Paper ID #21114Outcomes Assessment in an ACCE Construction Management ProgramDr. David L. Batie, East Carolina University David L. Batie is an Associate Professor and ECU Scholar-Teacher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Outcomes Assessment Development in an ACCE Construction Management ProgramThis paper presents the various perspectives on and levels of outcomes assessment developed bya construction management program implementing the new American Council for ConstructionEducation (ACCE) Student Learning Outcomes accreditation requirements. The variouselements of assessment
construction professionals deal with adiverse group of professionals in architecture, engineering and construction. In addition, there isan expectation within the construction industry of 18% growth in the use of Design-Builddelivery method over the years of 2018 to 2021 [2]. Design-Build can be considered a morecollaborative delivery method than Design-Bid-Build due to the engagement of contractor anddesigner during the initial development of a project. The rise in use of more collaborativedelivery methods, such as Design-Build, Construction Management at Risk, Integrated ProjectDelivery, as well as previous research [3], [4] indicates the need for improving collaborationfrom an industry perspective. Additionally, construction programs are aware of
Paper ID #32440Gender Differences in Construction Management Students’ Sense of Belong-ingDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Man- agement Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus, her MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil. Her research is mainly
students’learning outcomes at the end of the semester illustrated the advantages of this type of pedagogy.In summary, this course can be judged a successful pedagogical experience for teaching BIM inConstruction Engineering and Management programs (Li Wang, 2014).Case Study 2Learning Construction Management includes Scheduling and Estimating techniques along withManagement skills. Learning the logic of Construction Management and managing itsaccompanying risks at the undergraduate level is very difficult because of lack of fieldexperience. Teaching construction scheduling to students requires detailed and comprehensivelearning of the methods and procedures involved in construction along with the impacts of riskand uncertainty on the methods and processes
Department. He received Doctorate in Engineering from University of Nebraska –Lincoln. He is a recipient of 1. Outstanding Ed- ucator Award – Region II, in 2016 and Construction Excellence in Teaching Award for Region II in 2013 presented by the Associated Schools of Construction. Dr. Meadati serves as a Graduate Program Co- ordinator and played vital role in obtaining the initial accreditation and re-accreditation for Construction Management Masters’ Program. He received outstanding dissertation award from University of Nebraska- Lincoln in 2008. Dr. Meadati’s research interests include Building Information Model (BIM), BIM applications in Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) education, 3D laser scanning
college, the University of Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. John Edward Patterson, Norwich University PhD – The School of the Built Environment Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh, Scotland MSCM – Masters of Science – Construction Management School of Architecture Clemson UniversityDr. Nadia Al-Aubaidy, Norwich University Dr. Nadia Al-Aubaidy is an Assistant Professor at the David Crawford School of Engineering at Norwich University and a Board Member at Vermont Green Building Network. Before joining her Ph.D. program, she worked as a Deputy Resident Engineer for the US. Army Corps of Engineers. She obtained her doctorate in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at
importance and value of each teammember’s position. These included role-playing negotiations, client relationship management,and the two active-learning games. All of these were designed to expose non-productive conflictto encourage the students to consider alternative, collaborative attitudes for managingconstruction projects from an inter-personal relationship perspective.Since this study compared conflict management styles of the same students pre-program andpost-program, the researcher employed a causal-comparative analysis to detect changes in thestudents’ conflict management styles while enrolled in CWU’s four-year, campus based,American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) accredited CM program.28 Thesecomparisons helped the researcher
from University of Nebraska –Lincoln. He is a recipient of 1. Outstanding Ed- ucator Award – Region II, in 2016 and Construction Excellence in Teaching Award for Region II in 2013 presented by the Associated Schools of Construction. Dr. Meadati serves as a Graduate Program Co- ordinator and played vital role in obtaining the initial accreditation and re-accreditation for Construction Management Masters’ Program. He received outstanding dissertation award from University of Nebraska- Lincoln in 2008. Dr. Meadati’s research interests include Building Information Model (BIM), BIM applications in Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) education, 3D laser scanning, Radio frequency Identification (RFID) and
