manufacturing were developed (David,1990).A lag also appears in the integration of environmental concerns with technologicaldevelopment. Since publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962, environmentalgroups have become political forces, a multitude of environmental laws and regulations havebeen enacted, and the limits to growth, global warming, and overpopulation have been debated.Yet the relationship between environmental protection and technological change has notmatured but remains largely adversarial, with the developers of technology often characterizedas willfully negligent about the impacts of their work, treating the environmental and socialconsequences of technological change as messy, impossible to model, and therefore outside
students: An examination of academic and environmental variables. The Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 297-304.15. Bantz, C. R. (1993). Understanding organizations: Interpreting organizational communication cultures. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press. p. 61.16. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.HEATHER CORNELLHeather Cornell is currently an undergraduate student at the University of Dayton. She is receiving dual degrees inchemical engineering and communication.WADE KENNYDr. Kenny is Assistant Professor of Communication, University of Dayton. He holds a doctoral degree in rhetoric aswell as advanced degrees in
junior-level fluid mechanics course.Concepts of mesh design on solution accuracy and the influence of solver parameters such asrelaxation are introduced using an in-house CFD code written primarily for undergraduatestudents. Three goals are met through the junior-level experience: 1) to improve the studentsunderstanding of basic fluid mechanics, 2) to motivate students to take a CFD elective course intheir senior year, and 3) to provide a basic exposure for students who use CFD tools during theirsummer internship programs. In the senior year, students are exposed to commercial solvers andthe use of CFD as a design tool in elective courses such as heating, ventilation and airconditioning. Senior-level students can also take an elective course in
, O’Reilly & Associates, 2nd edition 1996.7. Object management Group, The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, v. 2.2, published by Object Management Group, February 1998. see also http://www.cobra.org/8. CookieCentral.com, Cookie Central, URL: http://www.cookiecentral.com/9. Wilamowski B. M. and Richard C. Jaeger, Computerized Circuit Analysis Using Spice Programs, McGraw- Hill, 1997.10. Vladimirescu A., K. Zhang, A. R. Newton, D. O. Pederson, and A. SangiovanniVincentelli, SPICE Version 2G6 User Guide, Department of Electrical and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1981.11. Quarles T., A. R. Newton, D. O. Pederson, and A. SangiovanniVincentelli, SPICE3 Version 3F5 User’s Manual, Department of
; Simulation, Simulation Series Vol. 30, No. 1, 1998, pp.105-109[8] A. J. Baker, Z. Chambers and M. B. Taylor, “Finite Element Analysis for the Engineering Sciences: A Web-based, Video-streamed Education Environment at a Distance”, 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Charlotte, NC, June 20-23, 1999[9] Adrian Ng and Kurt Gramoll, “Online Review and Practice Tests for the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam”, 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Charlotte, NC, June 20-23, 1999[10] David R. Wallace and Philip Mutton, “A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom Teaching”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.86, No. 3, July 1998, pp.211-219[11] David Flangan, “JavaScript-The Definitive Guide
), April 1998, 133-141.6. Besterfield-Sacre, ME, Atman, CJ, and Shuman, LJ. “Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Attrition in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86(2), 1997, pp. .139-149.7. Besterfield-Sacre, ME, CJ Atman, LJ Shuman, RL Porter, RM Felder, and H Fuller. “Changes in Freshman Engineers’ Attitudes – A Cross Institutional Comparison What Makes a Difference?” 1996 FIE Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT.8. Besterfield-Sacre, M., L.J. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C.J. Atman, J. McGourty, R. Miller, B. Olds, and G. Rogers. “Defining the Outcomes – A Framework for EC 2000,” to appear in IEEE Transactions on Engineeirng Education, May 2000.MARY BESTERFIELD-SACREMary Besterfield
Figures 2 and 3 arephotographs of the cell. Figure 1. Layout of CellOne of the challenges facing the students was the dual-purpose nature of the injection moldingmachine – manual usage for instruction in Polymer Processing and automated operations for theRobotics project. To achieve this duality and still maintain a safe operational environment, thegroup decided to do the following: (a) Implement a selector switch at the operator console for mode selection – automated vs. manual (b) Incorporate a pressure-sensitive safety mat in front of the machine (see Figure 1) and (c) Protect the robot side of the cell with 8’-high perimeter guarding from American Machine Guarding. Access to the cell
