Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James P Becker, Montana State University; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Thereporting module is being developed not only to give student immediate feedback regarding thedegree to which their perceived content mastery matches their actual mastery, but to provide theinstructor, a convenient manner in which to identify struggling students. Preliminary AssessmentSections will be used beginning in the first weeks of class in hopes of making students aware ofany deficiencies they exhibit, while offering resources to combat their deficiencies early enoughin the course to make a difference.Reading and Reflection ExercisesReading and Reflections exercises will be available to all students, but may be required (if theinstructor wishes) for students not passing a given PAS. The reading and reflection exercises willcontain brief

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); David Torres, Purdue University; Sean M Eddington, Brian Lamb School of Communication - Purdue

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Engineering (BME) at Purdue University. These schools sharesimilarities with some common coursework and faculty, but also provide contrasts as BME’sundergraduate population, on average for recent semesters, has been 44-46% female, where ECEhas been 13-14% female. Although BME has slightly more underrepresented minority students(7-8% versus 5%), approximately 60% of BME students are white, versus 40% for ECE. It isimportant to note that Purdue’s School of ECE offers B.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering (EE)and Computer Engineering (CmpE), which reflect unique disciplinary cultures. Additionally, theschools differ significantly on undergraduate enrollment. The BME enrollment was 278,whereas ECE’s enrollment was 675 in EE and 541 in CmpE1.In this

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dominic J Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

#4 Ninety-two percent of graduating SESMC scholars who complete a major milestone (Objective #2) will be employed or enrolled in a four-year program related to their discipline within two years of completion.Objective #5 Success and retention rates among SESMC scholars in select core courses will be at least 83% and 95% respectively. The success rate (“C” grade or better) among comparable STEM students in core courses is 72%; the target reflects a 15% increase over the baseline. The retention rate (percent completing a course) among comparable STEM students in core courses is 85%; the target reflects a 12% increase.Scholar Selection Process and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carl A. Nelson P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Greg Bashford P.E., University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We also wish to acknowledge the many faculty mentors who contributed tothis project, as well as the Bureau of Sociological Research at UNL for assisting with programevaluation.References Cited[1] Cesar Guerrero, Miguel Labrador, Rafael Perez, 2007, “Enhancing the Global Perspective ofREU Site Students,” ASEE 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii.[2] Robert Nerenberg, 2006, “Challenges and Opportunities in Working With Minority/OverseasREU Students,” ASEE 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.[3] Terri Camesano, David

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carl A. Nelson P.E., University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Judith Marie Burnfield, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals' Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering; Linxia Gu, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Adam Wagler, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; William Edward Dick, Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

studentsprovides mutual benefits, particularly improved understanding of stakeholder requirements forthe engineering students and the realism of working with a product development team for theadvertising students. Achievement of certain student outcomes targeted in engineeringaccreditation criteria is an added benefit.AcknowledgementsThis material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant Number 1159626. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References Cited[1] Don Dekker, Stephen Sundarrao, Rajiv Dubey, 2007, “Capstone Design and theRehabilitation Engineering Program

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Cavicchi, University of Akron; John Fellenstein, University of Akron

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

with the Ohio Science Standards, which list designingtechnological/engineering solutions using science concepts as one of four cognitive demands andemphasizes real-world applications in demonstrating content mastery.5 The focus is alsoconsistent with National Science Standards that emphasize both that “science and engineeringare integrated in K–12 science education and K–12 science education should reflect real-worldinterconnections in science.”6ActivitiesThe RET site ran as an eight week program each summer. The program met for five days thefirst week and four day each subsequent week. This is a similar number of days to a five day perweek/six week program, but the extended total time of the program allows the teachers the timeto adjust to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University; Austin Spencer Bohlin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Science Foundation CAREER grantunder Grant No. 1150874. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References 1. Golish, B. L., Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., & Shuman, L. J. (2008). Comparing academic and corporate technology development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Mangagement, 25, 47–62. 2. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). 16 implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. Handbook of Creativity, 313. 3. Fila, N. D., Purzer, Ş., & Mathis, P. D. (2014). I’m not the creative type: Barriers to creativity in student engineering innovation projects

