Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University; William M. Jordan P.E., Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

,” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session F3A, Saratoga Springs, NY, October 22-25, 2008.[16] Davis, D., “Collaborating with Industry Via your Advisory Board,” 2006-397, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006.[17] Lunt, B., “Industry Advisory Boards in Engineering Technology,” Session ETD 506, 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration,[18] Genheimer, S. R., and Shehab, R., “The Effective Industry Advisory Board in Engineering Education - A Model and Case Study,” Session T32E, 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI, October

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mathew D. Evans, Arizona State University; Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

” between experts and public audiences about recent research throughinteractive platforms7 (p. 2). Through an analysis of science bloggers who promote and discussscientific research, Luzon8 notes that these writers use five main strategies to communicate withaudiences outside of the field: a) take into consideration the background knowledge andinformation needs, b) selecting the most salient information from the research, c) appraise theresults and significance of the research, d) speak conversationally and try to involve the reader,and e) include their personal opinions and feelings on the matter. Guiding Luzon’s work isHyland’s concept of “proximity” which is how writers “represent not only themselves and theirreaders, but also their material in

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Robin Ott, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Cristian Hernandez; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech; Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Francesca Giardine, Smith College; Anne Kary, Smith College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #25708Women’s Experiences in the Transition from Capstone Design Courses to En-gineering WorkplacesDr. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is invested in building the capstone design community; she is a leader in the biannual Capstone Design Conferences and the Capstone Design Hub initiative. She is also involved with efforts to

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claude Brathwaite, City College of the City University of New York; Julianne Vernon, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

modulation of TNF receptor expression. Journal of Neuroscience Research,92 (11), 1490-1498. 11. Cruz, J. D., Schmidt-Kastner, R., Stevens, J. A. A., Steinbusch, H. W. M., & Rutten, B. P. F. (2014). Differential distribution of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-beta (ARNT or ARNT2) in mouse substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 61, 64-71.12. Cruz, J. D., Hescham, S., Adriaanse, B., Campos, F. L., Steinbusch, H. W. M., Rutten, B. P. F., ... & Jahanshahi, A. (2015). Increased number of

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Jeffrey J. Yackley, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

outcomes assessment after everyoffering. Applicable ABET Criterion 3 Learning Outcomes is listed in Table 5.Table 5: Applicable ABET Criterion 3 Learning Outcomes for Software V&V course at author’s institution b. An ability to design and conduct experiments, and analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component or a process to meet desired needs e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities g. An ability to communicate effectively h. Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. j. A knowledge

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa DeWitte, University of Florida; Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

emphasis on industrial engineering and manufacturing. b.) An automated titration apparatus using a Vernier Ph sensor that illustrates applications of environmental and chemical engineering. c.) A model bridge strut equipped with the Vernier Dual Force sensor in selected crossbeams that allows the student to observe static tensile and compressive forces. This demonstration mostly concentrates on civil engineering, with supplementary mechanical engineering principles. This presented body of work includes supporting schematics of all model demonstrations,including detailed descriptions of their functionality and operation, for other universitiesinterested in developing their own representative models for student

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; Melissa Geist, Tennessee Technological University; Yunbo Zhang, Rochester Institute of Technology; George Chitiyo, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. J. Roselli, S. P. Brophy, “Redesigning a biomechanics course using challenge-basedinstruction,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 22(4), 66-70, 2003[10] V. Gaddam, I. Fidan, B. Barger, “Hands-On Entrepreneurial Engineering ManagementCourse and Its Experiential Learning,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE2016, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/25433, accessed on April 5, 2019.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue Engineering Education; Tara C. Langus, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385–16389, 2004.[7] B. Mazur, B. Mazur, and P. Biatosticka, “Cultural diversity in organisational theory and practice,” J. Intercult. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 2010.[8] A. Godwin, A. Kirn, and J. Rohde, “Awareness without action: Student attitudes after engeineering teaming experiences.,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2017.[9] M. K. Feister et al., “Exploring the Social Processes of Ethics in Student Engineering Design Teams,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, p. ID# 13322.[10] J. M. LaFave, H.-S. Kang, and J. D. Kaiser

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Theresa Green, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

.), SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 722-724). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 13Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 457- 482.Mentzer, N., Becker, K., & Sutton, M. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students’ performance and knowledge. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 417- 432.Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.Moss, P. A., Phillips, D. C., Erickson, F. D., Floden, R. E., Lather, P. A., & Schneider, B. L. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

currently working towards incorporating writing assignments that enhance students’ critical thinking capabilities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Abstract In this study, the author discusses the beneficial aspects of TQM and PBL and providesan insight as to how these two can be intelligently incorporated in an educational institution.It is a well–known fact that TQM requires considerable time for its effective implementation.Some experts indicate that this is about five years. Researchers Kevin B. Hendricks of RichardIvey School of Business, the University of Western Ontario and Vinod R. Singhal of GeorgiaInstitute of Technology have studied three thousand firms and determined that the

