Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Jane Grigg, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

controversialtopics surrounding engineering innovation with the class as a whole. Figures 2-4 show some ofthese activities. Figure 2 shows a design thinking exercise that illustrates the difference inworking harder and working smarter. Students are instructed to design a way to get an objectfrom point A to point B where there is a barrier between. Most start by building a bridge orcatapult while going around is a simply feasible alternative. As seen in Figure 3, whendiscussing the differences between incremental, breakthrough, and disruptive innovations,lighting is used as an example to highlight these differences. To expand on the topic, studentsbuild an electrical circuit to compare the brightness and voltage drops across incandescent andled bulbs. Figure

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #21861’It was a Failure, But a Good Failure’: A Qualitative Study Exploring Engi-neering Students’ Critical Entrepreneurship Experiences and Their ImpactsMr. Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University Mark Huerta is a second year PhD student in the Engineering Education Systems & Design (EESD) program at Arizona State University. Mark is also the Chairman and Director of Projects of a non-profit called 33 Buckets, which empowers rural communities in developing countries to develop solutions for their drinking water problems. Before enrolling in the EESD program, Mark obtained a BS and MS in Biomedical Engineering

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Timothy Chow, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Tony Ribera, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

years.Several aspects of maker and innovation centers have been reported on including a classificationsystem, operating policies, training programs, and assessment approaches. This paper will reporton student utilization of our innovation center through the analysis of activity records. Over theyears of operation of the center, multiple measures of student activity and utilization have beencollected including lock logs, team rosters, and training completions. This paper will analyzethese sources of data and report on several aspects of growth and utilization of the centerincluding: (a) overall level of student activity over the last three years; (b) student activity brokendown by time of year, quarter, and day; (c) student gender and class standing

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Douglas E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

) A Implementation or Execution Model C Business Model New, Revisions, Enhancements Business Model B T1 T2 Figure 1 – Three Models for Enterprise Innovation and Transformation19Three components are necessary to develop and implement successful offerings supported by asustainable organization (T2) and thus capture value in a marketplace. The three components area model of the product offering (A), a business

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University; Lawrence Funke, Ohio Northern University; David R. Mikesell, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

dynamics projects. Finally, theimportance surveys suggest that students gained a better appreciation for the importance ofhaving an entrepreneurial mindset in a traditionally-technical course. This increase in perceivedimportance and ability in EML outcomes is the most encouraging. It indicates that theframework presented is an effective way of continuing EML through the more technicalcurriculum typically seen during the sophomore and junior years. It is also significant that thesepositive EML outcomes did not come at the expense of technical outcomes. The students’increased confidence in modeling and simulating electromechanical systems, and the fact that 23of the 29 respondents received a B or A on the project bear this out.It should be

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Antti Oskari Surma-Aho, Aalto University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University; Katja Holtta-Otto, Aalto University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

datasets (0.702 to 0.827), and a factor analysis further confirmed itsunidimensionality. The B-IRI:PT comprises four questions, IRI-08, IRI-11, IRI-25, and IRI-28.Thus, IRI:PT scores were computed based on four items, whereas ISE and INI scales wereanalyzed at the level of individual items.Next, the B-IRI:PT as well as the individual ISE and INI items were analyzed for differences indistribution between the paired and unpaired responses in the January and June datasets. Nostatistically significant differences were observed between the distributions of responses (p >0.05). However, the differences in responses to items ISE-2, ISE-5, ISE-6, and INI-3 approachedstatistical significance with p values below 0.1. Thus, in further analysis, it was

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Bielenberg, Khalifa University of Science and Technology; Ali Bouabid, Khalifa University of Science and Technology; Sami Ainane, Khalifa University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

University of Maryland, Baltimore County c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22296Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MDPresident, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MDHONORS AND AWARDSBest Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences andEffective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En-richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003SELECTED PUBLICATIONS1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leon Szeli, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

research question is: How can we describe therelationship between the BFPT and SCCT constructs? We conducted a (mainly quantitative) online-survey (n=465) among Alumni of the Stanford School of Engineering who graduated between 1 and17 years ago and who had successfully the course ME203: Design and Manufacturing. Over 20percent of the respondents had founded a venture. Results show that three out of the five personalitytraits have a significant positive relationship to certain SCCT constructs: a. Openness to newexperiences and Extraversion are correlated to Entrepreneurial Self Efficacy, EntrepreneurialIntention, Entrepreneurial Outcome Expectations, Innovation Self Efficacy and EntrepreneurialLearning Experiences. and b. Emotional Stability

