University. A recipient of the DOE Nuclear Energy University Programs Fellowship, she has served as an Instructor for the Engr 120 freshmen engineering introductory class for the past three years where she shares her passion for coding and engineering with the next generation of engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Engagement for first year students: The effect of required participation in engineering engagement activitiesAbstract: Serving the demands for future engineering professionals in our society requiresincreasing retention of students in year one. This study is focused on students enrolled inInnovation
(described below), they were used as ameans to connect to teacher curriculum, engage classrooms, and train students, both on how theirresearch sensor operates and how best to interpret AQ data. Chemical Engineering outreachstudents, AirU faculty, and Breathe Utah were all involved in conducting the designed teachingmodules; AirU sensors are installed by the AirU faculty and sponsored staff. These partnershipsbetween faculty, undergraduates, community partners, and local high schools were key toachieving CS goals. After installation, outreach teams and faculty remain available totroubleshoot and address student and teacher follow-up questions.Teaching Modules: Opening Up the Black BoxAn important part of collaborating with middle and high school
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impact of Narrative, Character Creation, and Game Mechanics on Student Engagement in a Game-Based Chemical Engineering Laboratory Course1. IntroductionAs modern students have come of age in a time where video games, whether mobile, console, orsocial, have become ubiquitous, game-based learning (GBL) is gaining increased attention as atool used in education1-5. In GBL, games are used as environments and contexts where studentscan learn via trial-and-error with no permanent consequences6-8. Note that GBL is not merelyfree-form activity, but one with rules that guide and dictate the experience, as well as offering acondition in which the game can be “won”9,10.One
learn about phases other than the one they were assigned to investigate? 3. To what extent did the jigsaw session foster students’ perception of the need for individual accountability and support peer learning?MethodsWe present a balanced approach to threading a community-based, entrepreneurial designchallenge throughout the semester, focused on algal biofuel production. Participants includestudents (N=61) enrolled in a sophomore-level Chemical Process Calculations course at a largeminority-serving research university in the American Southwest. Students worked in teams onhomework assignments and design challenge deliverables. We divided the class into three largeteams, each focused on one of three production phases (i.e., growth
Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of Immersive Training on Senior Chemical Engineering Students' Prioritization of Process Safety Decision CriteriaIntroductionProcess safety is becoming a greater focus of chemical plant design and operation due to thenumber of incidents involving dangerous chemical accidents [1]. Since its creation nearly 20years ago, the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) has investigated 130 safety incidents and providedover 800 safety recommendations to operating chemical facilities. Following a gas well blowoutin 2018, the CSB gave a recommendation to the American Petroleum Institute (API) to establishrecommended practice on alarm management [2]. Similarly, in 2017, the CSB gave arecommendation to Arkema Inc. to
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 How much does student perception of course attributes impact student motivation?Intrinsic motivation creates a more positive and engaged atmosphere in the classroom, and ispositively correlated with students’ persistence in engineering. While an instructor can’t“intrinsically motivate” students, they certainly can create conditions that cultivate or defeatintrinsic motivation. In this study, the impact on students’ motivational state of five coursedesign features was measured using Guay, Vallerand, and Blanchard’s Situational MotivationScale (SIMS) (1). Course features considered included the incorporation of open-ended problemsolving, physical realization of
engineering laboratory sequence, many students have been exposed towriting laboratory reports, usually in a chemistry laboratory and/or physics laboratory course.Although writing laboratory reports is a valuable skill, today’s engineers are expected to reporttheir results and express their findings in a variety of different forms of oral, written, and visualcommunication [3].To help our students develop new and improved skills in effective communication, we havemodified our laboratory course sequence to highlight and address different approaches toreporting laboratory results. This new initiative in our senior chemical engineering laboratorysequences provides the students with a range of skill-sets that prepares them to communicatesuccessfully on a
St. Louis where she works extensively with faculty to enhance active learning strategies to help create inclusive, engaging classrooms. Her research ranges from communication networks in mammals and birds to metacognition in student learning.Dr. Erin D Solomon, Washington University in St. Louis Erin Solomon, Ph.D., (Social Psychology) is currently a research scientist and project manager in the Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education at Washington University in St. Louis. Her work focuses on the collection and analysis of educational data to evaluate the impact of curricular changes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. She also works to support STEM
years.iiMuch research has been done with regards to coming up with solutions to the problem ofattrition. One proposed solution is an emphasis on undergraduate research. Nagda et al studiedthe impact of one undergraduate research program, UROP, on student retention at the Universityof Michigan.iii They found that, for White, Hispanic and African American students,participation in UROP positively affected retention for sophomores in the University. In anotherstudy, David Lopatto at Grinnell College in Iowa looked at the effects of participating inundergraduate research on decisions to go to graduate school.iv The results he got were veryencouraging. About 91% of respondents indicated that their research experience sustained orincreased their decision to