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amitabha Ghosh, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

performthe integration, simplify the ratio incorrectly, or, evaluate the constant incorrectly, which wouldbe revealed from the given choices. If the class performance was not up to expectations, studentswould still get the opportunity to improve their score on the question by resubmitting the quiz[18]. If the class size is small enough, alternate and accurate assessment may be performed usinga stand-alone quiz as the Quiz No. 3 shows. As always, a prompt return of the original quiz isnecessary so that students can relearn the missed topic over the approaching weekend (seeAppendix B for a note sent to students).The relevant flow viscosity questions are preceded by understanding of dry friction first indynamics and then (with the help of strength

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erdogan Kaya, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

make it more universal. The modified instrument, as shown in Appendix B, has notbeen validated. All the questionnaire items will be translated to Vietnamese by translators. The NOEinstrument will be distributed to the Vietnamese faculty when they sign the consent form.Participants will have ample time to complete the written questionnaire. This will allowparticipants to reflect on their NOE views in-depth and relate the responses to their current workexperiences. After receiving the written responses, we will conduct a follow-up interview withthe participants to elaborate on their written responses to generate as much detail as possible ontheir NOE views. All NOE items will be used in conjunction with individual follow-upinterviews with

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Systems Thinking

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raed Jaradat, Mississippi State University; Michael Andre Hamilton, Mississippi State University; Vidanelage Lakshika Dayarathna, Mississippi State University; Sofia Karam, Mississippi State University; Parker Jones, Mississippi State University; Emily S. Wall , Mississippi State University; Safae El Amrani; Ginnie Shih En Hsu, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

analysis will be conducted infuture research to study which method has a lower impact on causing simulation sickness. Withall feedbacks and results, the remaining dimensions on the ST skills instrument will be developedas VR complex system scenarios to assess student’s system skills capacity.References[1] R. M. Jaradat, “Complex system governance requires systems thinking - how to find systems thinkers,” International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1/2, pp. 53- 70, 2015.[2] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, & D. R. Krathwohl, “Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain.” Longman Publishing Group, 1984.[3] L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A

Conference Session

STEM Issues

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony E. Sparkling, Purdue University; Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Aayushi Sinha, Purdue University; Trenton Thomas Hasser, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, and B. F. Bigelow, “Factors Impacting Hispanic High School Students and How to Best Reach Them for the Careers in the Construction Industry,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 82–98, 2016.[3] C. L. Menches and D. M. Abraham, “Women in Construction—Tapping the Untapped Resource to Meet Future Demands,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 701–707, 2007.[4] V. Francis, “What influences professional women’s career advancement in construction?,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 254–275, 2017.[5] V. Francis and A. Prosser, “Career Counselors’ Perceptions of Construction as an Occupational Choice,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2012.[6] W. Ahmed

Conference Session

Transfer and Transitions

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Surendra K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Franz Allen Foltz, Rochester Institute of Technology; James E Moon, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Roy W Melton, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Michael Kuhl, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Daniel P. Johnson, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); James Lee, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Rob Garrick, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

mostinteresting results from this survey came in the section concerning their 2-year programs as theysupport the need of the VTAB grant. Most of the students always planned to go to a 4-yearschool after completing their 2-year program (22 out of 23 respondents or 96% of the secondcohort, which was almost identical to the 22 out of 24 respondents or 92% for the first cohort).Question #5 of the online survey asked, “What were your main reasons for enrolling in the 2-Year school instead of a 4-Year college or university? (Check all that apply): (a) Academicreasons, (b) Financial reasons, (c) Personal reasons, and (d) Other reasons.” Figure 1 presents abar chart of responses to this question from each of the two cohorts.What were your main reasons for

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Mathematics in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Claudia Morello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Mathematics

. Long is a native of Dayton, OH. He is a proud graduate of Dayton Public Schools and Wright STEPP - Wright State University’s Science, Technology, and Engineering Preparatory Program (STEPP). Dr. Long’s research interests include: (a) students’ technology use, (b) diversity and inclusion, as well as (c) student retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. He has helped to lead research, funded by the NCAA Innovations in Research and Practice Grant, to improve the well- being of the student-athlete. Dr. Long has also assisted with research, funded by NSF, to study factors that broaden minority student participation and success in STEM fields. He has conducted and published research