simulation with General Purpose SystemSimulator (GPSS/H) to (a) measure effectiveness of CADLAB teaching and learning, (b) plan forcad-lab activities and estimate utilization, and (c) monitor and improve cad-lab performance undersevere resource limitations.IntroductionEffective Teaching of Computer Aided Design necessitates strong student learning experiencesdemonstrating abilities as outcomes of "Affective Behavior." An affective behavior is a behavior thatis demonstrated by the student as an act of competence or show of confidence. In an introductory levelcourse, a student after completion of about only twenty eight lessons of one hour each must be able todemonstrate effective learning in higher level cognitive, affective and psychomotor domain
, B., "An attempt to move mountains: the 'girls into science and technology' GIST project," Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17:351-35439. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1: Cognitive Domain, New York: Longman, 195640. Thielens, W., “The Disciplines and Undergraduate Lecturing,” paper presented at an annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1987, Washington, DC, ED 286 436, 57 pp, MF-01, PC-0341. Tobias, S, They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier, 1990, Tucson, AZ, Research Corporation42. Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 197843. Waitley, Denis, Empires of the Mind: Lessons to Lead and Succeed in a Knowledge-Based World, New York
, B., "An attempt to move mountains: the 'girls into science and technology' GIST project," Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17:351-35439. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1: Cognitive Domain, New York: Longman, 195640. Thielens, W., “The Disciplines and Undergraduate Lecturing,” paper presented at an annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1987, Washington, DC, ED 286 436, 57 pp, MF-01, PC-0341. Tobias, S, They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier, 1990, Tucson, AZ, Research Corporation42. Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 197843. Waitley, Denis, Empires of the Mind: Lessons to Lead and Succeed in a Knowledge-Based World, New York
. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers, 249-263, 1987.8. Flower, L. Metacognition: A Strategic Response to Thinking. In The Construction of Negotiated Meaning. Southern Illinois University, 223-262, 1984.9. Kellogg, R.T. Strategies. In The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, 249-263, 1994.10. Odell, L. Teaching Writing by Teaching the Process of Discovery: an Interdisciplinary Enterprise. In L. Gregg and E. Steinberg (Eds.) Cognitive Processes in Writing, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, 139-159, 1980.11. Hammons-Bryner, S. and Robinson, B. Excitement in Core Curriculum Classes. College Teaching, Vol. 42, 97-100, 1994.12. Engineering Criteria 2000, 3rd Edition, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for
. (1996) Java for 3d and VRML Worlds, New Riders Publishing. 13. Sawhney, A., Marble, J., Mund, A., and Vamadevan, A. (1999) “Internet Based Construction Management Learning System” 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, AZ, December 1999. 14. Suda, V. L. (1993) “Developing project Management Skills: A Case for Simulations” PMNETWORK, vol. VII, No. 10, October 1993, pp. 30-37. 15. Tatum, C. B. (1987) “Balancing engineering and management in construction education” Journal of Page 5.396.9 Construction
Approach to Engineering ProblemsConstructivist learning theory asserts that knowledge is not simply transmitted from teacher tostudent, but is actively constructed by the mind of the learner through experiences (Piaget, 1973;Vygotsky, 1978). Founded in developmental psychology, constructivism suggests: (a) thelearner should be an active organism within the environment, not just responding to stimuli, butengaging and seeking to make sense of things; (b) knowledge is best generated internally, notabsorbed from an external source; and (c) the motivation for learning should be intrinsic.To facilitate such learning by discovery, the teacher and instructional environment must allowrepeated, prolonged experiences with the materials and events associated
Machine", Manufacturing Engineering7. Zeid, I., 1991, CAD/CAM Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill, NY, p 3-13, 975-9808. Deitz, D., 1998 Manikins Fly High, Mechanical Engineering9. Mannequin User Guide, 199710. Felps, B. “College Students, Professor Develop Child Safety Devices,” Wireless Week, May 3, 1999.11. AP News Services, Engineering Students, Professor Develop Baby Monitor Device,” April 23, 1999.MARK RAJAIMark R. Rajai is an Associate Professor/Director of Manufacturing Engineering Program at East Tennessee StateUniversity. He has a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and a Master of Engineering in Engineering Management fromUniversity of Louisville. He also has a B.S. and M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering with highest honors fromthe
