for these outward swinging arms is that the angle of thebowstring becomes more parallel to the bow arm when attempting to go past a 55 degreeangle causing the arm to be pulled out of the cord bundles which results in a decreased torquein the bow arm. Figure 4 The two principal ballista configurations: the out swinging (a) and the in swinging forms (b).Student Project DescriptionFor this project, the student began by reviewing the historical background literature to gain anunderstanding of the technical and historical aspects of the project. With the help of the Page 22.73.4authors, the student then re-derived the mechanics
. Page 22.833.84.4.1 Evaluation of NIT Trichy Workshop Questionnaire I requested the participants to use 5 ratings “A, B, C, D and E” whichrepresent Strongly Disagree (SD), Disagree, Neutral (neither agree nor disagree), Agree andStrongly Agree (SA), respectively. We will assign values 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, which means A=1,B=2, C=3, D=4 and E=5. Because questions 2, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 12 are negative questions, theratings A, B, C, D and E, of these questions are assigned 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1. The responsesfrom the 33 post-surveys are included here (Table 1). Table 1: Descriptive Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation Variance VAR00001 41 2.8049 1.0055
antenna shownbelow. The antenna and drive parts have a moment of inertia J and a damping B ; these arise tosome extent from bearing and aerodynamic friction, but mostly from the back emf of the DCdrive motor4. The equation of motion is J B Tcwhere J 600000 kg m2 , B 20000 N m sec , and Tc is the torque from the drive motor.Now the applied torque is computed so that tracks a reference command r according to thefeedback law Tc K ( r )where K is the feedback gain.Laboratory assignment: Using Program CC: (1) Find the maximum value of K that can be used if you wish to have an overshoot M p 10% ? (2) Plot the step
multi-faceted, multidisciplinaryengineering issues. They are then asked to determine the most important problem/s and todiscuss stakeholders, impacts, unknowns, and possible solutions. Table 2 presents a summary ofsample scenarios, and Appendix B provides three full scenarios with instructional prompts. TheEPS Rubric, an analytic rubric, was developed to measure the extent to which studentperformance in response to a given scenario achieved the six learning outcomes associated with Page 22.38.2the ABET professional skills. This method is flexible, easy to implement, and can be used at the course level for teaching and measuring engineering
characteristic information forinitial comparative purposes, be misleading since they provide little insight into the variation anddistributions of the credit hours. To provide a more descriptive presentation of the credit hourrequirements in today’s curricula, simple plots are provided for each data set. Figure 1 providesa summary of the total credit hours required for degree. Figure 1(a) provides the percentage ofprograms requiring various total credit hours and Figure 1(b) illustrates the cumulativepercentage of programs requiring the same various total credit hours. The most commonrequirement is 128 total credit hours with the next most common being 132 total hours. Figures2-6 provide similar presentations of the credit hour requirements for
, Walker H. and Krathwohl, David R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain David McKay Company, Inc. New York. (1956).3. Michaelson, Larry K., Knight, Arletta B., Fink, L. Dee, Team-based Learning: a transformative use of small groups Praeger Publishing, Westport CT. (2002).4. Hamer, O. Lawrence, The Additive Effects of Semistructured Classroom Activities on Student Learning: An Application of Classroom-Based Experiential Learning Techniques Journal of Marketing Education April 2000 vol. 22 no. 1 25-34 Page 22.1435.7
Ethics Pre-Test PART 2 1. What repercussions may there be if Jill challenges Brian’s results to Dr. Brey? 2. The paper is already published, so what options are there in terms of the manuscript. Is there anything they can do? a. How can Jill find out what the options are? b. Who is responsible if the results are determined to be false? 3. If Jill brings up the issue to Dr. Brey and he sides with Brian, what can she do? 4. How may Brian’s lab notebook help with issues encountered in this scenario
wereidentified as A1,B3, E4 .. etc.The response rate to the survey was 66% from 42 students representing the 20 project groups.The number of respondents who belong to the same project group varies as shown in Table 2.Table 1. Project assignment of the survey respondents Project# No. of respondents No. of groups Subtotal of respondents per project E 4 1 4 A, B, C, D, F, G 3 6 18 H, I, J, K, L, M, N 2 7 14 O, P, Q, R, S, T 1 6 6 Total