and cleanup inthe Gulf of Mexico became the focus of the national news media.1 A second environmentalevent occurred in Europe in October 2010 - the release of toxic red sludge into the Danube Riverbasin in Hungary.2 The impact of an environmental accident may be widespread, and candevastate not only pristine nature areas and wildlife, but also the social and economic realities ofcommunities adjacent to the accident site. Many of these students have vacationed on thebeaches on the Gulf of Mexico since they were children; this history brings the harsh reality ofthe BP/Deepwater Horizon spill and its devastation on the communities along the Gulf Coast intomuch sharper focus for this generation of students. We believe integrating environmental
AC 2009-1257: IMPACT OF INTEGRATION OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSIN AN ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY: A CASE STUDYAdam Ekenseair, University of Texas, Austin Adam Ekenseair is a doctoral student in Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. He received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in May 2005. Currently he is working in the laboratory of Dr. Nicholas Peppas on "A Fundamental Investigation of Non-Fickian Penetrant Transport in Glassy Polymers." Adam is a Department of Defense (NDSEG) Fellow and a National Science Foundation (NSF-GREP) Fellow. He is also active in the American Institute of Chemical Engineering, the American Physical
AC 2008-74: ORAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS WORKSHOP FOR STUDENTSIN ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCEWilliam Krantz, National University of Singapore Page 13.955.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Oral Communication Skills Workshop for Students in Engineering and Applied ScienceAbstractThis paper provides an overview of a two-week non-credit workshop that focuses on the skillsneeded for effective formal oral and poster technical presentations. It is required for all graduatestudents in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the NationalUniversity of Singapore. Special considerations are a relatively large number of
Madeline Polmear is a PhD student in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engi- neering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and the societal impacts of engineering and technology.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts Uni- versity. He has additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial mindset can be used to further
, recent engineering graduates enteringthe workplace are still reported to be deficient in written and oral communication skills.This work investigates student perception of written and oral communication skills after theirparticipation in game-based activities as a means to determine whether game-based pedagogycould serve as a potential tool to enhance these skills in engineering undergraduates. Game-basedlearning incorporates game design elements in non-game contexts, balancing subject matter andgame play to help players engage in the information being presented, while allowing them tolearn how to apply it in real world contexts, such as communication in industry.Game-based communication activities were incorporated into one section of
medium to large class where one instructorcan function as a floating facilitator for up to sixty students. Although PBL has constructivistunderpinnings, incorporating CL into PBL to become CPBL includes social constructionistprinciples into the model. Designed in accordance with constructive alignment, the frameworkprovides a systematic structure to scaffold students in undergoing CPBL step by step to supportas well as engage students in learning. The cooperative learning elements in the model drivestudents to cooperate and support one another to learn as a team, allowing less monitoring fromthe facilitator compared to the small tutorial group PBL model.The motivation and engagement of students undergoing CPBL in learning were studied. A
also given a series of prompts designed to explore the way they study forthe course and to encourage them to make more direct connections between theory and their ownexperiences and learning. Students also self-assess their reflection using a provided rubric. Thecourse instructor provides comments as feedback for the first few iterations of this assignmentwithout an impact on the grade before starting to numerically assess the student responses andself-assessment for the rest of the semester.Further, in-class activities include regular use of a reading activity, in which students take time toexplain to one another the most important details of the week’s textbook reading, then discusswhy those details are important and relevant. This reading
learning experiences. Laboratory projectshave been shown to enhance development of discipline-specific skills and general research skills.Additionally, longer-term laboratory projects may allow students to develop skills associatedwith undergraduate research experiences. Undergraduate research has been shown to increase Page 13.316.2student satisfaction with education and serve as an “educational and personal-growth experiencewith many transferable experiences.”7,8The specific nature of student involvement in a course has a significant impact on studentsuccess and satisfaction.9-12 Biggs and Moore classify four types of motivation:12
before the start of the Spring 2019 semester was no more than8-10 hours in total.Overall, the first version of this course was largely successful. Student evaluations were overallquite positive, with 100% agreeing or strongly agreeing that the course added to theirunderstanding of the impact of engineering solutions on society and that the course made themdemonstrate their ability to communicate, and 96% saying the course “frequently” or “almostalways” required them to communicate effectively and engage in contemporary issues.Evaluations of the Learning Portfolios demonstrated that all students in the course achievedproficiency in each course learning goal. However, there are a number of minor improvementsthat will be made in future iterations
asengineering, defined as accountable disciplinary knowledge (ADK) [6], change over the courseof an undergraduate education and entry into an engineering profession. In the first years of anundergraduate engineering degree program, introductory classes often focus on textbookproblems, larger lectures, and individual written exams. The ability to produce specificnumerical results to written problems is therefore ADK. In later years, ADK increasingly shiftstowards teamwork, communication skills, research, and collection and analysis of data. Coursesbecome more project-based and assignments have longer timelines with more open-endedsolutions. For students this shift in ADK can be a source of frustration or anxiety, as theyexperience a misalignment between
