engineering librarian communities in ACRL and ASEE grewquickly, offering new opportunities for professional development, networking, informationsharing, research, and advocacy.This paper seeks a deeper understanding of the academic engineering librarian community in the1940s and early 1950s through the analysis of data compiled from the Directory of CollegeEngineering Library Personnel [2], published in 1949 by the Engineering School LibrariesSection of ACRL and supplemented by data from other sources such as Who’s Who in LibraryService [3]. The Directory is a rich source of data that includes details such as position titles,degrees
/2020.10.12.336230.[18] J. D. Dworkin, K. A. Linn, E. G. Teich, P. Zurn, R. T. Shinohara, and D. S. Bassett, “The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 8, Art. no. 8, 2020.[19] J. M. Fulvio, I. Akinnola, and B. R. Postle, “Gender (Im)balance in Citation Practices in Cognitive Neuroscience,” J Cogn Neurosci, vol. 33, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01643.[20] P. Chatterjee and R. M. Werner, “Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 4, no. 7, Art. no. 7, 2021.[21] P. Zurn, E. G. Teich, S. C. Simon, J. Z. Kim, and D. S. Bassett, “Supporting academic equity in physics through citation diversity,” Commun Phys
Buffalo Office of Admissions. "UB Fast Facts." https://admissions.buffalo.edu/academics/about-ub.php (accessed February 14, 2022).[15] University at Buffalo School of Management. "Facts and Figures." https://management.buffalo.edu/about/facts-figures.html (accessed February 14, 2022).[16] University at Buffalo School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. "By the Numbers." http://engineering.buffalo.edu/home/school/about/glance.html (accessed February 14, 2022). [17] A. Ireland, D. S. Thompson, and B. Bourke, "Examining the pedagogical practices of business faculty: a qualitative analysis to inform library support," 2019.[18] A. Ireland, D. S. Thompson, and B. Bourke, "Business pedagogy: a qualitative
*) N/1 Native*) OR Amerind* OR (America* N/3 Indian*) OR Eskimo* OR Aleut OR Inuit OR ((Indigenous OR Native* OR Aborigin*) N/1 (population* OR People* OR Tribe* OR Tribal) 3. First Peoples OR First Inhabitants OR Tribal Nation 4. (3n) (Nation?? or Indian or Indians or Trib?? or Reservation??) a. (Navajo OR Navaho OR Navahu OR Dine OR Diné) n/1 (Nation? OR Trib?? OR Indian OR Indians OR Reservation? OR Communit???) b. ((Tohono OR Akimel OR Hiaced OR Hia-ced OR Hiac-ed) n/1 (“O’Odham” OR Oodham
Paper ID #37905Board 96: Exploring the Impact of Textbook Costs on UndergraduateEngineering MajorsJentry E. Campbell, Dartmouth College Jentry Campbell is a Librarian for Research & Learning for STEM at Dartmouth College in Hanover, NH. She works primarily as a liaison to Thayer School of Engineering. She obtained her MLIS from the University of British Columbia.Stephen Krueger, Dartmouth College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploring the Impact of Textbook Costs on Undergraduate Engineering MajorsAbstractIn the fall of 2022, the