-impact academicdeliverables is a way to feed the fire of their own creativity.References[1] E. Swartz, R. Striker, M. Pearson, L. Singelmann, and E. Alvarez Vazquez, “Innovation Based Learning on a Massive Scale,” in 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 2019.[2] J. W. Thomas, “A review of research on project-based learning,” 2000.[3] W. B. Gudykunst, Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Sage, 2004.[4] R. Striker, M. Pearson, E. Swartz, L. Singelmann, and E. A. Vazquez, “21st Century Syllabus: Aggregating Electronic Resources for Innovation-Based Learning,” in 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 2019, pp. 75–78, doi: 10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939640.[5] E. Alvarez Vazquez
accreditation purposes depends on a myriad of activities. Areview of both best practices as well as common pitfalls and shortcomings can focus effortsthroughout the accreditation cycle. In addition, targeted decisions prior to the development of aself-study can promote the success of accreditation review.References[1] C. Bern, B. Steward, A. Kaleita-Forbes, S. Mickelson, and T. Brumm, T, “Abet Is Coming!Getting Faculty Involved.” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 2005.[2] B. Christe, and E. Cooney, E, “Meet the ABET “Student Work Sample” requirements:Document student learning.” in American Society of Engineering Education Annual ConferenceProceedings, Austin, TX, June 2009.[3
by McGraw Hill on a trial basis. Only eight students, all of whom were advisees of one of the authors of this manuscript, were strongly encouraged to enroll in ALEKS. Of these eight, one student received 93% on the pre-test and rightly opted to not participate in the module. Two never attempted the module, while the remaining five took the pre-test and received a score ranging between 56% and 78%. Two of these students never took any additional steps beyond the pre-test. Three students stayed with the module throughout the semester. By the end of the semester, the pre-calculus grade and the GPA of these three students ranged from to B- to A, and to 2.69 to 3.75, respectively. In future offerings of ALEKS, we must find
, findings, conclusions andrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] J. Roy, Engineering by the numbers. Engineering College Profiles & Statistics ASEE, 2019.[2] N. Dlodlo and R. N. Beyers, “The experience of girls in a fabrication engineering environment,” Gender Technol. Develop., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 127-135, 2009.[3] APS Physics, Bachelor’s degrees earned by African Americans, by major. https://www.aps.org/programs/education/statistics/aamajors.cfm accessed Nov 24, 2019.[4] A. A. Bergerson, B. K. Hotchkins, and C. Furse, “Outreach and identity development: new perspectives on college student persistence,” J. College Stud. Retention, vol
, collusion is the act of collaborating with one or more students or others on coursework when the professor has not expressly approved collaboration or group work on the assignment. 3. True or False: Hiring someone to write your paper or complete some other assignment is an example of impersonation. 4. Which of the following situations were included in the handbook as examples of cheating? (Select all that apply.) a. Copying from the examination or quiz of another student b. Using classroom notes, messages, or crib sheets in any format which gives the student extra help on the exam or quiz, and which are not approved by the instructor of the class c
policies within one’s courses, and assignments that are designed to focus on studentsincrementally developing their skills rather than large-stakes assessments, instructors andinstitutions have the power to prevent dishonest behaviors among their students.References[1] T. L. Giluk and B. E. Postlethwaite, “Big five personality and academic dishonesty: a meta- analytic review,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 72, pp.59-67, Aug. 2014.[2] L. W. Thompson, J. H. Bagby, T. N. Sulak, J. Sheets, and T. M. Trepinski, “The cultural elements of academic honesty,” Journal of International Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, p.136+, Jan./Feb. 2017.[3] J. Payan, J. Reardon, and D. E. McCorkle, “The effect of culture on the academic honesty
results on sustainabilitysystems-thinking skills will be presented. The sustainability interventions in the courseinclude (i) just-in-time lectures to introduce sustainability concepts (ii) technology-in-social contexts activities intended to help students understand how social context caninfluence the success or failure of an engineering design and (iii) contextualized studentprojects, which include (a) individual projects that address wasteful human behavior andenvironmental sustainability in product designs and (b) team projects that address social,environmental and economic sustainability aspects in designing large engineeringstructures.The assessment plan includes an investigation of students’ a) perceptions of thesustainability-related
