AC 2011-1781: WRITING EFFECTIVE EVALUATION AND DISSEMINA-TION/DIFFUSION PLANSThomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Edu- cation and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has been on the faculty since 1985. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, faculty development, and assessment. He teaches and conducts research in the areas of combustion and thermal sciences. He is an Associate Editor of Advances in Engineering Education and a Fellow of ASEE.Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah
degrees? ShouldABET then require service as an accreditation criteria?In this short paper, service in professional codes of conduct are explored, a case study is made ofthe opinions of beginning engineering students as well as students at all levels who have beeninvolved with service-learning projects in several courses, and the implications are considered.Service and professional societiesEngineering professional societies as well as the societies of other professions, such as theAmerican Bar Association, expect community service in their codes of ethics and conduct, as forexample, the following:NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers) code of ethics III. Fundamental Canons
, learning and communicationthrough teamwork. According to Johnson, Johnson and Smith23, such active learning strategiesare increasingly recommended as the alternative[to non-active styles], in which students areempowered to think and learn for themselves.Once the lesson has started, the teacher used tips to conduct the lesson in a manner to increasestudents‟ participation level because to obtain better lesson outcomes in the architecture anddesign learning environment it is fundamental that each educator teaches according to his/herown set of ideologies and beliefs and in a manner that is distinct from others24 Page 22.1013.14Thai students are shy
article is scholarly and whether it follows citation or styleguidelines. Finally, students can use the criteria for validity as scholarly research and what waslearned in the discussions to write their critique reviews.Tips 1. Students need exposure to many good examples of the type of writing that they are expected to produce. They need to read and critically examine those examples, and have samples of the type of work available to them to review in courses. 2. Feedback to students should emphasize what is done right as well as areas for improvement. Feedback should be given often. Try to guide the development of the writing by having the student address fundamental flaws in one draft, then mechanics in the next, then
AC 2011-202: STUDENTS LEARN FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERINGDESIGN WHILE PURSUING THEIR OWN ENTREPRENEURIAL IDEASKevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from WPI in 1992 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998. He has published on teaching engineering design, assessment of student learning, and use of process simulation in undergraduate education. He is the recipient of the 2004 Fahien Award and the 2010 Mid-Atlantic Section Outstanding Teaching Award from ASEE.William Riddell, Rowan University William Riddell is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Engineering Department at Rowan University. His research interests include design
AC 2011-18: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A COM-PREHENSIVE NANOTECHNOLOGY FUNDAMENTALS LAB FOR EN-GINEERING STUDENTSNael Barakat, Grand Valley State University Nael Barakat, PH.D. P.Eng. is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Grand Valley State University, MI. He is also a Fellow of the ASME and the Committee on Ethical Standards and Review (CESR). His interest and research work is in the area of Dynamic Systems, Robotics, NEMS, Engineering Ethics, and Engineering education.Lihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University LIHONG (HEIDI) JIAO Lihong (Heidi) Jiao is currently an Associate Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand
AC 2011-1444: A RELEVANT, AUTOMOTIVE-THEMED EXPERIMENTTHAT TEACHES FUNDAMENTAL FLOW RATE CONCEPTS AND EX-PERIMENTAL UNCERTAINTYBrian P Sangeorzan, Oakland University Dr. Brian Sangeorzan, is registered Professional Engineer and an Associate Professor of Engineering at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan, where he serves as the faculty advisor for the SAE student chapter and has taught graduate and undergraduate courses in thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer and combustion for the past 27 years. His research interests generally include heat transfer and fluid mechanic phenomena in internal combustion engines, as well as the instrumentation and optical techniques for thermal/fluid measurements. Past
reference. Often, various authors haveapplied slightly different labels to fundamentally the same concepts, or have subdivided andcategorized the same ideas in slightly different ways. For purposes of our discussion and toexplain and illustrate one axis of the three dimensional conceptual model of innovation, we havechosen “The Innovator’s DNA,” as presented by Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen6.The competencies defined by the Innovator’s DNA, the authors refer to as, “Discovery Skills” 6.The term, “skill,” refers to task proficiency. While specific task proficiency is certainly anessential element of Engineering education for effective innovation, we envision the boundariesof the innovation space as broader than task specific skills alone. We refer
