Conference Session

Curriculum and the Classroom

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Gary Teng, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

students were US centric in nature even though the instructing faculty emphasizedthe importance of global perspectives at the beginning of the semester.To overcome this issue, the case study assignment was changed to embrace the world’s nextbiggest smart phone market – India [5]. The following statements show the main requirementsfor the revised case study assignment. The case study work should include the case of analyzing the capital investment strategy in the next three-year period for Apple, Inc. to enhance its design, production, future new product deployment, and market dominance in the second largest smartphone market in the world - India. The expected budget is 20 million dollars of the present-day value. The

Conference Session

Communicating Across Cultural and Epistemological Boundaries

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

loads when it comes to supporting social justice, inclusion and equityin their respective workplaces. Because the voices of engineers swimming against the current ofmainstream engineering culture can be difficult to detect, we have chosen to highlight theirstruggles in this paper. First, we address the communication disconnect between equity-mindedengineers and their colleagues; second, we identify structural barriers faced by junior engineersattempting to interrupt social inequities from positions of limited organizational influence; andthird, we share the concern expressed by many participants that raising equity issues would resultin personal attacks rather than positive social change. All of the names we use to identify peopleand

Conference Session

Embedding Sociotechnical Systems Thinking I

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha A. Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

goal more clearly. However, the lack of social referencesis of concern and reinforced that social issues should be more intentionally and explicitlyaddressed in the course. These results, in part, led to the subsequent class activities.Activity 2 - Installation of a New Wind Energy Farm in the State of New York The main goals of this activity was to introduce the term “stakeholder” as language thatwould be used in future classes and to increase students’ awareness of the diversity ofstakeholders impacted by a technology. The instructor collected and assessed 17 groupworksheets for this activity. Students were asked four questions; however, we only focus here onone of the questions: “Choose a stakeholder (that was not easily identified

Conference Session

Faculty Development Work-in-Progress Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M. Sherick, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Paper ID #23704Work in Progress: Coaching as a Midcareer Faculty Development ApproachDr. Heidi M. Sherick, University of Michigan Dr. Heidi Sherick has worked in higher education for over 25 years. Currently, Heidi is the Faculty Devel- opment and Leadership Specialist in the College of Engineering and the Medical School at the University of Michigan. Her primary role is to design and initiate a suite of professional leadership development ac- tivities and coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring strategies for faculty. She provides one-on-one coaching for faculty in new executive leadership roles and for Associate level

Conference Session

Research in Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University; Allyson Jo Barlow, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Dominga Sanchez, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Paper ID #21477Exploring Faculty Beliefs About Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing fromCurrent Measures?Dr. Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University Ben Lutz is a Postdoctoral Scholar in Engineering Education at Oregon State University. His research in- terests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, conceptual change and development, school- to-work transitions for new engineers, and efforts for inclusion and diversity within engineering. His current work explores how students describe their own learning in engineering design and how that learn- ing supports transfer of learning from school into

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine S. Grant, North Carolina State University; Barbara E. Smith, North Carolina State University; Louis A. Martin-Vega, North Carolina State University; Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

in terms of the themes and overarching goals. Faculty have varying levelsof input into and interaction with the execution of the strategic plan with the majority of theirfocus concentrating on the day-to-day operations of their research and academic programs.Faculty well-being surveys can reflect the status of the faculty views on their collectiveexperiences in an institution; some issues raised in these surveys can be addressed in targetedcollege of engineering faculty development initiatives.The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of how an established college of engineeringfaculty development office at North Carolina State University integrated the findings of aqualitative faculty well-being survey and programmatic faculty

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lessons Learned Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

attitudes toward the course or the instructor.For the substantial number of returning clients who have us do SGIDs in subsequent offerings ofthe same course, the database enables us to provide longitudinal reporting that tracks shiftingtrends in feedback across multiple terms. Our longitudinal reports help our clients identifywhether and how changes they made, that were based on student feedback, may be impactingstudents in subsequent course offerings. The longitudinal reports also help faculty membersidentify issues they may have initially dismissed as trivial or minor when seen in a single report,but often change that impression when seen in a longitudinal report as a persistent issue.Although categorizing and grouping feedback takes some time

Conference Session

Evidence-based Practices in Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vittorio Marone, University of Texas, San Antonio; Robin L. Nelson, University of Texas, San Antonio; Stephanie Ann Garcia, University of Texas at San Antonio; Emily Peterek Bonner, University of Texas, San Antonio; Timothy Yuen, University of Texas, San Antonio; Joann Browning P.E., University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

