Paper ID #15693New Web-Based Interactive Learning Material for Digital DesignProf. Frank Vahid, University of California - Riverside Frank Vahid is a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the Univ. of California, Riverside. His research interests include embedded systems design, and engineering education. He is a co-founder of zyBooks.com.Dr. Alex Daniel Edgcomb, Zybooks Alex Edgcomb finished his PhD in computer science at UC Riverside in 2014. Alex has continued work- ing as a research specialist at UC Riverside with his PhD advisor, studying the efficacy of web-native content for STEM education. Alex also
Pitsco Tetrix Prime robotics kit2, designed for K-12 roboticsactivities, an Atmel XMEGA-A3BU XPlained microcontroller board3 along with a customcircuit board, both designed to provide electrical signals to the servo motors in the kit givencommands from the robotics software tool and the software tool itself. The robotics softwaretool4 was developed by our research team for the purpose of supporting undergraduate andgraduate introductory robotics courses.a. The SRO Summer CampThe system was used in the Summer Research Opportunity5 camp offered at Florida Gulf CoastUniversity’s Whittaker Center for STEM Education. This summer camp was offered as a two-week camp to middle school students who participated in the Thomas Alva Edison RegionalScience
Paper ID #16693Simplifying a Course to Reduce Student Stress so Students Can Focus Againon LearningDr. Alex Daniel Edgcomb, University of California - Riverside Alex Edgcomb finished his PhD in computer science at UC Riverside in 2014. Alex has continued working as a research specialist at UC Riverside with his PhD advisor, studying the efficacy of web-native content for STEM education. Alex also works with zyBooks, a startup that develops interactive, web-native textbooks in STEM.Prof. Frank Vahid, University of California - Riverside Frank Vahid is a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the Univ. of
research focuses on the use of virtual reality in facilitating learning in online environments.Morris Branchell Lee IIIDr. David M. Neyens, Clemson University David M. Neyens, PhD MPH, is an assistant professor of industrial engineering at Clemson University. He received his PhD in industrial engineering from the University of Iowa in 2010 and a MPH from the University of Iowa in 2008.Dr. Anand K. Gramopadhye, Clemson University Dr. Anand K. Gramopadhye’s research focuses on solving human-machine systems design problems and modeling human performance in technologically complex systems such as health care, aviation and man- ufacturing. He has more than 200 publications in these areas, and his research has been funded by
building, self-managing teams, and sociotechnical systems.Dr. Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University Pilar Pazos is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engi- neering at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA. Her main areas of research interest are collabo- rative work-structures, virtual teams and team decision-making and performance.Mr. Preetham Sathish Ullal, Old Dominion University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Qualitative Inquiry into the Role of Web-based Collaboration Tools and Instructional Scaffolds in the Facilitation of Team ProcessesGlobalization and advances in information technologies drive organizations to use
antimicrobials, creating effective learning environments, and science, engineering and technology educa- tion for K-12.Dr. Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Professor Palou is Director, Center for Science, Engineering, and Technology Education as well as Dis- tinguished Professor and Past Chair, Department of Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. He teaches engineering, food science, and education re- lated courses. His research interests include emerging technologies for food processing, creating effective learning environments, using tablet PCs and associated technologies to enhance the development of 21st century expertise in engineering students, and
Division of the American society for Engineering Education havedistinguished between technological literacy and engineering literacy. One approach is to distinguish betweenthe “process” of engineering and its “product” technology. While useful in engineering education at school leveland in higher education it is no wonder that the public continue to be confused about the differences betweenengineering and technology. Krupczak and his colleagues not that “the term engineering is not treatedsystematically by any of the technological literacy standards which must be to the detriment of engineering, andthose wanting to develop engineering standards.Attempts to show how engineering and technology interact inevitably lead to models that conflate the