AC 2011-2579: AN ENGINEERING APPROACH TO WRITING: A PILOTPROGRAM FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTSChristianna Irene White, Iowa State University Institute for Transportation Christianna White has a PhD in rhetoric and professional communication, an MA in business and technical communication, and a BA in psychology. She is an editor and writing coach who specializes in working with graduate students on master’s theses or dissertations. In addition to her affiliation with the Iowa State University Institute for Transportation, she operates C I White and Associates.David J White, Iowa State University David White holds a B.S. (Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, 1997), M.S. degree (Iowa State University 1999), and a Ph.D
course, itis also critical that students receive individual feedback to assess and improve theircommunication skills. Similar to most Senior Design courses, the VU course emphasizes teamperformance, and it has been determined that team assignments can mask communicationdeficiencies of individual students. This is especially prevalent in the area of technical writing Page 22.1135.4where the faculty advisor may not know the author of each paper section. Therefore, it isimportant to provide communication feedback to both teams and individuals.Multiple techniques are used to improve the consistency of faculty technical communicationfeedback. First
small and medium-sized wireless networks areassigned to students regularly accompanying to their homework assignments to help studentsestablish the direct experience using wireless technologies and help them to better understandand master the subject matter of the topics. Students can even use their home network facilitiesto fulfill the hands-on projects. In addition, a group project is required of students, which buildsupon and complementing the material covered in class.We have chosen the text books with the writing style for non-major undergraduate students andwhich were tried by non-technical writing language. Such references include Fundamentals ofWireless Networking by Ron Price, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Business Data Networks
is:1. Feedback from 2. Having to write 3. Having to run 4. Listening to 5. Having to work 6. Not ApplicableInstructor. multiple reports. multiple presentations in a team. experiments. from other teams.38.2% 32.8% 42.1% 56.7% 3.9% 1.5% 1.3% 0 10.5% 6.0% 3.9% 3.0%3. I am more able to assess technical quality in my work.1. Strongly Agree 2. Agree 3. Neither Agree 4. Disagree 5. Strongly 6. Not Applicable or Disagree Disagree14.5% 17.9% 72.4% 70.1
; hydropower; fuel cells;biofuels; geothermal; and ocean, wave, and tidal energy. In all of the topics, the class coversenough of the engineering fundamentals to allow for mini-design projects in each technology.The classroom periods use an active learning methodology. The classes are structured such thatthe students work together in multi-disciplinary teams where each student is able to bring theexpertise of their major to understanding the technology. For example, the background ofmechanical engineers combined with electrical engineers will allow a team to begin to grasp thebasic fundamentals of fluid flow and power generation needed to understand how a hydropowerplant operates.A significant assignment in the class is a community-based service
curriculum summary. The content ofCBEE 414 is essentially identical for all three disciplines. It is a writing-intensive course for ourstudents. The Linus Pauling Engineer serves as the lead instructor and two CBEE facultymembers serve as “subject matter experts”. CHE/BIOE/ENVE 415 has a shared lecturecomponent and discipline-specific laboratories, and CBEE 416 is the senior project course,which is devoted to a single, original project. In both these courses, the Linus Pauling Engineerserves as the lead instructor and several CBEE faculty members provide projects and serve asmentors for project teams. Written communication is emphasized early in the year, then oralcommunication and project management fundamentals. Laboratory activities generally
cuspof another revolution, as linear, printed textbooks may soon give way to hyperlinkedelectronic ones [2]. The earlier revolution was driven by technology (the growingavailability of blackboards, and more affordable pens and paper) as well as pedagogy. Thenew revolution is being driven by technology, but also by pedagogy. One aspect of thischange is the idea that students should be more actively involved in interacting with theirtextbook.Taking the idea of interaction one step further is the student-authored textbook movement—the idea that students will benefit from writing all or part of their textbook. There are manyadvantages to this approach: It forces students to confront the primary literature, readingtechnical articles about the subject
