/s40594-023-00419-6[3] D. Gerrard, K. Newfield, N. Balouchestani Asli, and C. Variawa, “Are students overworked? understanding the workload expectations and realities of first-year engineering,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, May 2017. doi:10.18260/1-2--27612[4] U. Beagon and B. Bowe, “Understanding professional skills in engineering education: A phenomenographic study of faculty conceptions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1109–1144, Sep. 2023. doi:10.1002/jee.20556[5] “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022 - 2023,” ABET, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-20 23/ (accessed Feb. 8, 2024
Engineering Education, 2024 10 2024 ASEE Annual ConferenceRiley, D., Slaton, A. & Pawley, A. (2014). Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering. InCambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Jahiri and B. Olds (eds.), 335-356.Schuck, P.H. (2017). One National Undecided: Clear Thinking about Five Hard Issues That Divide Us. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.Schwarz-Plaschg, C. (2018). The power of analogies for imagining and governing emerging technologies.Nanoethics,12, 139-153.Sedlack, V. (n.d.). Fish don’t know they’re in the water. Almeda Education Foundation.https://AlamedaEducation.org.Slaton, A. (2022, July 7). Fast-track
Paper ID #42016Contextualizing Technological Stewardship: Origins and Implications of anApproach to Responsible Tech DevelopmentDr. Kari Zacharias, University of Manitoba Kari Zacharias is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education at the University of Manitoba. She studies intersections and meeting points between engineering ways of knowing, being, and making, and other ways of understanding the world.Mr. Renato B. Rodrigues, University of Manitoba Renato Bezerra Rodrigues is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education, with degrees in engineering and philosophy. He
., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019, January). Pain and gain: Barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. In Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Cowan, R. S. (1985). How the refrigerator got its hum. In J. Wajcman & D. A. MacKenzie (Eds.), The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum (pp. 202–218). Open University Press.Day, M. (2021, September 21). Inside Amazon (AMZN) flagship fulfillment center where machines run the show. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-09-21/inside-amazon-amzn-flagship-ful fillment-center-where-machines-run-the-showDowney, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M
in productive ways.References[1] b. hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York, NY,USA: Taylor & Francis Group, 1994.[2] D. Riley, “Employing liberative pedagogies in engineering education,” Journal of Womenand Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 137-258, 2003.[3] Office of Institutional Statistics. “Enrolment Reports | Institutional Analysis | University ofManitoba” umanitoba.ca. https://umanitoba.ca/institutional-analysis/enrolment-reports (accessed:Mar 27, 2024)..[4] A. Quan-Haase, Technology & Society: Social Networks, Power, and Inequality, 3rd ed. DonMills, Canada: Oxford University Press, 2020.[5] B. Arao and K. Clemens, “From safe spaces to brave spaces: A new way to frame
,” YouTube, Jun. 1,2023. [Online] Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvpGdoKTK_I[10] P. Bloom, “Against Empathy,” Boston Review, Aug. 20, 2014. [Online] Available:https://www.bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy/)[11] B. H. Fried, “Emotional Empathy Is Not the Culprit,” Boston Review, Aug. 20, 2014.[Online] Available: (https://www.bostonreview.net/forum_response/barbara-h-fried-response-against-empathy-fried/)[12] X. Tang, “From ‘Empathic Design’ to ‘Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering Education,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2018.[13] C. D. Batson, “These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena,” inThe Social Neuroscience of Empathy, J. Decety and W. Ickes, eds
modules that all students take to acquire skills in civics education and designand engineering thinking. There are two PILLARS: Civics and Design Thinking. A module isdefined as lessons teachers implement that contain content and learning experiences organized tocreate a clear learning path for students. The civics education pillar will consist of 4 modules(1.a: What is an effective citizen; 1.b: Principles of democracy; 1.c: Democratic practices andinstitutions; 1.d: Authentic civic actions). The design thinking pillar will consist of 2 modules(2.a: Identifying problems and 2.b Addressing problems) that delineate iterative modes thatencourage students to empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test[5]. There are explicitempathy and ethics
thatcommonly create hierarchies in engineering thought and practice, and embrace a culture that isholistic and integrated? a) characterize the current state of the departmental culture with regard to endorsement or rejection of historical binaries in engineering, b) describe the systemic conditions and processes that build capacity for students, staff, and faculty to co-create revolutionary change, c) examine how the culture shifts over time.R2. To what extent does our change model help students, staff, and faculty navigate, respond to,and engage in critical organizational change?R3. What are the impacts of a holistic environment on individual growth and social cohesion?To describe faculty members’ basic assumptions
Educators to Integrate Inclusive Design Across a 4-Year CS Degree Program. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.02748Leydens, J., Johnson, K., Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Moskal, B., & Cordova, O. (2018). Measuring Change over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/Validation Model for Sociotechnical Habits of Mind. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 30794. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30794Loweth, R., Daly, S., Paborsky, L., Hoffman, S., & Skerlos, S. (2021). “You Could Take ‘Social’ Out of Engineering and Be Just Fine”: An Exploration of Engineering Students’ Beliefs About the Social Aspects of Engineering Work. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Paper ID #43129Design Iterations as Material Culture Artifacts: A Qualitative Methodologyfor Design Education ResearchDr. Grant Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Grant A. Fore, Ph.D. is the Assistant Director of Research and Evaluation in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. As a trained anthropologist, he possesses expertise in qualitative methods and ethnographic writing. His primary research interest is in the teaching and learning of ethics in higher education through community-engaged and place-based pedagogies. ©American Society for
