knowledge, skill, and experience are alsoleaving the workforce. The electric utility industry, like many others, is feeling the effect of babyboomers’ exodus to retirement. A variety of factors, including the growing retirement eligibilityand “…the generational shift in the traditional utility workforce…”1 is having an adverse effecton the utility industry.According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor, 46.2 million baby boomers, 46.9 million generation xand 46.4 million millennials were employed in the fourth quarter of 2014. Baby boomers beganto reach retirement age, 65, in 20112. All baby boomers will be over 65 by 2029 and will makeup more than 20 percent of the U.S. population3.To get ahead of the curve, EASi partnered with one of the largest electric
. Nelson & B. McCrigler, A service-learning collaborative project in a mechanical engineering technical writing class. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference, 289-293, 2014.[20] G. Getto and J. T. Labriola, “IFixit Myself: User-Generated Content Strategy in ‘The Free Repair Guide for Everything,’” IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 59, no. 1, 37–55, 2016.
completing an online questionnaire • Review documentation (e.g., website, facility layout, organizational structure, etc.) • A facilitated on-site discussion • A facility walk-through • A detailed report that includes observations and recommendations Figure 1. CR Assessment ProcessDuring the on-site facilitated session, the following topic areas are discussed (abridged): • History o General information o Reasons for being successful o Strategic plan • Marketing/Sales o Recent sales numbers o Weaknesses, threats, and opportunities o Strategic marketing plan • Customers o Primary customers/profiles o International business
identify emerging trends, pinpoint challenges and gain data-driven insights intothe forces shaping the technical talent pipeline and Industry 4.0 in the United States, and inparticular Southeast Michigan.Research objectives include:1 - Building on previous and ongoing research findings to provide a deeper and morecomprehensive understanding of the talent pipeline in United States.2 - Evaluating three key segments of the talent pipeline: 1) next-generation leaders, 2)undergraduate engineering students and 3) skilled trade apprentices.3 - Defining the fundamental DNA of the talent pipeline in terms of the professionalcompetencies, motivational factors and behavioral styles of the three groups.4 - Producing data-driven insights that industry and
. While believing strongly in the importance of this topic, the major reason given why more programs do not include leadership is that it is difficult to fit into the curriculum. With the rapid expansion of knowledge in all fields of engineering, and with the constraints on credit hours, leadership often takes a back seat. Those that are not providing leadership education are asking how this problem can be solved.It is clear that there is a need for leadership education for engineers based on requirements in themarketplace. A recent article in MarketWatch discusses this need.4 John Shinal writes in his column for MarketWatch /FINS (1/2), "Rather than focusing strictly on business acumen or technical skill, companies want top managers
resulted in identifying the need for combining course offerings ofa 4-year university and a nearby technical college. For the 4-year university, an associate ofscience degree requires a minimum of 60 credit hours (of which about half is university corecourses such as Composition, Algebra, and Social Science). A technical certificate requires aminimum of 18 hours. The number of hours for each program was determined by therequirements established by the institute’s governing body. Based on these constraints, thefollowing 2-year program was developed and approved by each institution’s curriculumcommittee, see Table 1.Table 1. Advanced Manufacturing Technician Curriculum (Sessions I and II refer to the two six seeks summersessions at the 4-year
the protection of trade secrets and confidential company data, communications that areprivate and confidential, and keeping a competitive advantage by protecting key technology andinformation. Therein lays the fundamental tension and intellectual property at the heart ofuniversity-industry collaborations/partnership, is often the most contentious issue.Intellectual Property (IP) has value to both universities and industry. But what exactly is IP?Intellectual property refers to rights that attach to intangible creations. In university-industrypartnerships, the main IP issues generally involve patents and copyrights, with trademarks tolesser extent. IP, in general, refers to a collection of rights held by not only inventors, but alsoauthors
, combustion testing, flares, process heaters, processburners, flare gas recovery, metallurgy, and equipment fabrication. Some instructors taughtmultiple topics. Each topic was covered in one or two 75-minute face-to-face sessions taughttwice a week at the local university. Two of the sessions, combustion testing and equipmentfabrication, were held at the industrial company where students were given a lecture and then atour of world-class combustion testing and manufacturing facilities (see Figure 1), respectively.All lectures including the tours were video-taped and uploaded to a server at the remoteuniversity for their students to watch at their convenience. (a) (b)Figure 1
, proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 845-850.6. A.J. Dutson, R.H. Todd, S.P. Magleby, and C.D. Sorensen, A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 17-28, 1997.7. H.I. Abu-Mulaweh and N.T. Younis, Local Industry Involvement in the Support, proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education, Session 1566.8. M.P. Brackin and J.D. Gibson, Capstone Design Projects with Industry: Emphasizing Teaming and Management Tools, 2005 American Society for Engineering Education conference.9. S. Laguette, Integration of Industry Partners
poster sessions and does not include an abstract of the project in theSenior Design Project Proceedings for that year.Project X Considerations: 1. The benefit to the Student makes this project worthwhile even though project details cannot be disclosed in the classroom or a public forum. 2. The tradeoff between not being able to fully present the project to other students and participating in designing and building an innovative, expensive, state-of-the-art, one-of- a-kind machine must be weighed for each situation and evaluated. 3. No one foresaw the time required to iron out an agreement acceptable to both the School and the Company; however, the Student was able to continue participating on the Company’s design
elements (which also serve as the meritreview criteria): 1.the general topic of combustion science (i.e., applied chemistry) around which the learning module will be structured (e.g., stoichiometry of oxygenated fuels, calculated and measured flame temperatures as function of stoichiometry and / or fuel, and types of combustion- generated pollutants and techniques for pollutant mitigation), 2.the general structure / pedagogy employed in the learning module, 3.the basic activities the learning modules will require students to conduct, 4.the expected improvement to the curriculum for enabling students to meet state / national proficiency requirements, 5.the expected use of award funds (including cost estimates), 6.a timeline of
offersa bachelor in information engineering technology and a bachelor in mechanicalengineering with a concentration in solar energy. Due to this fact, it is clear that ourinvolvement enhanced the broader impact of the project. This collaboration has providedsome technical resources that are not typically available for an institution of our size andlocation.The scope of the general project for NNMC included the following requirements: • Retrieve and store data from a minimum of 102 data collection points at the battery/photovoltaic (PV) site. The data is sampled at time-intervals that vary from one second to one minute. • Develop and implement a data model to capture data being generated by the battery
supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. (NSF 1700581).1.0. IntroductionAdvanced manufacturing (AM) employers are challenged to find enough adequately trainedworkers. One reason may be that the K-12 educational system has failed to engage or exposestudents to technical application or workplace skills either early or extensively enough, orarticulate high school students to 2- or 4-year manufacturing programs [1, 2]. Another reason isthat institutions of higher education (IHEs) often produce too few graduates to fulfill AMindustry demands, and many engineering technology graduates are not gaining the right skill setsfor available positions [3]. Quite possibly, this misalignment may include skills that can be hardto manage and
industrialtraining site and receive classroom and practical application training on full life-cycle utilitiesproject management with the help of company experts from Quanta Services.IntroductionAs the technology innovates quickly, a pro-active industry-university partnership has constituteda backbone to an effective future workforce development including engineers, engineeringtechnologist and technicians who can adopt the technological innovations promptly andeffectively in the industrial environments. As the highly-skilled and experienced technicalemployee from the baby-boomers generation begin to retire in vast amounts, stable and quickreplacement of management and technical workforce with the qualified employee has been achallenging problem to solve [1
articles and papers in conference proceedings, two technical reports, and seven poster presentations focusing on mechatronics, product identification, product lifecycle management, assembly systems, collaborative engineering, automation, and energy efficiency. She was active member of Euro- pean Robotic Association EUROBOT, and currently serves as a co-advisor of ODU IEEE Car Team. She had internships in engineering services, aerospace, and power generation industries.Dr. M. Brian Thomas, Trine University Page 24.1083.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