capacity, he man- aged projects ranging in size from $4 million to over $115 million and was responsible for overall project execution including budget and cost controls, procurement, safety, scheduling, quality, and client satisfac- tion. Anthony received both his Ph.D. in Planning, Design and Construction and master’s degree (M.S.) in Construction Management from Michigan State University. He received his bachelor’s degree (B.S.) from Eastern Michigan University and also holds a master electrical license in the State of Michigan. Anthony is a committee member for the Transportation Research Board - Standing Committee on Project Delivery Methods, a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, and Ronald E
experience as a project manager in multiple building construction projects. Dr. Kermanshachi has con- ducted several research projects which were awarded by Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and Construction Industry Institute (CII). Dr. Kermanshachi has received several prestigious national and regional awards, including the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Professional Service Award, ASCE Excellence in Education (Ex- CEEd) Fellowship, Aggies Commit to Professional Student Educational Experiences, Graduate Teaching Lecturer Fellowship, and Climate Award. She was also the only academic recipient of the Texas and Louisiana Engineering News Record
civil structures [1,11, 12]; (2) increasing engagement with core topics by moving from abstract to interactivelearning [7, 11, 13]; (3) introducing the engineering design process in a quick, easy, andvisible way [14, 15]; (4) bridging the physical and digital model within the classroom [7]; (5)integrating hands-on experience with digital work in a creative capstone project [7]. Thispaper aims to evaluate the feasibility of integrating laser scanning technology in theconstruction engineering management curriculum. The study conducted a thorough literaturereview to assess how laser scanning technology can improve SLOs required by ACCE. Thecontributions of the study involve (1) helping educators in construction engineering andmanagement programs
Character, 12(4), pp 1-639. Tatum, C.B. (2018) Learning Construction Engineering: Why, What, and How?, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 2018, 144(3)40. Wang, X., Wang, Y. and Prevost, A. (2017) A Researcher–Practitioner Partnership on Remedial Math Contextualization in Career and Technical Education Programs, New Directions for Community Colleges, 178 (3), pp 23-3441. Zepke, N. (2013) Threshold concepts and student engagement: Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge. Active Learning in Higher Education 14(2) 97 –10742. Adrian, J and Adrian, D. (1999) Construction Accounting, Financial, Managerial, Auditing and Tax, Stipes Publishing, Champaign, Il.
- neering program evaluator for ABET. He is an American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) Fellow, a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society.Dr. Simeon J. Komisar, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Komisar is the Backe Chair and Program Director of Environmental Engineering at FGCU c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Learning in Engineering Project Management Classes: Does Technology Matter?AbstractIncreasing the interest, attention and engagement of engineering students in learning engineeringand construction project management is a genuine challenge. Appropriate use of educationaltechnologies such as cloud-based student
Paper ID #21308The Use of Peer Teaching Quality Managers to Improve Student Learning ina Construction Project Management CourseDr. Anthony Torres, Texas State University Dr. Torres, a native of New Mexico, joined the Department of Engineering Technology (Concrete In- dustry Management program) in August 2013 where he teaches Concrete Construction Methods and a variety of project management courses. He received both of his graduate degrees, Ph.D. and M.S., in Civil Engineering (Structural), from the University of New Mexico. He obtained his B.S. degree, also in Civil Engineering, from New Mexico State University. Dr
described above could be readily adapted to any university. Every other teamcompeting at ASC is from a civilian university, so the structure is not uniquely military.Additionally, nearly all of the projects used in the Crucible are designed and constructed bycivilian firms, and a university partnering with its local industry or advisory board could findsponsors with relevant projects for their program. Additionally, the event has been modified to fit in a civil engineering program by addingelements of geotechnical, environmental, and structural design elements. Other universities couldeasily incorporate additional civil engineering sub-disciplines, or they could adapt thecompetition for an architecture or construction management program