undergraduate students in US colleges anduniversities. The assessment methods developed are expected to be suitable for use by facultyteaching general education courses on engineering and technological topics.Outline of Approach for AssessmentA challenge facing those intending to develop tests of engineering and technological literacy isthe vast amount of potential information that might be appropriate to include in such anassessment. An inventory of what everyone should know about engineering and technologywould be an expansive list. Even one of the sub-disciplines of engineering such as mechanical,electrical, or civil engineering could produce a near limitless array of facts to include.Compounding the problem is the time evolution of technology. One
experts and leaders that can ensure successful continuation of their mission.6As a result, the Unites States Standards Strategy established standards education as a highpriority in the U.S.Efforts in that direction started in 2000, when ABET, recognizing the benefits of includingtechnical standards into engineering education, included a reference to standards and codesin General Criteria, Criterion 5, requiring that all major design experience shouldincorporate appropriate engineering standards. Moreover, to provide additionalopportunities for education on standards, many SDOs have established educationcommittees with the goal to assist engineering and technology programs. Standardseducation is accepted as highly beneficial to engineering
growing the Itasca program from 10 students in 1992 to 160 students in 2010. In 2009, he worked with a national development team of engineering educators to develop the 100% PBL curriculum used in the Iron Range model. He has successfully acquired and managed over $10 million in educational grants including as PI on 7 grants from NSF. He has been in the classroom, teaching more than 20 credits per year to engineering students for more than 25 years. His specific areas of expertise are in active learning, faculty development, and learning community development. He has been awarded the 2012 Progress Minnesota award, 2012 Labovitz Entrepreneurialism award, and 2012 Innovator of the Year award from the Rural Community
and informationsystems as seen in figure 1. This course is made up of measurement systems, drive and actuationsystem, control system, microprocessor system and computer system that are required to createmore functional and adaptable products. As mechatronics is multidisciplinary in nature, properdesign of the hands-on experience is crucial for the success of the educational experience. Figure 1: Interdisciplinary nature of mechatronics1All instruments, equipment, and appliances used by us incorporate scientific knowledge andknow how from the fields of engineering. It is of paramount importance that mechanicalengineering students have an in depth understanding of Mechatronics, and it has thereforebecome a core mechanical
Paper ID #16186Developing an IP-Based Industrial Process Control Laboratory for Use in aDistance Education EnvironmentDr. John Pickard, East Carolina University Dr. Pickard is an Assistant Professor at East Carolina University in the College of Engineering and Tech- nology. He teaches undergraduate and graduate Information and Computer Technology (ICT) courses within the Department of Technology Systems. Dr. Pickard plays an active role in building positive and sustainable industry relationship between the college, local businesses, and industry partners. Current industry recognized certifications include; Cisco Certified
, and 5) Inform students of the excellent educational opportunities at theUniversity of Wyoming. For the course a low cost Dagu Magician robot kit was used. Eachstudent built their own robot. The robot was equipped with infrared sensors and an ArduinoUNO R3 processor board. The Arduino processor was specifically designed for use by studentswithout a technical background. They are easy to use and program. Students completed a pre-and post-course survey to determine their level of understanding in a number of course concepts.A substantial increase in student understanding was noted.OverviewFor many decades the University of Wyoming has offered the Summer High School Institute forrising sophomore students. Typically 100 students are competitively
: using IR cameras in STEM outreach Abstract The recent introduction of affordable infrared (IR) cameras and IR imaging attachments for smartphones has provided a unique opportunity to enhance the education of K-12 students. We have acquired a number of different IR cameras and IR camera attachments and discuss the utilization of these devices in both a college course and in our STEM and STEAM outreach efforts. While our outreach efforts have placed us in a classroom for just an hour or two at a time, thanks to local IEEE Chapter support, we have placed IR cameras in these classrooms for several weeks at a time. This paper
and creativity by innovating new technologies application for Engineering Education is currently under way to engage the university and the community. Concluding, Mr. Lugo’s ambition is to encourage students to focus in science, technology and engineer abilities in order to expand their professional potential.Mr. Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas - El Paso Pedro worked in the manufacturing industry as a Quality Control Engineer for some years before acquir- ing his current position as an Instructional Technologist at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). For over ten years in this role, he has worked with a team of managers that oversee various learning environ- ments and systems in the Academic
