visualization due to their familiarity with computers and video gaming, thehypothesis is that either “DTVR” or “CVR” would supplement and enhance student learningabove and beyond levels achieved through conventional physical experiment only mode.Assessment Experimental Design The Intact Group method was used to assess the impact of different modules on studentlearning. [32] Among three learning settings, “physical experiment only” mode was set as a“control” group, and the remaining two “DTVR” and “CAVE” modules were set as“experimental” treatment groups. The “control” group consisted of students who did not haveaccess to either “DTVR” or “CAVE” modules. Learning of the subject matter in the “control”group prior to the physical experiment was
self-exploration ofproblems by: Providing an environment that facilitates the integration of engineering analysis and engineering design by allowing users to explore different design options in early stages even before the detailed designs are made Stimulating an environment for design-analysis exploration, in which questions like „what-if‟, „why‟, „what‟ and „how‟ will be more effectively answered through on-the-fly simulation and visualization. Allowing better understanding of practical situations through solving problems, where conventional equations do not apply, and also beyond “toy” textbook problems. Enabling the transition from a model of education that is teacher-centered and passive to
JerseyInstitute of Technology, and the University of Puerto Rico in Mayagüez. The goal of the Centeris to become a national focal point for developing structured organic particulate systems used inpharmaceuticals and their manufacturing processes. Rowan University has partnered as anoutreach/education member institution to develop teaching modules for K-12 and college levelstudents. The Rowan University efforts have focused on mobile, hands-on teaching modules,problem sets and illustrative examples. Mobile, self-contained experiments in V-mixing,pneumatic conveying, particulate deagglomeration and segregation, and hopper flow have beendesigned, constructed and integrated in chemical engineering courses and K-12 outreach efforts.Experiments involving the
Paper ID #10355Enhancing the STEM Curriculum Through a Multidisciplinary Approachthat Integrates Biology and EngineeringProf. Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University Jennifer Vernengo is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Jennifer re- ceived her Ph.D. from Drexel University in 2007. She began work as a materials scientist at Synthes Bio- materials, then joined Drexel University College of Medicine as postdoc in 2009. Jennifer two published research papers and one patent in the area of injectable biomaterials for orthopedic tissue replacement and repair. She is particularly interested in
Paper ID #10148JTF Web-Enabled Faculty and Student Tools for More Effective Teachingand Learning Through Two-Way, Frequent Formative FeedbackProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is professor in the Materials Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials science and engineering. His research interests include strategies for web-based teaching and learning, misconceptions and their repair, and role of formative feedback on conceptual change. He has co-developed a
reverseengineer the model rocket parts, digitize each part into a virtual solid model, and then assemblethe parts into a virtual solid model of the entire rocket. The only additional instructor-suppliedinformation, beyond the engineering design process, was a basic understanding of center ofgravity, center of pressure, and how they relate to rocket stability.As the teams worked through the design process, they developed solid models of their payloadsusing Solid Works (Figure 1). A design review in the form class presentations allowed the teamsto explain how all the project constraints were being met as well as to receive feedback on theirdesigns. The completed payload designs were fabricated using a solid laser sintering process inMSOE’s Rapid Prototype
AC 2012-4676: FOSTERING STUDENTS’ CAPABILITY OF DESIGNINGEXPERIMENTS THROUGH THEME-SPECIFIC LABORATORY DESIGNPROJECTSDr. Hyun W. Kim, Youngstown State University Hyun W. Kim is a professor of mechanical engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Indus- trial Engineering at Youngstown State University. He has been teaching and developing the Thermal Fluid Applications course and the companion laboratory course for the past few years. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Ohio and is currently conducting applied research in hydraulics and micro gas turbines. He helps the local industry and engineers with his expertise in heat transfer and thermal sciences. Kim received a B.S.E. degree from Seoul National
for Engineering Education, 2011 Navy Metrology Engineering Center STEM Outreach through the STEP Program: Challenges, Lessons Learned and Application to DoD StrategyBackground:The United States and especially the Department of Defense (DoD) has historically reliedheavily upon scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians to innovate, design, produceand maintain a technically superior capability to defend and advance the interests of the UnitedStates, both at home and globally. The United States maintained a leading edge technologicadvantage through and beyond World War II until it was stunned by the Soviet Union‟s launchof Sputnik 1 on October 4, 1957. Sputnik 1 was the first artificial