, simulations, or discussions).This expectation brings attention to the need for the development of pedagogical competencesamong both engineering instructors and students in order to implement new learning andteaching strategies and provide relevant educational experiences to all learners [18].Recommended learner-centered strategies in engineering education include problem-basedlearning, hands-on activities, peer instruction, collaboration between teachers, and a multilayeredapproach to assessment [18]. With most engineering doctoral programs focusing on preparingthe next generation of researchers, there are few instances where future professors and instructorsare being adequately trained in engineering pedagogy. Further, engineering faculty may not

Conference Session

Evidence-based Practices in Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Megan Huffstickler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joseph C. Tise, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sven G. Bilén, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

teaching the course for 20 years and they’re really set in their ways. And then, you have new people coming in who are more open to changing things, and I think the main issue is you have so many people. And trying to get a person to buy into it and utilize it, I think is the biggest challenge.The logistical considerations related to having instructors and sections at other campuses alsocomplicated the adoption process. As one individual stated, “As you can imagine, getting 17faculty here at (name of largest campus) and another more than a dozen faculty at the campuses toagree on. Everything in the course is challenge.”Relatedly, some participants discussed prior attempts to standardize the course curriculum,describing barriers

Conference Session

Faculty Development Work-in-Progress Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Kamal Abdulla Ahmed, University of Washington; David Schipf, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

with a student workshop modeland ongoing analysis of data collected in the workshops. At the University of Washington’sOffice for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning, our primary activity isinstructional consultation with faculty, but we also frequently guest-present a workshop forengineering students entitled “Teamwork for learning and project success.”The workshop’s immediate, practical objective is to help students begin group work on the rightfooting. The fundamental emphasis, however, is on seeing group projects (at least in school)primarily as a context and vehicle for learning. Our experience suggests that both students andfaculty tend to see efficient project completion, quality of work, and realistic preparation

Conference Session

Mentoring Practices and Project Teams

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suzette R. Burckhard P.E., South Dakota State University; Joanita M. Kant, South Dakota State University; Gregory J. Michna, South Dakota State University; Ross Peder Abraham, South Dakota State University; Richard Reid P.E., South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

experiences for half an hour on a regular basis. At least it brought to the surface any issues that they may have been experiencing and talking about them, I think, helped tremendously." (Faculty mentor #8) " I came to realize the importance for a student to have a stable family/social structure to support student success. . . .We would have to provide a community not only of students, but, seasoned professionals and community members who can build those personal relationships that make the student feel like family. They need emotional support and guidance for their personal lives especially when they come from a place that does not understand the demands and rigor of academic life." (Faculty

Conference Session

Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession and ASCE

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Pamalee A. Brady, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Peter Laursen

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practice.The current Criterion 3 (a)-(k) student outcomes have been revised into a new Criterion 3(1)-(7) set of student outcomes1 shown below. The history of these changes and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jennifer Tygret, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Faculty Development Constituency Committee

URM engineering faculty, while enhancing the career engagement of emeritifaculty who served as mentors to the URM faculty. The primary goal was to match emeritifaculty with URM faculty in order to support the mentees as they navigated university promotionand tenure processes and established a wider professional presence in their competitive fields viaa new mentoring and advocacy-networking paradigm. The paradigm was developed through anIMPACT MENTORING PROGRAM 4extensive review of the literature across disciplines, with a targeted focus on diverse mentoringrelationships in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields (Johnson,2015; Kram, 1985

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

organizations, peer learningEth4 Micro and macro ethics, socio- News stories; group 3.6 2.7 3.0Social & Ethical technical, environment discussions; team projects;Issues in Engrg readingsEth2 Moral literacy framework, Current events / case 3.4 2.9 3.1Modern Ethical ethical theories, biotechnology, studies, discussion-basedIssues synthetic biologyRQ2. Disagreement among ratingsThe standard deviation in ratings was used as a rough measure of “dispersion” or disagreementamong the ratings. The average standard deviation among the 35 ESI teaching settings forstudent learning

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Collection

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George D. Ricco, University of Kentucky; Janet K. Lumpp, University of Kentucky; Joshua Parsons; Shannon Lee Sampson; Brad A. Hubbard, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

and recruitment issues perdepartment remain unknown.Conclusions and Future Work Our first conclusion is that the faculty and lecturers appear to have many of the sameconcerns or awareness issues surrounding FYE that student have in our previous work. Thealignment of the learning objectives with faculty and student responses is a positive one for us.Second, multiple departments being concerned with items beyond retention is positive, as itmeans they understand the purpose of a FYE program is not limited to enrollment numbers. Itstill remains to be seen how departments respond to increased or decreased enrollment numbersboth at the college level and within their own departments. From subsequent surveys performedearlier this year, it is

