) I can succeed (earn an A or B) in an advanced engineering 5.66 (1.30) course.C. Participants Participants in the study were students who identified as engineering majors in theirjunior or senior year of study at the urban research institution. The majority of participantsidentified as male (81%) and nearly three-quarters of participants identified as White (74%);these proportions are reflective of the engineering student population at the institution. Transferstudents comprised a little over half of the sample (55%), with a plurality of students reportingthat neither parent had obtained a college degree (38%). Based on lack of racial/ethnic diversityin the sample, researchers did not examine differences in
in their freshman and sophomore years.Acknowledgements We are very grateful to the University of Arizona Disability Resource Center and SALT Centerfor providing the data used in this study.References[1] D. Chubin, G. May, E. Babco. “Diversifying the Engineering Workforce.” J. Eng. Ed., vol. 94, no1, pp. 73-86, Jan. 2005.[2] D. Bilimoria, S. Joy, X. Liang. “Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons oforganizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering.” HumanResource Management, Special Issue, Aug. 2008.[3] W. Lee, C. Brozina, C. Amelink, B. Jones. “Motivating incoming engineering students withdiverse backgrounds: Assessing a summer bridge program’s impact on academic
individuals working to advance gender equity in science, technology, engineering and math fields. Berry received her B.S. Chemical Engineering degree from the University of Texas, Austin in May 1993 and her M.B.A. from the University of Houston, Clear Lake in May 1999. She has been a member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) since 2001, most recently serving on the WEPAN Board as President Elect, President and Past President from 2007 - 2010. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018A Leadership Collaborative Model:Fostering Community ThroughDiverse Student OrganizationCollaborations Tricia Berry Women in Engineering Program
Paper ID #221082018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Afrofuturism: Catalyzing a Pathway to more Inclusive Engineering DesignDr. Woodrow Wilson Winchester III, Robert Morris University WOODROW W. WINCHESTER, III is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management and Coordi- nator of Graduate Engineering Programs at Robert Morris University, Moon Township, US-PA. He has over twelve (12) years of teaching and course development (online and on-ground) experiences within the disciplines of industrial & systems engineering (ISE) and engineering
Paper ID #242332018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Advancing the College of Engineering Strategic Goal of Becoming a NationalModel of Inclusivity and CollaborationMichelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Padma Akkaraju, College of Engineering, Oregon State University Padma Akkaraju is the
Paper ID #213292018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Social Enterprise Model for a Multi-Institutional Mentoring Network for Womenin STEMDr. Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College Dr. Sara A. Atwood is an Associate Professor and Chair of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Penn- sylvania. She holds a BA and MS from Dartmouth College, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Atwood’s research interests are in creativity, engineering design, first-generation and low-income students, internship
Paper ID #241682018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Work in Progress: Will looking ”over the fence” of academic challenges to afuture as a successful engineer, support the persistence the WiE students needto succeed?Ms. Olga Maria Stavridis, Ohio State University Olga Stavridis is the Assistant Director for Diversity, Outreach and Inclusion’s Women in Engineering Program. She served as Senior Lecturer for six years for the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University. She has taught Fundamentals for Engineering I and II for the Freshmen
Paper ID #242582018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Embedding Cross-Cultural Communication Awareness and Skills Trainingin a Living Learning Community for First-Year Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsMs. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash
Paper ID #216972018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Exploring the incorporation of diversity and inclusion curriculum in engi-neering living and learning community programs: A work in progressDr. Elizabeth R. Kurban, Women in Engineering, University of Maryland College Park Elizabeth Kurban serves as the Assistant Director of Retention for the Women in Engineering Program at the University of Maryland Clark School of Engineering. Elizabeth’s professional and research interests broadly surround STEM-field access and persistence for women and
Paper ID #231132018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29How Making and Maker Spaces have Contributed to Diversity & Inclusionin Engineering: A [non-traditional] Literature ReviewAdam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech Adam S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. They received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Delaware and are currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Adam’s research interests include access, equity and social
Paper ID #241222018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Too Black to be Woman and Too Much Woman to be a Man: Black WomenAttempting to Reconcile Their Multiple Identities in Academic and Profes-sional Engineering SpacesDr. Stacie LeSure, American Society for Engineering Education Dr. LeSure is a Program Director and Senior Researcher in the College of Engineering at Howard Uni- versity. She manages various research projects focused on the academic perceptions and persistence of students in STEM, particularly those students who are traditionally
