to enable diversecontexts to ease comparison and contrasts across participant views (Morelock, Matusovich,Cunningham, & Hermundstad, 2016). The first research site (PubU) was a large, public,research-focused university in the Mid-Atlantic United States (PubU). The second research site(PriU) was a small, private not-for-profit, teaching-focused university in the Midwestern UnitedStates. The student population at PriU was less than 5000 (approximated at the time of theinterview), while that for PubU was larger at approximately 35,000. A comparative descriptionof the sites is available from Morelock et al. (2016) to provide an overview of the differencesbetween the two sites. Table 1: Comparison of
, June 14-17, 2015, Paper ID # 13620 5) L. Lee, R. Hackett, and H. Estrada, “Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom in Mechanics of Materials”, 122 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Paper ID # 11392 6) K. Sharpe, Ph. D., University of Virginia, Darden School of Business) personal communication. 7) S. Chetcuti, H.Thomas, and B. Pafford, ”Flipping the Engineering Classroom, Lessons Learned in the Creation, Production and Implementation”, page 7, Fall 2013 Middle Atlantic Section Proceedings Archives, ASEE 8) T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, F. P. Incropera, and D. P. Dewitt, “Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer” 7th ed.; Pg 38, J. Wiley and Sons. ©2011, 2007, 2002 9) B. Kerr, “The flipped
2019 Physics I STEM degree; students with better grades[13] (n=4,498) 98.1% more likely to graduateInkelas et Mid-Atlantic 2009- longitudinal Calc I and Calc graduation Students beginning in Calc I had lower Sequential, exploratory,al., 2021 university 2016 II (on-track GPA (p ≤ .001), and longer time-to- mixed-methods design; t-[14] (n=2,689) calculus) degree (p ≤ .05) than those in Calc II. tests, hierarchical
following the design method taught in class.In this paper, the authors will describe the rationale, pedagogical choices, and administrativetasks involved in providing a design-related service learning experience for first-year students onsuch a large scale. Excerpts from students’ reflection essays are presented as anecdotal evidencethat the proposed program assisted students in achieving the course objectives and learningoutcomes.1. Offering a First Year Engineering Design Experience on a Large Scale1.1 Context: “Exploration of Engineering Design”The context for this paper is a required introductory course for first-year engineering students ofVirginia Tech. Virginia Tech is a large mid-Atlantic land-grant university; the engineeringcollege is its
. Each class (or “section”) includes typically no more than 16 studentsenabling high levels of student engagement. For example, in the Spring 2020 semester, studentsenrolled in EV350 were distributed among 13 sections taught by six instructors. During thatsemester, one lab, one field trip, and 20 lessons were transitioned from in-person learning to anonline platform, Blackboard Collaborate. During the pivot, all lessons, labs, and field trips, wereprerecorded using existing materials (e.g., slideshows and handouts). Lessons learned duringSpring 2020 were immediately refined and the entire course (40-lessons) was transitioned to100% remote for a summer course offering. To do so, an additional lab, field trip, and the first 20lessons of the course
Paper ID #33885Relationship Between Guided Interactive Activities and Self-concept inEngineering StudentsDr. Ing. Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello Doctor en tecnolog´ıa de informaci´on Universidad Atlantic International University, Magister en Inform´atica de la Universidad Andr´es Bello de Chile, Ingeniero Inform´atica de la Universidad T´ecnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa de Chile. Experiencia docente de m´as de 12 a˜nos, realizando diversas asignaturas del a´ rea de la In- genier´ıa de Software, inteligencia de negocios, metodolog´ıas a´ giles en las carreras de Pre grado, Advance y Mag´ıster de la Universidad Andr
and record book for student outcomes assessment and institutional effectiveness. New York, NY: Agathon Press.3. ABET. (2015a). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf4. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7–25. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x5. Joye, D. D. (2010). A lifelong learning exercise (ABET required) in an undergraduate fluids course. Published in Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Villanova, PA.6. Marra, R. M., Camplese, K. Z., & Litzinger, T. A. (1999). Lifelong learning: A
15 Communication C6 difficult than other kinds of teams.Participants and ProcedureData for this study was collected with students enrolled in a first-year general engineeringprogram at a suburban mid-Atlantic R1 institution. All participants were enrolled in differentsections of an introductory engineering design course, where students were introduced todifferent engineering concepts and the engineering design process. The course was taught in afully online synchronous modality due to Covid-19 precautions. All participants were required tocomplete an assignment that outlined the basic function of their design teams, includingindividual member
