between gender and/or ethno-racial identity and the stereotype ofengineering as a field appropriate for white males can impede the development of STEM identities amongwomen and minorities. With the increasing importance of innovation, students who pursue engineering graduate degreesoften seek to build skills in conducting research (Brown and Linden, 2008). The social psychologicalconstruct of identity has emerged as a relatively new metric for assessing graduate student retention andsuccess. Studies suggest that graduate students’ identities correlate with their competency levels as wellas their professional and academic motivation (Alexander, 2011; Silver, Garver, and Watkins, 2011;Virgil, 2016). Importantly however, the literature
State University studying Industrial and Management Systems Engineer- ing with a focus in Aerospace. She is currently engaged in engineering leadership identity research as well as a proud member of Pi Beta Phi fraternity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing Students’ Engineering Leadership Identity: Development and Results of a Pilot Effort with First Year StudentsAbstractIn an era of scientific and engineering advancement, we need engineers who have a diversifiedskillset. More specifically, in order to solve many of the complex problems faced today, industryis calling for engineers who combine their technical expertise with leadership qualities
Community and Self-Efficacy Building of Civil Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe Citadel, a regional, residential military college, is currently engaged in a multi-year NSF S-STEMproject to encourage persistence of academically-talented, low-income civil engineering students. OurExcellence in Civil Engineering Leadership (ExCEL) scholarship program builds on a prior program (ofthe same name) that included 34 scholarship recipients, of which 85% graduated with a STEM degree and65% met the academic requirements to graduate as an ExCEL scholar [1]. The current ExCEL programseeks to retain several community-building and support services that were highly valued by our formerstudents, including: (1) funding to attend the
West Point, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and a Master of Science in Operations Research from North Carolina State University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the state of Missouri and his research interested include optimized network flow modeling, American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Napkin Sketch Pilot Study: A minute-paper reflection in pictorial formABSTRACTThis paper presents an evidence-based practice pilot study of the potential cognitive benefits ofrequiring students to create sketches that summarize course material in ways
best answer their research question, hypothesis, orpurpose of the study [1]. A mixed methods research methodology that a researcher may select isQ methodology. Q methodology is a social science research methodology focused onsystematically studying subjectivity utilizing both qualitative and quantitative researchtechniques [2]–[6]. While Q methodology has had limited use in engineering education research,it has been used in studies regarding the career paths of engineering education doctoral graduates[7], competencies for nanotechnology [8] and IT [9], curriculum design for information systems[10], construction engineering technology program assessment [11], and undergraduateengineering students’ out-of-class activities [12]. However, Q
has served as PI/Co-PI on multiple educational projects sponsored by NSF programs including NSF S-STEM, NSF GK-12, and NSF TUES.Dr. Jianyu ”Jane” Dong, California State University, Los Angeles Jianyu Dong is a professor in electrical and computer engineering and currently serves as the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at Cal State LA. Her area of expertise is video compression/communication, multimedia networks, QoS, etc. With a strong passion in Engineering Education, she has been engaged in multiple funded projects and initiatives to increase the participation and success of students from undeserved, low-income communities in engineering areas.matthew jackson PhD
participation for women.MethodsThis work presented here is part of a larger mixed-methods study, employing an exploratorysequential study design: first, qualitative data were collected and analyzed, which then informedthe development of a survey to collect quantitative data [5].Qualitative Interview AnalysisAs part of the qualitative study [4], fifteen interviews were conducted with female students,prompting them to reflect on their team project in their first-year engineering course and discusswhat contributed to their satisfaction, or dissatisfaction, with their team experience. Studentswere asked to describe their team project; discuss which tasks they performed in the project andwhether there were any tasks they wished they did more or less of; and
, their education, and their profession, and how experiences uniquely affectunderrepresented or marginalized students. Researchers have suggested that culture is especiallyimportant for women to persist in a field [23], [30]. A culture of “Engineering with Engineers”could result in graduates who not only are prepared technically and professionally with apractical, realistic understanding of what it is to be an engineer, but who also identify with andare committed to the engineering profession. Hence, results of the study are hoped to lead to aclearer understanding of the changes that promote engineering identities, particularly in women,and how such identities affect students’ sense of belonging in a program and their persistence inthe major.It
Education, 2020 Ethics in Undergraduate Construction Curricula: A Two-Stage Exploratory Sequential Approach to Developing and Piloting the HETC SurveyAbstractConstruction and construction related engineering programs (construction engineering and civilengineering) must provide ethics education to students for accreditation; however, there arelimited resources for instructors who teach ethics in these degree programs. This exploratorytwo-stage sequential research study utilizes three of Eash’s five curriculum components (content,modes of transaction, and evaluation) as the conceptual framework to understand the teaching ofethics in construction programs by developing and piloting a survey instrument
professional identity development in medical and engineering students, and formative joint display analysis on dissonance in a cultural competency study of first-year engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Exemplars of Integration in Engineering Education’s Use of Mixed Methods Research AbstractThis theory paper explores ways in which the engineering education community can achievemore comprehensive integration in mixed methods designs. We searched for exemplars in theJournal of Engineering Education, the European Journal of Engineering Education, and theAustralasian Journal of Engineering Education using “mixed-method” and “mixed