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Furnbach Clavijo P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology; Leslie R. Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology; Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; Kishore V. Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

specializing in Urban Land Redevelopment and Municipal Engineering. Sandra holds a B.S. Degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering, an A. B. degree in Art History, and a Master of Engineering degree in Engineering Management from Stevens Institute of Technology. She also holds a Professional Engineering license in NJ.Dr. Leslie R. Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology Leslie Brunell, PhD, PE is a Teaching Professor at Stevens Institute of Technology. She coordinates both the civil and multidisciplinary engineering senior design projects. These projects are the culmination of the undergraduate engineering experience. Students design an innovative solution to a complex problem. She has recruited professional sponsors

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid R. Piroozi J.D., Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Charles Feldhaus, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

completed, eachstudent group will create a proof-of-concept prototype, and thereafter prepare a patentapplication in association with the company’s legal department, providing a rich engineering andlegal learning environment as well as potential internship and permanent employmentopportunities. The experience that students will gain through this approach will solidify conceptsthey learn in the classroom.AcknowledgmentsThis project was supported by seed funding from SEIRI at IUPUI. We would also like to thankthe students who participated in the course and survey design described herein.References[1] B. Obama

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

] C. L. Colbeck, A. F. Cabrera, and R. J. Marine, “Faculty motivation to use alternative teaching methods,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA, April 1, 2002.[9] M. Miles and M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: A source book for new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 
Publications, 1994.[10] P. L. Hardré, R. B. Miller, A. D. Beesley, T. M. Pace, M. S. Maxwell, and K. Xie, “What motivates university faculty members to do research?: Tenure-track faculty in research- extensive universities,” Journal of the Professoriate, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 75-99, 2007.[11] P. L. Hardré, A. D. Beesley, R. L. Miller, and T. M. Pace, “Faculty motivation to do research

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

11 Research PaperTable 2. Planned and Actual Deployment Schedule of EML activities (DB: Discussion Boardand Student-led, In-class Discussion) Discussion Topic: Internet of Things 1. Please watch or read the following content: a. How It Works: Internet of Things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSIPNhOiMoE (IBM Think Academy) b. Top 5 Facts about the Internet of Things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Ekz2kK7J4 (watchmojo.com) c. Unlocking the potential of the Internet of Things: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our- insights/the-internet-of-things-the-value-of-digitizing-the-physical-world 2. Write at least two technical paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting paragraphs. Make at least one

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Bernd Steffensen, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Appendix B. We eliminated publications that used T-shaped to Deleted: Eliminatingdescribe an object or junction (rather than an individual or a curriculum); the yielded data Deleted: tshowed a big increase in papers on the topic between 2014 and 2015 and a significant increase in Deleted: that   3  the number of divisions whose programs included papers on the topic between 2014 and 2017.These numbers are discussed in the following section of the paper. Commented [NKA(5]: These  additions  are  intended  to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabel Hilliger P.E., Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile; Constanza Miranda, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Mar P´erez-Sanagust´ın is a researcher and Assistant Professor at the Computer Science Department of the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and the Director of the Engineering Education Division at the same university. Her research interests are technology-enhanced learning, engineering education, MOOCs and b-learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018A Methodology to Involve Students in the Evaluation of an EngineeringCurriculum in Design, Entrepreneurship and InnovationA Methodology to Involve Students in the Evaluation of an Engineering Curriculum inDesign, Entrepreneurship and InnovationAbstract Engineering schools have created courses and concentrations to train students

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dustyn Roberts P.E., University of Delaware; Trevor Scott Stephens, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