Paper ID #21493Examining the Computing Identity of High-Achieving Underserved Comput-ing Students on the Basis of Gender, Field, and Year in SchoolMs. Atalie GarciaDr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida In- ternational University, holds a doctoral degree in engineering education from Purdue University. Her research interests are focused on broadening participation in computing and engineering through the ex- ploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity; and 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform
similar program at respectiveinstitutions, and 4) brainstorm outcomes to take back to their institutions to improve diversityrecruitment, retention, and graduation.Content: 1. Background Literature (National Academies, PCAST) 2. What is ECAP? How to build a comprehensive program based on NAE recommendations a. Results of ECAP b. ECAP awards 3. ECAP next steps a. Engineering Math Acceleration Program b. ECAP 2.0 expansion 4. Breakout discussionsList of presenters and qualifications:Bryan Hill, native of Louisiana, earned a B.S. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering and a Ph.D. in PublicPolicy from the University of Arkansas. Currently, Bryan is the Assistant Dean for Student Recruitmentand Diversity
Director for International Student and Scholar Services at the University of Alabama. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Technology and Gendered Spaces: Examining Equity and AccessA workshop-style presentationPowerPoint Presentation Outline: I. Introduction to Topic: Technology and Gendered Spaces II. Examining the Current Landscape a. Brogramming Culture: define the concept and share examples b. Sexual Harassment in Technology Spaces: share recent examples of sexual harassment allegations in technology spaces; provide an overview of the larger #MeToo movement c. Data: share data regarding CS and CSE graduation numbers both at the
achieve a grade of “C-” at a far greater percentage thanstudents in the traditional classes. 78.3% of students received a “C-” or greater in the flipped classroom,as compared to 64.4% for the traditional classes. Headcount % Students Cumulative % Flipped Traditional Flipped Traditional Flip Traditional Flip + A 4 64 17.4% 16.6% 17.4% 16.6% 0.8% B 3 89 13.0% 23.1% 30.4% 39.7% -9.3% C 8 89 34.8% 23.1% 65.2% 62.9% 2.4% C- 3 6 13.0% 1.6
provide our students with practice in using media reports they will encountereveryday in a manner that influences their day to day practice.The structure students are presented with to guide their investigation and work toward addressing theissues of each case follows a rubric based on the social-justice theories of John Rawls [39] (seeAppendix A). To help familiarize students, a fictionalized example of issues of inclusion, diversity andsocial justice in computer science education is used as a warm-up, to (a) show what is to be identifiedand how it can be encoded, (b) apply key vocabulary and conceptual relationships, and (c) demonstratehow they can proceed through subsequent case examples in the course (see Appendix B).These cases are
. Future workcould expand on the stories where each individual could reflect on specific aspects of theirexperience (e.g. faculty interaction, financial challenges, peer support, etc.) where similaritiesand differences could be compared and contrasted.References[1] Froyd, J. E., & Lohmann, J. R. (2014). Chronological and ontological development ofengineering education as a field of scientific inquiry. In Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (Eds.).Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, 3-26. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.[2] Goals Committee. (1968). Goals of engineering education: Final report of the goalscommittee. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC.[3] Riley, D., Slaton, A. E., & Pawley, A. L
, “Collaborative research: NSF INCLUDES: An integrated approach to retain underrepresented minority students in stem disciplines.,” in INCLUDES PI Meeting, 2017.[27] M. Brewer, N. Sochacka, and J. Walther, “Into the Pipeline: A freshman student’s experiences of stories told about engineering,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2015.[28] B. Arao and K. Clemens, “From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces: A New Way to Frame Dialogue Around Diversity and Social Justice,” in The Art of Effective Facilitation, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2013.[29] B. D. Tatum, “Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?” And Other Conversations About Race, vol. 64, no. 2. Basic Books, 1997.[30] B. A. Nagda
," Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, vol. 27, pp. 261-272, 2014.[7] E. W. Kimball, R. S. Wells, B. J. Ostiguy, C. A. Manly, and A. A. Lauterbach, "Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research," in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. vol. 31, M. B. Paulsen, Ed., Switzerland: Springer, Cham, pp. 91-156, 2016.[8] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard, "An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, pp. 227-234, 2009.[9] E. Seymour and N. M
, andInclusivity in STEM Education at Cal Poly,” PLC sought to: 1. identify explanations for patterns of underrepresentation that exist within the research and best practices literature; 2. assess how Cal Poly’s student recruitment (admission and yield), retention, and graduation demographics compare to those at other institutions and the nation (with a focus on discipline-by-discipline comparisons); 3. employ the research and best practices literature as a lens to a) initiate analysis of Cal Poly at the course, major, department, college, and university levels and b) identify research questions and areas of uncertainty; 4. build and strengthen new and existing faculty
as mediators for first-generationcollege students’ measures of grit: persistence of effort and grit: consistency of interest, we testthe following hypotheses: 1. Performance/competence would have a direct effect on engineering identity. (path a) 2. Engineering identity will have a direct effect on both grit: persistence of effort and grit: consistency of interest. (path d; path e) 3. Belonging in an engineering major and belonging in an engineering classroom will mediate the pathway between engineering identity and grit: persistence of effort (path b à h; path c à g). 4. Belonging in engineering major and belonging in engineering classroom will mediate the pathway between engineering identity and grit