Paper ID #28898Building Early Elementary Teacher Confidence in Teaching ComputerScience Through a Low-Cost, Scalable Research-Practitioner CollaborationJustin Lee Clough, University of Southern California Justin L. Clough is a PhD student at the University of Southern California studying Mechanical Engineer- ing; his advisor is Assad A. Oberai. He received his Bachelors of Science from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Masters of Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, both in Mechanical Engineering. He holds a DOD:SMART scholarship and works closely with the AFRL/RQHV teams at Wright-Patterson
include recognition, interest, andperformance/competence. There are 11 questions total within the three constructs, including “Myinstructors see me as an engineering”; “I find fulfillment in doing engineering”; and “Iunderstand concepts I have studied in engineering.” These are assessed on a six-point scale(strongly disagree to strongly agree). Role identity is identified as a theoretical framework. Herinitial pilot study included over 300 students and the subsequent study had over 2500 studentresponses. As she concludes in her 2016 paper “The items developed to measure engineeringidentity are the first of their kind to quantitatively measure students engineering identity self-beliefs. I offer these items as a way to quickly assess and broadly
?”; and coping and help-seeking behaviors (six questions), for example, “What resourcesand support are there on campus or in your department for students who are stressed?”.Participants were asked to describe any interactions with other students and faculty regardingmental health issues and to share any other additional information about engineering-relatedstress. The interview protocol was developed from the results of a quantitative surveyadministered at the same institution in the fall of 2017, which included metrics of stress, anxiety,depression, inclusion, and engineering identity, as well as an open-ended response opportunityfor participants to share additional thoughts [8]. The interview was piloted with three participantsexternal to the
anythingwe have written about in this paper. For example, if teams of faculty and students are interestedin using our signification framework, either at their own institutions or as part of a cross-institutional study, we are open to sharing and/or collaborating. As we progress with our project,we will continue to share our experiences with SenseMaker with the engineering educationcommunity.References[1] LEES, "Welcome to the LEES website," Accessed on: 28 April, 2020Available: https://sites.asee.org/lees/[2] S. E. Van der Merwe et al., "Making Sense of Complexity: Using SenseMaker as a Research Tool," Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 25, 2019.[3] L. A. Schreiner, "Thriving in College," New Directions for Student Services, vol. 2013
engineeringprofessionals, women will need to engage and persist in engineering educational pathways. Thepurpose of this pilot qualitative case study was to examine the educational pathways andexperiences of three undergraduate women who are on track to graduate during the 2019-2020academic year a large, public university located in the southeast region of the United States. Byusing social cognitive career theory, the pilot study examined how and why three womenauthored their engineering identities through their secondary and post-secondary educationalexperiences to gain insight on their pursuit and attainment of an engineering degree and toinform a larger case study. Three themes, congruent with social cognitive career theory emergedfrom the data: eagerness to
42 54Evaluation Plan A psychology graduate student with expertise in quantitative analysis from the College ofEducation served as the program evaluator for this study under the guidance of Dr. ChuangWang, an education assessment expert and Professor in the College of Education at UNCCharlotte. The evaluation plan, which included both quantitative and qualitative assessmentinstrumentation, was developed to evaluate the educational impacts of flipping specific lectures.The skills, perceptions, and gains developed by student participants in a control group werecompared to the same data collected from the treatment group. While all quantitativeinstrumentation questions were identical for the control and treatment groups
for K-12 Engineering Education? National Academies Press.27. Museum of Science. Engineering is Elementary. Available from: http://www.eie.org/eie- curriculum.28. Massachusetts Department of Education, (2006) Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework, Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.29. Kucuk, S. and B. Sisman, (2017) “Behavioral patterns of elementary students and teachers in one- to-one robotics instruction,” Computers and Education, 111: p. 31-43.30. Liu, E.Z.-F., et al., (2013) “An analysis of teacher-student interaction patterns in a robotics course for kindergarten children: A pilot study,” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
paper also provides follow-up to a previousconference paper that was used to provide construction educators insight into andragogicalmethods used to reinforce IPD collaboration principles. The conclusions presented in theconference paper indicated that CM students at CWU tended to be non-cooperative in conflictscenarios.19In the original pilot study, it was established that as a group, the CM students at CWU variedfrom the general population, as well as several other industries, regarding conflict managementstyles.19 Although informative, it was not conclusive as each graduating class had its own set ofnorms and its own personality that develops over time. It was possible that these results differedfrom one year to the next. In addition, it was
Paper ID #29045Impact of mentor-mentee fit in preparing undergraduate STEM students toteach engineering technology for elementary studentsDr. Lei Xie, TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. Lei Xie is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Organization, Workforce, and Leadership Studies at Texas State University.Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam joined the faculty of Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M Univer- sity in 2007. Natarajarathinam received her Ph.D. in Supply Chain Management from The University of Alabama. She received her Bachelor of Engineering (Major
