ormarketing students3,4 and some interdisciplinary courses are focused on the design andconstruction disciplines and include architecture and construction management students as wellas engineering students5,6,7. However the literature on these courses is of limited relevance andprovides limited guidance. Although the courses described in this paper have aninterdisciplinary component, they are not really interdisciplinary. They teach structuralengineering skills and principals to non-engineering (ARCH and CM) students but do notcontain the content of multiple disciplines and do not function as interdisciplinary courses.Saliklis, et al describe the different curriculum approaches typically employed for architecturaland engineering programs8. They
AC 2010-493: INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY INTO STUDIO DESIGNCURRICULUMDaniel Davis, University of Hartford Page 15.774.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY INTO STUDIO DESIGN CLASS CURRICULUMAbstractAt the University of Hartford, we have established an architectural program founded onintegration. Architecture by its very nature is connected to other disciplines, yet architecturaleducation is often criticized for a lack of integration in the curriculum. By increasing theawareness of the interrelationship between different areas of study, we are attempting to strike anew and more effective
engineering.These courses included HVAC Systems analysis, Building Hydronic Systems, Building AirSystems, Building Thermal Systems, and Mechanical Systems Design Project (ARE 4740: thecapstone design course). Until 2008, the architectural engineering program was mainly orientedtoward HVAC system design. In 2009, however, the first 5000 level course in mechanical optionwas taught during the fall semester. The fourth major change was accomplished in 2009 andwill be in application starting from 2010-2011. Three areas have been introduced to thecurriculum: Energy, Fire protection, Plumbing, and Building Electrical Systems. The courseprerequisite system has also been improved.The new Program Curriculum (starting from fall 2010):The Program’s aim is to meet the
requirements as five-yearprograms compared to four-year programs. Regarding ABET, all programs comply with thesemester hour count in the three areas required: general (one semester), mathematics and science(one year), and engineering (one an one-half years). It is the hope of the author that this discussionwill start a national dialog regarding the requirements for the architectural engineering programsin the US. It appears that the four year curriculum is serving the architectural community well;however, with the new national movement in engineering to move to the Masters Degree (orequivalent 30+ graduate hours) as the first professional degree, it might reasonable to assume thatthe five year programs already meet this criterion. Another issue that
Diagnostic Problem-solving Approaches – Application to Thermal Comfort and Indoor Air Quality Ahmed Cherif Megri North Carolina A&T State University Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Department Email: ac_megri@hotmail.comAbstract:The engineers are usually confronted to two types of problems: design or troubleshooting. Thedesign concerns the creation of a new product (in our case the product is a building, buildingcomponent, mechanical or electrical system) and the troubleshooting involves fixing an existingproduct using a sequential diagnostic.In this paper, we introduce how these two
tracks would provide our students with the design and technical skills necessary forworking on construction projects, from beginning to end. Students would develop constructionindustry expertise with emphasis on team building. Career opportunities in construction arefound throughout the world and include the following industries: construction companies,government agencies, architectural/engineering/environmental firms, industrial firms andmanufacturing/materials suppliers.ReasonThe current recession has had a dramatic impact on all aspects of the design and constructionindustry. “There are some very serious challenges facing the construction industry that aremotivating new approaches to how we design, build, operate, and maintain buildings
Code,” NOMOS29 (1987), pp. 302-337. 10) Michael Davis, “Thinking Like an Engineer: the Place of a Code of Ethics in the Practice of a Professional,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, Spring 1991, pp. 150-167. 11) Michael Davis, “Ethics Across the Curriculum: Teaching Professional Responsibility in Technical Courses,” Teaching Philosophy 16, September 1993, pp.205-235. 12) Michael S. Pritchard, ed., “Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Case Study Approach,” NSF Grant No. DIR - 8820837. Available through the Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5022. 13) National Society of Professional Engineers, 1420 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Tel: 703-684-2882. 14
AC 2011-1190: DESIGNING STEM KIOSKS: A STUDENT PROJECT THATTEACHESBekir Kelceoglu, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Assistant Prof. Bekir Kelceoglu was born in Ankara, Turkey and attended Anadolu University, where he received his B.A. in Interior Architecture degree. Even before his graduation, he started to work as a free-lance tutor, product designer, and interior designer. In year 2006, he received his Master of Fine Arts degree from the Ohio State University, concentrating on Design Development in industrial design. Prior to joining School of Engineering and Technology in IUPUI, where he currently teaches Architectural Technology and Interior Design classes, he successfully established Interior