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Edward E. Anderson, Texas Tech University; John Richard Schumacher, Texas Tech University; Hani Dulli; David Lamp, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

their curricula.3.2 MaterialsThe materials consisted of two forms (Form A and Form B) of a paper-pencil survey consistingof 22 5-point Likert questions concerning strategies and confidence while solving word problems(Q3-Q24), followed by ten background questions (Q25-Q35). The five Likert options wereNever, Rarely, Sometimes, Most of the Time, Always. The five Likert options for Question 25(Familiar) and Question 26 (Interest) were Not at All, Marginally, Somewhat, Very, Extremely.The questions are shown in Table 1. Form A and Form B differed only in the random order inwhich the 22 questions were presented. The background questions were always presented at theend of the survey and in the same order on both forms. Written instructions at the top

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Horst Brandes, University of Hawaii; Eric L. Flicker, Pennoni Associates Inc.; Kelly Dooley P.E., American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

acceptable graduate-level or upper-level undergraduate courses in a specializedtechnical area and/or professional practice area related to civil engineering.” In response, Policy465 was modified in 2010 to include similar language, calling for: a. a baccalaureate degree in civil engineering b. a master’s degree in engineering, or no less that 30 coordinated graduate or upper level undergraduate technical and/or professional practice credits or the equivalent agency/organization/professional society courses which have been reviewed and approved as providing equal academic quality and rigor with at least 50 percent being engineering in nature c. appropriate experience based upon broad technical and professional practice

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Systems Thinking

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra M. Degen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Marsha Lovett, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

] Rehmann, C. R., Rover, D. T., Laingen, M., Mickelson, S. K., and Brumm, T. J., 2011,"Introducing systems thinking to the Engineer of 2020," ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.[9] Yurtseven, M. K., 2000, "Teaching Systems Thinking to Industrial Engineering Students,"International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, pp. 655-659.[10] Jain, R., Sheppard, K., McGrath, E., and Gallois, B., 2009, "Promoting systems thinking inengineering and pre-engineering students," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin,TX.[11] Monat, J., and Gannon, T., 2018, "Applying Systems Thinking to Engineering and Design,"Systems, 6(3), p. 34.[12] Simoni, M., Andrijcic, E., Kline, B., and Bernal, A., 2016, "Helping

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, Virginia Tech; Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering education practices through interdisciplinary research and scholarship. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 6.Bennett, J. B. (1998). Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, and the Common Good. Oryx Press: Phoenix, AZ.Cech, E. A. (2013). Ideological wage inequalities? The technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering. Social Forces, 91(4), 1147-1182.DiMaggio, P. & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 93-118.Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Social studies of science, 30(5), 759-792.Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities

Conference Session

PCEE Resource Exchange

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina Anlynette Alston, Rice University; Carolyn Nichol, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

waterproofing materials on their hydrophobic testing sheet.3. Students will devise two ways to waterproof their chosen material. Students must develop a written plan for both methods. Students must modify and label at least two approaches Material A and Material B.4. Students will engineer and modify their 2 surfaces.5. Teams will then observe and diagram the drop profile/contact angle of a drop of water on their modified surface. a. Place a drop of water on the surface. b. Look at the drop from the side and sketch the drop profile or your worksheet. *Additional steps on full online versionWrap UpStudents will reflect upon their designs and test results. They will choose a spokesperson to communicate their results and futureimprovements

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jinjushang Chen, Florida State University; Jeannine E. Turner, Florida State University; Min Tang, College of Education, Learning and Cognition Program,Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, or believed they eventually would understand them on their own.Table 1 Researchers’ definitions and range of acceptable answers for each of the dimensionsTable 2 Mean cognitive validity scores by items Item Related Coherent Global Sum a Interpretation Elaboration a Response a Score b Source of Knowledge 1.17 1.2 1.5 3.87 Source of Knowledge 2 1.67 1.6 1.6 4.87 Justification for Knowing 1.3 1.43 1.83 4.57 Simplicity of Knowledge 1 0.83 1.27

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Reza Hassanzadeh Gorakhki, Colorado State University; Daniel W. Baker Ph.D., P.E., Colorado State University; Stephanie F. Pilkington, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

instruction (with < 10% active learning during the class session) and tworelated homework problems per topic. For the flipped sessions, students watched recordedlectures before class. Each topic had a <20 minute overview video plus an example video whichwere recorded lectures from the same instructor and then edited to present online. Students wereminimally introduced to the in-class activity before dividing into 2-4 person groups to createMindstorms Lego systems to manipulate and evaluate rigid-body motion systems. Two teachingassistants and one grader helped students during Section A flipped session and the instructor anda teaching assistant answered students’ questions during Section B flipped session. As part of thein-class activity, each

