Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University; Terence Geyer, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Paper ID #11883Using a Blended Learning Format to Extend the Influence of a TechnologicalLiteracy CourseDr. William R Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is a Full Professor, Emeritus of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional En- gineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Q. Peter He, Tuskegee University; Jin Wang, Auburn University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

papers, over 20 conference proceedings, and two book chapters. He was the 2009 recipient of the Outstanding Faculty Performance Award in Research from Tuskegee University.Dr. Jin Wang, Auburn University Dr. Jin Wang is B. Redd Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Auburn University. She obtained her BS and PhD degrees in chemical engineering (specialized in biochemical engineering) from Tsinghua University in 1994, and 1999 respectively. She then obtained a PhD degree (specialized in control engineering) from the University of Texas at Austin in 2004. From 2002 to 2006 she was a development engineer and senior development engineer at Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Dur- ing her tenure at

Conference Session

Novel Student Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

D. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Esther W. Gomez, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Manish Kumar, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Paper ID #11183Preliminary Evaluation of a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)Program: A Methodology for Examining Student OutcomesD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Esther W Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Esther Gomez is an assistant professor in the Departments of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven G Northrup, Western New England University; John J. Burke P.E., Western New England University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Paper ID #13650A Hybrid Approach to a Flipped Classroom for an Introductory CircuitsCourse for all Engineering MajorsDr. Steven G Northrup, Western New England University Dr. Steven G. Northrup, an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Western New England University, earned a BSEE from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and an MSEE & Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University. Before attending Vanderbilt University, he worked in the defense industry in Whites Sands, NM and in the automotive electronics industry designing climate control systems for Ford Motor Company. At Western New England University

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Steven C. Currall, University of California, Davis; Ed Frauenheim, The Great Place to Work Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Paper ID #11561Organized Innovation: A Framework for Effectively Managing InnovationDr. Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University Sara Jansen Perry is an assistant professor of management in the Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University. She teaches organizational behavior and human resource management courses, including ne- gotiation and principles of management. She earned her PhD in 2009 from the University of Houston in Industrial-Organizational Psychology, also earning the Meredith P. Crawford fellowship in I-O Psychol- ogy from HumRRO that year. In the 2013-14 academic year, she held the Professional Land

Conference Session

Virtual Instruction and Collaboration

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yizhe Chang, Stevens Institute of Technology; El-Sayed S. Aziz, Stevens Institute of Technology; Zhou Zhang, Stevens Institute of Technology; Mingshao Zhang, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; Sven K. Esche, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

exercisesdesigned using this game-based virtual laboratory platform will be conducted.References[1] J. E. Corter, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, J. Ma and J. V. Nickerson, "Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories," Computers & Education, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 2054–2067, 2011.[2] D. Magin and S. Kanapathipillai, "Engineering students' understanding of the role of experimentation," European Journal of Engineering Education , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 351-358, 2000. Page 26.1637.12[3] B. Dalgarno, A. G. Bishop and W. Adlong, "Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource

Conference Session

Community Engagement in Engineering Education Projects

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Zakzewski, The University of Scranton; Mark Robert Murphy Sr., University of Scranton, Director of Sustainability; Michael Mahon Ph.D., Abington Heights School District

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

. Yee, "How Service Learning Affects Students," Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000, p. 21.4. J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Jr., Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.5. I. S. Fisher, "Integrating Service-Learning Experiences into Postcollege Choices," in Service-Learning in Higher Education, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996, p. 209.6. S. Krishnan and T. L. Nilsson, "Engineering Service Learning: Case Study on Preparing Students for the Global Community," in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.7. B. Tempest, M. Pando, S. Loree and M. A. Hoff, "A Student

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christi L Patton Luks, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Laura P Ford, University of Tulsa

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

85 89 88Bragging Points Earned, Average n/a n/a 51 59Weighted Bragging Points Earned n/a n/a 88 92Curve Given 1.5 1.0 0 0Earned A before curve 1 ( 4%) 7 (28%) 18 (50%) 11 (32%)Earned B before curve 24 (96%) 12 (48%) 18 (50%) 23 (68%)Earned C before curve 0 ( 0%) 6 (24%) 0 ( 0%) 0 ( 0%)Earned A w/ curve or Bragging Pts 8 (32%) 8 (32%) 19 (53%) 12 (35%)Earned B

