. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22
Military Academy. His current research interests include laboratory and field determination of geotechnical material properties for transportation systems and the use of remote sensing techniques to categorize geohazards. He has published over 85 peer reviewed articles relating to his research and educational activities. Dennis holds BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (now Missouri University of Science and Technology), an MBA from Boston University and a Ph.D. from the University of Texas-Austin. He is a registered professional engineer in Arkansas and Colorado.Dr. Decker B Hains P.E., Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the
relative compaction value would be (something less than/greater than 100%) ifthe field conditions were measured to be 112 pcf. In comparison, the L10 level 3 question reads,Given the above flownet, assume the datum is at the bottom of the headwater. If a piezometerwere installed a point B, what would it read? The 2D seepage question requires the student toevaluate a figure and dive deeper in concept. As a result, the significant difference reported onthe L10 data is promising. 3 2.75 FLIP TOPIC Control (Next Class) Combined Mean Score Treatment (Next Class) 2.5
Paper ID #25741The Evolution of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: From the FirstEdition to the Third EditionDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska Anchorage in
in 2010. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army
= 𝐴𝑇 · 𝑏 (1)where R is the resultant force [F], AT is the area of the triangle or trapezoid [F/L], and b is theuniform width of the planar area on which the pressure distribution is acting [L]. The dimensionsof AT are [F/L] because the sides of the triangle or trapezoid have dimensions of pressure andlength. Figure 2. Pressure distribution acting on a submerged planar surface.If the submerged planar area does not have a constant width, the triangular or trapezoidal area isnot useful for calculating the resultant. In this case, equation (2) must be used: 𝑅 = 𝛾ℎ𝐶 𝐴 (2)where γ is the specific weight
Paper ID #25200Monitoring and Controlling a Construction Project in the ClassroomCol. Brad Wambeke P.E., United States Military Academy Colonel Brad Wambeke is the Civil Engineering Division Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from South Dakota State University; M.S. from the University of Min- nesota; and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. He is a member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His primary research interests include construction engineering, lean construction, and engineering education.Major Todd Mainwaring, United States Military
]. Accredited programs must have documented student outcomes that preparegraduates to attain the program educational objectives. The student outcomes are outcomes (a)through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may be articulated by the program. Table 4: Mapping ABET outcomes with 21st-century skills 21st Century ABET Outcomes Skills for Success (a) an ability to apply knowledge of 2. Numeracy mathematics, science, and engineering 3. Scientific Literacy (b) an ability to design and conduct 7. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving
when thestudent, under stress, was asked to complete a similar problem in an exam environment.A typical process of assigning homework is shown in Figure 1a. The steps are straight-forward;the instructor assigns a set of homework problems and the student is given a set amount of timeto complete these problems before submitting to the instructor to grade. The instructor reviewsthe homework set and then returns to the student with a score based on the correctness of thesolutions provided.Figure 1: a) homework grading process (typical); b) homework self-grading process (by student)By comparison, the implementation of student self-grading (see Figure 1b) for this studyrequired several additional steps. The rationale for these steps will be
://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/09/why-is-college-so- expensive-in-america/569884/. [Accessed 9 January 2019].[5] K. Hopkins, "New Three-Year Degree Programs Trim College Costs," 29 February 2012. [Online]. Available: www.usnews.com/education. [Accessed 22 November 2018].[6] A. R. Kukreti, T. C. Keener, P. L. Bishop and S. T. Kowel, "The Accelerated Engineering Degrees (ACCEND) Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Cincinnati," in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[7] K. R. Leitch and E. B. Butler, "Creating a New Civil Engineering Program in the 21st Century," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2015.[8] N. M. Safai and L. Reaveley, "Universal Model - A Partnership for
field as they fabricate their steel frame specimens; (ii) understand differences inseismic response of SMF, SCBF, and BRBF systems based on their experimental testobservations and data analysis; as well as (iii) develop project management, teamwork, andcommunication skills to function in a large team with varied design, construction, experimentaltesting, and reporting tasks. Appendix B details the FE and PE exam objectives as well as ABETcriteria met by the new ARCE 372 course. The remainder of this paper will detail the learningactivities associated with the ARCE 372 course projects and student feedback from the first twoundergraduate student authors as well as data collected through end-of-quarter course surveys.Project OverviewTable 1
: Draw deflected shape Indicate side of the beam in tension, top or bottom (at designated points A, B, C) Indicate magnitude of bending moment diagram (at location of pink bands) Indicate magnitude of shear force diagram (at location of pink bands) a) Draw Deflected Shape b) Indicate Location of Tension c) Indicate Magnitude of Shear Force Figure 1: Samples of Beam Hotspot QuestionsMultiple choice questions that involve selection from three image choices (toggle button). Indicate direction of rotation at various points along beam Indicate bending moment + = sagging, – = hogging, or zero at various points
