. Patel, “Reverse Engineering self-Modifying Code: Unpacker Extraction,”IEEE 17th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (pp.131-140). October, 2010, Beverly,Massachusetts. [11] E. Eilam, Reversing: Secrets of Reverse Engineering, Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc.,2005.[12] B. Dang, A. Gazet, and E. Bachaalany, Practical Reverse Engineering, Indianapolis, IN: WileyPublishing, Inc., 2014.[13] A. Mourad, M. Debbabi and M.A. Laverdière, “Security hardening of open source software,”International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust: Bridge the Gap Between PSTTechnologies and Business Services (pp. 2-4). Ontario: ACM.[14] B. Scarlett, “8 Reasons Why Hardening Sprints Are Truly Necessary.” Sagepath, July 6, 2017.Available: https
assessments," Teacher Education and Special Education, vol. 29, pp. 261-274, 2006.[4] Q. Hang and K. Rabren, "An Examination of Co-Teaching: Perspectives and Efficacy Indicators," Remedial and Special Education, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 259-268, 2009.[5] T. Moorehead and K. Grillo, "Celebrating the Reality of Inclusive STEM Education: Co-Teaching in Science and Mathematics," Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 50-57, 2013.[6] J. D. Orlander, M. Gupta, B. G. Fincke, M. E. Manning and W. Hershman, "Co‐ teaching: a faculty development strategy," Medical Education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 257- 265, 2000.[7] C. Rasmussen and J. Ellis, "Who is Switching out of Calculus and Why?," in Proceedings of the 37th Conference of
., & Bundy, C. (2012). School-university partnership. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 83(9), 1 5-35, doi: 10.1080/07303084.2012.10598841Hoppey, D. (2016). Developing educators for inclusive classrooms through a rural school- university partnership. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(1), 13-22. doi: 10.1177/875687051603500103Jesiek, B. K., Mazzurco, A., Buswell, N. T., & Thompson, J. D. (2018). Boundary spanning and engineering: A qualitative systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 380–413. doi: 10.1002/jee.20219Johri, A. (2008, October). Boundary spanning knowledge broker: An emerging role in global engineering firms. In 2008 38th Annual
engineering practice. Because STS is an interdisciplinary field, STScourses are intrinsically integrative and allow the school to provide efficient instruction. At the time of our most recent accreditation visit in 2016, ABET required thatengineering degree programs demonstrate that students are competent with respect to 11educational outcomes, only three of which are not developed or assessed in STS courses: (a) anability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, (b) an ability to design andconduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, and (c) an ability to design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs. Outcomes d-j, listed in Figure 2 below, aredeveloped and assessed in STS courses. The
internal multi-1 With adoption of America Invents Act and change from First to Invent to First to File some individuals believe thatkeeping a paper-based notebook may provide more sustentative evidence in the event of legal proceedings.[10]week review cycle that involves waves of feedback from the instructional staff as well as thetechnical mentors. This cycle creates an opportunity multiple times per semester for students toengage in dialogue directly with project mentors before submission to guarantee the highest qualityend result.Each major design document is graded on a 5-point scale in which numerical scores are equivalentto: 5 = A+, 4 = A, 3 = B, 2 = C,1 = D, and 0 = F. The first draft of an Implementation Pre-Tripplan is externally reviewed
must gain proficiency in. In order to earna particular grade, the student must successfully complete parts according to the schedule shown intable 1 below: Required Number of Accepted Desired Grade Parts from Each Bin A 12 – 14 B 9 – 11 C 6–8 D 3–5 F 2 or less Table 1: Part Thresholds per GradeDeadlines are used at the
course, the authors start with a definition of ethics as a set of moral principles and cyberethics as a set of "moral principles relative to IT systems, technologies, and digital media." Wedefine “cyber” as pertaining to cyberspace. We adopt the United States Department of Defensedefinition of cyberspace as A global domain within the information environment consisting of the interdependent networks of information technology infrastructures and resident data, including the Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers. [23]We build from these definitions as a class by discussing how (a) the acceptable behavior in thereal world is also acceptable in cyberspace, (b) examples
