Experiences.” The median senior faculty response was 41 to this item, which indicated that their responses fell slightly to the Out of Class Experiences side of the scale. (See Figures 8a and 8b for boxplots).Independent groups t-tests were conducted on each of the slider questions to determine if therewere significant differences between the entrepreneurship and design faculty. Due to the smallsample sizes, none of the above tendencies were found to be significantly different.3. Do faculty members believe that the entrepreneurial mindset is something that can be developed or is it innate?In an effort to quantify the degree to which the faculty members who participated in the presentstudy believe that the entrepreneurial mindset is
figured out that the project was not centeredon making money, but making people’s lives better. It was in this light that I found a new way toview social entrepreneurship. In the entrepreneurship classes that I have taken, many of thesocial views were from those that had started their own small businesses in third world countriesand did not often discuss examples of outside entrepreneurs coming into these countries andmaking a large impact. Not to say I had not heard of examples of this happening, the book ThreeCups of Tea is a great example
AC 2012-3829: OVERVIEW OF THE FIRST YEAR OF AN INNOVATIVESCIENCE EDUCATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP VENTUREMs. Kelsey B. Hatzell, Pennsylvania State University Kelsey B. Hatzell is a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow studying material science for her doctoral studies. She received a bachelor’s of science degree in general engineering, and a bachelor’s of arts in economics from Swarthmore College. She also holds a master’s of science in mechanical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University.Marta C. Hatzell, Pennsylvania State University Marta C. Hatzell is a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow studying mechanical engineering for her doctoral studies. She received a bachelor’s of science degree
and an undergraduate degree in politicalscience. We are in the business of helping students develop their methodological toolkits through the liberal arts practices of reflection, insight, and synthesis. Using thesepractices, innovation and entrepreneurship have been integrated into an engineeringcurriculum through a year-long liberal arts seminar at Milwaukee School of Engineering.This three-course freshman-level honors sequence has “The City” as its topical focus.Although we did not set out to create a course in entrepreneurship, the relationshipbetween our intended goals and the tenets of entrepreneurial education became clearwhen we examined the content of our classes in connection with a grant application webecame involved with that
for the design and delivery of faculty development programs.Faculty development programs should: a) be relevant and tailored to needs of the audience; b)practical and focused on “what they can do next Monday to make their classes work better;” c)include both disciplinary and pedagogical expertise; d) be evidence-based (supported in soundresearch); e) avoid being prescriptive, dogmatic, or evangelical; and f) teach by example(“practice what you preach”).Faculty development activities to improve engineering students’ entrepreneurship and innovationskills target multiple levels of the educational environment, ranging from classroom instruction,to curriculum development and university infrastructure. Some examples include: • Course design
Creativity and Innovation in the ClassroomAbstractMuch is being required of engineering graduates that goes well beyond the basic skillstraditionally required in engineering. While ABET assessment insures that all programs have theminimum skills and outcomes required for accreditation, it is the responsibility of academicinstitution to develop “core values” in their students so that the constituents are best served.Feedback from industry highlights the need for students to understand more about the areas ofcreativity and innovation in the context of the business environment.1 Innovation and creativityare critical to maintaining an engineering edge in the United States’ industrial base.2 These topicsdeserve emphasis in classes other than dedicated
Entrepreneurship Academic Experiences Experiences None Low Moderate High Coursework Never heard Heard of it but not Heard of it and Have taken the of it interested in taking it interested in taking it class Program/Minors Never heard Heard of it but not Heard of it and Enrolled in this Certificates of it interested in pursuing interested in pursuing program minor minor Innovation Never heard Heard of it but not Heard of it and Have entered the