provides a laboratory ofcommon experience for development of language, logic, and problem-solving skills in theclassroom; 3. A democracy demands that its citizens make personal and community decisionsabout issues in which scientific information plays a fundamental role, and they hence need aknowledge of science as well as an understanding of scientific methodology; 4. For somestudents, it will become a lifelong vocation or avocation; and 5. The nation is dependent on thetechnical and scientific abilities of its citizens for its economic competitiveness and nationalneeds [12].Upon graduation from undergraduate construction programs, graduates are engaged in thedesign, planning, engineering, construction, estimating/budgeting, management
buildingmanagement, such as construction management, engineering, architecture, interior design, andmore. A 2007 study of 4,600 facility managers found the average age was 48, with 24 percent ofthe workforce being 55 years or older [6]. As the gap grows between older generations leavingthe industry and younger generations that are not aware of FM career opportunities,organizations like IFMA are dedicating resources to develop career awareness and education. Todate, IFMA has 24 international accredited programs that provide degrees in FM [7]. Aware ofthe resources available, universities are investigating the potential of developing FM degreeprograms. Through the experience of developing an FM degree program in another university,the author knows the
modern construction relies heavily on technology, materials, and methods, the executionof design and the profession of Construction Engineering and Management is largely human-centric.Construction Engineering and Construction Management graduates need to be equipped with theknowledge, analytical methods, technical skills, and human perspectives that will allow them tolead and manage themselves so that they can successfully lead and manage others as well as thevarious resources necessary to complete complex construction projects and schedules that meetor exceed contract, budget, and safety objectives on a consistent basis [1] [2] [3]. The key toconstruction productivity is human factors [4] . In a 2016 survey of 36 contractors,“communication” and
project managers to field engineers. As shown in Figure 3, all PEOs met the goal. Part ofthe assessment process was also to make sure proper documentation is done for the tools, as wellas the results and analysis of the data collected. This not only helps document the assessmentprocess but also provides for organizing and maintaining the data over many assessment cycles.Thus, the program would adopt a system where surveys, data generated, and analysis conductedwould be stored on the program’s shared folder in each cycle.B. Student Outcomes (SOs)Since the purpose of the paper is to present the assessment framework utilized as one that couldbe adopted by other Construction Engineering Programs, the authors will demonstrate theframework
civil engineering program evaluator for the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). He is an American Society of Civil Engineering Fellow (ASCE), a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society.Dr. Simeon J. Komisar, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Komisar is the Program Director of Environmental Engineering at FGCU c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Using Poll App to Improve Active Learning in an Engineering Project Management Course Offered to Civil and Environmental Engineering StudentsAbstractProject management knowledge areas such as cost estimating, financial evaluations and
engineering education is helping students develop effectiveelectronic graphical communication skills to convey their design solutions. Many undergraduatecivil and architectural engineering programs address this at the document creation stage byteaching Autodesk AutoCAD or Revit to create 2-D or 3-D structural design files. However,students tend to have limited exposure to commercial software for document management andmarkup that allows for coordination between the engineer, architect, and contractor teams.Bluebeam Revu is one such software that has emerged as an industry standard for annotation andmarkup of engineering design documents.Previous educational studies on the use of Bluebeam have been in construction managementcourses where students
Con- struction Management. Saeed completed his PhD in Construction Management while he got a master of science in Management Information Systems. He is continuing his research on simulation to provide a comprehensive supplementary method in construction management education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Thirty-Hour Safety Course for Construction Technology Academic ProgramsConstruction safety is an important aspect of every construction project in the United States.Safety training is provided by construction industry companies for individuals involved withsafety programs as professional development, non-credit courses, seminars and in-companytraining classes. The safety training
, creativity and innovation in construction. .Dr. George D. Ford, Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi State’s Building Construction Science (BCS) pro- gram. Dr. Ford has 15 years of industrial experience including corporate work, and 16 years of teaching experience at the post-secondary level.Ms. Tori Thompson, Mississippi State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Is Summer Semester Effective Enough in Studio-based Construction Programs? Saeed Rokooei, Ph.D., PMP, George Ford, Ed.D., PE, Tori Thompson Mississippi State UniversityAbstractLecture and lab course formats are still