Students obtain knowledge and skill in the consumption, design, and execution of advanced research in technology management and their area of specialization Students demonstrate knowledge of academic units and faculty roles in technology study programs in higher education.Admission of a student to the Consortium-Based Ph.D. in Technology Management Program isbased upon the attainment or completion of: a) A Master's degree in a relevant field from an accredited university. b) A graduate grade index of 3.5 on a 4.0 scale. c) The Graduate Record Examination (GRE) or Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) taken within 5 years of application—scores should be competitive, with no minimum score specified. d) Five
University after this experience b) I was challenged by the academics of this program c) The teachers/professors were knowledgeable d) Your interest in the subject matter has increased as a result of this course As stated previously, the pre-college programs are fairly new at Northeastern University,thus only limited data from the past two years (2018 and 2019) was considered as shown belowin Figure 3. Secondly, not all program participants who receive the survey complete it. Based onthe data used for the study, the average number of survey responses across all pre-collegeprograms to the various questions in the survey were 80 and 73 responses for 2018 and 2019,respectively. The average number of responses specific to EID during the
Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World. New York: Riverhead Books, 2019. [3] A.P. Carnevale, B. Cheah, M. Van Der Werf, A First Try at ROI: Ranking 4,500 Colleges, Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, 2020, [Online.] Available: https://cew.georgetown.edu/roi-of-liberal-arts-colleges-coverage-by- report/ [Accessed: 22-Jan-2020]. [4] T.T. Tuyett, “What Shapes the Passiveness in Learning of Vietnamese Students”, VNU Journal of Education Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp.71-83, 2013. [5] C. Bonwell, J. Eison, “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom”, AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass, 1991. [6] M. Marrone
building blocks as a prerequisite for building agrasp of larger-scale system design issues.The authors actively seek collaborations on projects such as this. All of our designs are opensource, and we will provide full manufacturing and course materials.References[1] H. C. Powell and B. Hayt, “Developing a Low-voltage Microgrid for Experiments in Renewable Energy Distribution,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018, Accessed: Feb. 01, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-a-low-voltage-microgrid-for-experiments-in-renewable- energy-distribution.[2] “Power Management.” https://university.ti.com/en/faculty/teaching-materials-and- classroom-resources/ti-based-teaching-kits-for
reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press, 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ, 1990.9. P. J. Fensham, Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research, Vol. 20, Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.10. Thorsten Bell, Detlef Urhahne, Sascha Schanze, and Rolf Ploetzner, “Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, Tools, and Challenges,” International Journal of Science Education, 32 (03), pp.349-377, 2010.11. B. Morgan, “Research impact: Income for outcome,” Nature, 511(7510), pp. S72–S75, 2014.12. G. Cohen, J. Schroeder, R. Newson, L. King, L. Rychetnik, and A. J. Milat, “Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: Testing a new
quantity. The week 6 column has the last large/red sticky note on the game board;this is the blanket purchase order representing a total quantity ordered to supply Weeks 6 – 10.Students then issued “purchase order releases against the blanket” beginning with Week 6,represented by the smaller pink sticky notes. In addition, the game moderator added yellow [B]sticky notes to represent a “bill of lading” for the supplier shipment, and yellow [I] sticky notesrepresenting the “invoice” from supplier to customer. Student teams posted payment the sameway it was done in the first half of the game. The additional forms were explained during theWeek 5 break, along with communicating that the blockchain sticky notes, while placed on thegame board, are
constituents. The ProgramEducational Outcomes for associate and baccalaureate degree programs (ABET-ETAC) areoutlined in Table II. Table II. Program Educational Objectives (PEO’s) for Associate and Baccalaureate degrees (8) Associate Degree Programs Baccalaureate Degree Programs PEO a. Application of principles of geometric Application of principles of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing. dimensioning and tolerancing. b. Use of computer aided drafting and design Use of computer aided drafting and design software. software. c. Selection, set-up, and calibration of measurement Perform