actually occurred.This has resulted in the criticism that CAD has failed to meet the expectations of its users andthat it’s true potential has gone unrealized. Therefore a more effective strategy may lie in re-conceptualizing conceptual design by utilizing processes that embrace and exploit computation.Generative design approaches have emerged from the search for strategies to facilitate theexploration of alternative solutions in design, using computers as variance-producing engines tonavigate large solution spaces and to achieve unexpected but viable solutions. [15] Kolaravec usedthe term “digital morphogenesis” to refer to design processes in which digital media is not usedfor representation but as a generative tool for the derivation of form
AC 2007-216: INDEPENDENT STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITIONS AND THEASSESSMENT DILEMMAJoseph Betz, State University of New York JOSEPH A. BETZ is Professor of Architecture at the State University of New York College of Technology at Farmingdale and a licensed architect. He is currently the Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division for ASEE. He received his undergraduate and professional degrees in architecture from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and his post-professional degree in architecture from Columbia University. He is a recipient of the SUNY Chancellor's Award for Excellence in Teaching
concepts.As instructor, I would go around the room and encourage students to think outside the box, turnthings on their side, literally, to see things in a new way, and try something new or creative. Iftheir exploratory components were unique, dynamic, exciting, and innovative, I’d call the classover and have everyone take a look; the same was true with components that were flat or boring.This was all done very early on in developing a solution. In the end, the emphasis was ondeveloping a value for an innovative and unique application of the concepts and approach todeveloping a solution.Studio Critique Process of BoundariesStudents presented their projects comparatively in groupings of four or five. A simple oneminute presentation was made on each
natural environment; routinelypolluting air, water, and land resources. In response, the study of “Green Engineering andArchitecture” has emerged in an attempt to rectify damages and forge new environmentally-sound construction techniques and technologies. This manuscript provides an overview ofsustainable design as it relates to architecture and engineering within the United States andidentifies education opportunities both domestically and abroad.Keywords: Green Engineering, Sustainable Architectural Design, International EducationIntroductionEnergy consumption, rising cost of petroleum, poor ambient/indoor air quality, severe weather,and global warming are important issues that have been consistently in the news and are likely tohave a
degree in engineering only 9. Much like the program at KFUPM,the dual career oriented curriculum at Princeton focuses on “core engineering courses inmath, science, and engineering science … [and] core program courses in architecture” 9.A large difference between the KFUPM program and the Princeton program is thatKFUPM actually developed a new department specifically for “architectural engineering”while Princeton’s students enrolled in the curriculum simply take courses from twodifferent departments, in fact, “most of the courses are part of regular non-programofferings” 9. This could be the reason why the program only accredits the engineeringportion of the curriculum. The four year architecture program at Princeton awards an A.Bdegree, which is
process Design in its many facets is the heart of the Architectural Engineering AE profession All the tools of mathematics the sciences communication and the varied analytic methods of the disciplines in which our students specialize are chosen to support and enhance the design process and product (ow we teach design for Architectural Engineers is the subject of a year long study that ) ve undertaken as a sabbatical project )n the literature there are many papers addressing specific aspects of design classes particularly freshman and capstone design as well as some looking at the entire curriculum There is also a vast literature about general engineering design addressing everything from the latest theories in the learning
develop and design structural systems, someArchitecture faculty observed that these lessons were not consistently integrated into theArchitecture Department’s design studios. It appeared that the building structure was a separateand isolated topic receiving inconsistent emphasis in the architectural studios. As part of a largerreconfiguration of the five course structural engineering sequence, a culminating structuralengineering course was created that would directly provide this structural integration.This new course, ARCE 316 Structural Integration in Architecture, has some traditionalstructural content. However the unique aspect of this course is the integration of ARCE facultyinto Architecture studios. Each ARCE section is associated with two