higher education in Liberia for approximately 11 years. He currently serves as a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at VT. His research interests are: Immi- grants in STEM, migration and immigration issues in education, and Quality Assurance.Mr. Abram Diaz-Strandberg, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020Understanding Students’ perceptions of Dimensions of Engineering Culture in EcuadorAbstractThe purpose of this study is to explore how engineering students perceive different dimensionsassociated with culture. We are using Hofstede’s theory of
has her M.A. in Counseling and taught at the undergraduate level for five years prior to beginning her doctorate. Her research areas include organizational behavior, creativity and innovation, social networks and social issues in the workplace.Dr. Carol S Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D
University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a socioeconomically just engineering education.Mr. Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University at West Lafayette Matthew Scheidt is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University with a M.S. in Me- chanical Engineering with a focus in Ultrasonic Additive
design and instructional components of flippingrather than quantitative statistical analysis of student outcomes and achievement [4]. Ofparticular note is the limited number of large-scale comparisons of student learning outcomes incourses taught simultaneously through alternative methods, with accompanying data analysis andstatistical significance, and explanation of relevance to broader educational theories [4]. Further,studies examining the effects of different implementations or components of flipped classroomstrategies are needed to solidify the effects of and best practices around flipped course design,especially within the context of large engineering classrooms.With this backdrop, beginning in the fall of 2018, a 200-level mechanical
study skills, how touse university student services, and how to become holistically involved at the university. Summer Scholars was established to (1) promote the holistic development of enteringengineering students, (2) develop a sense of community before their first semester of university,(3) introduce students to the academic rigor of a highly ranked four-year institution, (4) fosterunderstanding of successful campus involvement, and (5) provide students with co-curricularexperiences to develop their identity as an engineer. The primary objective of this study was tounderstand the effect of Summer Scholars on student long-term GPA patterns, retention, pathwaychanges, and sense of belonging.BackgroundUnderrepresented Students in
improving the culture and environment of undergraduate education experience for all students, particularly those from underrepresented groups.Mrs. Risa D Hartman, The University of Texas at Austin, NASCENT Center Risa Hartman oversees multiple Education and Outreach programs at the University of Texas at Austin. Her roles include: Staff Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Dynamics and Control of Materials, a Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) and as the Pre-college Ed- ucation Director for the NASCENT Engineering Research Center focused on nanomanufacturing. She manages programs in the areas of graduate student traineeship and career development, undergraduate research, Research
efforts have significantly more training for science education and, practices in quantitative methods, 86-99.anecdotally, we have observed that imbues a science-oriented lens whereby the distinctions and[14] Pleasants, J. & Olson, J.K. (2019) "Refining an Instrument and Studying Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Scope of Engineering," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER): 9(2).[15] Pleasants, J., Olson, J. K., & De La Cruz, I. (2020). Accuracy of Elementary Teachers’ Representations of the Projects and Processes of Engineering: Results of a Professional Development Program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1-22.[16] Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus
the engineering college.While aspects of university-specific environments could be considered, what has been reportedin literature in various studies is that high school preparation and ranking is a factor which canhave a large impact on retention through the first year of college up to and through graduation[1-3] [4]. Such results have encompassed STEM students [1-3]; business students [3]; emphasison underrepresented minority (URM) students[4].; and more [2, 3].For example, a team out of University of North Texas (UNT), tracked cohorts of studentsthrough a seven-year continuum, in their three largest “majors”– STEM, Business, andEducation – to discern the number of students dropping out of the university, switching majors,and/or graduating
at the college of engineering, computer science and technology (ECST).Prof. Paul S Nerenberg, California State University, Los Angeles Dr. Paul S. Nerenberg is currently an Assistant Professor of Physics and Biology at California State University, Los Angeles. He received his PhD in Physics from MIT and has a strong interest in improving the quality of introductory physics education, particularly for students who enter college with little or no previous physics coursework.Ni Li, Northwestern Polytechnial University Ni Li, Ph.D., was an Assistant Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Los Angeles. Now, she is working in the school of Aeronautics at Northwestern
Future Careers Over Time,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2018.[17] C. D. McGough, “A Mixed Methods Study on Mid-Year Engineering Students’ Perceptions of their Future Possible Careers,” 2019.[18] C. McGough, A. Kirn, and L. Benson, “Different Perceptions of Future Careers for Mid- Year Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ.[19] C. McGough, A. Kirn, and L. Benson, “Work in Progress : Developing a Quantitative Instrument for Measuring Undergraduate Engineering Students ’ Future Time Perspectives,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.[20] A. Kirn and L. C. Benson, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Problem Solving and their Future,” J. Eng. Educ., 2018.[21] H.-F. Hsieh and S. E
- Life Sciences Education, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 453-461, winter 2010.[8] E. Ince, “An overview of problem solving studies in physics education,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 191-200, 2018.[9] M. V. B. Reddy and B. Panacharoensawad, “Students problem-solving difficulties and implications in physics: An empirical study on influencing factors,” Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 59-62, 2017.[10] A. J. Mason and C. Singh, “Surveying graduate students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving,” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 020124, 2010.[11] K. Cummings, S. Lockwood and D. M. Jeffrey, “Attitudes toward problem