Figure 1 Controls Technology PathwayApproachA strong connection between educational institutions and industry is crucial in the collaborationprocess. In this case, the relationship was primarily driven by industry, who demonstrated apurpose and demand for the Controls Technology Pathway. The partnership covered post-secondary academic levels, including high school Concurrent Enrollment, Career and TechnicalEducation (CTE), technical colleges, Salt Lake Community College, and Weber State Universityjoined by several Wasatch Front manufacturing industry partners. Employer engagement isessential during the design process of the pathway; they offer leadership and ongoing support forthe programs. As partners, they provide work-based learning
to keep minds occupied as students wait in the halls.3.3 Personalization: Education Customized to Suit Individual Learners 1. IoT tools and the data generated from them about individual learners can be used to create special content for students that could be sent to them directly on their tablets and smartphones or other devices. For example, a student whose preferred learning mode (say visual vs. audio) is known, can receive a personalized lesson in the preferred mode once they are identified through biometric identifier or an id reader. 172. With IoT, students can easily access personalized assessment and feedback. The
of the faculty are funded mostly from discretionary accounts. Because gifts make asizable portion of departmental discretionary account one could say our benefactors indirectlysupport our labs and partially support the professional development of faculty.This paper discusses an alternative approach to alumni giving with a direct impact upon theexperiential learning environment.Figure 1: Light analogy of the current state of technology. The EE curriculum at senior and MS leveltraditionally resides to the left deeper into the individual technical fields while the changes we experiencetoday are arguably fueled by the confluence. 2. How Can Alumni Help Realize the Full Potential of a Lab-Intensive Curriculum?While our program has a long
professors’ opinions. They also liked the diversity in the board members’ answers and industries.7. What did you find unnecessary or useless about the forum? Some did not feel attendance at the forum should be necessary (see question 5 above). Some felt certain questions were too specific to a particular student, repetitive (either in this session or from previous years), or focused on social issues. Some felt the option to text in questions was unnecessary (see question 4 above), there was too much focus on jobs rather than graduate school, there were distracted students (asleep or on phones), and some of the responses were too generic.8. Did you learn anything from the forum that will change your future plans for engineering? If so
Paper ID #24603The AutoDrive Challenge: Autonomous Vehicles Education and Training Is-suesDr. Jennifer Melanie Bastiaan, Kettering University Jennifer Bastiaan received her Ph.D. in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering from the University of Waterloo. She is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Kettering Univer- sity, where she is focused on teaching and research in ground vehicle systems. She is a veteran of the U.S. automotive industry with two decades of experience, including modeling and physical testing programs. Her technical research interests include vehicle dynamics, tire
Tables 1 and 2) use the same video instruction as the sessions that thesophomores complete. However, the students are required to watch these videos again forreview purposes and also because the goal is that the students will address the instructionalmaterial more carefully at this later point in their academic career. In terms of assignments forthese lessons, the students are again required to revise and upload their resume to Blackboard,attend the career fair and upload to Blackboard conversations with four companies, and updatetheir Handshake profile and upload their revised resume to Handshake.Table 3 also shows the new lessons that all engineering seniors are required to complete. Lesson1 provides general strategies for obtaining full-time
qualitativeanalysis was conducted to understand how the student capstone design experience changedduring the pandemic.The qualitative analysis revealed that the lack of significant difference may be due to the fact thatstudents rapidly adapted to the remote learning disruption. The results provide an insight into thevarious ways in which students acclimated to the crisis circumstances. These adaptationsmanifested in the form of product and process adaptations, in which students swiftly adjustedtheir final product or design process to respond to the evolving crisis. Students used variousstrategies such as changing team roles and ways of communication, using different tools andtechnology, and creative technical solutions to drive product and process
, there is no clear definition in theliterature of what a mutually-beneficial partnership entails, across the full range of educational,research, and professional development and service activities carried out within the engineeringand technical community. The authors of this paper established informally that educators in bothengineering and engineering technology are often challenged by this lack of research on soundrecommendations regarding collaborative efforts. This paper is intended to be the start of alarger systemic literature review.IntroductionTo date, no broad, holistic studies have been conducted on best practices for maintaining multi-faceted relationships between industry and academia. There has been some research oncollaboration