learning domain that are fundamental to team-based engineeringdesign: (a) design process, (b) teamwork, and (c) design communication. Students must masterthese three to be successful, so these are the dimensions of engineering design learningoutcomes: DESIGN PROCESS— Defining, performing, and managing steps to create and deliver a technological product that meets or exceeds needs of clients. TEAMWORK— Organizing and managing the activities and resources of multiple people to achieve results beyond what can be done individually. DESIGN COMMUNICATION— Exchanging and managing information needed to support effective design.Approach to Design AssessmentAssessment begins with the establishment of learning outcomes for these dimensions
you may send them to: Edward B. McCaul, Jr., PE Academic Affairs College of Engineering 181A Hitchcock Hall 2070 Neil Avenue Columbus, OH 43210-1278 Phone: 614-292-7931 Fax: 614-688-3805 e-mail: mccaul.1@osu.edu5. Please return the survey in the enclosed addressed postage paid envelope not later than 15 February 1999. Thank you for your time and cooperation. Page 5.208.10I. Education Outcomes - GeneralPlease rate the following skills, abilities, and attributes generally expected of an engineering graduate.First rate how important each has been relative to your needs and employment experience sincegraduation. Second rate each item relative to your abilities in each area. If a
about one principal axis, they wouldreduce those about the other. Ideally, if they could design a shape with two axes of symmetry,they would equalize the two principal moments of inertia and corresponding radii of gyration. Page 5.438.6III. Assessment of Project 1The concepts proposed by the students as alternatives to concepts 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 4.These concepts vary in geometry and manufacturing complexity. The simplest one tomanufacture is the four-corner section designated as (A) in Fig. 4. The more complex ones arethose marked B and C. The majority of students suggested concept D, which was very similar toconcept 2 but with
., Nadeau R., and Moreland J., VRML 2.0 Sourcebook, Second Edition, 1997.10. Epstein B., Director in a Nutshell, First Edition 1999.11. Janathan Bacon, Deborah, and Kurt Cagle, "Director 6 Bible", IDG Books Worldwide, Inc, 199812. Goodman D., JavaScript Handbook, 1996.BibliographyHRISHIKESH POTDARHrishikesh Potdar is currently a Masters student in the department of Industrial Engineering at the University ofOklahoma. He received his B.S. in Production Engineering from the University of Bombay in 1996. Beforereturning to graduate school he worked as an Engineer with Mahindra & Mahindra and as a Project Engineer withChemtex International Inc. for two years.KURT GRAMOLLKurt Gramoll is the Hughes Centennial Professor of Engineering and Director
/ Page 5.385.6Bibliography1. Building GUIs with MATLAB Version 5, The Mathworks, 1998.2. Dean, Loren, The Design of Callbacks, The Mathworks, 1997.3. Hanselman, D., Littlefield, B., Mastering MATLAB 5, Prentice Hall, 1998, Chapters 31 & 32.4. Using MATLAB Graphics Version 5.2, The Mathworks, 1998, Chapter 8.ROBERT DeMOYERBob DeMoyer is a faculty member in the Weapons and Systems Engineering Department of the United StatesNaval Academy. He has been active for years in the CoED Division of ASEE, and currently serves asSecretary/Treasurer. Dr DeMoyer received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University and a MSand PhD in System Engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn
Marietta, GA 30060 Introduction Implementation of safety and health programs on construction projects requires a well-educated workforce that is knowledgeable in safety requirements and procedures. Suckarieh andDiamantes (1995) indicated that time dedicated to construction safety training is not adequate.He mentioned that formal training could have a significant impact on students’ performance assoon as they graduate. Coble et al. (1998) mentioned that safety education for the BuildingConstruction Management students has not often been a high priority in US universities. J.Christian (1999) observed that teaching a class like safety is sometimes difficult as the studentsregard its regulatory nature as is "boring". The need for
-data acquisition systems, IR thermal imaging, project management, and team-buildingskills. The outcomes of these student projects have resulted in a laboratory that can be easily adaptedfor use in several of our mechanical engineering courses.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the air compressor donation and creative input from CliffWenniger of Wenniger Compressor Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The Applied Research Grantfrom The University of Wisconsin System is also gratefully acknowledged. We are deeplyappreciative of the efforts put forth by the following UWM Mechanical Engineering students whohelped us create our air compressor experimentation facility: Mr. Michael L. Jarmuskiewicz, Mr.Kevin L. Mueller, Mr. Mac B. Milleur
Session 1368 3-D Finite Element Analysis on the Internet using Java and VRML Ã Ã Karthik Ranga and Kurt Gramoll The University of Oklahoma School of Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringAbstractNot only has the Internet gained a prominent role in the industry by revolutionizing commerce,information access, supply-chain management, entertainment and publicity etc but it is alsoquickly impacting engineering design and technical education. This paper describes the