-groups analysis of predictors of higher level career aspirations among women in mathematics, science, and engineering majors. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1998;45(4):483-96.5. Hutchison MA, Follman DK, Sumpter M, Bodner GM. Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students. J Eng Educ. 2006 JAN;95(1):39-47.6. Hutchison-Green MA, Follman DK, Bodner GM. Providing a Voice: Qualitative Investigation of the Impact of a First-Year Engineering Experience on Students' Efficacy Beliefs. J Eng Educ. 2008 APR;97(2):177-90.7. Marra RM, Rodgers KA, Shen D, Bogue B. Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study. J Eng Educ. 2012 January;101(1):6-27.8. Concannon JP, Barrow LH. A Cross-Sectional
7the long-term impact of the experience by implementinga longitudinal study with participants attending multiplenon-technical conferences. Finally, it would be interesting toexamine how participants implement the gained benefits intotheir academic work as well as their job search. R EFERENCES [1] B. E. Seely, “Patterns in the history of engineering education reform: A brief essay,” Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, pp. 114–130, 2005. [2] A. S. Bix, “From” engineeresses” to” girl engineers” to” good engineers”: a history of women’s US engineering education,” NWSA journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 27–49, 2004. [3] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and
of engineering: The 9 African American experience. Baltimore, United States: John Hopkins University Press.Svrluga, S. (2015, November). U. Missouri president chancellor resign over handling of racial incidents. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2015/11/09/missouris-student- government-calls-for-university-presidents-removal/?utm_term=.f174fdd3df52T aylor, A., Waters, R., Bhaduri, S., Lutz, B., & Lee, W. (2017). Student attitudes about diversity: “If the field of engineering were more diverse, what would that mean for you?” In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
flagshipUniversity Park campus and 18 regional undergraduate campuses. About 60% of PennState students opt for the “2+2 plan” by completing the first two years of their educationat a regional campus and then transition to the University Park campus for the last twoyears. One reason to focus on regional campus students is because half of the raciallyunderrepresented students in Engineering begin their Penn State career at a regionalcampus. This paper focuses on promising practices to expand and sustain summerbridge academic enhancement programs beyond the traditional model of a residentialprogram at a Research I university. This presentation will discuss (a) different modelsfor summer bridge programs, (b) strategies for sustaining summer bridge programs, (c
ensure that hiring policies require that those being hired can demonstrate cultural competence.The work by Armstrong and Jovanovic (2015) studying the impact of a large group of NSFADVANCE IT grants indicates that it is important to: (a) Create accountable leadership:Institutional leaders (provosts, deans, department chairs) must take active roles as co-changeagents, (b)Understand the (N)umbers Game: Majority faculty must listen to URM women'svoices and learn to be effective allies, (c) Enable community structures: this includes connectingURM women via consortia, coalitions, conferences, understanding URM women as primaryactors, and providing URM women with space to define their own needs and to createcommunities.Launching Academics on the
personal experiences in pairs or small groups for thefirst 15 minutes of class. Students were asked, as volunteers, to share any info about their conversations fromthe previous week and to sketch their intended project. Some students shared how other people have reactedto them taking the class but most students got to work immediately on their projects. 4 Figure 7. Student survey responses about LGBTQ+ topics (a), course inclusiveness (b), and contribution toaffirmationofself(c)In total, this seminar included 10 hours of class time, of which a combined total of ~ 1 hour was spent
, 252(5013), 1604-1606.Harris, B. C. (2015). Likely transgender individuals in U.S. federal administrative records and the 2010Census. (U.S. Census Bureau Working Paper No. CARRA-WP-2015-03). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2015/adrm/carra-wp-2015-03.htmlKinsey, A. C. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Sanders Co.Kinsey, A. C. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Sanders Co.Pell, A. N. (1996). Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. Journal of Animal Science,74(11), 2843-2848.Stanford University. (2015). Report on the 2015 Stanford Campus Climate Survey. Retrieved fromhttps:// stanford.app.box.com/v/2015-campus-climate-surveyTrenshaw, K
,this is not a problem that can be completely written off. Instead, the results presented here point to theneed for further in-depth, multi-institution studies to determine the extent of mental health andwellness issues in engineering programs nation-wide, and how engineering programs can best servetheir students’ mental health and wellness needs. We are in the process of seeking funding to conductsuch a nation-wide study.ReferencesBlanco, C., Okuda, M., Wright, C., Hasin, D. S., Grant, B. F., Liu, S.-M., & Olfson, M. (2008). Mental Health of College Students and Their Non–College-Attending PeersResults From the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychology, 65(12), 1429
), 108-137.Erichson, E. A. & Bollinger, D. U. (2011). Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 309-326.Johnson, D. R., Wasserman, T. H., Yildirim, N. & Yonai, B. A. (2014). Examining the effects of stress and campus climate on the persistence of students of color and white students: An application of Bean and Eaton’s Psychological Model of Retention. Research in Higher Education, 55, 75-100.Katz, J., & Hartnett, R. T. (Eds.) (1976). Scholars in the Making. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.CLIMATE AND ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTS