attribution. This paperdiscusses the ethical and legal implications surrounding AI art generators and copyrights,describes how the AI generators operate, considers the positions in the creative process, andconcludes with suggested best practices for engaging AI art in the architectural design curricula.IntroductionA consensus definition of art within the art community is asymptotic as each artist may have adifferent opinion on what art is. Oxford defines art as “the expression or application of humancreative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producingworks to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power [1].” One might simplifyand suggest that art is a process led by the human mind that
minimum. One school did indicate that as long as they can“finish” the designs required and are confident they can proceed, but that students may be advised it’s notthe best use of their time. Table 1: Studies Faculty Recommend to Students to Avoid doing in Capstone. General Categories Specific Technical Task Discipline Specific Categories Categories Non-critical systems Arc Flash Advanced structural design that is “in Students cannot just have software do Complex structural models that are the weeds” within design everything it must be justified not necessary
in the VR environment. This work-in-progress paper will analyze the use of digital tools in the architectural design process andevaluate the validity of the tools as pedagogical content in an architectural design course.IntroductionThe rise of remote learning and working during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggests that varioustypes of immersive software can be adapted to the architectural field. [1] The platforms thatfoster virtual collaboration are defined below. • Virtual Reality (VR): This technology refers to a digitally generated simulation of a 3D environment that can provide the user with an immersive experience with special electronic equipment as shown in Figure 1.1. Typically, the VR headset covers the user’s
the attention of the groups, including continuous assessment throughadaptive parametric quizzes. Figure 1. A model for semesters in our educational modelFrom the student's perspective, the Tec21 model means that students must quickly adapt tothe context of the subject and instructor, and the instructor needs to generate products(evidence) for evaluation from the first days to build the cognitive scaffolding from whichcontent knowledge can be escalated to practical application (know-how) while also buildingattitudinal aspects must be constructed. As students develop skills, it is necessary to guidethem in forming abilities (the art of doing things) consistently and daily within the blocks, inaddition to maintaining their
, science, and engineering, besides studio-based courses appliedto building construction. Similarly, civil engineering courses in design around the world havemostly focused on timber, masonry, reinforced concrete, and steel structures. However, increasedglobal warming in recent years due to greenhouse gas emissions, coupled with the need forenergy efficient buildings, has resulted in several architecture programs including at OklahomaState University to offer courses on sustainable building design, covering topics on buildingenergy modeling.The growing interest in energy efficient buildings has resulted in building facades beingconstructed of different materials, such as wood, sheet metal, glass, aluminum, and vinyl [1]. Afaçade is considered a
step would be to include a qualitative assessment of the issue in order to captureeducational methods that are required in SDC in the near future. References[1] A. Ragheb, H. El-Shimy and G. Ragheb, "Green architecture: A concept of sustainability,"Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 216, pp. 778-787, 2016.[2] M. Roseland and M. Spiliotopoulou, "Converging urban agendas: Toward healthy andsustainable communities," Social Sciences, vol. 5, (3), pp. 28, 2016.[3] K. I. Vatalis et al, "Sustainability components affecting decisions for green buildingprojects," Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 5, pp. 747-756, 2013.[4] C. Carmody, "Considering future generations Sustainability in theory and
discipline's coreprinciples suggest providing educational fundamentals that help students understand sustainable,safe, comfortable, productive, resilient, and economically feasible buildings [1]. Due to theseeducational fundamentals, the discipline unites the interdisciplinary expertise of structural,mechanical, electrical, acoustic, and construction engineering, which helps in conceptualization,design, construction, operation, and maintenance using creativity and education. However, todevelop sustainable practices and design buildings that prioritize human conditions and society’swell-being, other competencies exist alongside technical expertise.These competencies, on one end, align with the requirements in national policy documents[2][3][4], ABET
the productionof a podcast or short video.All sessions are recorded by the professor using the hardware provided in the classroom orvia Zoom and these videos are made available to students within hours after the sessionended. No further post-processing is done to the videos as it is important to keep a good workflow of the videos.One thing that we can take as a positive lesson from pandemic terms, is the fact that moreprofessors and students have developed some digital transformation competencies such ascommunication in video conferencing, preparation of technical videos, oral communicationskills using digital media, and others. Fig.5: Hybrid model for the new courses with online contentsResultsAs it was mentioned in the
extended into other domains, as it has been for general systemsthinking, another key element of system architecture.References:[1] E. Dano, “Augmented ARCADIA Capella based approach for the system architecture of engineered systems,” Presented to INCOSE Canada, Feb. 13, 2023, website: (https://incose- org.zoom.us/rec/play/qK0_yMxsAgwT5GZEEVwggAltKpDmQJk5NBM0AhCMzrE6- KOLNozMAIvUxqLVWkn5BKTY3iair6zxiZFx.mZjttg633nJRGoTs?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=liVYN xq9T3aSYjYJFK5FOg.1677558111981.d3e6fc0a4ca18c2e12583257a0238e66&_x_zm_rhtaid=581).[2] E. Dano. “System architecture, the missing piece of engineering education,” Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Section (MAS) ASEE Fall Conference, Philadelphia, PA., Sept. 2021.[3] R. Arnold
career and self-development,critical thinking, communication, intercultural fluency, teamwork, professionalism, leadership,and technology. These competencies are the most widely used generic criteria and research hasshown that meeting these competencies increases the chance of employment for students (Newell& Ulrich, 2022).Although several studies have discussed the success of experiential learning and the improvedcompetencies of students through the LEED Lab program (Fick & Jones, 2018; Jones & Fick,2017; Trujillo & Spencer, 2015a, 2015b; Woo et al., 2020), the implementation of NACEcompetencies in LEED Lab program has not been investigated to understand the success of thisprogram in preparing career ready students.To bridge
studentslack the ability to communicate clearly and concisely early in their careers. Their poor writing brings toquestion whether the writing is confusing or the thought process is confusing them. Addressing these twodeficiencies deserves a review of the university writing curriculum. Three questions should be examinedby programs: 1) Should all freshman students receive instruction in creative writing? 2) Should engineeringstudents be taught differently than the general college population? and 3) Should technical writing beintroduced earlier in the curriculum? Three areas to improve engineering writing were identified in FoggyMirror: • Sentence structure to express a complex idea is difficult to master. Students often resorted to complex
, and indoor air quality. He is also a university wide award, named Michael J. Graff Award for Innovation in Teaching, at IIT for his novel teaching.Prof. Ankit Srivastava, Illinois Institute of Technology Prof. Srivastava is an Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering. His expertise is in the general area of mechanics with specific interests in wave propaga- tion, homogenization, metamaterials, and data driven modeling. His pedagogical interests lie in utilizing emerging technology to provide modern and relevant learning experiences to students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Implication of Developing Digital
of the effectiveness of the site visits related to theirstructural concept learning, and a comparison between physical visits and virtual visits makingemphasis at the advantages of each one of the options available.The generated interaction [1] either physical or virtual, is much more suitable compared to theone experienced by only watching pictures or pre recorded videos, mainly because we can godeeper into the concepts, focusing in the most interesting points of the construction site, we caninterview and interact with the construction workers, architects, structural engineers and everyperson related to the construction site, earning a lot of experience in these kind of activities.In the new Tec21 Model at Tecnologico de Monterrey, that is
citing it as a reference.ChatGPT was also used to develop a course image used in the web-based learning managementsystem Canvas. The image was generated by DALL-E, which is an image generation tool that usestext prompts from ChatGPT 4. DALL-E was also used for each lecture to generate an image that isplaced on the cover slide of the course lecture. The idea of incorporating these images is to sparkinterest in the students since the images usually try to involve a comical twist on what they will belearning during that lecture. Figure 1 shows the cover slide for the first lecture discussing compositebeams. To generate the image in Figure 1, the text prompt into ChatGPT 4 was, “create a comicalimage that appears to tell a love story between a
in Ireland. It then explains why research is needed to move the adoption of BIMforward and how student research can support implementation of BIM in industry. It proceeds todescribe TU Dublin’s stepped and scaffolded approach for supporting student researchers, andthen propose a plan for a study that will systematically map, critically analyze, andsystematically review the results of BIM-related research generated at TU Dublin since 2020.The paper concludes with implications for future research.Strategies for National Implementation of BIMBIM signifies a digital representation of the physical and functional characteristics of a building– using both graphic and textual data – to help plan, design, construct, and manage buildings
learning methods areparticularly pertinent for architecture students, given the artistic nature of their career, wherevisuals play a crucial role. “... Architecture students are generally visually orientated andhave rather creative minds, capacities that seem less compatible with the more-strict rulesand systematic approach of doing research” [1]. Considering this characteristic ofarchitecture students, there is a preference towards the use of create visual study tools ratherthan traditional reading-writing methods.It is crucial to recognize that employing diverse teaching methods enhances the approach toknowledge acquisition. In the field of architecture, establishing connections betweentheoretical concepts and their practical and technical
historical unit cost as a professional standard. Dysert [5]describes this type of estimate as an analogous estimate; “an analogous estimate is typicallyprepared by selecting a completed project as a base case, and then adjusting the historical costsfor the technical, performance, complexity, physical, and other differences between the newproject and the base case.” When preparing this estimate, we generally end up with a singlepoint, which is usually the cost. The single point (cost) is evaluated by generating a cost per unit (normally area), where thetotal project costs is divided by the total gross area of the building. Such evaluation is made with-out reference to: (1) specific conditions about site condition, (2) site limitations for
program alumni wereasked during each term, and the questions about non-alumni AE professionals were askedstarting in the second academic year of the study (from Fall 2021 forward). Participants wereasked to estimate the number of alumni or non-alumni AE professionals they were “aware of, interms of who they are, what their jobs are, etc.” and that they had met personally. Responseoptions were 0, 1-2, 3-5, 6-10, and 11+.Auxiliary demographic data were also collected to analyze group differences and impact at theindividual and channel level. This included students’ gender, race/ethnicity, year in the AEprogram, status as a first-generation student, status as an international student, and students’channel membership. These demographic questions were
active learning spaces to support a variety of pedagogical strategies”. Their team ofpedagogy experts and IT technicians work with the selected faculty individually and in somegroup activities to assess our use of the space to ensure we are maximizing its potential.Teaching in an architectural design studio classroom style requires the ability to function both inteams and/or pods of students collaborating to generate creative solutions to vertical structureproblems and space use issues. Physically putting students in pods where they face each othermeans being comfortable with some students having their backs to the lecture position or whatwe traditionally think of when we say front of classroom, see image 4.0. However, with themobile tablet the
complete an individual graduate project advised by afaculty mentor. However, this requirement was phased out of the curriculum to allocate morecourse credits to the interdisciplinary team design project and other technical electives.Table 1 – Full Selection of Course Topics in 4+1 Program Four-year Undergraduate Course Topics Mathematics and Physics: Architectural Engineering:Calculus I/II/III Introduction to Architectural EngineeringDifferential Equations AE Design & Simulation Studio CoursesGeneral Chemistry Fundamentals of Lighting DesignGeneral Physics I/II Fundamentals of Building AcousticsProbability & Statistics
theprocess. The students find it really attractive and interesting, so they were very excited onthese visits.In the classroom sessions, the student gets, using mathematical models and theoreticaldevelopments, a general basic description of the structural behavior of a cable-stayedbridge. The concepts of general equilibrium so that the structures hold the performancerequirements stablished in codes and state or federal laws, the characterization of thematerials to evaluate their behavior during construction processes and the operation of thestructure (during short and long term in the useful life of it), are the main topics of thelectures to give the students a complete comprehension of the structure’s behavior.The structural elements that are
2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 22 years of the academic experience at five different universities. Students and departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published 100+ journal papers and conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3