to create a repository with the results of thisand all subsequent projects and the ongoing test data to enable future teams of students to confidentlydevelop solutions and to enable faculty to organize and manage such projects.13References1. S. Murugesan, and I. Bojanova, "Encyclopedia of Cloud Computing", ISBN:9781118821978, Wiley,2016.2. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017-2022 White Paper,https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html3. S. T. Faraj Al-Janabi, A. Shehab, "Edge Computing: Review and Future Trends", ResearchGate (2019)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335858067_Edge_Computing_Review_and_Future_Directions4. B. Varghese, R
structuredtraining and mentoring will help current and future selectors develop these new skills in a moresystematic way than was possible in the past.References[1] K. Jensen, “No More Liaisons: Collection Management Strategies in Hard Times,” Collection Management, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3-14, January 2008, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2016.1263812[2] B. Mehra, and A. Elder, “Benefits to Collection Development Librarians from Collaborating with “Community-Embedded” Librarians-In-Training,” Collection Management, vol. 43, no. 2, pp.120-137, February 2018, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1426510[3] C. C. Wray, “Learning Collection Development and Management on the Job,” Collection Management, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 107-114, May 2016, doi
strategies, students have the option of selecting an evidence-based strategy notincluded on the list with permission from the instructor.Once a topic is selected, students seek out and utilize high quality sources to research theirstrategy and create two, and only two, presentation slides about the topic. Sources are deemedhigh quality when originating from an institution or organization and containing relevant, currentevidence to support claims that are made. The slides (Appendix B) must include why the topic issignificant or relevant, tips for applying the strategy, and potential cautions or challenges. Thesmall number of required slides is enforced in an attempt to support critical thinking as studentsare required to be selective in determining
man and machine," Communications of the ACM, vol. 9, pp. 36-45, 1966.[12] D. Fossati, B. Di Eugenio, S. Ohlsson, C. Brown and L. Chen, "Data driven automatic feedback generation in the iList intelligent tutoring system," Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, vol. 10, pp. 5-26, 2015.[13] G. Biswas, K. Leelawong, D. Schwartz, N. Vye and The Vanderbilt Teachable Agents Group, "Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software," Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 19, pp. 363-392, 2005.[14] S. Brophy, G. Biswas, T. Katzlberger, J. Bransford and D. Schwartz, "Teachable agents: Combining insights from learning theory and computer science," in Artificial intelligence in education, 1999.[15
. Dym, A. Agogino, O. Eris, and D. Frey, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching and Learning,” J. Eng., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[2] W. L. Neeley, S. Sheppard, and L. Leifer, “Design is design is design (or is it?): What we say vs. what we do in engineering design education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2006.[3] C. J. Atman, O. Eris, J. McDonnell, M. E. Cardella, and J. L. Borgford-Parnell, “Engineering Design Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 201–226.[4] S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, and W. M. Sullivan, Educating engineers : designing for the future of the field
mindset,2) providing opportunities to develop essential troubleshooting skills of hardware and softwareprograms, 3) encouraging programming multilingualism and 4) stimulating self-learning andexploration of new hardware to foster lifelong learning skills. Our approach drew inspiration fromcomputational and system thinking while promoting programming multilingualism to betterprepare students for the engineering challenges they will encounter in the 21st century. The classis designed to achieved the following ABET outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as wellas to analyze and interpret data (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (g) an
University Press; 2015.17. Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N. A survey of serious games on sustainable development.Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC); IEEE; 2012.18. Salah B, Abidi MH, Mian SH, Krid M, Alkhalefah H, Abdo A. Virtual reality-basedengineering education to enhance manufacturing sustainability in industry 4.0. Sustainability.2019;11(5):1477.19. Stanitsas M, Kirytopoulos K, Vareilles E. Facilitating sustainability transition throughserious games: A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod. 2019;208:924-36.