analysis andinvestigation. The majority of projects were focused more on the pre-construction phase of aproject where teams are tasked with addressing design and construction related skills such asestimating, scheduling, constructability analysis, and cost/value propositions. This approach wasparticularly true from respondents representing ACCE and NAAB programs that collaboratedtogether.Makeup of student teams was categorized into three distinct areas: 1. Within Discipline: CM or Architecture students assuming various different roles such as estimator, scheduler, superintendent, project manager, architect, engineer, owner. 2. Between Disciplines: CM and Architecture students assuming their discipline-specific roles and executing
of Science and Technology. He is a visiting professor at the Bamenda University Cameroon, His interests are in Structural Mechanics, strength of material for sustainable construction, Bridge Construction. He has written and published several studies in collaboration with faculty in the research area of strength of material. He is an active member of the Cameroonian Association of Civil Engineer (CACE) also an active member of American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE).He was a Co-PI on a USDA proposal, Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program 2014 also, serve as Co-PI on a DWC Myrtle beach water management, he is a Reviewer for the technical journal (IJME).Dr. Christian A. Bock Hyeng may be reached at
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student Perception as a Planning Input in a Project-Based Construction Program Saeed Rokooei, Ph.D., PMP and Greg Hall, Ph.D., AIA, NCARB Mississippi State UniversityAbstractThis paper addresses the results of the first stage of a study that explores different factorsimpacting students’ perception in a construction program that presents content through aninnovative curricular model—studio-based learning. While there are disciplines outside of thosethat traditionally embrace studio-based learning such as architecture, art, and design, theapplication of this method to construction is limited. The
introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Challenges and Opportunities Observed in the Implementation of a New Architectural Engineering Undergraduate Academic ProgramAbstractIn the fall of 2018, a new, first-of-its-kind in Canada architectural engineering undergraduateprogram was launched. The program features 24 months of compulsory / inclusive coop workexperience, along with a series of core studio courses in each of the eight academic terms. Eachof these courses will involve the planning and execution of a series of design projects thatintegrate and put into practice concepts covered in the other courses the students
2007graduates who took the earlier version of the course said during a recent campus visit that he hasnot designed a house in his career as a structural engineer, but he has designed a fire station.Most importantly the architectural design course prepares civil engineering students for theirfuture roles in designing and managing real building projects.References[1] ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020, Criterion 3. StudentOutcomes, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3. [Accessed December 17, 2019].[2] ASCE Commentary - On the ABET Program Criteria for Civil and Similarly NamedPrograms, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), January, 2019.[3
Sustainable Design and Construction(SDC) in the construction management program from two universities, Kennesaw State University(KSU) and the University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver), in construction major or minor. Themajority of survey respondents were from construction or civil engineering major. But there wasone student from CU Denver who was in a dual degree program. Table 1 shows the demographicsdata of both universities. Most students (75%) who study in construction at both universities weremale and did not have a minor. The most significant difference in demographics between thestudents at KSU and CU Denver was related to ethnicity. For the work experience, the similaritiesare there were about 50% to 60% of students in both universities had
Danney, Texas A&M University Nicholas Danney is a graduate student and teaching assistant in the Zachry Department of Civil Engi- neering at Texas A&M University, and will begin employment with Walter P. Moore Houston Structures Group in Summer 2019. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Rethinking Computer-Aided Design in the Civil Engineering Curriculum: Impact and Lessons LearnedAbstractIn response to the removal of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) instruction from the First YearEngineering Program at Texas A&M University, and at the urging of the departmental IndustrialAdvisory Committee, a visualization course comprised of CAD and Building