in 1997.Hector Estrada, University of the Pacific Hector Estada is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific; a position he has held since August 2006. Prior to joining Pacific, Professor Estrada was chair of the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. While at Texas A&M Kingsville, he was instrumental in establishing a new program in Architectural Engineering and a regional division of the Texas Transportation Institute. Professor Estrada received his B.S. (with honors), M.S., and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1993, 1994
focuses primarily on new buildings. Architecture students have relatively little exposure to concepts related to the evaluation of existing buildings, retrofit design or approaches to protecting historic structures. Although computer aided design methods are used extensively in schools of architecture, fewer than half of the faculty teaching seismic design ask students to use computer models of building performance in their study of structural concepts. The majority of faculty members teaching seismic design in schools of architecture are structural engineers. 70% of the instructors surveyed reported that their highest degree was in engineering. 30% have degrees in architecture
graduate architect (Calgary, Canada) with degrees in art education, visual arts and sustainable architecture (LEED AP). He is the co-founder of Global Design Stu- dents which is an international education collaborative that addresses building design in various locales around the world, most recently in Thailand, Hawaii, Indonesia and New Orleans. Dr. Cowan is also the Director of Service Learning Initiatives in the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. He has practiced as an architectural designer in the private sector and has taught in post secondary institutions in several countries. He is the Program Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division of ASEE.J. Craig Greene, College of the North AtlanticModibo
practice but to engineering and engineeringtechnology education as well.Past reports and studies have been prepared by the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE), the National Academy of Engineers and the American Society Civil Engineers (ASCE)discussed that the changes are needed for improvement of engineering education. Numerousstudies revealed that the engineering curriculum of today still does not provide the foundationnecessary to ensure the engineer’s success in the 21st century. In the past, the skills workersacquired would serve them well for decades. In the 21st century, however, an engineer’s successor a company’s success will be measured against how well they can adapt to new conditions andtechnologies. Thus to remain
system design to actual loads.Section 1.3 Using Building Performance Simulation for Education and Praxis Integrating building performance simulation into the design curriculum affects twocrucial parameters. First, the use of building performance simulation provides a horizon uponwhich to ground the design of a building. Too often contemporary architecture students aretaught to exercise unbridled formal ambitions that lack grounding in engineering, costestimation, or constructability. While teaching design is a critical aspect of architecturaleducation, it must be balanced with an approach that grounds architecture within its broaderframework of collaboration. At the more advanced levels of engineering and architecturaleducation, the
AC 2012-3908: THE ROAD TO CREATING, EVALUATING AND CHANG-ING A BIM LEARNING ENVIRONMENTMrs. Blythe Marlow Vogt, Kansas State University Blythe Marlow Vogt joined the faculty in architectural engineering & construction science and manage- ment at Kansas State University in Jan. 2008. She received her B.S.A.E. from K-State in 2001 and com- pleted her M.S.A.E. from K-State in 2010 related to curriculum development in architectural engineering and construction science with regards to building information modeling. Vogt is currently pursuing her Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering with an emphasis in engineering education/outreach under the supervision of Dr. Noel Schulz. During 2001-2008, Vogt was employed
the traditional mode of teaching engineers is oftenimported from civil engineering without much modification to teach structures to and thatthis approach is unsuitable for architects.4,5 Specifically, it argued by a number ofresearchers that fostering the ability to select and configure structural systems as opposedto the more fine-grained mathematical skills that an engineering student would have toacquire are the most important aspect of teaching structures to architects.6,7,8Education researchers in this area have also argued persuasively that the most successfulteaching of structures (and technical material more generally) to architecture students