(b) Building a LEGO robot (c) Programming (d) Asking for help (e) Testing (f) Demo Page 22.53.4 Figure 1: Students in the robotics labObservations and ResultsThe courses Introduction to Engineering and Problem Solving for Engineers are two of the first-year engineering courses. Most students in these courses were new to each other, to the facultyand to the campus. According to the Tinto model13, the more they interacted with theirclassmates and the faculty, the higher the probability they will succeed in
problems at the interface of engineering and biology. a-4 Apply knowledge of math, science and engineering.b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data b-1 Design experiments for hypothesis testing. b-2 Measurement and data interpretation skills from living systems b-3 Basic circuit analysis and troubleshooting skills b-4 Statistical data analysis skillsc) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs c-1 CAD skills c-2 Mechanical, fabrication and manufacturing skills c-3 Prototyping skills c-4 Needs assessment skills c-5 Project planning skills c-6 Medical devices design skillsd) An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams d-1
12 Other 4 Undecided 4 2) My printed circuit board in Lab 1 worked: a) on the first try 22 b) with minor repairs in the lab session 12 c) only after help outside lab from the teaching staff 3
AC 2011-763: A GUATEMALAN IMMERSION FOR TEACHING ENGI-NEERING DESIGN PRINCIPLES TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSKristine R. Csavina, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Kristine Csavina is an Assistant Professor of Bioengineering in the U. A. Whitaker School of Engi- neering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Dr. Csavina received a B.E. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Dayton and the Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Arizona State University. Her research inter- ests range from motion analysis of human movement in movement disorders, orthopedics and sports to engineering education research in student learning, pedagogical approach, and K-12 outreach initiatives.Lisa Zidek, Florida Gulf Coast University Lisa A. Zidek is
withmicrocontrollers does not mean that students will respond positively. Instructors used the “buzz”about the Arduino to motivate students, by indicating that the students were using a new andpopular technology. Instructor observations of student reaction showed that students were notuniversally inspired by or interested in the technology. This makes sense because the definitionof “cool” is not uniform for engineering students. Assessment was performed with an end-of-term survey of student attitudes toward thecourse and how it affected their career plans. Students were asked whether the use of theArduino platform changed their attitude toward computer programming and electromechanicalsystems. The complete survey is included in Appendix B. Results from
Page 22.1068.5 contents. Use the GIS join operations to integrate the data and symbolize the points to create an informative map. Turn in acompressed folder with a) your map (mxd file) b) data folder containing i. your point data (txt or shp files) ii. spreadsheet with your data log. iii. Any other layers you have included c) Jpeg file with the exported image of your map. d) A short paragraph describing the accuracy of the measurements you have included. Directions for Mapping Assignment 3 This project is similar to the preceding two mapping
) (b)Figure 5. Word clouds that pictorially show the frequency of certain words by size to the open-ended question of “What are important personal traits needed to become an engineer?” on thea) pre-camp survey and b) post-camp survey.From grouping similar free responses in the 2009 survey, we were then able to then create asurvey question with specific phrases for the following year, and asked participants to rank themin order of importance (Figure 6). We wanted to see what young students thought were the mostimportant traits, even though all the choices are important and possessing a variety of traits isideal.From this sort of question format, we could then also measure changes in responses after thecamp in order to gather quantitative
