. Page 24.240.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 BUILDING A STUDENT- STUDENT-GENERATED INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO LIBRARY FOR THERMODYNAMICSAbstract Current college students are accustomed to documenting and sharingtheir experiences through text, photo, and video, thanks to the ready availabilityof all of these through personal portable devices. The democratization of videoproduction and access has led to the possibility to both teach and learn with videoas never before. This work seeks to capitalize on student expectations and thecurrent technological environment to bring the benefits of both teaching andlearning with video into core technical undergraduate engineering
program outcomes is based on: 1) How well the studentscommunicate specific design aspects in the formal report; 2) How well they communicate theirlinearization methods using MATLAB; 3) A survey on how well the students believe they aremeeting the course objectives associated with the laboratory project; and, 4) the successfulcompletion of embedded questions in quizzes the final exam associated with the design project.IntroductionThe general engineering program at East Carolina University was started in 2004 to help supportthe need of broadly-skilled, general engineers for the regional industries and business located Page 22.1420.2among the small
two areas: (1) one chat session is for addressing studentquestions on the multimedia content, readings, and homework problems; and (2) the other chatsession is to address lab questions, observe their conduct during the labs remotely, and guidethem to the troubleshooting process.If the College of Engineering can effectively deliver the lab content from this first course to meetstudent outcomes, then the engineering faculty can expect the development of future electricalengineering courses involving lab activities to go much smoother.As mentioned earlier, the full-time engineering faculty have a combined teaching experience ofover 60 years but no experience in developing and delivering a complete engineering coursefully online. Because the
technical material. Curriculum-level approaches to teaching engineeringwriting can generally be categorized relative to two extremes along the integration spectrum,namely: (a) a highly focused delivery of writing instruction, with the most focused deliverybeing a single, stand-alone course in technical communication, or (b) a diffused approach, inwhich technical writing instruction is integrated throughout the curriculum.Case Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Formal writing in Formal writing in a composition and None None Senior Design or communication course
, and enhancing virtual reality.1 These challenges are complex, multiplydetermined, and fraught with social and personal complications. As such, solving them willrequire engineers who combine both technical training and other skills (e.g., ability to work ingroups, communication, etc.).2 Such complementary skills are often difficult to develop in thecourse of traditional engineering education, which often presents technical problems in abstractand stylized form without connection to real-world applications. Such education works for manyengineers, but it risks missing those students who could be engaged by the opportunity to addressproblems of fundamental import.Here, we describe a framework for integrating the NAE GC program into engineering
relevant cases. More details about this research project are providedelsewhere 1.This was a broad project with many aspects. It built on prior work developing failure casestudies for incorporation into engineering courses, with specific application to civil engineering,engineering mechanics, architectural engineering, civil engineering technology, and constructionmanagement.Failure case studies may be used in engineering courses to address technical topics as well asnon-technical topics, such as management, ethics, and professionalism. The authors havedeveloped a number of failure case studies for classroom use. Studies have been carried out overseveral semesters in order to assess the use of failure case studies in civil engineering
Built Environ- ment at Arizona State University (ASU). Kristen’s work focuses on integrating energy efficiency measures into building design, construction, and operations processes. Specifically, she is interested in novel design processes that financially and technically facilitate energy-efficient buildings. Her work also explores how principles of lean manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and experience-based learning foster better understanding of engineering and management principles. Prior to joining ASU, Kristen was at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) as a
Exercises: A set ofquestions are generated from the RP manuals in order to test the basic knowledge of the studentsin handling them. Then, the results of the students are analyzed and used for further tutoringmethods. FAQ’s: A list of frequently asked questions will be provided with the answers tofacilitate the whole process of operation of RP. The set of questions will include the commonmistakes made by the students while operating the RP’s and also other general information willbe provided using this option. Help (Manual): A manual containing the screen shots of theoperation by an expert will be provided which can work as an help also. These manual containsthe technical information related to the FDM 3000. In general, the proposed TS is based on