include a separatecourse on this topic, different programs may be influenced by the CEPC requirement to “preparegraduates to apply probability and statistics to address uncertainty [1], [2],” and may be using acourse in probability and statistics to meet the requirement and to fulfill credit hour requirementsof Criterion 5. The remaining 28% of programs likely cover probability and statistics in othercourses. Twenty three percent of programs require students to take a course in linear algebra.(a) Distribution of total credit hours required for graduation by programs (b) Cumulative percent of total credit hours required for graduation Figure 1. Summary of total credit hours required for graduation (a) Distribution of credit hours of
quarters or semesters. Table 4. Faculty survey questions included in on-line Qualtrics Survey Survey Question1. How many activities did you implement in your course this semester? (type in answer)2. Which activities did you implement? (bulleted list included for selection)3. In general, students responded to these activities a. Positively b. Mixed c. Negatively4. If you have taught soil mechanics before, the frequency at which you previously incorporated active learning was: a. Never b. In some classes c. In about half of the classes d. In most of the classes e. In every class f. This is my first time teaching soil
of Knowledge, Third Edition, “Preparing the Future Civil Engineer.”American Society of Civil Engineers, August 24, 2018.[2] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2017-2018. https://www.abet.org[3] United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/[4] C. I. Davidson, M.G. Hajra, Y. E. Pearson, “Applications of the Envision Rating System inEngineering Courses and Curricula” in ASEE 2018 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.[5] J. M. Price and J. Aidoo, “Introducing Sustainable Design Principles in Freshman CivilEngineering Design,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23 – 26, 2013.[6] E.R. Brown, D. B. Thomas, J. L. Smith and A. B. Dieckman, “Closing
Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006.[15] R. Toto and H. Nguyen, “Flipping the Work Design in an Industrial Engineering Course”, in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.[16] S. Zappe, R. Lieicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H.W. Lee, “"Flipping" the Classroom to Explore Active Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course”, in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.[17] B. McCabe, “Flipped learning in a civil engineering module: student and instructor experiences,” Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol 4, Issue 1, 2019. 9
for a building. Senior Senior Design Students complete a capstone design project.MethodsIn order to help our students make a connection between theory and real-life application, twoapproaches were implemented to improve student’s ability to solve open-ended problems: (a) AFramework to Approach Open-ended Problems and (b) A Common Project Platform forSynthesizing Components of Open-ended Problems.Framework for Open-ended Problems (OEP)Based on our interaction with students during their capstone design projects and course projectsin some of our required courses, we realized students had a difficult time to even approachOEPs: specifically, where do they find resources, how do they make connections to knowledgeobtained in
proposed outcomes, b. Clarify common terminology for all faculty teams to apply across outcomes, c. Identify ill-defined concepts and develop common definitions for these concepts that were more clearly defined, d. Develop a philosophy for use of multiple criteria under a single outcome to address challenges combining outcomes between the four different outcome types, e. Prioritize departmental priorities about learning, including the addition, combination and deletion of some outcomes.5. We compiled a single summary of all outcomes and subjected the combined outcomes list to a common review. In this final step, we examined the outcomes one more time for redundancy, ill-defined terms
programs of the Biological Science Initiative:Students’ intellectual, personal and professional outcomes from participation in research. Report prepared for theHoward Hughes Medical Institute. Boulder, CO: Ethnography and Evaluation Research, 2009.[11] S.T., Ghanat, D. Garner, J. Howison, S. Banik, B. Swart, M. Verdicchio, R. Hunter (2018), Students’Perception of Summer Undergraduate Research Experience: Across the Disciplines, proceeding of 2018 AmericanSociety of Engineering Education National Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018[12] A.L. Zydney, J.S. Bennett, A. Shahid, K.W. Bauer, Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate researchexperience in science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 291-297, 2002.[13] C.M. Kardash
in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Ms. Leslie Nolen CAE, American Society of Civil Engineers Leslie Nolen, CAE, serves as director, educational activities for the American Society of Civil Engineers. She brings over 20 years of association management experience to her work with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and graduate level education of civil engineers.Dr. Decker B Hains P.E., Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US