challenges during the semester long project.Question 1. Which one of the following has presented you with the greatest challenges incompletion of your Capstone project? a. Using curricular/technical knowledge gained in your courses or learned independently to solve the problem b. Dealing with communication problems, delays, different personalities, company specific constraints (policies, protocols, procedures), scope changes, or prioritization? c. Internal capstone team issuesThe results from this question can be seen in Figure 1. Students overwhelming reported that thegreatest challenges were related to the working within a professional work environment. This isconsistent with previous research that reports frustration with
conference, including students and faculty from variousuniversities/colleges, government agency representatives, and various community leaders. Theconference is a venue for the students to receive recognition for their efforts, gain experiencefrom presenting in a professional setting, and to gain knowledge from several informativesessions led by government agency researchers and officials. The community representatives arealso provided with training sessions that focus on grant writing and loan procedures, as well asinformative sessions for at-risk coastal communities on the identification and strategies regardingsea level rise vulnerabilities and emergency management [1].Not all student projects that are supported by CUPP have obtained technical
information may provide potential mechanisms toincentivize individual faculty engagement in industry partnerships, foster overall program andschool support of these collaborations, and serve as a model for extending this work to otherinstitutions.Introduction Industry partnerships in capstone design programs have increased substantially over thepast few decades. Studies have highlighted how these partnerships can be beneficial to multiplestakeholders [1], [2]. Working with industry partners can benefit students, engineering programsand partnering companies. However, potential benefits to faculty are rarely considered. Based onthe critical role faculty play in student engagement and learning, more consideration of facultyengagement within
been invented yet - 49% of current jobs have the potential for machine replacement, with 60% having at least 1/3 of their activities automated - 80% of the skills trained for in the last 50 years can now be outperformed by machines - At a global level, technically automatable activities touch the equivalent of 1.1 billion employees and $15.8 trillion in wages The rapidly changing landscape of the workplace and associated uncertainty has raised a lot of questions about the future of our education system. The impact of different industrial revolutions on education, just like all other parts of society has been profound. Education 1.0 was no education at all. At that time children worked in manual jobs and child labor was the order of
interest in their coursework increased dramatically as theyprogressed through the curriculum. Figure 1 below is drawn from the department’s senior surveydata [1] and shows graduates’ average reported interest in their classes for each year of thecurriculum. There is a large increase from the second to third year, with smaller increases fromthe first to second and third to fourth years. While there are likely many reasons for that shift,there was a consistent trend in the associated qualitative feedback of students indicating that theirinterest increased as they started to see a clearer connection between what they were learning andthe kinds of work they were likely to encounter as practicing engineers.Figure 1: Senior Survey Reporting of
Paper ID #23329The Industry Scholars Program: An Immersive Professional Experience forUndergraduatesDr. Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego Bre Przestrzelski, PhD, is a post-doctoral research associate in the General Engineering department in the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, where she seeks to innovatively integrate social justice, humani- tarian advancement, and peace into the traditional engineering canon. Before joining USD in August 2017, Bre spent 9 years at Clemson University, where she was a three-time graduate of the bioengineering program (BS, MS, and PhD), founder of The Design &
Grants(PPG) program to support the delivery of P2 and E3 assessments to a wide variety of commercialand industrial sites statewide. In 2016, the program merged with ENMRN, which serves as theCollege’s formalized outreach organizational unit.NMSU is among a group of academic institutions across the country that provides sucheducational awareness and outreach services to the business community, with EPA havingfunded several university- and community-college-based technical assistance programs since thepassage of the P2 Act in 1990 [1]. In states with a large manufacturing presence (where thereduction of chemical and hazardous materials is most needed), EPA's funding has beenespecially beneficial. Nationally, the program leverages engineering