Conference Session

Multidisiplinary Student Research Experiences

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natacha Depaola, Illinois Institute of Technology; Eric M. Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology; Fouad Teymour, Illinois Institute of Technology; Paul R. Anderson, Illinois Institute of Technology; Roberto Cammino, Illinois Institute of Technology; Bonnie Haferkamp, Illinois Institute of Technology; Jamshid Mohammadi, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

designed toalso enhance the educational experience. Over 92% of students participants agreed that theexperience enriched their education (Figure 3C). Four percent of students disagreed. Page 26.25.9   Figure 2: Distribution of student responses for survey questions on (a) mentorship and (a) the overall value of the experience. Figure 3: Distribution of student responses for survey questions on the impact of the research experience on (a) interest in pursuing additional undergraduate research experience and/or graduate school, (b) seeking a career in research

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Luciana Cancado, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Cindy M Walker, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Dian Mitrayani , University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

of the Undergraduate Educational Experience.”Assessing the Value of Research in the Chemical Sciences. National Research Council Report, National Page 26.441.12Academy Press: 73-81. (1998)6. E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni,. “Establishing the Benefits of ResearchExperiences for Undergraduates: First Findings from a Three-Year Study.” Sci. Educ., 88, 493-594.(2004)7. D.W. Mogk, “Undergraduate Research Experiences as Preparation for Graduate Study in Geology,” J.Geological Education, 41:126-128. (1993)8. D. Willis, P. Krueger, and A. Kendrick, “Perceptions, Expectations, and Outcomes of the Third Year ofa Research

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ralph Ocon, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

courses were taught by different teachers (Dr. Deiter and the author) and at different universities.1. When comparing the survey results on humor in the classroom administered by Dr.Deiter and the author, the overall results are relatively consistent. Tables 4 and 5summarizes the ratings for each of the 6 courses surveyed.2. Average scores were compared for Dr. Deiter’s three courses and the author’s threecourses on 4 questions dealing with humor and: (a) students remembering class material(b) students asking questions (c) class attendance and (d) students paying attention. Table6 summarizes the average scores for the 3 courses surveyed by Dr. Deiter and the 3courses surveyed by the author on questions 3, 5, 9 and 11.Table 6: Average Score

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andrew Michael Smith, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; P. Scott Carney, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois; Dipanjan Pan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Page 26.1774.5used to document student experiences.References:[1] E. Litzler and J. Young, “Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, issue 2, pp. 319–345, April 2012.[2] J. D. Karpicke, "Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning," Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 157–163, 2012.[3] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Science Education, vol. 88, issue 4, 493–534, July 2004.Acknowledgement

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Problem-based and Active Learning

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dennis A. Silage, Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.6. Litzinger, T.A, Wise, J. C, Lee, S.H. (2005). “Self-directed Learning Readiness Among Engineering Undergraduate Students,” Journal of Engineering Education 22: 122-128.7. Bloom, B. S., ed. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.8. Mason, G., Dragovich, J. (2010) “Program Assessment and Evaluation Using Student Grades Obtained on Outcome-Related Course Learning Objectives,” Journal of professional Issues in Engineering education and Practice 136: 122-131.9. Case, J., Gunstone, R., & Lewis, A. (2001) “Students' Metacognitive Development in an

Conference Session

Manufacturing and Machine Component Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda E. Craugh Ph.D., United States Naval Academy; Ethan E. Lust, United States Naval Academy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

this case a reciprocating internal combustion engine) work? What comes in? What goes out? • Air and fuel goes in, gas, heat, and work come out. b) How does air get into the engine? • Through the intake manifold, into the carburetor, then into the cylinder through the intake valve. c) How does fuel get into the engine? • From the gas tank into the carburetor where it is mixed with air. d) How does exhaust get out of the engine? • The exhaust valve opens and the piston pushes the exhaust out through the muffler

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Bring-Your-Own-Experiments 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

/manuals.nsf/websearch/876393DF257DB5B086256E55005A51CE , Accessed 3/12/152 Smyser, B. M. and McCue, K., “From Demonstration to Open Ended: Revitalizing a Measurements and AnalysisCourse”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Convention, San Antonio, TX 2012 Page 26.315.8