Engineering Education. His research is supported through various internal and external funding agen- cies including the National Science Foundation. He is a popular and well-respected instructor, and has received many teaching awards including the Regents Distinguished Teaching Award in 2010 at OSU.Dr. Kerri S Kearney, Oklahoma State University Dr. Kerri Kearney is an associate professor of educational leadership at Oklahoma State University. Her professional experience is in both education and organizational consulting. She holds an M.B.A. and an Ed.D. Her research agenda focuses on the emotional impacts of human transition, other mothering, visual methodologies in qualitative research, and other organizational and
provided withvery little speed and no special features beyond surface movement. With the monetarybonuses, players can purchase upgrades or perks to improve their gaming experience.Upgrades can be performance based (such as extra speed, thrusters, or better brakes for therover), aesthetic (such as changing the color of the rover or adding parts), or additionalfeatures (such as vertical boosts or hovering).It is a challenge in any game to teach a player how to play and to guide them through thegame world. When dealing with an education-based game, the challenge intensifies due to the Page 24.1092.6inherent variations in student backgrounds (e.g., highly
Page 13.92.4 Figure 1. The general structure of the Engineering curriculum at ECU. III. THE PROJECT-DRIVEN TEACHING APPROACHTo successfully meet the course objectives, two major design projects were developed to coverfundamental concepts in the instrumentation and controls areas. The first project was athermometer design project that requires the student to design a thermistor-based digitalthermometer; the second was a coupled-tank level control system design project. The concepts,analysis methods, and design approaches tied to the two projects are illustrated in Figure 2. Thispaper, however, addresses only the second project and discusses how control concepts weretaught through this project-driven approach. Specifically
to information to peoplewho would not otherwise have the privilege [1]. Distance learning has been implemented for decades and proven to be a viable alternativeto traditional learning practices [2]. It works well for classes where predefined information istransferred from instructor to student, for example, history or basic math. A major bottleneckoccurs when a student must obtain his or her own data through an experiment or laboratorywork. It is important for a student to get hands-on learning to prepare them for a future inindustry [3]. There is currently no system in place that allows a remote user to have the sameexperience as a student who is physically able to participate in an experiment. This hands oninteraction is how
appropriate sustainability content into those mid-level courses.Our larger project includes five major areas of work, some of which have been publishedpreviously. This paper will focus on the fifth area, where we discuss with sustainabilityeducation experts what they think should be in our assessment framework through a professionalconference, online conversations, and a workshop, and we introduce the framework itself.First, however, in the interest of providing context, here are summaries of all five studies:(1) To develop this framework, we began by doing a content analysis of existing literature published on sustainability in engineering education.7 We found ecofeminist theory8–10 and polarity management tools11 useful for understanding why
. Page 24.240.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 BUILDING A STUDENT- STUDENT-GENERATED INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO LIBRARY FOR THERMODYNAMICSAbstract Current college students are accustomed to documenting and sharingtheir experiences through text, photo, and video, thanks to the ready availabilityof all of these through personal portable devices. The democratization of videoproduction and access has led to the possibility to both teach and learn with videoas never before. This work seeks to capitalize on student expectations and thecurrent technological environment to bring the benefits of both teaching andlearning with video into core technical undergraduate engineering
. Page 24.214.4Since 1996 the ABET Outcomes Assessment Criteria have offered a set of guidelines to assurethat engineers are equipped to succeed and lead in this new world4. Among the most vital ofthese criteria is Outcome h: “the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context”. Properlyunderstood, Outcome h goes far beyond contextual awareness. It provides the bond betweenvirtually all other ABET outcomes, linking the profession’s traditional strengths in scientificknowledge (Outcome a) with design (Outcomes b and c), multidisciplinary teamwork (Outcomed), and knowledge of contemporary issues (Outcome j). Outcome h is doubly important forengineering education