order”—important updates, deadlines, and general instructor feedback regarding trends from class performance or engagement • Introduction to the topic of the day • Activity or open-ended question to establish the students’ existing schemata towards the topic of the day • Lecture and discussion on topic (emphasis on discussion) • Activity to reinforce lecture and discussion points, as well as evaluate student gains from class • Re-visiting any points deemed necessary from results of activitySummary of TopicsLike many technical communication courses, the focus is on both oral and writtencommunication. Audience analysis and communicating significance are two overarching themesthat are woven into all topics
asentrepreneurship, financial planning, cross-cultural communication and gender issues inengineering. Although many of the guest lecturers have a background in chemical engineering,all lectures are presented to engage a general engineer. As applicable, some of these lecturesinvolve exercises that the students must complete either before or after the lecture. For example,a lecture on entrepreneurship requires the students to develop a 30 second elevator pitch to a jobrecruiter. Term Project: The objective of the course project is to give the students the ability toapply the problem solving heuristic in teams to a particular business or organization. Each teamis required to carry out the analysis presented in Table 2 for their business
negatively impacts the finalproficiency of all students in the course. However, facilitating content and study environmentsthat enable students to practice formulating the equations to represent the physics and to relearnmath techniques outside of class has increased (anecdotal observation from a sample size of 15-20 students per year for >3 years) the proficiency and success of weaker students. The prevalence of cheating has been found to be as high as 80% with a higher percentageof students who cheat on assignments [1, 2]. After assigning and grading homework in the firstyear of this Advanced Transport Phenomena course, it became apparent that most students couldonly complete homework with the solutions manual open as a guide. Education
Page 13.673.6programmed with more flexibility. In these instances, the assessment processes and the learningjournals help spot the opportunity to introduce any given topic. For instance, it is foreseeable thatwhen the MT team members start observing project team meetings and providing feedback toteam leaders, some of these may contradict the feedback received and argue against the MT teammembers. Then, students are ready to be instructed on the “Giving and receiving constructivefeedback” topic.A Leadership Competency Dictionary has been created to support both this education processand the majority of assessment processes described in subsection III.2. In the first place, thisdictionary provides students with a framework of high-impact
written communication 93% (7%)Build / implement a design 95% (7%)* Sample is randomly assigned subset of the class, graded by a single instructor. For consistency, onlyassessments from this instructor are shown.Another window into Gizmo function is provided by the team- and individual- studentreflections that were completed after the Gizmo was built, demonstrated at the expo, andgiven away. As mentioned above, over 90% of students reflections capture insights onpossible improvements and design successes. This is a qualitative reflection, studentswill engage in quantitative assessment of projects later on in their curricula.ENGR 100 student evaluation of the experience is assessed both
live observance of changes in thephysical system such as the shift in heights of manometer fluid with flow.Conclusions & Future DirectionsAlthough there were many factors to consider that may have affected the results, the LC-DLMimplementation showed similar statistics with improved student outcomes, at least for someconcepts, at a university other than where the technology was developed, which suggeststransferability of the LC-DLM pedagogy. The on-site mentoring and discussions along with onlineinstructions, phone discussions were helpful for engaging the faculty in using the DLMs in theirclasses.Previous studies at the founding university have shown significant improvements with the moduleswhen compared to a control group. To further
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The
individual questions. Key feedback included practicing theimplementation from a faculty perspective instead of from a student perspective, and desire foradditional time spent on the educational psychology background. In addition, the workshopspurred some participants to request additional modules after seeing ease of use, and otherparticipants inquired about letting other faculty at their home institution use the LC-DLMs in theclassroom. This feedback will be used to improve future spoke workshops in the coming years,including two serving the South Central Region, one in the Northeast, and one in the West.Keywords: active learning, hands-on activities, disseminationIntroduction:Studies have shown that students participating in engaged, active
Kaiphanliam is a doctoral candidate in the Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bio- engineering at Washington State University (WSU). Her research focuses include miniaturized, hands-on learning modules for engineering education and bioreactor design for T cell manufacturing. She has been working with Prof. Bernard Van Wie on the Educating Diverse Undergraduate Communities with Affordable Transport Equipment (EDUC-ATE) project since Fall of 2017.Olufunso Oje, Olufunso Oje is a Masters student in the Educational Psychology program at Washington State University. His research interests include learning strategies in engineering education and multimedia learning. He has a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and
course involve technical communication, team writing, and analysis of thedata collected in lab. While creation of devices and collection of data occurred in the lab spaces,the rest of this work typically occurred outside of lab. As such, it is perhaps no surprise thatmoving from UOL to MIL had no statistically significant impact on student project scores. Whileteam projects were scored higher on average in MIL than in UOL, the p value was only 0.088.Furthermore, it may be worth noting that the same observations could be made for student peerevaluations of their team members. In the test course, students switch teams for each of their sixprojects and they tend to work with almost every peer in their section. Part of the score for theirteam