Conference Session

Research to Practice: STRAND 1 – Addressing the NGSS: Supporting K-12 Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy and Engineering Science Connections (Part 2)

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie Anne Aloia, Bayonne High School; Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

properly, and documented results as required. Page 26.414.7 • B: The project goals are “almost” there, or achieved perhaps more by accident than skill, and the documentation is good, but could be a little more complete, or just neater and more organized. • C: The project is not quite complete or functional, but at least one part is viable, and with a little more time or work students could have achieved the goal. • Failure: The project work plan is not viable, or the students gave up.When creating this grading rubric, the easiest level to define is the “A”. Defining the level ofwork for the “B”, “C”, and failure, is

Conference Session

Innovations in Manufacturing Laboratories

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John T. Tester, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

9/8/2014 Section Last Name Chambers 1 A √ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Gonzalez 1 A √ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Martinez 1 B √ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Abdulla 1 B √ 1 2 3

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Ludwigsen, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

). Available from URL http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~bwilson/training.html, accessed 18 December 2014.7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Holum, A., "Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible." American Educator 15 (3), 6-11 (1991). pp. 6-11.8. This description is paraphrased from the website of the American Modeling Teachers Association, URL http://modelinginstruction.org, accessed 18 December 2014.9. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., Steinberg, R. N., “Student Expectations in Introductory Physics,” Am. J. Phys. 66, 212-224 (1998).10. Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., Fincham, F. D., “Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities,” Journal of Personality

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, 2011. 111-128. 8. Hamon, C., and M. Dunlap Green. "B., Camburn, B, Crawford, R., Jensen, D., 2014 “Virtual or Physical Prototypes? Development and Testing of a Prototyping Planning Tool”." 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN June 15-18, (2014). Page 26.1318.11

Conference Session

Dynamic Systems and Control

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chan Ham, Kennesaw State University ; Mohsin Mohammad Taufiq, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, students also learned fundamental multidisciplinary principles inorder to achieve a compact, portable, and an affordable system while taking consideration of cost,performance, and functionality.The final class grade confirmed effective learning outcomes of the project team. All five studentsof the team received class grade A or B while the course success was defined a grade C orhigher. In addition, a class survey administered to the team students showed the students' fullsatisfaction with the course on how their learning of multidisciplinary mechatronics engineeringimproved for their professional career development in the future. As a result, students learnedclear lessons on how a multidisciplinary engineering design project is implemented. In

Conference Session

Software Engineering Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Victoria Bernal, Kennesaw State University, Marietta; Jeffrey Chastine, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

, 2007 (Springer Science+Business Media, New York). 3. Dugan, John P., et al, Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership. International Leadership Association, November 2006, Maryland. 4. Herrington, J., et al, A Guide to Authentic e-Learning, 2014 (Routledge, London and New York). 5. Johrendt, JL., et al, A Learning Outcomes Survey of Engineering Cooperative Education Students: Preliminary Findings, 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paper AC 2009-789, Austin, TX, USA. 6. Nelson, B. C., et al, Global channels of evidence for learning and assessment in complex game environments, 2011, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42:88-100. 7. Software Engineering

Conference Session

Technical Session: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Techniques for Teaching Assistants

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Pennsylvania; Julie Schafer McGurk, University of Pennsylvania; Emily R. Elliott, University of Pennsylvania; Ursula J. Williams, University of Pennsylvania; Leann Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Student

throughout the semestercompared to learning facts, theories, and equations (e.g., static equilibrium equations) that couldbe presented and then practiced in one activity.With these goals and methods in mind, the TA can begin designing in-class activities. Severalresources summarize the variety of active learning techniques, and we refer the reader to theseexcellent guides.10-13 Deciding which in-class activities to use depends on the activity goals.Regardless of the technique used, many of the following questions, posed by the “ActiveLearning in STEM Courses” mini-course, should be considered when designing a newassignment: 1. Preparation a. How will students prepare for the in-class work? b. Will this preparation be

Conference Session

Curriculum and New Course Development in ET

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay R Porter, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