in “both” ways – or, more accurately, to ideate along a continuum of thinking that willenable them to generate ideas from radical to incremental (and every point in between) asneeded.Based on Kirton’s8 cognitive diversity research and several exploratory studies with engineers9,11 , we expect to be able to characterize engineers’ preferred ideation approaches. Using Kirton’scognitive style construct and terminology, engineers that are “more adaptive” can becharacterized as preferring more incremental change, whereas engineers that are “moreinnovative” can be characterized as preferring more radical change8. As shown in Figure 1, wehypothesize that ideation behaviors can be shifted from one’s natural preferences through theway a problem is
students to understand their own natural approaches to idea generation and to learnhow to approach idea generation in other ways.The focus of our work is ideation flexibility, what we define as the ability to ideate in bothincremental and radical ways – or, more precisely, to be able to ideate along a continuum ofapproaches depending on the needs of the problem. Based on existing research, we expect threekey factors to influence ideation flexibility: 1) problem framing (the way a problem and itsconstraints are “set”); 2) the use of ideation tools; and 3) ideation teaming (interactions withothers during ideation). Our research investigates the impacts of these key factors on engineeringideation flexibility and correlates them with students
learning by online or digital means in a common communicationmanner, allowing for a general technology platform [41]. The ET Pathways program brings the technical Page 24.509.7competence and student support together in a pipeline noted in objective 3: objective 3 - Student and 6 Industry Outreach: Create robust pipeline among industry, faculty, staff and students. This objective issupported by the following aims. • Aim 3A: Increase networking opportunities for student, faculty and industry networking. The ET Pathways team recognizes the importance of promoting opportunities
Global Waste Research Institute (GWRI) atCal Poly, provides unique opportunities for undergraduate students to participate in theadvancement of fundamental research related to wastes and byproducts. The institute providesthe focal point of the REU program. A primary goal of the institute is to advance currentpractices in resource management. Ongoing research seeks to provide anticipatory solutions tothe entire lifecycle of large quantities and wide varieties of wastes and byproducts generated inthe U.S. and around the world.The REU program, currently in its second year, supports ten students over a 10-week periodduring the summer. The principal objectives of the program are: (1) to engage undergraduate
abandwidth of low frequencies. Page 24.132.7 Figure 4 – Integrator Circuit Page 24.132.8Figure 5 – Practical Differentiator CircuitThe student tasks are to: 1. Derive the transfer function in the Laplace transform domain. What type of filter does the circuit represent? 2. Write a well commented MATLAB function to calculate and plot the magnitude response of the circuit. The freqs command will be helpful. Generate a plot for R1 = 1.6 kΩ, R2 = 100 kΩ and C = 0.01 μF. 3. From the plot, deduce the bandwidth of frequencies for which differentiation is performed. For high frequencies
revealed as clues were unveiled in an “archaeologicaldig”. Clues included technical, global, economic, social, and environmental aspects of a product. Course Information Implementation Information Assessment Discipline Course Size Level Location Type Length InstrumentsAll Eng < 25 Fr In-class Individual 1 class/lab session Design Majors 25-50 So Outside Group 1-2 weeks scenariosBiomedical 50-100
.7. Recognize “scientific language” and “teacher language,” and know when and how to use eachlanguage.SECTION TWO: PROGRAM ACTIVITIES:For Items 8-14, please rate the various summer program activities on their usefulness on a scale of1-5, with 1 = Not useful and 5 = Very Useful. Please make comments.8. Participating in intensive research on various aspects of smart car vehicle development.9. Coaching on curriculum development with new standards.10. CMU faculty visits highlighting research and education topics.11. Training sessions for lab instruments and/or tools.12. Professional development sessions on effective teaching.13. Social activities and team building activities.14. Reflection sessions.SECTION THREE: RESEARCHFor Items 15-19, rate
that the teamswhich were most cohesive tended to develop a more practical and effective project. Accordingto Forsyth 4, cohesion is the strength of the relationship linking the members of the group to oneanother and to the group itself.The data collected every fall indicated the same satisfaction as shown in Table 1 for one of thefall semesters, 9 of 21 students felt that their presentation skills were very effective. On a wholethe majority (13 of 21 students) felt no changes needed to be made in future classes as indicatedin the row 2 of the Table 1. Subsequent semester generated the same data. Mark only one Not at all Partially Effective Very EffectiveDid your presentation help you with