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Penny Rheingans, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Lee Blaney, UMBC; Marie desJardins, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; E. F. Charles LaBerge, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Susan Martin, University of Maryland; Carolyn Seaman, UMBC; Gymama Slaughter, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Anne Marie Spence, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Leaders from Baccalaureate-Granting Institutions. 2011, College Board. 10. Hrabowski III, F., Fostering first-year success of underrepresented minorities, in Challenging & Supporting the First-Year Student, M.L. Upcraft, Gardner, J.N., and Barefoot, B., Editors. 2005, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA. p. 125-140. 11. Jewett, S. and Martin, S. “STEM Transfer Success: The Value of Critical Reflection and Shared Responsibility.” Evollution. Published online, August 20, 2015.http://evolllution.com/attracting-students/accessibility/stem-transfer-success-the- value-of-critical-reflection-and-shared-responsibility/ 12. Jewett, S. and Martin S. “STEM Transfer Success: Reflecting on Lessons Learned.” Evollution

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Department of Physics, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Elizabeth Lopez, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, California State University Fullerton; Bethany B Smith, University of California, Berkeley

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

)encouragemetacognitiontobuildhabitsofexpertlearnerswhodefinetheirlearninggoalsandmonitortheirownprogress.These principles were realized through student reflection, student engagement, andcontextualizationofconceptsbylinkingabstractconceptstoreal-worldconcreteexamples.Thepositiveimpactofthisapproachoffacultybeliefswasshownwithasurveytakenafterthreeyearsontheproject.Itfoundthateightoutofeightfacultysaid,inthelasttwoyearsof using JTF pedagogy, their classroom practice had "changed somewhat or changedsignificantly." One quote illustrating this was, "I teach using full engagement strategies....previousclassesweremuchmorelecture-centric."Anotherquestionshowedthat7of8feltthat their views about teaching had changed "somewhat or significantly." On an open-endedsurveyfacultywerequeried,"HowdoyouviewyourroleintheclassroomnowascomparedtobeforejoiningJTF

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole Berge, University of South Carolina; Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina; Robert Petrulis

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

assigned to view three educational videos (produced as part of thisproject) on nanomaterial dimensions, uses, and manufacturing. The first exercise requiredstudents to draw, as individuals and in teams, a nanoscaled view of low-porosity and high-toughness Portland cement mortar incorporating multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs).Supplemental questions were designed to invoke student reflections on the shape and relativesize of MWCNTs and cement hydrates, and how those physical relationships affect relevantmechanical properties of the nanoreinforced mortar. Student teams worked on a set of threehands-on active learning exercises using more familiar physical objects, on a larger scale, torepresent MWCNTs, cement hydrates, and fine aggregate. These

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew A. Verleger Ph.D. (He/His/Him), Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

it was deemed too time intensive.Stage 3) Full evaluation of 5 samples with comparison to an expert evaluator. Participants werepresented with 5 sample MEA solutions and asked to complete a full evaluation of the workusing both the numeric and free response items. After each evaluation, they are shown theirreview next to an expert’s review of that same sample and asked to reflect on how they mightimprove their evaluation to more closely align with the expert.For peer review, the peers went through a similar, but much shorter training process to theteaching assistants, with Stage 3 being reduced to only a single training evaluation andcomparison to expert.ResultsFor each of the 7 rubric items shown in Table 1, the 6 non-expert evaluations

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

-out which enableda richer view of the various inter-relationships between areas of the ecosystem, participants wereasked to reflect on their relationships with other parts of the ecosystem. The goal of this exercisewas to begin to elicit both the types of resources participants needed from others to thrive(inputs) as well how the results of their efforts were utilized by other sectors (outputs). Thiselicitation was scaffolded using the framework shown in Figure 3. This framework drew fromthe Crucial Conversations framework (Patterson, Grenny, McMIllan, Switzler, & Roppe, 2012)to identify areas where participants had, and were lacking, resources they might draw from orcontribute to other parts of the ecosystem. Messages were then developed

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pong P. Chu, Cleveland State University; Chansu Yu, Cleveland State University; Karla R Hamlen, Cleveland State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

engineeringcurriculum. Each theme grows in two dimensions:  Component complexity.  Design abstraction level.The component dimension represents the I/O devices and peripherals. Each theme uses an arrayof I/O components and modules. While all the components in a theme follow the same basicoperation principle and perform similar functions, their capabilities and complexities graduallygrow. The design abstraction dimension reflects the abstraction layers of an IP core shown inFigure 1(a). The construction starts at the gate level or register-transfer level and graduallyevolves to an IP core with software driver library.2.1 Components in each theme2.1.1 Video (image) theme A computer image is composed of a matrix of pixels. A pixel contains three