Paper ID #14594Early Internships for Engineering Technology Student Retention: A PilotStudyDr. Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University - San Marcos Dr. Vedaraman Sriraman is a Piper and University Distinguished Professor of Engineering Technology and Associate Director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research at Texas State University. Dr. Sriraman’s degrees are in mechanical and industrial engineering. His research interests are in engi- neering education, sustainability, and applied statistics. In the past, he has implemented several grants from the NSF, NASA and SME-EF. He has also received several
, presenting results graphically andunderstanding the underlying principles. Student survey results show that the use of Matlab wasreally enlightening.References [1] [Online]. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/.[2] D. Silage, "Teaching Digital Communications in a Wireless World: Who Needs Equations?," in Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.[3] M. Boulmalf, Y. Semmar, A. Lakas and K. Shuaib, "Teaching digital and analog modulation to undergradute Information Technology students using Matlab and Simulink," in Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010 IEEE, Madrid, 2010.[4] I. Marsh, "ACM SIGCOMM educational resources," 04 05 2011. [Online]. Available: http
currently chair of the Engineering Technology Division. During his tenure at ETSU, he has authored several papers, taught numerous courses, and presented at professional meetings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Use of Drone for a Campus Building Envelope Study Use of Drone for a Campus Building Envelope Study By Raheem Ariwoola, Mohammad Moin Uddin, Keith V. JohnsonAbstractIn 2014, 41% of total U.S. energy consumption was consumed in residential andcommercial buildings, or about 40 quadrillion British thermal units according toCommercial Building Energy Consumption Survey. As the number of commercialbuildings and floor space
Engineering at Monterrey Tech (ITESM-Monterrey Campus). Teaches courses in CAD/CAE, Mechanical Design, Finite Element Method and Optimization. His interest are in the area of product development, topology optimization, additive manufacturing, sustainable design, and biomechanics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Use of Additive Manufacturing (AM) for Mold Inserts in Injection Molding Abstract Currently, whenever there is a need for an injection molding prototype, it can take weeks andthousands of dollars to develop and manufacture it. Therefore, the use of AdditiveManufacturing (AM) to produce inserts for injection molding for rapid quote of parts
Paper ID #14417Hybrid Delivery of Environmental Engineering: Perception, Attitude, andAssessmentDr. M. A. Karim P.E., Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, KennesawState University Kennesaw State University, Marietta Campus, 1100 South Marietta Parkway, Marietta, L-114, Georgia 30060, USA. Phone: (678) 915-3026 / (804) 986-3120; Emails: mkarim4@kennesaw.edu / makarim@juno.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Hybrid Delivery of Environmental Engineering: Perception, Attitude, and AssessmentAbstractOn-line or hybrid offering of
Society for Engineering Education, 2016 APPLICATIONS OF SOLIDWORKS AND MICROSOFT POWERPOINT TO TEACHING STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS COURSESAbstractDeveloping new ways for teaching structures courses to engineering students, in addition tothose in an alternate major (construction management, architecture, etc.) is a staple in thecurriculum. One of the most common techniques used by instructors to demonstrate variousconcepts is by using props. While those can be effective, instructors are looking for a moredigital approach that students can learn and replicate on their own. Current cohorts of studentsare incredibly tech savvy, and have the ability to quickly understand how to use computerprograms, and the like. The advantages of knowing computer
sustainability.Jason D. Millar, Oregon Institute of Technology Jason Millar is a graduate student in the civil engineering program at Oregon Tech. With a background and emphasis in structural engineering, Jason is conducting a research study regarding the use of technology to enhance the education and application of non-destructive structural health monitoring. In his fourth year at Oregon Tech, Jason has enjoyed the opportunity to attend multiple national engineering conventions, hold leadership positions in several extracurricular clubs, and excel in a broad range of civil engineering and related projects. The ultimate career goal for Jason is to own a private consulting firm specializing in sustainable structural
different academic levels, the introductory material at the beginning of the class facilitated the success of the vertical integration approach. Furthermore, the following list provides recommendations for successful future implementation of the proposed SHRP 2 vertical integration approach. These recommendations are based on feedback from the SHRP 2 module instructors. ̶ It is recommended that future implementation of SHRP 2 products incorporate more of the SHRP 2 hands-on or field components. ̶ It is also recommended to develop group or individual class projects that focus on using SHRP 2 products. ̶ It is recommended to develop an “instruction manual” to educate
designer at Dartmouth College, working primarily with the STEM depart- ments. She focuses on active learning strategies guiding faculty in student-centered pedagogies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Active Learning about Structures through a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)Is it possible to incorporate active learning strategies into a Massive Open Online Course(MOOC)? Will learners complete hands-on activities proposed through a MOOC? Are learnerswho are sent a set of supplies for the hands-on activities more likely to participate in theactivities? Are these learners more engaged in the course? If learners are asked a set ofpreliminary questions will
articles, and 126 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 17 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 100 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 60 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,500 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using an AR Drone Lab in a Secondary Education Classroom to Promote Quantitative Research1. IntroductionIn recent years, science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM
Technically Speaking3and Tech Tally,4 sponsored by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), and theTechnology and Engineering Literacy Assessment, developed for all K-12 students as partof the National Assessment of Educational Progress carried out by the US Department ofEducation5. These works developed and elaborated on the elements of technological andengineering literacy that should be achieved by all Americans. In the time since 2000, theNAE has also produced The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the NewCentury6,7. The Engineer of 2020 advocated an effort to clarify and establish engineers as“as broad-based technology leaders, in the mind of the public and prospective students.”Similarly, the NAE’s Changing the Conversation: Messages
operatedvehicles (ROVs) 7, 17, 21. ROVs have been used in education as early as 1992 for the purpose of applying scienceand engineering knowledge, tools and techniques to the understanding and use of the marineenvironment 12 and to increase the number of skilled technicians to work in “strategic advanced-technology fields” 16. Educational programs that have used ROVs suggest ROV-basedcurriculum and activities can be a tool to enhance interest and improve perception regardingtechnology and engineering 9, 14. There is, however, limited research on the impact an ROVactivity or program makes on increasing student interest and/or perception of technology andengineering. Programs such as SeaPerch 1, 8, Utah Underwater Robotics 9, 23, Summer BridgeProgram
, informing ofengineering technology practice, and supporting new directions in engineering technologyeducation research. The presentation of this work at the conference using a higher level of initialreview is intended to encourage discussion of known literature, and to further the engineeringtechnology education community’s understanding of the more obscure or little-known researchin this area. Future work, including input gathered at the conference, is expected to contribute toan in-depth systematic review of engineering technology research literature, which is expected toencourage the expansion of rigorous engineering technology research.IntroductionSystemic reviews have been done in the medical field1 for decades, in conjunction with otherfields
patterns of faculty who integrate computer technology for teaching and learning in higher education," 1998 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications.2. R. Schroeder, et al., “TQM in Education: Changing the Culture of Schools” 1997; nsf.gov. http://www.nsf.gov/award search/showAward.do?AwardNumber=9712991. (accessed: 4/1/2015).3. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics, http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=40, . (accessed: 4/1/2015).4. Reeve Hamilton, “At UTEP, Success Is Not All About Graduation Rates”, March 2, 2012, http://www. nytimes .com/2012/03/02/us/utep-calls-for- success-criteria
/public/conferences/32/papers/93 Smith, Michelle K., et al. "Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-classconcept questions." Science 323.5910 (2009): 122-124.4 Bergmann, J., A. Sams, “Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class EveryDay”, International Society for Technology in Education, 20125 Farrell, J. J., R. S. Moog, J. N. Spencer, "A Guided Inquiry Chemistry Course." J. Chem. Educ.,1999, 76, 570-5746 Sivilotti, Paolo AG, and Scott M. Pike. "The suitability of kinesthetic learning activities forteaching distributed algorithms." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, no. 1 (2007): 362-366.7 Northeast Regional Learning Assistant Workshop, Boston University, March, 21-22, 2014.8