Education, 2011 Design of Experiments in Introduction to Thermodynamics CourseAbstractThis paper describes an easily implementable new approach to thermodynamics laboratoryinstruction that directly addresses ABET Criterion 3, an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. In a traditional lab, students conductpreconfigured experiments based on established procedures. They then gather, analyze andinterpret data, and write reports. However, little is done to train engineering graduates to designexperiments for a specific purpose and without a prescribed procedure. Engineeringprofessionals are frequently tasked with designing experiments to demonstrate performance
importance of fluid mechanics principles.Test results showed a higher level of understanding of these fundamentals. Survey responses andtest results demonstrated that student engagement and performance in the class improved fromidentifying fluid mechanics aspects of real world problems via the lifelong learning assessments.IntroductionThe Whitaker School of Engineering (WSOE) was established in 2005 at Florida Gulf CoastUniversity (FGCU) and is now fully accredited. The WSOE teaching mission fosters excellencein teaching by providing innovative lecture-lab classes. Offered in the Fall Semester of thejunior year, Fluid Mechanics has proved to be challenging to students. While teaching is“outside” the student’s brain, learning is what is going on
ABET EC2000assessment process for program outcomes. Data for 2009-2010 as reported by instructors.Common ConcernsSurvey respondents were asked what they believed were the biggest issues encountered bystudents taking this course. The majority of responses indicated the following commonchallenges: ODE solving skills Mathematical software skills Chemistry preparation Unsteady-state conservation law writing Dependence on “design equations” rather than fundamental conservation lawsThe Role of the InstructorInstructors often take different approaches to teaching. For many responding to the
(Introduction to Academic Writing and Argumentation), ENGL 2311(Introduction to Professional and Technical Communication), and COMM 1315 (Basic Speech Communication) aspart of the university’s core educational requirements. The State of Texas has legislated a 120 semester credit hourrestriction on degree requirements with the exception being a need for additional hours to receive accreditation. TheDepartment of Engineering currently holds one of these exceptions but it is felt that it cannot be extended to cover acourse specific to engineering communication.The authors, working in conjunction with the Communication and the Engineering and Computer ScienceDepartments, respectively, have identified methodologies to improve and reinforce technical
“soft skills” upon their graduation, with the former learning outcomes typicallyeasier to evaluate and assess than the latter. This paper presents rubrics and assessment methodsusing engineering courses for evaluating the soft-skills-program learning outcomes engagementin lifelong learning competencies, communication, and the impact of engineering solutions. Theassessment of the lifelong learning student outcome is addressed using results from a set ofsemester-long assignments in a fluid mechanics course. The recently developed and adoptedcourse, Engineering Technical Writing and Presentation, in which students learn to develop aneffective writing process for writing engineering documents in future courses and industry, isused in the assessment
. Page 22.917.2Description of the Thermal-Fluid Systems CoursesThe lesson content of both 40-lesson courses is shown in Table 1. A review of the first course inthe sequence (ME 311) shows content in the areas of the fundamental properties, the ideal gasequation of state, hydrostatics, conservation principles, cycle analysis, the 2nd Law ofThermodynamics, the Rankine cycle, internal flow, vapor compression refrigeration cycles, andtotal air conditioning. This clearly represents a thorough mix of fluid mechanics andthermodynamics topics that have been traditionally taught in separate courses. The second course(ME312) continues this practice, including exergy, reciprocating internal combustion enginecycles (Otto and Diesel cycles), combustion
Interface There are short and long addresses in the static RAM memory organization in theMRF24J40MA module that is accessible via the SPI interface protocol. The diagram shown inFigure 6 illustrates required communication formats.MRF24J40MA Short Address Read Figure 6. Short Address Read SPI ProtocolMRF24J40MA Short Address Write Figure 7. Short Address Write SPI Protocol The specifications state that there are only 6 bits needed in short address for either read orwrite to the memory in the MRF24J40MA. It is important to note that the communication withSPI protocols on the short address memory is not lined up. This requires a simple conversion byshifting the bits and package by zero or
also give a five minutes presentation and conduct class discussion/debate on acontemporary environmental issue as soon as it appears as a news item. Students maintain aportfolio/journal of all the articles on contemporary environmental issues they read over thesemester. At the end of the semester each student is required to submit his/her portfolio of sevenarticles along with his/her reflections and assessment of each articles. In addition, studentsconduct environmental caucuses similar to town hall meetings, and write two term papers oncontemporary environmental issues.Course OverviewThe Fundamentals of Environmental Engineering course is intended for sophomore /juniorengineering students at Trinity University1. This course is also open for