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Kathleen Meehan, University of Glasgow; Bonnie H. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology; Aldo A. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology; Deborah Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

given to high school students who worked on FirstRobotics. Thus, the myRIO is better suited to students without a strong electrical engineering orcomputer engineering or computer science background.Best PracticesThe list of topics below reflect the discussion and general consensus of the workshop participantson the use of portable labs.1. Pedagogical approachThe level of open-endedness of the experiment or project depends on the purpose. Thepedagogical approaches observed by the practitioners can be categorized as: directedexperiments, open-ended programing tasks, and mobile labs. The best practices of experiencedpractitioners are summarized below.Directed experiments use straightforward labs that instruct students to explore and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony J Petrosino Jr, University of Texas, Austin; Walter M Stroup, University of Massachusetts

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

town, as supported by the use of thesimulation environment, is to engage students in ways that mirror how scientists or engineersapproach and solve problems and are also to have qualities that lead to extended inquiry. Ideallythe students have some familiarity with the challenge, but need to research more or try outpossibilities to better comprehend the problem, identify potential solutions, and then generateand execute a plan to solve it. Within a traffic simulation where each student controls one lightin a simulated city, students may start off using hit-or-miss or highly localized strategies forcontrolling traffic ((Wilensky & Stroup, 2000, Stroup & Wilensky 2014).As they extend their inquiry and reflect on the overall outcomes for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University - Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

suggested by Black [8, p.28], “engineering schools need tohave a clear mission focus that reflects the needs of their industrial customers and their placeamong all engineering schools.” Having a better understanding of student SRL activities willhelp engineering educators to design and implement teaching interventions that promote studentmetacognitive awareness. i) Phase 1: Quantitative Study – Breadth View (Completed) The objectives of this phase were to: (1) validate the SRL survey instrument; and (2)study self-regulation in a large-scale administration. During Phase 1, the researcher gathered datafrom 307 seniors from several engineering colleges to validate an adapted SRL surveyinstrument called Engineering Design Metacognitive

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Reeping, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Steve Robert Harrison, Dept of Computer Science, Virginia Tech; R Benjamin Knapp, Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology; Luke F Lester, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Thomas Martin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Annie Yong Patrick; Matthew Wisnioski, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC) and CATALYST Fellow at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Steve Robert Harrison, Dept of Computer Science, Virginia Tech Steve Harrison is the Director of the Human-Centered Design Program at Virginia Tech, an associate professor of practice in Computer Science

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James E. Payne, Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical College; Linda Lawson Payne, Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical College; Charles Richard Murphy, Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Utilizing Modules as an Objective in ATE Projects”) to the Community CollegeJournal of Research and Practice and the manuscript has been published. The ATE-RAMPLeadership Team also submitted an abstract to the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) which has been accepted as a poster presentation at its Annual Meeting (June 2017 –Columbus, Ohio).E. AcknowledgementThis paper was made possible through funds from the National Science Foundation under grantnumbers DUE-1501828. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan D. Niemi, LeTourneau University; Jeff Johnson, LeTourneau University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

streamlining and strategizing to maximize efficiency to prepare for sustainabilityas our grant funding comes to an end.AcknowledgementsPrior versions of some of the information provided in this executive summary has been presentedin various forms in previous ASEE papers1,2,3,4,5 that address other aspects of this project. Thedata provided here has been updated to reflect the state of the project at the time of this writing.This project, entitled First-Year Initiatives for Retention Enhancement, is supported by theNational Science Foundation under Grant No. 0969382. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith W. Buffinton, Bucknell University; Vincent P. Manno, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Joseph J. Helble, Dartmouth College; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

education that havealready occurred over the last number of years. That question was, “Are we actually making anyprogress?” This question addressed the core purpose of the workshop and raised the issue of thetrue opportunity for change. The workshop organizers considered this question and decided thatan unplanned reflective exercise would be valuable using the simple prompt, “What progresshave we made?” Each group of two representatives from the attending institutions was asked toreflect and comment on the progress made in the areas of the 5 themes identified earlier in theworkshop at either their home institution or nationally within the engineering educationlandscape.Responses to this simple prompt were illuminating and in many ways inspiring

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Kevin C Bower P.E., The Citadel; William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

reflection integration of academic/ student interactions. activities difficult. professional development activities. Weekly Site visits, service Many students expressed Continue site visits, meeting learning, and dissatisfaction with service learning, and activities professional diversity workshops, citing professional mentoring. mentoring helped that they were disconnected Encourage students to students develop from professional practice. interact directly with professional identity diverse

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Tressa Kay Mikel, University of California, Berkeley; Aida Marie Morales; Sanya Sehgal; Melissa L. Whitson, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

National Science Foundation under GrantsNo. 1360987/1361028. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.We would like to thank Amelito Enriquez for partnering with us to pursue this work. We wouldalso like to acknowledge the insight and contributions of advisory members Monica Cardella,Holly Matusovich, C. Judson King, and Mark Graham.References Cited 1. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics, 2015 (NCES 2016-014), Chapter 3. 2. http://www.bestcolleges.com/features/49-best-colleges-for-older-students/; accessed: Feb 10