., Zoghi, B., Morgan, J., Zhan, W., " Product and System Development: Creating a New Focus for anElectronics Engineering Technology Program,” 2012 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[4] Zhang, J.A., Burbank, K., Adams, R., “A Systems Approach to Teaching “Introduction to ElectronicCommunications” for ECET Students,” 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, SaltLake City, UT, 2004.[5] Porter, J.R., “Teaching Applied Electromagnetics to Engineering Technology Students,” 2004 American Societyof Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004[6] Beasley, J.S., Hymer, J.D., Miller, G.M., “Electronic Communications: A System Approach”, Prentice Hall

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Innovative Course Offerings

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert S Crockett, California Polytechnic State University; Jonathan L. York, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo; Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

ABET Outcomes (d) and (e) are the most supported by the Innovation Sandbox Program.While these results should be expected at the intersection of engineering and a program such asInnovation Sandbox, we find this table to be extremely useful in communicating the value of theprogram to the various engineering disciplines at our university. Mapping Between ABET Outcomes and Sandbox Outcome Sandbox Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, (a) science, and engineering X X Ability to design and conduct experiments, as (b) well as

Conference Session

Course Development / Curriculum Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carlotta A. Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Conga LineThe fourth lab was also based upon light sensing and required the students to implementBraitenberg vehicles. This was a demonstration of reactive control and creating photophobic andphotophilic animal-like behaviors based upon excitatory and inhibitory connections between thesensors and motors. Based upon the wiring connections, the robots would demonstrate love,aggression, fear, and explorer behaviors. The wiring and the lab demonstration images areshown in Figures 3 and 4. (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 3: Valentino Braitenberg Vehicles Figure 4: Braitenberg Vehicles LabIn the fifth lab, the students were required

Conference Session

Civic Engagement and Volunteerism in Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shoba Krishnan, Santa Clara University; Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

Paper ID #11126Civic Engagement as a Component of Engineering EducationDr. Shoba Krishnan, Santa Clara University Dr. Shoba Krishnan is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Santa Clara University. She has a strong interest in engineering education, and is involved in several community based activities to increase the participation of underrepresented groups in engineering. She collaborates with non-profits that are in need for technical expertise and with K-8 schools in need of STEM programs. She helped es- tablish the IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Design Engineering And Service) program and developed the course

Conference Session

Graduate Recruitment & Professional Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gurlovleen Rathore, Texas A&M University; Matthew Pariyothorn, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

Applied not 40% Did not Matriculated apply Admitted matriculate 51% 60% 87% 39% (a) (b) (c)Figure 1. (a) Application to TAMU; (b) Admissions to TAMU; and (c) Matriculation to TAMU.Factors - Graduate School SelectionParticipant responses on factors that influenced their selection of a graduate school were codedinto four categories based on previous research10. The categories included institutional factors,department factors, faculty factors and personal factors. Response percentages for

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiyu Liu, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Irene B. Mena, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kirsten S Hochstedt, Penn State University; Tricia Bertram Gallant, Rady School of Management, UC San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Irene B. Mena, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tonatiuh Rodriguez-Nikl P.E., California State University, Los Angeles; Deborah Soonmee Won, California State University, Los Angeles; Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Arturo Pacheco-Vega, California State University, Los Angeles; Adel A Sharif, California State University, Los Angeles; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

shown in Figure 5.Figure 3: AC unit shown on the support frame. The support frame can be modeled by a pin at theleft end and a single vertical reaction at the right end due to the rigid vertical strut. The AC unitwas assumed to be supported at the four corners.Figure 4: Sketch of an AC support beam showing the AC unit placed at an arbitrary location andwith non-symmetric loads due to the AC unit. Page 26.983.6Figure 5. 3D Model of beam displacement under specific boundary conditions: (a) cantilever; (b)fixed at both boundaries; (c) fixed (left) and pinned (right) boundaries; and (d) simply-supported.Roof Truss Analysis and Solving Systems of

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kent A. Wayland, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

International

Page 26.805.12 transformative learning: A dialogue between John M. Dirkx and Jack Mezirow.” Journal of Transformative Education, 4(2), 123–39.2. Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., … Nichols-Belo, A. 2006. The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently.” Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 1–16.3. Downey, G. 2011. Epilogue beyond global competence: Implications for engineering pedagogy. In G. L. Downey and K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering for? The making of international educators (pp. 415–432). Morgan & Claypool.4. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. 2010