m p e r a tu r e ( C ) (b )Figure 4. Output voltage Vo response of the thermistor circuit. (a) Typical response of Voversus T for the circuit in Figure 3 when no linearization procedure is used. (b) Typical responsewhen the linearization procedure is used.designed and meets the design requirements, the students are required to construct the circuit ona breadboard. They are instructed to use ±12 V to power the operational amplifier and to searchonline for LF353 pin layout of the chip.Week 3– Voltage Comparing Circuit and Alarm Circuit DesignThe overall objectives of the third week lab session are determine the voltages corresponding tothe
appropriate methods selection. Proc. of the International Design Conference (Design 2002), Dubrovnik, May 14-17, 2002.[14] Lopez-Mesa, B. and G. Thompson (2006). On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(4): 371-386.[15] Mann, D. (2002). Hands-on systematic innovation. Clevedon, UK: IFR Consultants, Ltd. Page 22.20.12[16] Messick, S. (1984). The Nature of Cognitive Styles: Problems and Promise in Educational Practice, Educational Psychologist, 19: 59-74.[17] Michalko, M. (2006). Thinkertoys: A handbook on creative-thinking
3 7 ETEC 420 Manufacturing Automation and Robotics 4 8 ETEC 425 Machine Design 4 9 ETEC 428 Advanced Manufacturing Lab 3 10 ETEC 429 Directed Research in Manufacturing 3 11 ETEC 426 Advanced CNC (additional versions) 3 a. Surfacing and Contours b. Mill/Turn c. Hi-Speed Machining Draft d. EDM 2
information with the faculty to encouragefaculty to accommodate dominate learning styles. (Narayanan, 2007). Boylan is also of theopinion that students learn best when they have a visual representation and can manipulateobjects associated with the concepts.(Appalachian State University’s NCDE: National Center forDevelopmental Education)Implementation and Assessment The procedure used by the author is outlined in Appendix A. The author hassuccessfully utilized this very same procedure to conduct assessment in many other courses. Hehas reported this in his previous ASEE Conference proceedings and presentations. The rubrics used was obtained from Washington State University. This rubric has beenreproduced in Appendix B. Rubrics offer help
. Page 22.98.14 13 7. Cordes D. Teaching an integrated first-year computing curriculum: Lessons learned.Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 1997.8. Craig A, Bullard L and Joines J. Computing across curricula. Proceedings of the ASEEConference 2008.9. Deek F, Friedman R and Kim H. Computing and composition as an integrated subject insecondary school curriculum. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference 2002.10. Dunne B, Blauch A and Sterian A. The case for computer programming instruction forall engineering disciplines. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference 2005.11. Finlayson B. Introduction to chemical engineering computing. Proceedings of the
…:” Making Meanings of Being a Woman in EngineeringAbstractEngineering is often described as one of the last bastions of a macho culture where womencontinue to experience minority status. In this article we ask, how do women make meaning ofthis status? We explore this question in the context of students‟ socialization into the professionover the course of their engineering education. Drawn from diary data, our findings show thatyoung women hold multiple and contradictory perspectives about their status as women inengineering. The strands of these perspectives are articulated around (a) a feminist critique, (b)gender essentialism, (3) meritocracy and individualism, and (d) exceptionalism. These findingssuggest that their taken-for-granted assumptions
preparation in a co-op program that provides IEGs the opportunity todevelop social capital through explicit instruction in cross cultural differences, mentorship andnetworking may be one successful avenue in reducing the barriers IEGs face in securing relevantprofessional employment.AcknowledgmentThis research was supported by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities ResearchCouncil of Canada (SSHRC) and Manitoba Aerospace.References1 personal communication, Canadian Association for Co-operative Education, 2010.2 Blair, B. F
interface.Section 6 concludes with the results from a usability survey we conducted from a test group ofover 40 users. Appendix A provides installation instructions and compatibility information.Appendix B contains a Quick Reference of the toolbox’s functions.2. Reverse Engineering the Intelitek Dynamic Link Library Upon inspection we determinedthat the ScorBase Software provided with the Scorbot simply calls an Intelitek proprietary andundocumented dynamic link library (DLL) to communicate with the Scorbot’s Control Box.Although a complete picture of the routines encapsulated in this DLL is not known outside of themanufacturer, there are web sites that share some incomplete knowledge about the DLL routines[8]. In addition, these primitive routines are