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

teaching as an unpleasant“chore” they have to put up with. These frustrations and ill feelings, unless properlyaddressed and dealt with early on, would result in serious consequences, such as:opting out, changing jobs, or else continue to face problems in the classroom, andeventually, become demoralized, thus adversely affecting outcome. Given this ratherunpleasant situation, how may young faculty members of the Arab Gulf Region,overcome these difficulties and survive in this maelstrom of indecisiveness anduncertainty? What is the role of the institution in assisting young faculty inovercoming the initial hurdles at the start of their journey?The paper addresses issues and concerns that beset the majority of young engineeringfaculty in the Arab

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Anant Sahai, University of California, Berkeley; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, small oversights can quickly deplete resources of timeand/or money. All of these require careful planning and foresight. Large classes also have areasonably high inertia. Changes require new training of both the teaching team and students.Finally, we have the challenge of buy-in. In a single instructor class, the instructor only needsto convince himself or herself. In the firm-style class, the whole teaching team must bepersuaded to accept the changes46. For more significant changes the department must bepersuaded as well. Dealing with all of these issues falls upon the faculty member(s) in chargeof the course, and this induces an increased workload associated with teaching large courses inthe firm style. In practice, when crises occur, the

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

thegrading system and its data. For a robust grading system, each of these aspects of a high qualitygrading system must be worked out and monitored over time to ensure high quality data.Fairness is concerned with a number of issues pertaining to stakeholder perceptions, particularlystudents. First, grading is perceived to be fair if it is focused on an individual’s work withoutcomparison to other individuals’ work (as with normative grading) [12]. This particular aspect offairness is foundational to SBG; grades are issued based on an individual student’s demonstrationof their ability with each learning objective. Second, grading is perceived to be fair if studentsknow when and how they are going to be judged [12]. This can be achieved by making a

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University; Jennifer Retherford P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville; David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

one of the staple experiences for young andaspiring civil engineering professors. The ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop, or morespecifically the founding members, have provided an atmosphere to inform and inspire new civilengineering faculty to climb Lowman’s ladder. This paper seeks to extend the vision of theworkshop for ExCEEd graduates and entice those who wish to improve their pedagogicalpractices in the spirit of the ExCEEd Teaching Model. The authors gratefully acknowledge thesupport of the entire ASCE ExCEEd family.Bibliography1. Lowman, J., 1995. Mastering the techniques of teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.2. Estes, A.C., Welch, R.W., and Ressler, S.J., 2005. “The ExCEEd Teaching Model.” Journal of Professional Issues in

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

undergraduate and graduate classes that might not otherwise be offered to the student body due to budget and other resource constraints.2. The opponents of the large lecture approach argue that large lecture sections dilute the learning process, place an undue burden on faculty in terms of test monitoring, grading, office hours or student interaction, and course management.Whichever camp one belongs to, whether one attempts to move toward small lectures or largeones, or one believes more in one idea over the other, there is a perspective that has been longneglected – the students. The central issue is not small versus large lectures, but theeffectiveness of student learning. It is quite true that in large fundamental courses, such as

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

University he was a research associate in Florida Center for Advanced Aero- Propulsion. Dr. Solomon’s research interests include high speed flow control, actuator development, experimental fluid mechanics and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Study on Student Success in a Blended-Model Engineering ClassroomAbstractOne of the primary issues that many engineering educators face is the lack of engagement of students intheir classroom. This becomes a more crucial concern for new engineering educators, many of whom lackany significant teaching experience. While the literature suggests a variety of factors that mightnegatively influence student engagement, the theory of

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Matthew Walker, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

a recency weighting or a threshold aggregation approach, begs additional study. Preliminary work suggests that standards-based grading in general produces an increase in student self-efficacy and motivation [17], but the underlying driver of this effect has not yet been attributed to any particular element of the assessment approach. 8) Novice practitioners may feel more comfortable using an even-weighted numerical aggregation approach, at least during early implementations of standards-based grading, until underlying structural issues can be resolved (such as an underassessed objective) and the faculty member better understands how to deploy and navigate the standards- based approach.References

Conference Session

Revealing the Invisible: Engineering Course Activities that Address Privilege, -Isms, and Power Relations (Interactive Session)

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, International, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering

inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering, Handbook of Engineering Education Research ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, Ch. 17, 2014.[2] A. L. Pawley, "Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define “engineering”," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, pp. 309-319, 2009.[3] D. Riley, "Employing liberative pedagogies in engineering education," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137-158, 2003.[4] D. Riley, "Engineering and social justice," Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, vol. 3, pp. 1-152, 2008.[5] ABET. (2017, February 04). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2016-2017. Available

Conference Session

Electrical/Electronic ET Issues

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve C. Hsiung, Old Dominion University; Feng Jao, Ohio Northern University; Lijian Xu, Farmingdale State College; Marjaneh Issapour, State University of New York, Farmingdale