crystallization process is characterized using x-ray diffraction and differential thermal analysis.Refractive Index of Glass Measurement of the refractive index of glasses by the Becke line test.decomposition of a salt (MgCO3), (b) solid-state reaction to form a complex oxide (BaTiO3), and(c) precipitation of TiO2 from solution. Thermal analysis techniques, thermogravimetric analysis(TGA) and differential thermal analysis (DTA), are used to characterize the kinetics of the solidstate reactions and x-ray diffraction is used to identify the phases formed. Particle size isanalyzed by optical methods.2. Stabilization and Characterization of Particulate SuspensionsThe formation of ceramic green
37% 59% 4%b. Ability to design and conduct experiments as well asanalyze and interpret data 47% 57% 2%c. Ability to design a system, component or process tomeet desired needs 54% 44% 2%d. Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineeringproblems 38% 60% 4%e. Ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team 59% 30% 11%f. Understanding of ethical and professionalresponsibility 59% 20% 21%g. Ability to communicate effectively 56% 26% 18%h. Having
interactions will be purely web-based and relatively inexpensive. Asa natural partner we have begun an association with SuccessLink (www.successlink.org), anexisting K-12, web-based teaching resource in Missouri.Bibliography 1. Rita Colwell, Address at Amer. Phys. Society Centennial Symposium, Alanta, GA, March 21, 1999. 2. Kenneth and Rita Dunn, Teaching Students through their Individual Learning Styles; A Practical Approach,”, Reston, VA, (1978). 3. B. McCarthy, The 4-MAT system: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques,” Barrington, IL (1987). 4. J. N. Harb, R. E. Terry, “Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Education, 82
/EE664: 8% 1998/EE664: 0% 1998/EE664: 0% 1998/EE664: 0% ESTJ ESFJ ENFJ ENTJCAPT/MBTI: 9% CAPT/MBTI: 4% CAPT/MBTI: 2% CAPT/MBTI: 7%1997/EE664: 14% 1997/EE664: 0% 1997/EE664: 0% 1997/EE664: 0%1998/EE664: 15% 1998/EE664: 8% 1998/EE664: 0% 1998/EE664: 0%(B) Class dataFour sets of data are compiled: theory grades, experimental grades, combined grades(using a 60-40 weighting for theory and experiment), and cumulative GPA. All scoresare normalized to 100%. For the 1997 class, the bar graphs and the composite plots (withGPA) are shown in Figures 3-4 while the box plots are shown in Figure 5. Similarly
Accredited programs must satisfy the first twoCriteria and two others of the succeeding ones:a. A reasonably high standard of instruction as manifested by the quality of its teachers;b. A highly visible community extension program;c. A highly visible research tradition;d. A strong staff development tradition;e. A highly credible performance of its graduates in licensure examinations over the last three years. (Will apply only to those programs where such examinations are required)f. Existence of working consortia or linkages with other schools and/or agencies.Level IV accredited status – institutions which have distinguished themselves in abroad areas of academic
Session 1315 Using Expert Systems Technology to Teach Earthquake Resistant Design of Buildings Abbes Berrais Abha College of Technology, POB 238, Abha, Saudi ArabiaAbstractComputers have been introduced as an element into the teaching environment for a long timenow. Until recently, computers have been used for relatively routine calculations such as:report writing, spreadsheets, drafting, and simple simulations. Very rarely are computers usedto help teach and visualize fundamental concepts, or to explore the alternative solutions of adesign project. Today the most
Assessment) outlines the desiredattributes for graduating students of engineering programs. It states that engineering programsmust demonstrate that their graduates have certain attributes. These specific attributes arenumbered "a" through "k" and they cover many facets in engineering education. Attributes a,b, c, and e which are shown below place special emphasis on engineering design and theability to formulate a solution to an engineering problem.a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data Page 5.661.1c) An ability to design a system
. Page 5.512.4The convex-envelope proof of optimal capital budgeting rapidly scans the best way of doing eachproject and the best projects to do within a planned range of capital constraints withoutexhaustively evaluating every possible combination. Vector bundles of each project are firstranked in descending order of their steepest-slope vectors which are added geometrically to forman initial convex envelope as shown in the figure below. In the figure below , four separatemutually exclusive projects (A-D) are shown. Project A contains a vector with the highestefficiency, and therefore occupies the base position at the origin, with two alternatives originatingat the same point. Project B has an alternative with the next greatest capital