://www.sciencebusiness.net/sites/default/files/archive/Assets/94fe6d15-5432-4cf9-a656-633248e63541.pdf. [Accessed 19 Jan 2020].[6] S. Kaul, G.A. Chang, PM Yanik, and CW Ferguson (2015, June), “Development of a MentorshipProgram in Engineering and Engineering Technology,” presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington.[7] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and CN Nelson (2019, June), “Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-basedLearning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences toEngineering Students,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
and Y. Zhao, “Design project based modules to promote engineering learning and retention,” The Technology Interface International Journal, Vol 11(1), 2010. 4. K. Ricks, J. Richardson, H. Stern, R. Taylor, R. Taylor, “An engineering learning community to promote retention and graduation of at-risk engineering students,” American Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 4(2), 2014.5. B. W-L. Packard, “Mentoring and retention in college science: Reflections on the sophomore year,” Journal of College Student Retention, Vol 6(3), pp. 289-300, 2004.6. L. Schreiner, “Linking student satisfaction and retention,” Noel-Levitz, pp. 1-16, 2009.7. J. Wolfe, Team Writing: a guide to working in groups, Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010.8. J. G
betterunderstanding about the function and layout of the building. Lastly, this building does not containany private areas, such as dormitory rooms, so students were allowed to examine the entirebuilding in detail. (a) ARC Building Exterior (b) Elevation - Drawing Figure 2. Images of the ARC Building (Photo Courtesy of Ohio University)The building has a gross area of 101,850 sq. ft. with five different levels: the area of the lowerlevel is 13,400 sq. ft.; the area of the 1st floor is 27,700 sq. ft.; the area of the 2nd floor is 23,750 sq.ft.; the area of the 3rd floor is 25,500 sq. ft.; and the area of the mechanical penthouse is 11,500 sq.ft.Project Team OrganizationIn order to provide a necessary
. Year 2. Nationality 3. Gender (Male, Female, Prefer not to answer) 4. High school type (International/Private or Independent) 5. Religion Questions on perspectives 1. Would you choose courses based on the gender of your professor? 2. Do you feel comfortable approaching a professor of the same gender? 3. Do you think the gender of professor affects his/her teaching style? 4. Do you feel the need for more female professor at your program? Appendix B Interview Questions 1. Do you believe that your childhood upbringing affects your perception on gender preferences on professors? Explain. 2. Do you believe the schools you have attended affects your professor’s gender
by thestudents in all the courses they take. The survey was not set up specifically for this study, butprovides insight into how the authors can frame a future study. It is, therefore, a general tool tomeasure the students’ perceptions about a course and the instructor of that course. The survey is acompound of 19 statements plus two open questions. These 19 statements are evaluated by thestudents using the following scale: 1 Never, 2 Sometimes, 3 Frequently, 4 Always. Table 1 shows (a) LCD on a smart bicycle (c) Smart door prototype (b) LED array on a smart bicycle Figure 1: Examples of projects realized by students.the
workshop on Computing education research (ICER '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97-108, 2006.[2] A. Petersen, M. Craig, J. Campbell, and A. Tafliovich, "Revisiting why students drop CS1," in Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71-80, 2016.[3] C. Watson and F. W. B. Li, "Failure rates in introductory programming revisited," in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39-44, 2014.[4] T. Beaubouef and J. Mason, "Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations," in SIGCSE Bull. 37, 2
Paper ID #29253Evaluating ABET Student Outcome (5) in a Multidisciplinary CapstoneProject SequenceDr. Nicholas A Baine P.E., Grand Valley State University Nicholas Baine, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. His expertise is in the design of electrical control systems and sensor data fusion. As an instructor, he specializes in teaching freshman courses as well as control systems and design of digital and embedded systems. While at Wright State University, he was part of the group that developed a new model to teach mathematics to engineering students. As a faculty
, 2004.[8] V. J. Shute, "Focus on formative feedback," Review of educational research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 153-189, 2008.[9] T. R. Guskey, "Reporting on student learning: Lessons from the past-Prescriptions for the future," ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT- YEARBOOK-, pp. 13-24, 1996.[10] J. B. Nyquist, "The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis," Vanderbilt University, 2003.[11] G. Smith, "How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exams?," Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 36, no. 7, p. 28, 2007.[12] J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik, "Timing of feedback and verbal learning
, no. 2, pp. 72–7, Feb. 2010.[8] C. Robinson and J. Collofello, “Utilizing Undergraduate Teaching Assisstants in Active Learning Enviornments,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2012.[9] “Grand Challenges - Grand Challenges for Engineering.” [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/. [Accessed: 03-Feb-2020].[10] Author and Autor, “Relationship Between Motivation, Contribution in a Team Project and Academic Performance in a Design Thinking Course.,” Under Review.[11] E. Roberts, J. Lilly, and B. Rollins, “Using Undergraduates as Teaching Assistants in Introductory Programming Courses: An Update on the Stanford Experience,” ACM SIGCSE Bull. 1995, 2011.[12] N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick, “Using Mixed