executive committee of this division (Program Chair 2011, Division Chair 2012, and Nominating Committee Chair 2013). Dr. Allen is the recipient of ten teaching awards at UVA, including the All-University Teaching Award in 2017. Since 2016, he has been the PI on an NSF REU site focused on multi-scale systems bioengineering and biomedical data sciences, a collab- oration involving faculty in SEAS, SOM, SDS, and CLAS at UVA, as well as six partner institutions in the mid-Atlantic and Southeast. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Effect of In-person versus Pre-recorded Final Presentations on Student Learning Outcomes and EngagementAbstractPre-recorded
conducted at a public university in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region. Through aquasi-experimental design approach, this research assessed the impact of Ed+gineering on PSTs’engineering and pedagogical knowledge and beliefs towards engineering integration. PSTs wereassigned to treatment and comparison groups based on their course section. All participatingcourses had two versions (treatment and comparison) with the same learning objectives andsimilar content. The PSTs in the treatment group completed the Ed+gineering collaborationproject with engineering students as one of their class assignments. The comparison group wascomposed of PSTs enrolled in the same courses as the treatment group, but in sections that didnot participate in the Ed+gineering
Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, July. ASEE Conferences, 2021.8. Tinkercad website https://www.tinkercad.com/9. Arduino website https://www.arduino.cc/10. Yu Wang, Warren Hunter, XiaoLin Chen, Housney Ahmed, and Haneefah Safo. "Improved Hardware Design of IoT Prosthetic Device". 2018 Mid Atlantic Section Fall Meeting, Brooklyn, New York, 2018, October. ASEE Conferences, 2018.11. Afsaneh Minaie and Reza Sanati-Mehrizy. "Capstone Projects in a Computer Engineering Program Using Arduino". 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016.
System Instruction to Improve Undergraduate Education.” In Proceedings of ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring 2016 Conference, Washington, DC, USA.[17] Teichman, A., Levinson, J., and Thrun, S. 2011. “Towards 3D Object Recognition Via Classification of Arbitrary Object Tracks.” In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4034-4041.[18] Janoch, A., Karayev, S., Jia, Y., Barron, J. T., Fritz, M., Saenko, K., and Darrell, T. 2013. “A Category-Level 3d Object Dataset: Putting the Kinect to Work.” In Consumer Depth Cameras for Computer Vision, pp. 141-165. 10[19] Socher, R., Huval, B., Bath, B., Manning, C. D., and Ng, A. Y. 2012
a PhD in Computer Science from SUNY, with particular emphasis on Data Mining and Big data analytics. He is an author or co-author of over 25 peer reviewed journal and conference publications and co-authored a textbook – ”Essential As- pects of Physical Design and Implementation of Relational Databases.” He has four patents in the area of Search Engine research. He is also a recipient of the Math Olympiad Award, and is currently serving as Chair Elect of the ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) Mid-Atlantic Conference. He also serves as an NSF (National Science Foundation) panelist.Prof. Karen Goodlad, New York City College of Technology, CUNY Karen Goodlad is an Assistant Professor specializing in
recipients that are female is often used in research because it allows forinstitutional comparisons, accounts for persistence, and provides an index of whatmight at some point in the future be reflected in the composition of the workforce.The final pool of participating institutions consisted five private and three publicdoctoral/research universities of varying sizes. Four of the institutions are locatedin the Northeast, one in the Mid-Atlantic Region, and three in the West. Page 15.297.4The Engineering Student Survey and RespondentsThe survey distributed to students in the participating colleges of engineering was basedon The Student Persisting in
general discussion. Getting students intensely involved in talking about an issue we feel was a worthwhile benefit to this class, even if we cannot yet judge long-term effects.Bibliography1. J. Newell, A. J. Marchese, R. P. Ramachandran, B. Sukumaran, and R. Harvey, “Multidisciplinary design and communication: A pedagogical vision,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 15, 1999.2. R. Harvey, F. S. Johnson, A. J. Marchese, J. Mariappan, R. P. Ramachandran, B. Sukamaran and J. Newell. "Teaching Quality: An Integrated TQM Approach to Technical Communication and Engineering Design." Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education: Mid Atlantic Conference, April 17, 1999.3. F. S. Johnson