characterizethe steady-state behavior of the motor, including 1. Motor torque vs. slip 2. Motor Power factor vs. loading 3. Motor Efficiency vs. loadingThe performance characteristics of the motor will eventually be used to compare with simulatedresults obtained from the follow-on lab, which requires students to develop a computer model ofthe motor based on standard motor tests.The system diagram of Fig. 1 contains each of the primary components of the test setup. Themotor under test (MUT) is a 3-phase, 3-hp, 4-pole, 230 Vac, induction motor. The 3-phasesource voltage is controlled through a 3-phase autotransformer. The MUT is connected to acradled dynamometer, which is simply a DC machine for which the bearings are set
. The Experiments1. Slider Control of the Robotic Arm:This experiment is designed to give the lab user a feel of the workings of the robotic arm.Each of the servomotors (degrees of freedom (DOF)) of the robotic arm is controlled by aslider on the front panel of the LabVIEW VI. The user moves each slider to move each of theDOFs.The LabVIEW VI was designed so that the user gives in the angular positions desired foreach of the motors of the robotic arm. Each slider has variations from -90° through 0° to 90°.Each slider has a digital display beside it so that the user can view the exact angular positionhe is sending to the arm. Buttons are also included beside each digital display forincrementing and decrementing the angles. The design lets only
providingsupplementary material based on real world facilities in a format similar to a case-study.However, the material would go beyond the case-study format and include numerous skill basedproblems, similar to traditional textbook problems, based on the facilities. By using the Engagedproblems in place of textbook homework student interest could be fostered in a traditional “chalkand talk” classroom but the format and extent of the material would facilitate a variety ofpedagogical approaches.The material takes elements of textbooks, case studies, and other experiments in electroniclearning. Accompanying supplementary and background information promotes increasedinquiry-based or student-centered learning, better addresses student real world expectations
principles through active hypothesis testing and discovery.Engineering laboratory courses use active learning. Often, open-ended projects are used aspowerful pedagogical tools for discovery-based learning. To minimize the time to buildprototypes and to minimize the cost of such projects by using low-cost plastic parts andenforcing reusability of parts, many instructors adopted LEGO bricks and LEGO computerizedsystems as educational tools. A large body of engineering education research describes the use ofLEGO brick8. Most examples use LEGO Mindstorms RCX with the Robolab programmingenvironment (RIS 2.0) based on National Instruments LabVIEW software for various projectsand courses like robot competitions9, 10, programming11, 12, and project-based
improvement in student learning, however it had itsown issues, the most troubling being the long waits that the students tended to encounter whentrying to get their pre-labs checked. The following is the Reflection section from the FCAR: What worked well: Needing to get the pre-labs 100% correct helped the students understand the concepts better and certainly made the post-labs drastically better. I felt that the students learned more and fewer were just going through the motions when doing the experiments. My post-lab grading time was cut to almost nothing. The field trip was great. What didn’t work as well: I spent A LOT of time checking and re-checking pre-labs and helping students. The lines were long
systems). Numerous journal and conference publications of the last decade and beyond demonstrate awide variety of application domains, opened for remote operation (e.g. [1 - 7]). Most of themfocus on technical aspects of the systems being accessed, on their behavior and the featuresavailable to remote monitoring and control, and on the teaching lessons and student experiencesrelated to them. A few discuss general infrastructure aspects [8]. Some also cover parts of the Page 22.428.2data management that is needed [9 - 12], though often concentrating on learning goals,methodologies, and outcome. In contrary, this paper mainly addresses
provides innovative technical solutions and cross-trainingfor professors and students alike.laborative research projects at the NWRT. The proposed laboratory/teaching program willprovide abundant opportunities for individuals that may concurrently assume responsibilitiesas researchers, educators, and students. The NWRT will facilitate joint efforts that infuseeducation with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through a diversity of learningperspectives.Integrated Interdiscliplinary Curriculum The project is truly a cross-disciplinary effort between the School of Meteorology and theSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering. This cross-fertilization between engineeringand meteorology is also exemplified in efforts currently