thepercentages of success (blue bars) & failure (red bars) per question and Figure 3 represents thesummarization of these results. For this first study, two main concepts were selected to beconverted into PBH: non-perpendicular axis and 2D equilibrium with springs as shown in Figure3.a. Forces and Vectors with Non-Perpendicular Axis b. 2D Particle Equilibriumc. 2D Equilibrium with Springs d. 3D Particle Equilibrium Figure 2. Percentage of Correct/Incorrect Answers per Topic (First Midterm Examination) Figure 3. Percentages of Success/Failure per First Midterm Topic (Summary of 4 Sections)Same procedure was repeated for the second part of the class. The main topics covered for thismidterm
. (2014). Resilience assessment for geotechnicalinfrastructure assets. Infrastructure Asset Management, 1(4), 95-104.[5] American Society for Civil Engineers (2009). The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025.Reston, VA: ASCE.[6] Dong, J. and Chen, P. (2014). A Case Study: How Collaborative PBL Affects Learning ofMinority Students in Engineering Courses at Senior Level. ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.[7] Fernandes, S. R. G. (2014). Preparing graduates for professional practice: findings from a casestudy of Project-based Learning (PBL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 219-226.[8] Wu, W. and Hyatt, B. (2016). Experiential and project-based learning in BIM for sustainableliving with tiny solar houses. Procedia
Society, 2015.[4] B. Swartz, S. B. Velegol, and J. A. Laman, “Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses : Faculty Perspectives and Suggestions,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[5] A. Lee, H. Zhu, and J. A. Middleton, “Effectiveness of flipped classroom for mechanics of materials,” ASEE’s 123rd Annu. Conf. Expo., no. May, 2016.[6] A. B. Hoxie, T. Shepard, and R. Feyen, “The Flipped Classroom : A Means to Reduce Cheating?,” 122nd ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., no. Paper ID #11445, p. 16, 2015.[7] J. Laman, M. L. Brannon, and I. Mena, “Classroom Flip in a Senior-Level Engineering Course and Comparison to Previous Version,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.[8] G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K
the University of Iowa had found success as an in-person,academic credit-based course. When consideration was given to developing an online interactiveversion open to parties outside of the university, cost (associated with registration and theregistration process itself) and scheduling challenges grounded the effort. For these reasons, ashort-course format was ultimately “found to be much more successful in attracting participants[8].” A separate study noted that “some of the most important considerations of successful onlinetraining programs (for staff at a state department of transportation) are: (a) the inclusion ofinteractive components within the training modules to keep participants engaged, (b) a shortduration for each of the training
Paper ID #26499The Critical Pick: A Crane Rigging DemonstrationMajor David M. Flaherty, United States Military Academy Major David Flaherty is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He earned a M.S. in civil engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 2017. He is currently the course director for the Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design course, which is the largest course within the Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department. He can be contacted at david.flaherty@westpoint.edu. c American
carry water at a rate of 550 gpm (1.21 ft3/s). What is the total headloss for this length of pipe? 2 Which 8-inch pipe with a length of 500 feet A. friction factor, fd = .015; would have the greatest headloss? Assume: Q = roughness coefficient, C = 160 550 gpm (1.21 ft3/s), each pipe is made of new B. friction factor, fd = .02; unlined Schedule 40 steel, turbulent flow, each roughness coefficient, C = 140 pipe is flowing full, and there is no change in C. friction factor, fd = .025; elevation between point A and point B. roughness coefficient, C = 120
Paper ID #24585Sustainability Service Learning as a Mechanism for Acquiring New Knowl-edgeDr. Deborah Besser P.E., University of St. Thomas Dr. Besser, PE, ENV SP, holds a PhD in education and MS and BS in civil engineering. Currently, she is civil engineering chair and Center for Engineering Education director. Previous experience includes fac- ulty positions in diverse universities where she has taught a variety of coursework including steel, timber, concrete and masonry design, construction, engineering economy, engineering graphics and engineering education. Prior to teaching, Dr. Besser, a licensed engineer, was a
Paper ID #24701Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom in Structural Steel DesignDr. Brian J. Smith, University of Notre Dame Dr. Brian J. Smith, Ph.D., P.E., is an associate teaching professor in the Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering and Earth Sciences (CEEES) at the University of Notre Dame. He is also a concurrent associate teaching professor in the School of Architecture (SoA) at Notre Dame. Dr. Smith teaches struc- tural design courses within CEEES and SoA, as well as introductory engineering courses through the common First-Year Engineering (FYE) program. He was a recipient of the 2018 Rev. Edmund P
Paper ID #25122The ASCE Raise the Bar Initiative: A New Paradigm Based on Credentialingin the Medical ProfessionDr. Stephen J. Ressler P.E., U.S. Military Academy Stephen Ressler, P.E. Ph.D. is Professor Emeritus from the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) at West Point. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 1989, and a Ph.D. from Lehigh in 1991. As an active duty Army officer, he served for 34 years in a variety of military engineering assignments around the world. He served as a member of the USMA faculty for 21 years, including six years as Professor
Paper ID #25625Education for Sustainable Civil Engineering: A Case Study of Affective Out-comes among StudentsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, En- vironmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students