teaching fundamentals sessions weregiven by Kresta. Kresta continued to offer three of those sessions for eight of the next thirteenyears. Over the period these forums ran, over 120 new faculty members were introduced to basicknowledge about educational fundamentals, and more importantly to the idea that the Faculty ofEngineering expects a well grounded approach to teaching. The text by Wankat and Oreovicz5was provided to all participants while it was in print; the on-line version is now referenced. The impact of these sessions was documented in two short articles, and shared with othercolleagues in several conference presentations and invited talks 1,2. A summary of the teachingsessions is included as an Appendix.Active Learning WorkshopDr
. Page 22.367.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Concept Inventory Assessment Instruments for Circuits CoursesAbstractElectric Circuits course is a core component of undergraduate curricula in electrical engineeringprograms worldwide.The Electric Circuits Concept Inventory (ECCI) is a set of multiple-choice questions that we aredeveloping to measure students’ understanding of fundamental concepts such as DC and ACCircuits. First and Second-order circuits, etc. and Advanced Circuit analysis topics are covered.These questions do not test problem solving steps but test major concepts and ability of studentsto understand the concepts in the context of the problem and apply the required
reflected signal to the ground station (amplitude scaling and timeshift, and echo), and be the total signal at the ground station (fading).Also, let us assume that 0≤t≤T+2τ where x(t) is transmitted over [0,T].The first part of this project was aimed at getting the students to apply the concepts of phasorsand Euler identities that they have studied in their previous courses in circuit theory. Usingphasors, Euler identities, and trigonometric identities as well as simulation, students were askedto derive the amplitude and phase of and envelope of as varies. The intent herewas to help the students see the different fundamental techniques that they can apply to come tothe same solution. Also, students were
distance delivery at peer institutions isincluded to examine research and writing requirements common in CM programs with distancedelivery. Detail of corrective actions that have been implemented with limited effect areprovided. Finally, the program change for the most recent cohort of students enrolled in theprogram to a guided capstone academic writing activity under the direction of a single facultymember is described.IntroductionGraduate education in Construction Management (CM) has been slow to develop. In the yearssince the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) was organized in 1974 by theAmerican Institute of Constructors (AIC) and the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), ithas accredited undergraduate programs that
, offeredthrough First-year Engineering Program provides a multidisciplinary approach through lectureand laboratory experiences to the wide variety of engineering majors offered. The AEV design-build experience was developed specifically to facilitate innovation through energy managementconcepts within the multidisciplinary nature of design – complementing the acquisition of life-long learning skills offered through the First-year Engineering Program.Each student is introduced to fundamental energy conservation and loss measurement techniquesin designing energy efficient AEVs. Each team takes a hands-on approach in designing,building, and testing AEVs and AEV components with the use of desktop wind tunnels anddesktop and classroom monorail track systems
states. Following this formula, eachmagnetic dipole or each capacitor can only record 1 bit of information, while each base pair inDNA can record 2 bits of information.Towards the end of the semester, students were required to write a term paper on the applicationof entropy in different areas. The students investigated many interesting topics, such as steamengines, chemical processes, biological systems, neural networks in brain, the birth and death ofstars, black holes, global warming, economics and social organizations, etc. Through this termpaper students expanded their perspective and realized that entropy is a very general conceptwhich may be applied to many seemingly unrelated areas.IV. AssessmentTwo years ago the author taught this course
AC 2011-66: INVESTIGATING THE VALIDITY OF STUDENTS’ SELF-ASSESSMENTS OF THEIR ABILITY IN STATICSJeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology at Western Washington University. He received B.S. (1988) and M.Eng. (1989) degreesin Aeronautical Engineering, a M.S. in Science and Technology Studies (1993), and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (1994) from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is engaged in research to improve instruction and assessment in engineering, with an emphasis on engineering fundamentals such as mechanics Page