all level students at Rowan. Stephanie won the 2000 Dow Outstanding Faculty Award, 1998 ASEEOutstanding Campus Representative Award, and currently serves as Newsletter editor of the Mid-Atlantic Section ofASEE and the Rowan Campus Representative.Kevin D. Dahm is Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. inChemical Engineering in 1992 from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, and his Ph.D. in 1998 from MassachusettsInstitute of Technology, where he developed graph-theoretic methods for mechanistic modeling of hydrocarbonpyrolysis. Prior to joining the faculty of Rowan University, he served as an Adjunct Professor of ChemicalEngineering at North Carolina A&T State University. He also served for one
research expertise in the field of drug delivery and controlled release, and she iscurrently focusing efforts on developing laboratory experiments related to membrane separations, biochemicalengineering,and biomedical systems, for all level students at Rowan. Stephanie won the ASEE Outstanding CampusRepresentative Award in 1998, and she currently serves as Newsletter editor of the Mid-Atlantic Section of ASEE . Page 5.93.10 Robert Hesketh is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S.in 1982 from the University of Illinois and his Ph.D. from the University of Delaware in 1987. After
London before returning to graduate school. Prior to joining Rowanin September, 1998, she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Stephanie’shas research expertise in the field of drug delivery and controlled release, and she is currently focusing efforts ondeveloping laboratory experiments related to membrane separations, biochemical engineering, and biomedicalsystems, for all level students at Rowan. Stephanie won the ASEE Outstanding Campus Representative Award in1998, and she currently serves as Newsletter editor of the Mid-Atlantic Section of ASEE .Kevin D. Dahm is Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. inChemical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic
, the WaterEnvironment Federation and the Environmental Protection Agency. These links provideinterpretation of current regional and national biosolid issues as well as access to relevantdocuments developed by, EPA, EPA’s Pathogen Equivalency Committee and the NationalResearch Council. Links to state, county and local biosolids programs may often be madethrough the regional associations sites. Table 2 Links to Biosolid Resources Organization WebsiteNew England Biosolids and Residuals Association www.nebiosolids.org(NEBRA)Mid-Atlantic Biosolids Association (MABA) Www.mabiosolids.orgGreat Lakes By-products
theinstitution.Bibliography1. R.E. Lyons, Deepening our understanding of adjunct faculty. In R.E. Lyons (ed.), Best Practices for Supporting Adjunct Faculty, Anker Publishing, Bolton, MA, 2007.2. N.A. Lewis, The engineer as a professor: Bringing experience to the engineering classroom, presented at the ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section meeting, U.S. Military Academy at West Point (New York), March 28-29, 2008.3. C. Baukal, J. Colannino, W. Bussman and J. Matsson, Industry-University Partnership Case Study, presented at the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Annual Conference, September 22-24, 2010, Lawrence, KS.4. J.H. McMasters and N. Komerath, Boeing-university relations – A review and prospects for the future
ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section’s Distinguished Teaching Award.Dr. Jumoke O. Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Page 25.1413.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Useful Strategies for Implementing an Online Undergraduate Electrical Engineering ProgramAbstractOnline programs in Electrical Engineering disciplines have been mainly offered at the graduateschool level to avoid the complexities associated with conducting courses that require alaboratory component. To our knowledge, there are only a handful of online Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and
accessing.These individual student differences are important and can seriously impact their learning[18]. Wetherefore observe a gap in the literature that helps to motivate this study: for students in a realclassroom environment, what are the usage patterns of the various instructional supports (videos,peers, textbook, instructor) available to them, and in what ways does the ecosystem shape theseusage patterns? This paper gives a preliminary look at these issues using data collected during arecent academic semester in a Dynamics course.Study population, data, and methodologyStudent population. The subjects in this study were students in the sophomore-level courseDynamics at a large, mid-Atlantic public university during the Spring 2012 semester
transparentinstitutional action to enhance diversity and promote inclusive and equitable learningenvironments” [2, p.3]. Despite this growing attention and acknowledgment of the need toimprove graduate education in engineering, cultures and practices in these spaces are seldomcharacterized as welcoming. In response to the above calls, this study explores the engineering graduate student’sexperience, focusing on their perceived stressors or challenges, while considering the student’sdegree and citizenship status. This study is situated in a three-year effort to develop andimplement a mandatory graduate seminar course focused on promoting equity in STEM at anR1, research-intensive university in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. The following sections will