thatpracticing engineers at four different US firms and two Indian firms spent over half of their daycommunicating through email and other messaging (Levine, Allard, & Tenopir, 2011). Formally,these writings are in the format of proposals, memos, emails, progress reports, fabricationinstructions, and final reports. These documents require skills and knowledge in a wide range ofwriting components, including structure and organization, document formatting, graphics, andaudience and genre awareness (Plumb & Scott, 2002).In addition transmitting engineering knowledge, writing is essential to generation of knowledge(Winsor, 1990), and is also an essential partner to the engineering process itself (Levine, Allard,& Tenopir, 2011). Many scholars
separate sections and meetings (and, often, separate courses). The studio setting allowed immediate feedback of concepts and problems presented in class by providing a vehicle to test these concepts through experiment andmeasurement. In addition, the studio setting allowed direct involvement of the instructor andTA's with the students. The "personal" attention and interaction resulting
(including their administration, faculty, and students), government, and industry to optimize thesystem for preparing and ramping up freshout engineers in the workplace. This initiative alsogoes beyond existing efforts to provide cooperative learning experiences and internships. Whilethese learning experiences are valuable, they are only one component of a larger system todecrease rampup time to competent workplace performance.MissionThe mission of this coalition is to reduce the time to competent performance and reduce thedropout rate for new freshout engineers by fostering collaboration among academic, government,and industry stakeholders in ways that create, implement, maintain, and continuously improvesystemic solutions
. Forthe University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) system, enrollment data shows that 47% of the studentpopulation is actually enrolled through one of its satellite campuses [Institutional Research, 2010].Five of the six UAF satellite campuses are Alaska Native serving institutions. There is currentlyno engineering curriculum offered at these campuses.Minorities, and particularly American Indians including Alaska Natives, are underrepresented inthe field of engineering [NSF 2000, Bordonaro et al 2000]. Studies have shown that students whoattend a 2-year college or a Pre-Engineering program are not likely to actually transfer to a 4-yearcollege and complete their degree [Adelman 1998]. Alaska natives many times face the sameimpediments to choosing a
passive learning (i.e., merely listening to a professor speak) [2]. These exercisesmight include groups of students working together facilitated by the instructor or exercisesrepresenting a difficulty beyond that which had been previously encountered in class. Conceptualassessment exercises are broadly defined as any classroom engagement where students are nottasked with the direct application of equations and the calculation of solutions [4, 5].Workshop OverviewParticipantsThe workshop brought together 60 professionals from across the country, including 46engineering faculty members, 9 PhD students, and 5 government engineers from a total of 34different institutions. The workshop organizing committee was a subset of the NTCP, whorecruited
, robotics, and control system tech- nology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU- SoE’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the cate- gory Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University
selected standard test method.The test method projects and presentations were conducted in small groups during weeks six thrueleven. This activity exposed students to a wide range of standard test methods well beyond thetwo that were conducted in the first weeks of class. The same small groups were also givenassignments for the WTC project conducted from weeks six through fifteen, which will bediscussed in the following.2. Project ObjectivesThe focus of the World Trade Center fire reconstruction project was to investigate the September11, 2001 World Trade Center disaster by simulating the fire that followed the aircraft impact.Fire assessment techniques were selected to gain insight into peak temperatures, smokeproduction rates, and fire growth
and simulation architecture for virtual manufacturing systems,” ANN CIRP, 44(1):399–402, 1995.6. Ye L. and Lin F., “Virtual system simulation – a step beyond the conventional simulation,” 22nd Int. Conf. on Computer and Industrial Engineering, pp 304–306, 1997.7. Park, Chang Mok, Park, Sangchul, and Wang, Gi-Nam, “Control logic verification for an automotive body assembly line using simulation,” International Journal of Production Research, pp. 1-19, 2008.8. Chang Mok Park, Sangchul Park, and Gi-Nam Wang, “A PLC programming environment based on a virtual plant,” International Journal of Adv Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 39, pp. 1262–1270, 2008.9. Richard Chiou, Yongjin Kwon, and Prathaban Mookiah, “Manufacturing E-Quality Through