courses. It is an obligation to students and to the teachingprofession in general for faculty to provide a classroom environment that is engaging, and withcourse material that challenges and informs students of new techniques, knowledge, and thecritical reasoning skills necessary for the modern professional environment. Some exampleswhere faculty document this course modernization include the efforts to further engage studentsin engineering economy [1], to introduce new methodologies relating to computer vision [2], orto address content obsolescence in a computer science course [3]. In any case, these changesgenerally involve and require substantial effort by faculty, many of them might feel uncertain ifthese changes can be successful after their
emissionsalone [1]. This is a large percentage, which is why green roofs are such an up-and-coming designdecision for new buildings. As the use of green roofs becomes more prevalent, an evaluation ofthe benefits and challenges may be something architectural engineering programs choose toincorporate into their curriculum. This paper aims to consider the particular challenge of addedweight to a roof structure, with the understanding that the addition of structural material tosupport this load must be considered alongside operational energy benefits that a green roofprovides. In addition, the research herein provides a methodological framework for evaluatingthe efficacy of energy-saving strategies in general, including relevant software tools
aggregating them into different sorting groups. 5. Assessing trends in responses by discipline or association with other responses.Survey Results In this paper, a second, subsequent survey was deployed (Table 2) with a range of collectedresponses generated from the first survey. Based on the data collected from Fall 2021 and Fall 2022 careerfair surveys, this section of the paper presents a key summary of results. Specifically, the data presentedhere allows for the identification of AEC industry characteristics of students' success deemed important tointerdisciplinary learning.Survey 1: Fall 2021 Survey Table 3 provides a summary breakdown of company recruitment across disciplines of graduates.When examining the data, there is a
detection techniques in structural systems based on Non Destructive Evaluation. He actively collaborated in the creation and development of the Monitoring Center for Intelligent Bridges and Structures, leading the analysis and structural evaluation of the systems. In the academic field, he has worked as a professor in the Civil Engineering career, in the area of structural engineering at the Instituto Tecnol´ogico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM) Campus Quer´etaro. He has directed research projects for undergraduate and master’s degree students. He has authored several technical publications of the Mexican Institute of Transportation, extensive publications in congresses, international and national symposiums
unable to initially interact withprofessors who are experts in the major of study they have chosen. In many programs, studentstake general education and prerequisite courses in their first few years before taking coursestaught by professors in the program major of their choice. This can potentially lead to studentsfeeling isolated and left questioning whether their choice of study was the correct decision. Withretention being an important issue in every higher education program, if interaction with expertsin a students’ field of study could happen earlier in the program, this interaction might foster anincrease in retention, providing students with a fuller educational experience.For Architectural Engineering students in a program with both
to connect skills from both pedagogies in architecture education.Implications for research and practice are provided.IntroductionMind maps are a visual pedagogic tool that can be implemented for students who have apreference towards this type of learning method. It is relevant to emphasize that architecturestudents need to have visual learning methods to a certain extent because it is an artisticcareer in which visuals are highly relevant. “...Architecture students are generally visuallyorientated and have rather creative minds, capacities that seem less compatible with the more-strict rules and systematic approach of doing research” [1], [2]. Considering that architectsare visually oriented, there is a preference towards the use of create
opposition between the specificand the general, the different and the similar, which are comparative studies that makethe dimensions of culture be represented as a particular choice [19]. Through this study,Hofstede initially identified four independent problems related to a dimension ofculture, which with studies conducted in subsequent years would be added one moreresulting in five dimensions of a culture where thanks to these models individuals in asociety can fall into one pole or another of each of these five mentioned above[18],[1],[11], the same as they are: Individualism, Power distance, Uncertaintyavoidance, Masculinity, and Long-term orientation [20].Individualism relates to the degree to which people belong to a group, and isconsidered in
Professoriate. MiguelAndr´es’s research includes sustainable infrastructure design and planning, smart and resilient cities, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andr´es is in developing and applying contemporary pedagogies for STEM courses, teaching empathy studies in engineering as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate change. Currently, MiguelAndr´es is validating his