Mentoring Relationship,” Commun. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 309–334, Oct. 2012.[19] C. M. Ruud, E. S. Saclarides, C. E. George-Jackson, and S. T. Lubienski, “Tipping Points: Doctoral Students and Consideration of Departure,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–22, 2016.[20] B. J. Barnes, “The nature of exemplary doctoral advisors' expectations and the ways they may influence doctoral persistence," vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 323–343, 2010.[21] C. G. P. Berdanier, C. Whitehair, A. Kirn, and D. Satterfield, “Analysis of Social Media Forums to Elicit Narratives of Graduate Engineering Student Attrition,” J. Eng. Educ
o o S ee F Th ng t se t k i b u rin e a D anc t bs
discipline. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of ProTA mentorsby investigating student achievement outcomes of students working on similar projects beforeand after inclusion of the ProTA professionals.Student-level data was collected for 556 students over the two-semester study period and studentdata included information on (a) grade distribution reports, and (b) failure rates, The data wasused to answer three primary research objectives: 1) Did ProTA-mentored students experiencehigher grades and lower failure rates than students mentored by graduate students from theprevious year? 2) Did ProTA-mentored students experience higher grades and lower failurerates than students mentored by faculty mentors from the previous year? 3) When
can successfullyintroduce students to industrial systems engineering through a positive and educational learningexperience.References[1] B. M. Capobianco, H. A. Diefes-Dux, I. B. Mena, and J. Weller, “What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 304–328, 2011.[2] K. P. Brannan and P. C. Wankat, “Survey of first-year programs,” in 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, 2005, p. 410.[3] R. J. Freuler, A. W. Fentiman, J. T. Demel, R. J. Gustafson, and J. A. Merrill, “Developing and implementing hands-on laboratory exercises and design projects for first year engineering students,” in American Society for
large rocket (B&D model) powered by a D12-5 engineand small rocket (Skytrax model) powered by a B6-4 engine. Each rocket can also be powered byother engines that have higher or lower impulse ratings. Figure 8 shows some of the large rocketsduring the launch mass recording process. Figure 10 shows a large (left) rocket and a small (right)rocket during the lift-off stage. Each rocket was fitted by an altimeter to collect flight data. Figure9 shows the altimeter and its insertion under the nose cone of the large rocket. The large rocketdoes not have a dedicated payload section and the altimeter was hung under the nose cone. InFigure 10 (right), altimeter can be seen inside the payload section of the small rocket.Figure 8. Some of the large (B
its portable small size with high performance computing. Besides, it includes other attractivefeatures such as networking, I/O port, Wi-Fi, and etc. In this section, we will introduceRaspberry Pi in terms of specification, features, requirements, and its application fields.2.1 Introducing Raspberry PiRaspberry Pi was developed by Raspberry Pi Foundation based in United Kingdom (UK) to helppeople to teach and learn basic Computer Science with low cost high-performance computer.Raspberry Pi is low cost, credit-card sized computer introduced in 2012 as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Raspberry Pi 3 B plusInitially two models are developed, Model A and Model B in Raspberry Pi version 1. Thedifference of two models
. The benefits of peer mentoring and PLAs span more than just the outcomes of thestudents taking the targeted course. Many studies [11, 12] have emphasized the benefits to thementors, the mentees, professors, and the university.It is important to differentiate a PLA, in this work, from normal TAs. The PLAs role is to helpstudents with all aspects of a course, including homework, exams, labs, and project work. Theydo not grade student work. PLAs are undergraduate students who have taken the course inquestion and performed reasonably well (usually A and B grade students.) Selection for the PLAposition is usually based on the student’s ability to communicate and their drive to help otherslearn. Table 1 illustrates the basic differences of the two
le er M Jo itl Ri Lu Ph Lil To h h Alb a B S C K Diverging Converging Accommodating Figure 1. Preferred learning style by genderWhile the findings of this study allude to an apparent prevalence of the diverging style in aninternship, this study lacked sufficient number of participants to make a statistical judgement.Future study is needed to understand statistical significance of student learning style