. He is the recipient of the 2012 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section’s Distinguished Teaching Award.Dr. Craig J. Scott, Morgan State UniversityProf. Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, where he teaches courses on plasma physics, electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, en- gineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. Since joining the Rensselaer faculty in 1974, he has been continuously involved in research programs at such places as Oak Ridge National
rendered 64 listings for data collection. It was found thatqualifications in job listings referenced mostly soft skills, whereas responsibilities referencedtechnical skills the most. The listings were analyzed to find representation of Student LearningOutcomes (SLOs) as well. It was observed that job responsibilities represented more SLOs thanthe qualification sections. The findings from this study could be used by institutions to bringtheir construction management programs up to current industry expectations. Recent andupcoming graduates can use these findings to understand the skills they need to possess to workin their desired positions in construction.IntroductionConstruction graduates usually occupy a plethora of professional positions within
developed the tools to learn what they must when the time arrives that they mayneed it. It is our belief that a flipped classroom with problem solving helps reinforce their abilityto do just that.References:[1] Galgano, Francis, Bruce Keith, and Tim Judd. Educating Future Army Officers for a Changing World, ThirdEdition. West Point, NY, USA: Office of the Dean, (accessed April 8, 2013).[2] Chetcuti, Steven, Hans Thomas, and Brent Pafford. Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Lessons Learned in theCreation, Production, and Implementation. ASEE 2013 Fall Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference (2013) WashingtonD.C.[3]Shell, Amy E. "The Thayer Method of Instruction at the United States Military Academy: A Modest History anda Personal Account." PRIMUS
During Covid-19 Pandemic,” Higher Education for the Future, vol. 8, no.1, pp. 31–46, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/2347631120970757.[11] V. Shekoyan, S. Dehipawala, D. Kokkinos, R. Taibu, G. Tremberger, and T. Cheung,“Assessment of experiential learning in online introductory physics labs during COVID-19,”presented at the 2020 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Meeting, Virtual (hosted by StevensInstitute of Technology), Nov. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/36041.[12] A. Ożadowicz, “Modified Blended Learning in Engineering Higher Education during theCOVID-19 Lockdown—Building Automation Courses Case Study,” Education Sciences, vol.10, no. 10, p. 292, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10100292.[13] S. C. Lieber and A. D. Borgaonkar, “Focusing
suggested that instead of trying tofight with shifting paradigms, they would prefer to blend into the background instead of fight theethnic battles. Given their level of assimilation both in physical presentation and in ideals, thesestudents too made a choice.MethodologyData were collected as part of a larger study of engineering undergraduate students from fourdistinct U.S. Universities whom initially enrolled during the 2003-2004 academic year. For thepurpose of this study we have ascribed pseudonyms to each institution: A) Technical PublicInstitution (TPI), a public mid-western university specializing in teaching engineering andtechnology; B) Urban Private University (UPU), a private Historically Black University mid-Atlantic institution; C
,” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12, 2, 14, January 2018. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120214.[9] A. Satyanarayana, J. Kusyk, and H. Li, “Common Assessment of Two Related Courses to Reduce Grading Bias and Improve Readiness of the Students for Corporate Environments,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2017 Mid-Atlantic Section Conference, Reading, Pennsylvania, 6 - 7 October, 2017.[10] B. Z. Dymond, M. Swenty, and C. Carroll, “The Influence of Grading Bias on Reinforced Concrete Exam Scores at Three Different Universities,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2018 Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 24 - 27
from the Mid Atlantic and NewEngland region. Page 13.585.2In 1998, the awarding of an NSF Grant entitled “Integrating Engineering Design with theHumanities, Social Sciences, Sciences, and Mathematics” was the initiative for a major revisionof the curriculum of all of the engineering programs1,2. The emphasis of this grant was tointegrate design throughout the curriculum. This was accomplished by (i) Redesign of thefreshman engineering course by incorporating Integrative Learning Blocks by involvement offaculty from engineering, mathematics, physics, humanities and social sciences; (ii) Creation of anew engineering sophomore design course that