.” Practice in using on-line resources to learn can provide a conduit for self-education after graduation. Page 22.790.7AcknowledgementsThank you goes to Griet Devriese who helped to score the year one assessments. As well, thanksto Olivier Tingaud and Etienne Villette from Ecole Nationale Superieure de l’Electronique et deses Applications (ENSEA) who spent a summer internship at CSM and helped to put the lecturesinto Blackboard format.References1. Bloom B. S. , Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: DavidMcKay Co Inc., 1956.2. Pavelich, M.J., Miller, R.L. and Olds, B.M, "Software for Measuring the
and their usage in DLD courses.The samples of the representative assignments given in basic activities are described below.They are given to improve the students' understanding of the synthesis of logic functions byusing Product-of-Sums (POS) and Sum-of-Products (SOP) simplification as well as theirsimplified implementation by utilizing Karnaugh-map or Boolean algebra. • Design the simplest circuit that has five inputs; a, b, c, d and e which produces an output value of 1 whenever exactly three or four of the input variables have the value 1; otherwise output will be 0. • Design a logic circuit that will implements the function f (a , b, c ) = ∑ m (1,2, 4,5,6 )After completing the first
about 20minutes), the instructor compiled all of the assessment sheets. After grading of the project reports,a final, detailed feedback form was provided to each team during finals week which summarizedthe assessment of their project. It also included the verbatim written assessments provided by thestudent peers and faculty.While the faculty and peer assessments (Groups 1 and 3) provided an evaluation on whether theproject demonstration met the objectives, the senior-class student assessment (Group 2) wasdifferent. This sheet is provided in Appendix B and had questions which focused on: • Whether those senior students would have learned the concept better if they had access to this DEMO when taking the course the previous year
to evaluate the pressure-volume data from a single engine cycle for thesupermileage car. This MEA is introduced in the third week of the quarter to mostly third-yearundergraduate students. The students are told that they are to model this cycle with 4-6 simpleprocesses in order to evaluate the thermal efficiency of the engine cycle as well as recommend away to increase its efficiency. Appendix A contains the problem statement combined with thegraphic of the ‘real’ cycle plotted on a pressure and volume diagram seen in Figure 1. A pre-labwith helpful information for the students to learn beforehand is listed in Appendix B. The graphic Page
educational intervention programs for minority studentsinclude the following components: (a) intensive monitoring of participants, (b) an articulatedprogram that reaches across grade levels, (c) consistent messages to raise aspirations, (d)building group cohesion and a sense of membership in the school and the program, and (e)access to rigorous curriculum and support to succeed in that curriculum. The UW GenomicsOutreach for Minorities (GenOM) Project is an undergraduate research program forunderrepresented ethnic minorities that focuses on not only these four components, but also ondeveloping career pathways in science and engineering. This program not only provideseducational and research opportunities for underrepresented minority students
AC 2011-801: A NEW PEDAGOGY FOR THE ELECTRONICS LABORA-TORYDaren Reed Wilcox, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityGerd Walter Wstenkhler, Hochschule Harz (University of Applied Sciences) Page 22.79.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A New Pedagogy for the Electronics LaboratoryIntroductionFor decades, laboratory instruction of electronic circuits and devices has been centered onstandard plastic dual-in-line (PDIP) components and integrated circuits such as the uA741operational amplifier inserted in a breadboard for testing. Prior to this method many engineeringprograms used circuit board trainers
Page 22.683.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Experimental Modules Introducing Microfabrication Utilizing A Multidisciplinary Approach S. Wagoner, W. Cui, W. E. Jones, D. Klotzkin, G. Meyers, and B. E. White Jr. Binghamton UniversityAbstract A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to introducing the concepts ofmicrofabrication to the undergraduate student body is being developed. The approach relies onmultidisciplinary expertise in electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, chemistry, andphysics and utilizes a pipeline approach to introduce concepts in microfabrication at thefreshman, sophomore