entrepreneurial mindset.Entrepreneurially minded engineers (EMEs) are characterized as this emergent class of engineersand act as the drivers of U.S. innovation and competitiveness. EMEs have not necessarily starteda new business (although they may have), they are, most often, working in established small- andmedium-sized firms, many work in Fortune 1000 firms [1].The Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN), a collection of twenty-one privateengineering schools across the US, in partnership with Target Training International (TTI), aworldwide leader in personal and professional assessments, is undertaking the KEEN – TTIPerformance DNA Assessment Project. Three well-known and vetted assessments are beingused to identify current students’ skills
adapting” (p. 54). Inaddition, the Academy states that, “Creativity…is an indispensable quality for engineering, andgiven the growing scope of the challenges ahead and the complexity and diversity of thetechnologies of the 21st century, creativity will grow in importance.” The Academy questionshow engineering education must evolve to meet the needs and problems of the 21st century butgives few details on how it expects institutions to change current practices to develop engineerswith the list of ideal attributes.In recent years, the development of skills such as innovation and creativity has primarily beenleft to two areas in the typical undergraduate engineering curriculum: 1) institutionalizedprograms such as entrepreneurship minors or
AC 2012-3699: ENCOURAGING DIVERGENT THINKINGDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University Daniel Raviv is a professor of computer and electrical engineering and computer science at Florida At- lantic University. He also served as Assistant Provost for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. With more than 25 years of combined experience in the high-tech industry, government, and academia, Raviv devel- oped fundamentally different approaches to ”out-of-the-box” thinking and a breakthrough methodology known as ”Eight Keys to Innovation.” He has been sharing his contributions with professionals in busi- nesses, academia, and institutes nationally and internationally. Most recently, he was a visiting professor at the
the analysts. The facultyand staff are the senior partners who act as advisors. The client is the sponsoring company; withone to two mentors from the company assigned to each project. Student teams own the problem,the project, and the deliverables for the client.Student teams are sourced exclusively from the University of Maryland’s Hinman CEOsProgram. Hinman CEOs is the nation’s first living-learning entrepreneurship program, placingapproximately 90 entrepreneurially-minded junior and senior students from all disciplines into aunique community in which students live together, learn about entrepreneurship, and launch newventures. In the 2011 class, the major distribution is 48 percent engineering, 38 percent business,and 14% arts, humanities
feasible complete design that could actually befabricated.The College of Business at this University offers an Entrepreneurship minor that has 9 credithours of core courses and 9 credit hours of electives. This year, the two phases of the IdeationChallenge roughly correspond with the first two of those core courses: Entrepreneurship Ideationand Innovation and Entrepreneurship Feasibility Analysis. The third Entrepreneurship corecourse, Small Business and Entrepreneurship, was not addressed in this iteration of the IdeationChallenge.Entrepreneurial thinking begins with ideation…thinking outside of the box. An entrepreneurmust develop a vision for a new product or service, or a new way of delivering an existingproduct or service, to distinguish
AC 2012-4303: OPEN PROCESS FOR ENTREPRENEURING TEAM COL-LABORATION: PARALLELS FROM AN ACADEMIC RESEARCH TEAMTO THE START UP THEY STUDIEDProf. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. teaches graduate design methods and a new REVS class on the car experi- ence in the College of Engineering at Stanford University, using applied psychology and art for story- telling to facilitate student progress from the idea and prototyping phases to delivery. With a focus on entrepreneurial leadership, Karanian makes productive partnerships with industry and forms collaborative teams from the areas of engineering, design, psychology, and communication. She was the Michael T. Anthony Professor at Wentworth
experience in leadership development for all students, staff and faculty. Recognize student commitment to leadership development with credentials (e.g., a Certificate in Leadership, a Leadership Minor).From its inception, LAP was designed by a multi-disciplinary team representing many differentfunctional units of Rose-Hulman: administrators, faculty, student affairs staff, and staff drawnfrom other areas. The purpose of this cross-functional approach is two-fold. First, unlike otherundergraduate leadership development programs that are sponsored by student affairs staff onlyor are taught within the context of an academic class, the Rose-Hulman approach integratesleadership development into both a student’s academic and
, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom Mason is Professor Emeritus of economics and engineering management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where he has been teaching since 1972. He was founding Head of the Engineering Man- agement Department and its M.S. degree program and founding Vice President for Entrepreneurship & Business Planning of Rose-Hulman Ventures and has also served Rose-Hulman as Head of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vice-President for Administration and Finance, Head of Engineering Management, and Interim Vice President for Development. While on a three-year leave from Rose-Hulman, Mason served as CFO and CEO of a 140-person network management systems business. In 2007-08, he used
at different schools teach classes over the internet to get a different perspective on entrepreneurship; • record guest speakers and make them available to other KEEN schools or do it live over the internet; • summer exchange program between schools; • program that allows students to shadow entrepreneurs; and • podcast every two weeks in which an entrepreneur sends in a problem and students can present their solutions.The KEEN Second Regional Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education washosted and held at Mercer University Campus, Macon, GA during March 15-17, 2012. Theobjective of this meeting is to bring together administrators, faculty, students, and staff fromKEEN Schools on a common platform to
Page 25.1259.7included in the analysis. Innovation-related courses required to earn these academic credentialsranged from 3 to 12 classes. In many cases, they consisted of a majority of required “core”courses, coupled with elective options. Among institutions in the sample, five out of the eightalso offered an entrepreneurship program, four of which were multidisciplinary. Table 1. Innovation Education Programs, Originating Department, and Target Audience Type of Credential Originating College, Department Target Audience or Center Bachelor of Innovation College of Engineering and Applied Business, Computer Science, Computer Science and
AC 2012-3100: ENGINEERING INNOVATIVENESSMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education program at Purdue University. He received his B.A. in pre-engineering in a five-year B.A./B.S. program at the University of Notre Dame and a M.B.A. and M.S.I.E. from Stanford University. Prior to coming to Purdue, he was Assistant Pro- fessor of entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position, he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes, and interventions aimed at improving
sociocultural situations and methods that provide authentic contexts and enculturation into an academic disciplinary community (social constructivism, conscientization); • • Course material that demonstrates valuing of diverse cultures, ethnic groups, classes, and genders (conscientization, learning styles).Design of Modules When an instructor tries to design instructional modules that accentuate studentperformance, the instructor should focus on five important ideas. The author has usedthese principles in his classroom activities and has reported on the findings in otherASEE conference presentations and proceedings. The five ideas have been reproducedhere for sake of completeness and clarity. Reaffirm: In an
AC 2012-4795: CLOSING THE ASSESSMENT LOOP: A FACULTY TRAIN-ING PROTOCOLDr. Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University Ken Reid is the Director of First-year Engineering, Director of Engineering Education, and an Associate Professor in electrical and computer engineering and computer science at Ohio Northern University. He was the seventh person in the U.S. to receive a Ph.D. in engineering education from Purdue University. He is active in engineering within K-12, serving on the TSA Board of Directors and 10 years on the IEEE-USA Precollege Education Committee. He was named the Herbert F. Alter Chair of Engineering in 2010. His research interests include success in first-year engineering, introducing entrepreneurship
AC 2012-3634: CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, AND INGENUITY SUMMERENRICHMENT PROGRAM: ASSESSMENT FROM A MULTI-INSTITUTIONALCOLLABORATIONDr. Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the En- gineering Society of Detroit, and the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, as Chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, and as Chair of LTU/KEEN Entrepreneurial Course Modifi- cation.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence
AC 2012-3600: MIND LINKS 2012: RESOURCES TO MOTIVATE MI-NORITIES TO STUDY AND STAY IN ENGINEERINGDr. Maria M. Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic UniversityDr. Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of engineering at Penn State, Brandywine. His interests are in engineering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International
within engineering, outside of engineering, and cross disci- plinarily. Her research includes an emphasis on the translation of research to practice in the form of ped- agogy, curriculum development, and faculty support and programming in implementing evidence-based best practices in teaching and learning.Jennifer WegnerMr. Moses K. Lee, University of Michigan Moses Lee is Assistant Director and Adjunct Assistant Professor at the Center for Entrepreneurship at the University of Michigan College of Engineering. In his roles, Lee directs TechArb, the student startup accelerator, and teaches the entrepreneurship practicum course.Amy Frances Goldstein, University of Michigan Amy Goldstein is the Academic Programs