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Marissa A Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno; Heather Perkins, North Carolina State University; Jessica Nicole Chestnut, North Carolina State University; Daniel Eamon Briggs, North Carolina State University; Blanca Miller, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the student perspective and moving beyond traditionalinstitutional reporting begins to elucidate and provide evidence about the “true” engineeringgraduate experience. This increasingly accurate reflection of graduate experiences providesnovel insight into the experiences of students that have been traditionally ignored or unjustifiablylumped in with other students who share the title of graduate student.The initial findings of our qualitative analysis indicate that student perceptions of control and theability to utilize multiple resources to overcome barriers are fundamental to the successfuldevelopment of their identities and motivations. Students’ perceptions of control provide ameans of discerning the difficulty of a given choice or task

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine C. Chen, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lizabeth T Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Emily E Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Jaclyn Duerr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Helene Finger P.E., Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo; Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

cohort, but they also have the PEEPS Support Team (i.e., Engineering Student Supportstaff, engineering faculty, AmeriCorps VISTA member, financial aid staff) available forassistance. We have multiple avenues of inquiry to the PEEPS experiences, such as quarterlycheck-ins (that are also individualized advising sessions), periodic reflections, and a end of theschool year focus group.Therefore, while the PEEPS project enables the cohort members to take certain courses together,study with one another, and socialize together, do they really support each other academicallyand emotionally to make a difference? How do the PEEPS Support Team and PEEPS activitieshelp students, if any? How can we take what we’ve been learning through the PEEPS project

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Adeyemi Awolumate P.A; Mitchell Rudy, Rowan University; Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University; Nidhal Carla Bouaynaya; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Rouzbeh Nazari, Rowan University; Umashanger Thayasivam, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Processing Technical Committee for the IEEE Circuits and Systems society. His research interests are in digital signal processing, speech processing, biometrics, pattern recognition and filter design.Nidhal Carla BouaynayaDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard E Groff, Clemson University; Ian D Walker, Clemson University; Pamela E Mack, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

objective measure of the core reasoningskills needed for reflective decision making concerning what to believe or what to do.” [6]Initial Offerings and Course ModificationsThe original concept for the course included a hands-on component using Lego Mindstorms.The original conception also restricted the course to non-engineering majors [8], largely becauseengineering majors were thought to have a considerable advantage working with the LegoMindstorms. The hardware requirement imposed severe constraints on another important coursegoal, online delivery. Ultimately we decided not to implement the hands-on component. Thathad the side benefit of allowing us to open the course to all majors, including engineeringmajors. The course discussion boards have

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laila Guessous, Oakland University; Caymen May Novak, Oakland Unversity

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

students, as well as tothemselves. Furthermore, it shows that some of the REU students started to reflect about theeffectiveness of their “teaching” and of ways to further improve the benefit to other students inthe future.Given that the outreach activity took place close to the end of the school year, efforts to get thealready time-strapped elementary school teachers to complete a survey were unsuccessful.However, email feedback from the teachers indicated that they were very happy with theactivities as they saw their students engaged and excited about engineering and hands-onactivities. Efforts will be made in the future to obtain additional assessment data to gage theimpact on the K-5 students.All and all, this was a positive experience for all

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

students the opportunity to work withindustrial scale equipment. This experience will potentially help students to develop skill setsneeded for the automation field. Future directions include evaluating instructional effectiveness,identifying which aspects of the experience help students learn, and determining optimal timeframes for completing assignments.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Advanced TechnologyProgram (Award no. 1304843). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Trade in Advanced Technology Products

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zachary Holman, Arizona State University; Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University; Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon; Kate Fisher; Tiffany Rowlands, QESST

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

(PVSC), pp. 2389-2391. IEEE.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underNSF EEC-1560031, as well as by the NSF and the Department of Energy (DOE) under NSF CANo. EEC-1041895. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NSF or DOE.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Catherine Mcgough Spence, Clemson University; Justine Chasmar, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. The reflection questions toassess SRL strategy use throughout the semester was altered from a previous study assessing theSRL strategies in an Industrial Engineering course3. The interview protocol to examine students’FTP was modified from a previous protocol used to analyze the connection between FTP andproblem-solving, as well as other task-specific, current actions5. This protocol was first tested forvalidity, including a pilot study with four undergraduate engineering students4. A secondinterview protocol was developed to explore the connection between FTP and SRL, as a follow-up to the first interview. Underlying theory and the advice of experts were used to develop thequestions, and the protocol was piloted with an engineering