]. Available: https://lerner.udel.edu/centers/experiential-learning- centers/horn-program-in-entrepreneurship/. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2018].[4] “Innovation & Entrepreneurship Institute,” Fox School of Business | Temple University | Philadelphia, PA. [Online]. Available: https://www.fox.temple.edu/institutes-and- centers/innovation-entrepreneurship-institute/. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2018].[5] “Center for Entrepreneurial Studies,” Stanford Graduate School of Business. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/centers-initiatives/ces. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2018].[6] S. Blank and B. Dorf, The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, 1 edition. Pescadero, Calif: K & S Ranch, 2012.[7

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Cory Hixson, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #21515Student-created Canvases as a Way to Inform Decision-making in a CapstoneDesign SequenceProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Dr. Joseph (Joe) Tranquillo is an Associate Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Biomed- ical Engineering, He is also co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management, co-director of the KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Program, and chair of the Biomedical Engineer- ing Division of ASEE. Tranquillo has published three undergraduate textbooks and numerous engineering education publications, and has presented internationally on

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mathias J. Klenk, Technical University of Munich; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, SKG Analysis; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

people have their most innovative output (not creativeanymore) when they are older – in fact when they are more than 40 years old. These specificfindings suggest there are (generationally- and rank-based) workplace realities aroundinnovation that new engineering hires must confront. The current study deepens theinvestigation into innovation by examining it in the context of meaningful work forindividuals just beginning their careers.Our three specific research questions for this study are: A. What does meaningful work look like in the eyes of early career engineers? B. What does meaningful innovative work look like in the eyes of early career engineers? C. How do the personal experiences of innovative work and engineering work compare?To

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Buffardi, California State University, Chico; William Zamora, Califonia State University, Chico; Colleen Robb, California State University, Chico; David Rahn, California State University, Chico

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #22263Implementing the Tech Startup Model: A Retrospective on Year OneDr. Kevin Buffardi, California State University, Chico Dr. Buffardi is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at California State University, Chico. After gaining industry experience as a usability and human factors engineering specialist, he earned a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Virginia Tech. His research concentrates on software engineering education, software testing, and eLearning tools.William Zamora, Califonia State University, Chico William Zamora is a third-year undergraduate student at California State University, Chico and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University; Amy Frances Golightly, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #22908Curious About Student Curiosity: Implications of Pedagogical Approach forStudents’ MindsetDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jidong Huang, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

sufficientquality and intensity to influence intended outcomes. The process data were collected throughproject documents, attendance logs, a site visit with observations and interviews of anafterschool activity, and participant surveys. Post-, or end-of-program, surveys with students,mentors, teachers and parents also included formative items designed to inform next year’sprogram development. To assess program outcomes, ARS employed a number of measures (such as those forstudent interests and self-efficacy) and evaluation activities (such as those for student learningoutcomes) across the four participating schools and between the two different interventions (a,traditional new venture creation approach; and b, Lean Startup approach), including survey

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samarth Gupta, Purdue University; Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

released for each institution is displayed by state. 7. The researcher only collected data for funds related to “Research Support” and discarded the data for “Education and Human Resources” and “Major Research Equipment”. A total of 1543 rows of data was extracted.On the other hand, mode 2 is represented through the dataset obtained from NSF I-Corps: 1. The researcher went to the website https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/advancedSearch.jsp 2. Search for element code = “I-Corps” 3. There is a total of three element codes corresponding to I-Corps: a. I-Corps - Sites 8046 with 17 rows of data b. I-Corps - Nodes 8045 with 73 rows of data c. I-Corps - Program 8023 with 295 rows of data 4. The

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Analyst. She was the owner and chief systems engineer for Systems Engineering Services (SES), a computer systems design, development, and consultation firm. She joined the faculty of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University in 1997, where she teaches a variety of engineering and computer science classes, she is the Faculty Advisor for the Women in Computer Science (WiCS), the Director of the Computer Science Fellows program, and is a KEEN Fellow. She has authored and co- authored over forty peer-reviewed papers.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

engineering design and engineering entrepreneurship. a. Did the things you learned in the course about engineering design and engineering entrepreneurship help you with the designing your life course activities? Please explain. b. Did the designing your life course activities help you in the course about engineering design and engineering entrepreneurship? Please explain.The DYL activities used in the course were taken from the text and minimally modifiedto suit a classroom setting. The activities used in the course included: • Creation of a life-design team • Identification of key mentor(s) • Creation of health/work/play/love dashboard • Descritption of workview • Lifeview reflections • Good