architectural professionals that delved into and conducted extensiveresearch on CAD and digital media; the latter (virtual studios) enabled collaboration betweendifferent architecture schools that were geographically distant as well as the involvement ofprofessionals in architecture education through virtual communication.Since the early 2000s there has been a rapid movement from CAD to BIM in the architecture,engineering and construction (AEC) industry. BIM is a paradigm shift, a new way ofcollaboration and sharing of information between the various stakeholders during anarchitectural project. In a recent survey directed at accredited architecture, architecturalengineering, and engineering programs it was found that schools of architecture and
providebenefits to student learning. The example provided by the vignette instructional designs and theevidence of their pedagogic effectiveness offers architectural engineering, constructionengineering, and construction management educators new methods by which software skillsmight be incorporated into introductory BIM coursework.Literature ReviewBIM Concepts and Instruction. It is largely accepted that the burgeoning use of buildinginformation modeling in industry means that BIM has become a necessary content area forarchitectural engineering and construction management education.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 However, fullyincorporating BIM instruction across design and construction curricula has proven difficult.6, 7This problem is a result of both the challenge of
is “learn by doing”. This hands-on-approach is instilled in these studentsfrom the time they enter the university. Team experiences are considered integral to the successof the university. Both the Architectural Engineering (ARCE) and BioResource andAgricultural Engineering (BRAE) Departments at Cal Poly extensively use teaming to enhancetheir learning environments.Throughout their course work, the ARCE and BRAE Departments utilize extensive formal andinformal teaming throughout the students’ academic experience. Formal teaming is defined asteams that are formally created within the classroom environment and whose output is graded asa team endeavor. Informal teaming occurs when student-formed teams collectively worktowards a better
(UEH) and exchangenotes with the future Haitian engineers and architects in regard to building design andconstruction curriculum. The group was also able to visit a riverbed where sand and gravel werebeing harvested for the ongoing reconstruction and also witnessed firsthand the roadsideproduction of concrete masonry units (CMU). It was not all disappointments as the studentsspent the last day of their visit at the beautiful Haitian beaches. Figures 1, 2 and 3 capture someof the student visit activities.Figure 1: Community Visits (a), (b) Devastated Neighborhood and (c) New ConstructionSite Page 23.305.3Figure 2: Community Visits (a) New
. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1997.Prof. Brent Nuttall P.E., California Polytechnic State University Professor Nuttall has 25 years experience as both a practicing engineer and engineering professor. He is currently a tenured professor at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo where his teaching focus is on structural and seismic design for engineers, architects and construction management students. His professional experience includes the design of many high profile new construction and renovation projects including the Getty Villa Museum, Cathedral of our Lady of the Angels, Dodger Stadium Renovation and Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Restoration.Jill Nelson P.E., California
) from Indiana University. His current research interests include engineering education, integration of CAD/CAE software in the engineering curriculum, building information mod- eling, spatial visualization, and reverse engineering. Professor Leake’s publications include two books, Engineering Design Graphics: Sketching, Modeling, and Visualization published by John Wiley and Sons in 2008, and Autodesk Inventor published by McGraw-Hill in 2004. Prior to coming to Illinois, Leake taught CAD and math courses at UAE University in the United Arab Emirates. He is a returned Peace Corps Volunteer, where he served in Tunisia from 1983 until 1986. Leake worked as a naval architect in the Pacific Northwest for 10 years. He is
premise of such end-of-program culminating experiences was that studentseventually gained proficiency at the “design” level, apparently reaching higher level of Bloom’s.We note however, that recently there is a trend for curricula to move towards integrating thedesign experience earlier in the students’ program; thereby reaching higher cognitive levels incourses other than the capstone experience. Examples include the “design focus curriculum” atOlin (2008)8, a pre-capstone approach at Oklahoma State University (2008)9, and the emerginginclusion of freshman engineering courses such as those at the University of Southern Indiana(2008)10. However, it is the still capstone experience that many programs use (2007)11 to assesstheir ABET Design Outcome
assistant professor of architecture at Syracuse University in New York. Page 24.670.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Home Experiments: EarthBag Construction as Teaching Tool in RwandaThis paper investigates the meanings of home and field in architectural and engineering designsin international development. Academic research in the humanities and science disciplines tendsto situate the home and the field opposite of research activities. The home is a stable andcontrolled laboratory for analyses and theorization while the field is where raw