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

development begins with a goodstart in attending a training workshop or seminar but end up with little or no further interestbecause there is no continuous support. Sometimes it may simply be there is no one to talk towhen there is a “glitch” in the technology or a technical problem. Even when technical support isavailable, there are times where the support person does not understand or care about academicissues and concerns. Often assistance that may be provided is not applicable or beyond thefaculty capability to resolve the problem or issue. However, an effective LMS can provide thecapability to address and resolve many issues and problems. Suggestions and solutions can beposted to the LMS and shared and updated through links to other faculty that

Conference Session

Perspectives on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Beyond the Undergraduate Years

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cliff Fitzmorris, University of Oklahoma; Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma; Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

in non-tenure-track faculty includebudget constraints, the need for additional flexibility in scheduling, and the ability to include facultymembers with specific knowledge or expertise for specific courses [1][2], factors which are not likely toabate.As the number of non-tenure-track faculty increases, concerns about the impact of this change on studentlearning and as an attack on the tenure system have emerged. As Levin and Shaker note, “full-time non-tenure-track faculty are deemed accomplices, albeit unwitting, to the erosion of the academic profession,faculty power, and undergraduate education” [3]. Early quantitative studies supported this notion, usinglarge national datasets to show that non-tenure-track faculty, especially part-time

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Barendt, Case Western Reserve University; Nigamanth Sridhar, Cleveland State University; Kenneth A. Loparo, Case Western Reserve University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Access Control System HTTPS, MQTTS, Mosquitto 15 Final Projects System various As outlined above, the course is divided into two parts: constructing the IoT System (the“product”), and instrumenting, extending, and evolving the IoT System - Properties, Behaviors,and Concerns of Systems and the supporting courseware is divided into week-long modules,where each module tackles a new technology or concept. Details are provided in Table 1.Course SampleHere is an example of one week of the course, Week 10: Analytics and Dashboards. Prior tothis, students have incrementally constructed the LAMPI IoT System (including: the device witha touchscreen UI

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Curricular Design and Assessment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward F. Crawley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Anette "Peko" Hosoi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Amitava "Babi" Mitra, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

interconnected community of faculty, students, industry partners, alums and athletes who are dedicated to applying their technical expertise to advance the state-of-the-art in sports.Dr. Amitava ”Babi” Mitra, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Amitava ”Babi” Mitra is Executive Director, New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET), MIT. He was the founder-Dean, School of Engineering and Technology, BML Munjal University, Gur- gaon, India and the founder-President and Vice-Chancellor, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India. Mitra is passionate about evangelizing and implementing an educational vision that he believes in; he enjoys formulating, designing and planning its implementation, and then taking it through to

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3 – Course and Program Outcomes

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stu Turner, US Air Force Academy Systems Engineering; Kalyn Tung, United States Air Force Academy; Cory Cooper, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

andaccreditation efforts across the program are led by a dedicated SE faculty member holding thetitle SE Curriculum and Assessment Manager.ABET Criterion 3 Changes: Table 1 compares the expiring ABET EAC Criterion 3 SOs and thenew set of SOs effective beginning 2019. A comparison of the new and expiring SOs reveals thefollowing changes, organized by new SO:Table 1: Comparison of Expiring and New EAC Student OutcomesExpiring EAC SOs [1, pp. 4-5]: New EAC SOs, Effective 2019 [1, pp. 39-40]:a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, 1) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex science, and engineering engineering problems by applying principles ofb) an ability to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeleine F. Jennings, Texas State University; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Shaunna Fultz Smith, Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

appearance that makes studentsfeel welcome. Spaces that appeared too bare or “industrial” had the opposite effect, and as aresult, came across as inaccessible 2, 3.Reportedly, students felt anxiety about entering a space and not knowing where to go or what todo 3. An effective way to avoid this issue is to ensure that there is an appropriate amount ofsignage and accessible instruction for new attendees. This can be accomplished by way ofposters on the wall, standard operating procedures, and equipment instructions or informationavailable online or in the makerspace. Helpers and makerspace staff should be accessible,understandable, friendly, and knowledgeable as well 2, 8.Other factors affecting student perceptions of accessibility are the amount of

Conference Session

IED Technical Session: Preparing Programs for the Future

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

/2014/09/12/the-most-in-demand-and-oldest-engineering-jobs/#1d10c1e21e375) ASEE, College Profiles for 2015, https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf6) US News and World Report, Top Industrial/Manufacturing Engineering Programs,https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering-doctorate-industrial-manufacturing7) Kwon, Ohbyung; Lee, Namyeon; and Shin, Bongsik; “Data Quality Management,Data Usage Experience and Acquisition Intention of Big Data Analytics”, InternationalJournal of Information Management, Vol. 34, Issue 3, June 2014, pages 387-3948) Lee, Jay; Bagheri, Behrad; Kao, Hung-An; “Recent Advances and Trends of Cyber-Physical Systems and Big Data Analytics in