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
formatting style. Thus,instructional rubrics are both easy-to-understand and explicit enough to be informative. (For anexample grading rubric, see Appendix B: Grading Rubric for Resume Rough Draft.)In early offerings of the technical communication course, students received full credit forcompleting rough drafts (n=59 students). In the most recent offering, students received a gradebased on a rubric instead of credit for completion (n=35 students).It is important to note that the rough draft is worth 10 points and the final deliverable is worth100 points, which is aligned with current best practices that call for low-stakes assignmentsduring the writing and revision process with formative feedback before submitting a finaldeliverable with summative
, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 280-301, 2008. [Online]. Available: 10.1109/TPC.2008.2001253.[9] Paretti, M. C. (2008). Teaching communication in capstone design: The role of the instructor in situated learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 491-503.[10] Howe, S., & Goldberg, J. (2019). Engineering capstone design education: Current practices, emerging trends, and successful strategies. Design education today: Technical contexts, programs and best practices, 115-148.[11] Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (Eds.). (2014). Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge University Press.[12] Ford, J. D., Paretti, M. C., Kotys-Schwartz, D. A., Howe, S., Gewirtz, C., Deters, J., ... &
to employ a systems thinking approach. It’s about relations.Instructor B: The systems approach helps balance the different considerations. It helps identify relationships and make connections. It’s about scope and identifying strengths.Instructor A: It’s your Petri dish!The following excerpt by a student illustrates how faculty enriched students’ understanding ofthis concept through informal conversations and lectures where they expanded on why theconcept was important to training and how it will shape their work on various complex problems. Overall, I thought the other lectures were helpful too, just when they talk about systems thinking and design thinking and all that stuff, because those are things
/0950017020902968.[2] B. A. Schuelke-Leech, T. C. Leech, B. Barry, and S. Jordan-Mattingly, “Ethical Dilemmas for engineers in the development of autonomous systems,” International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, vol. 2018-Novem, pp. 49–54, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ISTAS.2018.8638282.[3] E. A. Cech and C. J. Finelli, “Learning to prioritize the public good: Does training in classes, workplaces, and professional societies shape engineers’ understanding of their public welfare responsibilities?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20590.[4] D. Oliver, “Whistle-Blowing Engineer,” vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 246–256, 2004.[5] J. Metcalf, E. Moss, and danah boyd, “Owning Ethics
complementthe development of critical consciousness, “where students (a) gain sociopolitical understanding,or engage in critical reflection, to (b) change the world, or take critical action” [8].An analytical review of CC literature by Jemal [9] observes divergence in the interpretation of“critical action,” with some scholars viewing the capacity, or the intention, to take action, assufficient, and also divergence in whether and how critical consciousness may be experienced bythe privileged as well as the oppressed. Jemal proposes the notion of “transformative potential”to clarify the construct of critical consciousness on both counts.Engineering identity and critical consciousnessWhile the engaged presence of diverse perspectives in engineering
, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1177/089124399013005006.[7] C. McCall, A. Shew, D. R. Simmons, M. C. Paretti, and L. D. McNair, “Exploring student disability and professional identity: navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79–89, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434.[8] L. Davenport Huyer et al., “Enhancing senior high school student engagement and academic performance using an inclusive and scalable inquiry-based program,” Npj Sci. Learn., vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41539-020-00076-2.[9] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and
questions, we walk’: How should engineering education address equity, the climate crisis, and its own moral infrastructure?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 447–452, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20295.[10] E. Godfrey, “Understanding Disciplinary Cultures: The First Step to Cultural Change,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 437–456. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.028.[11] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[12] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in
: - Guest speaker(s) on topics of interest identified by students 6 earlier in the course. 7 Open-Ended - Semi-structured and collaborative work periods to prepare 8 for the final presentation or reflection. - Student-led seminars on topics of interest. Students give final presentations, and receive feedback from 9 Final Presentations their peers and instructors.References [1] A. B. Diekman, M. P. Joshi, and T. M. Benson-Greenwald, “Chapter four – Goal congruity theory: Navigating the social structure to fulfill goals,” ser
%-100%, B = 80%-89.9%, C = 70% - 79.9%, D = 60% - 69.9%, and F = 0% - 59.9.Characteristics of the treatment group The treatment group had homework assignments, three exams, a final project, and a finalexam just as the control group did. All exams had the same number of questions testing the sameconcepts in the same order, and the final project remained unchanged. However, for thetreatment group, the proportion of the grade from participation was replaced with an equivalentproportion from weekly quizzes administered on paper in the classroom. Each quiz containedeither one question with two parts or two separate but related questions. The instructor gradedeach part separately according to the following rubric: 80% credit was granted for
Know,” New Dir. Community Coll., vol. 2006, no. 135, pp. 21–28, 2006, doi: 10.1002/cc.[2] K. J. Cross, K. B. H. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The Double Bind of Race and Gender: A Look into the Experiences of Women of Color in Engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2017.[3] A. E. Slaton, “Engineering Improvement: Social and Historical Perspectives on the NAE’s ‘Grand Challenges,’” Int. J. Eng. Soc. Justice, Peace, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2012.[4] A. Aparicio and A. Ruiz-Teran, “Tradition and Innovation in Teaching Structural Design in Civil Engineering,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 340–349, 2007, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133.[5] L. White, “‘Liberal
Paper ID #43452Extraordinary Engineering Impacts on Society: Over Seven Decades of Contributionsfrom the National Science Foundation: A U.S. National Academy of EngineeringStudyMs. Casey Gibson, National Academy of Engineering Casey Gibson, M.S., is an Associate Program Officer at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) of the U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine where she contributes to the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering (CESER) program. Gibson holds an M.S. from the Colorado School of Mines in Humanitarian Engineering and Science with a specialization
Paper ID #42036Initial Investigations into the Link Between Spatial and Technical CommunicationSkillsMr. John William Lynch, University of Cincinnati I am a first-year engineering and computing education PhD student at the University of Cincinnati. My interests are in the link between spatial skills and success in computer science, the retention of computer science undergraduate students, and the improvement of computer science education for undergraduate and adult students. My overarching goal is to increase the retention rate for studying Computer Science at all education levels and make the field accessible for more
, 2024Investigating Student Experiences of Inclusion and Exclusion to Guide Makerspace Development – Work in ProgressINTRODUCTIONA sense of belonging is vital to the success of engineering students during their academicjourney. At the Colorado School of Mines, first year students’ design experiences will be heldwithin our new flagship innovation, fabrication, design, & entrepreneurship center (hereaftermakerspace). By creating a welcoming and inclusive space that ties deeply into students’ firstyear, we hope to enhance students’ sense of engineering identity, improve learning outcomesthrough greater access to makerspace tools and community, and to increase retention andrecruitment rates, particularly for traditionally underserved
Paper ID #42551An Ecosystem Analysis of Engineering Thriving with Emergent Properties atthe Micro, Meso, and Macro LevelsDr. Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Julianna Gesun, Ph.D., is currently a postdoctoral research scholar at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Her research broadly focuses on understanding and supporting the process by which engineering programs facilitate the environments for students to develop optimal functioning in undergraduate engineering programs. Her research interests intersect the fields of positive psychology, engineering education, and human development to understand
, 27 (1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0Armstrong, F. H. (1980). Faculty development through interdisciplinarity. The Journal of General Education, 52-63.Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers, The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47.Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International
-education-and-engineering-work[9] M. McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press, 1994.[10] F. A. Salim and J. M. M. Ferreira, “Improving the learning effectiveness of educational videos,” in 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), May 2023, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125215.[11] B. Lazarevic, J. Fuller, and J. Cain, “Facilitating Community of Inquiry Through Video- Enhanced Online Instruction: What are Learners’ Impressions?,” TechTrends, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 611–625, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11528-023-00864-8.[12] E. Clinton, A. Galletta, and J. Zanton, “Overview and critical components of video-based instruction for students with disabilities,” Technol. Disabil., vol. 28, no
. Clean Air Act was not upheld. Before the Boeing 737 MAX Crashes, Boeingprovided fraudulent data to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) so that the FAAdetermined a lower, and less costly, level of pilot training was required, per Title 14, Part 21,Subpart B of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.MethodologyPer the IRB-approved protocol, after an Engineering course’s final grades were posted, de-identified survey data were used for secondary analysis. Separately, after informed consent wasobtained, students participated in a focus group.ParticipantsDuring Fall 2023, 38 sophomores enrolled in two sections of ENGR 201: ExperientialEngineering, offered during the third semester of the BS Engineering curriculum. Of these 38sophomores, 12/38
Paper ID #44224Beyond the Algorithm: Empowering AI Practitioners through Liberal EducationTammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship Director of the Aula Fellowship for AI Science, Tech, and Policy, a think tank in responsible AI. Tammy is also a Mom, a Tech CEO, an MBA, an ecological and human rights activist, a strategist, and a researcher of power and institutional change through strategic management, institutions, and systems theories. She is currently a guest researcher at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology’s Interdisciplinary STS research group on the digitization of culture (DigiKULT@NTNU), an occasional
]. Available: https://explore-education- statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/foundation-years-statistics[22] D. Chambers, “Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265,” Science Education, vol. 67, pp. 255–265, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670213.[23] M. Knight and C. Cunningham, “Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering”.[24] A. Young, L. Dawes, and B. Senadji, “Using journey maps as a holistic, reflective approach to capture student engineering identity experiences,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 22–44, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2268023.[25