Conference Session

Student Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee M. Desing, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

Paper ID #27054Board 131: Methods for Assessing the Impact of Counterfactual Thinking onthe Career Motivation of Practicing Women EngineersMs. Renee Desing, Ohio State University Renee Desing is currently a graduate student at the Ohio State University in the Department of Engi- neering Education. Ms. Desing holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. Most recently, Ms. Desing worked as a managing consultant for IBM Public Sector Advanced Analytics. c American

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University; Francis (Mac) Haas, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

thermodynamic analysis of engineering processes and cycles. Recognizing the need toquickly and effectively introduce thermodynamic properties of water and at the same timereinforce the fundamentals, a new instructional approach was implemented. The approach reliedon targeted videos to (a) make the transition from ideal gas model to water properties seem lessdisconnected and (b) convey state relationships in a visual form, namely property charts. Twoseparate videos on ideal gases and water were produced with a clear overlap related to realfluids. Both videos used property charts to visualize the thermodynamic property relationships.After students watched the videos outside the lecture period, a short lecture was dedicated to themechanics of property

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas C Williams, University of Louisiana; Aimee Barber, University of Louisiana at Lafayette; Peter Sheppard, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

innovation through the application ofbiomimicry and design thinking in a maker context and (b) evaluating models for deepeningpreservice teachers’ pedagogical knowledge for supporting student learning in maker-centeredclassrooms. This National Science Foundation (NSF) Improving Undergraduate STEMEducation (IUSE) funded project, just ending year 1 of a 2-year project, was in response to anNSF Dear Colleague Letter calling for EAGER proposals to conduct exploratory work withrespect to STEM learning and design thinking.Maker-centered LearningMaker-centered learning, an infusing of many of the practices and ethos of the maker movementinto education, provides a framework for developing in teachers and students the mindsets,habits of mind, and process of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacey L. Vaziri, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Liesl M. Baum, Virginia Tech; Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech ; Phyllis Leary Newbill, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

southwest regions ofVirginia, or regions 6 and 7 as defined by the Virginia Department of Education (see Figure 3). Figure 3. Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) Superintendent’s RegionsFocus groupsWe conducted seven focus groups with a total of 21 students in Year 1. The focus groupquestions aimed to understand (a) how and why participants chose to enroll in college generallyand major in engineering specifically, (b) the community-level factors that influenced theirdecision, and (c) general perceptions in their communities regarding college and engineeringcareers as well as who should/should not pursue such aspirations. Focus groups not onlyprovided rich data to begin exploring RQ1, but also informed the sampling process and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

that would form the basis of the typology presented in this study. Each theme was comprised of multiple codes or elements that added nuance or clarity to the overarching theme.4. Checking themes – We cross-compared themes and their underlying elements to ensure (a) similar aspects were grouped together and (b) themes conveyed different types of student learning related to innovation. Thus, themes were checked intrinsically by asking, “Is this an accurate depiction of the comprising elements and critical incidents?” Themes were also checked holistically by asking, “Does this comprehensively describe the learning apparent across the elements and critical incidents?”5. Building narratives – This step further described the themes in

Conference Session

Computing Research II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Rafiq Muqri, DeVry University, Pomona; Eliezer Ochoa Jr.; Joshua David De Piano; Michael G. Milford; Alan Moses Galvan; Alireza Kavianpour, DeVry University, Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

Science, vol. 22, no. 1, p.48-54, 2013.[8] Arduino Programming Certification Course, https://www.brainmeasures.com/certifications/1113/arduino- programming-certification.aspx[9] Thermoelectric Materials: Principles, Structure, Properties, and Applications, https://www.academia.edu/5923459/[10] Ssennoga T., Zhu J., Yan Y., Li B., " A comprehensive review of thermoelectric technology Materials: Principles, Structure, Properties and Applications", Elsevier Science.[11] BCS, Incorporated, "Waste Heat Recovery:Technology and Opportunities in U.S. Industry," U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial Technologies Program (ITP), United States of America

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maeve Drummond Oakes, CISTAR at Purdue University; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Maryanne Sydlik, Western Michigan University; Kristin M. Everett, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

rate their confidence in their abilityto complete activities related to engineering research on a scale of 1-5, with 1 = Low Confidenceand 5 = High Confidence. The nine activities they were asked to rate their confidence on were: a. Talk about science and engineering b. Read and use engineering and scientific literature. c. Write about science and engineering d. Generate a hypothesis e. Formulate a scientific argument from evidence. f. Design an experiment g. Analyze and interpret data h. Write a report based on an experiment. i. Pursue engineering as a career.Participants were also asked about their confidence on these items on the post-surveyadministered at the end of the six-week summer program. Paired