College (B.A., 1976), WSU (B.S., 1981, M.S., 1988), and the University of Oregon (Ph.D., 1993). He is currently a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering. He has been the President and CEO of IPM, a medical device company and Total Dynamics, LLC, a software company. He is also on the board of directors of Developing World Technologies, a company started by former students of the capstone class that he teaches. His interests include engineering and entrepreneurship pedagogy and assessment, technology development, and clinical applications of biomedical instrumentation.Prof. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director
demands for well-rounded engineers who bear deeptechnical skills coupled with profound knowledge in areas such as business, management,communication and even entrepreneurship, embraced as T-shaped engineer by the academicand industrial field. Preparing for an economic transition, China ought to cultivate a largenumber of T-shaped talents so as to stay competitive and create greater improvements in thefuture. However, engineering curricula and teaching methods often fail to be well alignedwith these goals in China and even worldwide. The “Advanced Honor Class of EngineeringEducation” launched by Zhejiang University presents a feasible way on how to build strongerT-shaped engineers with solid professional foundation, centralized training on
paper-based rubrics, it is also shown that small detailscan interfere with usability and thus user satisfaction and that compatibility with mobile devicesis a necessary, but still unaddressed, requirement.IntroductionThe logistical problems associated with distributing, collecting, grading, and returningassignments and the difficulties in ensuring fairness and consistency in grading tend to increasenon-linearly with the number of students enrolled in a class. This is especially true in project-based design courses where evaluation is subjective, deliverables are team-based, and thephilosophies and expectations of course faculty members may vary substantially.Online course management programs like Blackboard1 and Moodle2 can be very helpful in
AC 2012-3761: CAPSTONE DESIGN FACULTY MOTIVATION: MOTIVA-TIONAL FACTORS FOR TEACHING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEAND MOTIVATIONAL INFLUENCES ON TEACHING APPROACHESCory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech Cory A. Hixson is a graduate student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. Previous experience is in audio/visual engineering and K-12 math/science education. His research interests are in faculty motiva- tion, entrepreneurship, design education, K-12 engineering/STEM education, and research to practice in engineering educationDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
AC 2012-3885: STUDENT LEARNING IN MULTIPLE PROTOTYPE CY-CLESDr. Steven C. Zemke, Gonzaga University Steven Zemke is the Director of the Center for Engineering Design and Entrepreneurship at Gonzaga University. This center is chartered to enhance the design courses throughout the School of Engineering and Applied Science. Zemke teaches the mechanical design courses at Gonzaga. His area of research is the pedagogy of design with an emphasis on practically improving student learning. Page 25.1185.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Student Learning in
concepts.In this paper, we report the outcomes of a Design Heuristic implementation study in anintroductory engineering course. In one section, students were instructed on the use of DesignHeuristics as a means of generating new ideas for an unfamiliar design task. In a different secondsection, students were asked to use Design Heuristics as concept modifiers with their existingideas for a class project. Our goal was to observe the ways students used Design Heuristics inthese two different scenarios. In this paper, we present five case studies from each scenario,showing ideation outcomes as a result of working with the heuristics, and discuss successes andobstacles involved in the implementation of Design Heuristics in the engineering classroom. The
thepractical engineering design process even as they are immersed in fundamental math and sciencecourses, (b) encourage students to experience how knowledge from these fundamental coursescould be put to practical use, and (c) encourage retention in engineering.In ENGI 120, students learn the engineering design process and use it to solve meaningfulproblems drawn from local hospitals, local community partners, international communities, andaround the Rice University campus. Each freshman design team is coached by an “ApprenticeLeader,” an upper-class student who is taking a course in engineering leadership sponsored byRCEL. Freshman design teams directly interview clients, complete a design context review,develop design criteria, and brainstorm and