spectrum. This becomes important if the sample is not homogeneous. The FTIRmicroscope resolves this issue and allow us to view the sample two-dimensional image andchoose the pixels at which we need to evaluate the spectra. The OPUS software controls theFTIR system and allow us to choose the pixels on a line, single data points or a grid of pixels(chemical image). The resolution of the IR image depends on the selected grid size. Figure 2. a) The FTIR Invenio-R research and development spectrometer. b) The ATR unit of the spectrometer. Figure 3. The Hyperion 2000 FTIR microscopeUse of the equipment in Digital Image Processing courseDigital Image Processing is one of the
Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. Educ. Stat. Q. 2, 59–60 (2000).8. Kokkelenberg, E. C. & Sinha, E. Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students. Econ. Educ. Rev. 29, 935–946 (2010).9. Geisinger, B. N. & Raman, D. R. Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. This Artic. is from Int. J. Eng. Educ. 29, 1–12 (2013).10. Jensen, L. & Konradsen, F. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2018). doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9676-011. Freina, L. & Ott, M. A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art
grant from the National Science Foundation (Award # EEC-1730576). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors are grateful to Catherine McGough and Rachel Lanning fortheir assistance in collecting and analyzing survey data.References[1] W. Sarasua, N. Kaye, J. Ogle, N. Benaissa, L. Benson, B. Putman and A. Pfirman, “Engaging Civil Engineering Students Through a ‘Capstone-like’ Experience in their Sophomore Year.” Proceedings of the 2020 Annual American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition, Virtual Conference, June 21 – 24, 2020.[2] Ogle, J.H., Bolding
; Bird B-KER2 Laboratory Jars and Masterflex Tygon lab tubing toconnect both, one student holds the reservoir at a fixed location simulating a water source suchas a natural spring, lake, or river, and another student adjusts the elevation of the tap stand usinga simulated gate valve from the sampling port of the laboratory jar. As the tap stand locationremains lower than the location of the reservoir, students can notice water continuing to flow asthe third student is responsible for turning the tap stand valve on and off. However, as soon asthe location of the tap stand is higher than the location of the reservoir, water flow stops. Thus,students realize that the location of the outflow must be lower than the location of the inflowassuming
Indicators of ‘Yield’ From Mixed Methods Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147-163. [8] Mark, M. M. (2015). Mixed and multimethods in predominantly quantitative studies, especially experiments and quasi-experiments. In S. Hesse-Biber & B. Johnson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. (p. 21-41). New York: Oxford University Press. [9] Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133. [10] Reeping, D., Taylor, A. R., Knight, D. B., & Edwards, C. (2019). Mixed methods analysis strategies in program evaluation beyond “a little quant here, a little qual
. Dev., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 223–236, 2005.[3] E. A. Linnenbrink and P. R. Pintrich, "Motivation as an enabler for academic success," School Psych. Rev., vol. 31, no. 3, p. 313, 2002.[4] A. C. Koenka, L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, H. Moshontz, K. M. Atkinson, C. E. Sanchez, and H. Cooper, "A meta-analysis on the impact of grades and comments on academic motivation and achievement: a case for written feedback," Educ. Psychol., pp. 1–22, 2019.[5] R. E. Clark and B. Saxberg, "Engineering motivation using the belief-expectancy-control framework," Interdiscip. Educ. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2018.[6] M. Bong, "Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs," J
, Environmental Protection Agency, 10 May 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions- typical-passenger-vehicle.4. Sindhuja, B. (2014). A Proposal for Implementation of Wind Energy Harvesting System in Trains. Proceedings of The 2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Energy and Communication (CIEC), 2014, doi:10.1109/ciec.2014.6959180.5. Dwyer Instruments (2017). Model VT-300 Miniature Vane Thermo-Anemometer. Model VT-300 | Miniature Vane Thermo-Anemometer Measures Air Velocity, Air Volume, Temperature, and Humidity inside Air Ducts. Application in HVAC. www.dwyer- inst.com/Product/TestEquipment/VaneThermo-Anemometer/ModelVT- 300/Google
change in university STEM education (No. arXiv: 1412.3037).Sarabia-Cobo, C. M., Sarabia-Cobo, A. B., Pérez, V., Hermosilla, C., Nuñez, M. J., & de Lorena, P. (2015). Barriers in implementing research among registered nurses working in the care of the elderly: a multicenter study in Spain. Applied Nursing Research, 28(4), 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APNR.2015.03.003Steering Committee of the National Engineering Education Research Colloquies (2006). Special report: The research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 259–261.Subcommittee of Education Reform, U.S. Congress, U. S. H. of R. (2002). From research to practice: Improving America’s schools