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Ian Derk, Arizona State University; Stephanie Sowl, Arizona State University; Natalie Nailor

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, June), Entrepreneurially Minded Learning:Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery, Opportunity Identification, and Value Creation intoProblem-Based Learning Modules with Examples and Assessment Specific to Fluid Mechanics,Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.10.18260/p.26724[4] Bell-Huff, C., & Morano, H. L. (2017, June), Using Simulation Experiences, RealCustomers, and Outcome Driven Innovation to Foster Empathy and an Entrepreneurial Mindsetin a Sophomore Engineering Design Studio, Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27425[5] Zhu, H., & Mertz, B. E. (2017, June), Work In Progress: Incorporation of the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Diane Evans, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #21541Food for Thought: Predicting Entrepreneurial BehaviorDr. Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Craig G. Downing is Department Head and Associate Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology. His teaching responsibilities are focused on delivering graduate-level instruction related to Operations and Quality Systems. His interests are rooted in Academic-Industrial partnerships, Process Improvement, and Action Research in Engineering Management. Further, serves as one of the champions for leading the campus entrepreneurial initiatives. He is a certified Lean

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karl D. Schubert, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Clint E Johnson, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=mGY_9sFg2qM.[10] A. Maurya, Why Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas? February 27, 2012. [Blog post] Available: https://leanstack.com/is-one-page-business-model.[11] N. Althuizen, B. Wierenga, and J. Rossiter, “The Validity of Two Brief Measures of Creative Ability,” Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), pp. 53-61, 2010.[12] S. Bjorklund and N. Fortenberry, Measuring Student and Faculty Engagement in Engineering Education, Washington, DC: The National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies, 2005. [E-Report] Available: https://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=11463&v=451a62ea.[13] NR Anderson and MA West, “Measuring climate for work group

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Weed Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Neeraj Sonalkar, Stanford University; Ilya Avdeev, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Brian D. Thompson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Mohamed M. Megahed, Pennsylvania State University; Pratik Subhash Pachpute, Pennsylvania State University,Great Valley

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

IDN [39, 41], whileTable 1 lists and defines the IDN symbols used in Figure 4 (plus Humor). Fig. 4. Team interaction represented using IDN: A, B, C are individuals in the team [39, 41] Table 1. Definitions of IDN symbols used in Figure 3 (plus Humor) [39, 41]To apply IDN in a research setting, team interactions are first video recorded, then converted intoan IDN representation, and then analyzed (see Figure 5). The video data of team interactions areinitially coded into separate participant speaker turns, which also include non-verbal gestures. Thedata file with speaker turns is analyzed by multiple IDN analysts to create a sequence of IDNsymbols; each speaker turn is assigned one symbol. This assignment is checked for inter

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University; Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

for an application. Additionally, several other deans felt that entrepreneurial thinking enables students to bebecome more innovative and forward-thinking. Dean A also remarked, “The people with thatentrepreneurial mindset will be out in the lead and will be steering the needle where we'reheaded, versus just always catching up and playing catch up”. Several deans described thatexposure to entrepreneurial thinking enables students to more readily adapt to changes and cansupport their problem-solving abilities. Dean B chose to expand on how entrepreneurial thinkingcan reframe the idea of failure from being a bad thing to a necessary part of the design process.Dean B (from a primarily undergraduate-focused institution) comments: I

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; Mary Fraley, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

- neering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Ms. Mary Fraley, Michigan Technological University Mary Fraley is a Sr. Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University. Her research interests include online/blended learning methods, entrepreneurial mindset, and applying LEAN to the process of teaching and learning.Ms. Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University Ms. Kemppainen is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals. Her research inter- ests include the improvement of STEM education, mental toughness, growth mindset, and online/blended learning methods. c American Society for

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #23135Critical Incidents in Engineering Students’ Development of More Compre-hensive Ways of Experiencing InnovationDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Industrial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, design thinking, and instructional design