,” Presented at Open 2017, Washington, D.C.,March 2017.[20] B. Roughani, “Bridging Scientific Thinking with Innovation and Entrepreneurial Mindset,”Presented at Open 2017, Washington, D.C., March 2017.[21] W. Deconinck, “Innovation and Entrepreneurship at a Liberal Arts University,” Presented atOpen 2017, Washington D.C., March 2017.[22] C. Bailey, W. Deconinck, J. Gardiner, A. Newman, “Enabling Equity and Inclusion throughInterdisciplinary Innovation,” Planned Session at Open 2020, Salt Lake City, UT, March 2020.[23] A. Leak, C. Cammarota, B. Zwickl, “Physics students’ perceptions about seven aspects ofinnovation and entrepreneurship,” presented at Physics Education Research Conference (PERC)2018, Washington D.C., July 2018.[24] B. Roughani, R. S
to its focus on accreditation, ABET defines educational programs by describing thecurriculum requirements for each major. For example, the description provided in Section II:Program Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs [3] for programs containingelectrical and/or electronic(s) or other similar titles is: …prepare graduates to have competence in the following curricular areas: (a) the application of circuit analysis and design, computer programming, associated software, analog and digital electronics, and microcomputers, and engineering standards to the building, testing, operation, and maintenance of electrical/electronic(s) systems; (b) the application of natural sciences and mathematics at or
sections: (a) Introduction, (b) Assignment 1, (c) Assignment 2, (d),Assignment 3. The introduction is meant to provide students with a background on theassignment by placing them in an engineering scenario. The shortened version of theintroduction narrative states: As a new hire at FutureX, you are expected to design and develop systems that you yourself may not use or are familiar with. As an engineer, you are aware the most effective measurement of success for any engineered product is user satisfaction. For engineered products to be successful, they must accurately fulfill the requirements of the product’s stakeholders and create value…. A prominent example of this is the design and development of biomedical
Paper ID #28666Implementing Serial Communication for the Instructional ProcessorDr. Ronald J. Hayne, The Citadel Ronald J. Hayne is a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The Citadel. He received his B.S. in Computer Science from the United States Military Academy, his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Arizona, and his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Dr. Hayne’s professional areas of interest include digital systems design and hardware de- scription languages. He is a retired Army Colonel with experience in academics and Defense
poster.FundingThis project is funded by the National Science Foundation under Award XXX- XXXXXX. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] N. Veurink and A. Hamlin, "Spatial Visualization Skills: Impact on Confidence and Success in an Engineering Curriculum," presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/18591.[2] E. Towle, J. Mann, B. Kinsey, E. J. O. Brien, C. F. Bauer, and R. Champoux, "Assessing the self efficacy and spatial ability of engineering students from multiple disciplines," in
(detailed below). The secondworkshop will repeat this model (specified below) in order to iterate upon ideas generated in thefirst workshop.Workshop 1: Part A: Inspiration (the Discovery Section) - A Human Centred Design Approach will be used for mind-mapping. In this mind-mapping exercise, the goal is to use divergent thinking framework, allowing the faculty to explore variety of issues they face or are aware of in context of engineering teaching. Further, we will use Cause-Effect Analysis, Stakeholder Mapping and Problem Statement Building that allows our key stakeholder participants (i.e. engineering faculty) to explore barriers for adopting best practices in teaching and learning. Part B: Ideation – Creative Thinking will be used
, B., & Kay, R. (2016). The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 347-361.9. Pasupathy, R., & Siwatu, K. O. (2014). An investigation of research self-efficacy beliefs and research productivity among faculty members at an emerging research university in the USA. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 728-741.10. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2009). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century (Vol. 11). John Wiley & Sons.11. Eagan Jr, M. K., & Garvey, J. C. (2015). Stressing out: Connecting race, gender, and stress with faculty