members will continuously improve the content and delivery of the course by sharing updates and improvements to each lecture topic. Regular interactions will take place via a workshop in the summer of 2014, regular pre- workshop internet meetings, regular post-workshop internet meetings, and visits to the collaborating institutions by the PIs.Thus, the CoP will provide two-way conversation between the creators of the material and theinitial adopters at the partner universities, with the intent that eventually the line between thesetwo groups is blurred.This paper and its companion poster are the result of a very recent (September 1, 2013) fundingaward from NSF (TUES Type 2; “Collaborative Research: Training Next Generation
, lab instruction has remained unchanged even though educators acknowledgethat the new Millennial generation of student learns like no other generation before them.Educational research suggests that various teaching strategies should be implemented in theclassroom to engage the millennial generation. These strategies include incorporatingmultimedia, having a more relaxed classroom environment, making teaching relevant to real lifeexperiences and exploring active learning approaches [1-4]. Literature also suggests millenniallearners prefer a more relaxed, informal classroom environment that allows them to activelyparticipate in classroom discussions and helps them understand core concepts throughcollaborative and service learning approaches[4
, representing 93% of the total population [1]. The wireless industry generates $155.8billion dollars in avenue annually and is still growing [1]. WiFi networks [2] enable the creationof a mobile workforce. In addition to wireless notebooks, the use of cell phones and otherwireless devices has become the norm rather than the exception. In today’s ever-growing mobileenvironment, it is essential for every mobile worker to use wireless technology. Page 24.1090.2This explosion of wireless technology poses a unique and promising opportunity to attract newtalent into the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs and torevolutionize our
information literacy assessments thatcan be used to diagnose engineering students’ self-directed learning with a focus on informationliteracy skills and attitudes. The two assessments constructed consist of a multiple-choiceinstrument3 and a Likert scale self-assessment of student behaviors related to engineeringdesign8. Preliminary work was carried out under a Purdue Engineer of 2020 seed grant. Theproject goals and objectives are summarized in Figure 1.These instruments will situate self-directed learning within an engineering context by: 1)focusing on skills used in the engineering design process, 2) using technical and scientific topicsrelevant to engineering and engineering grand challenges, 3) being designed and evaluated byengineering faculty
objectives, an Internet search ofweb sites from universities, colleges and programs was conducted for courses entitled“Introduction to Engineering”, “Engineering 1”, or courses with similar titles. A team ofundergraduate research assistants was tasked with executing this Internet search and summarizingresults in cooperation with the principal investigator during the 2012 spring semester. Researchersused common search engines to search for “introduction to engineering” and similar terms. Whensuch a course was identified, an additional search for the course syllabus was completed. Eachsyllabus found was reviewed to ensure that the course was meant to apply as a commonengineering course rather than a technically oriented, discipline specific course
energy landscape is constantly changing inresponse to technical, political, economic, and environmental developments.Research in learning sciences1 and in engineering education2 recommends that college studentslearn more effectively when they find connections between the material they learn in class andthe information they receive in mass media and elsewhere in their daily lives. Students’ intrinsicmotivation is triggered when the course material is relevant to their daily experiences or to thepublic information they hear about in informal settings. Students who make use of the newlylearned material in generating arguments are likely to learn and retain the course materialcomprehensively and develop skills to communicate effectively and more
source of error-free worked examples and exercises of variabledifficulty for students, our system employs automatic problem and solution generation asdescribed previously, where both element values and circuit topology are randomly generatedfrom scratch for each student.2-4 With this approach, a student unable to find the correct answerat any step can simply be given the complete answer, and is then given a new problem of thesame type and level of difficulty to solve. An example of such a randomly generated problemand its solution using nodal analysis is shown in Fig. 1. This figure illustrates automaticallygenerated node equations, simplification of those equations by collecting like terms, placementof the simplified equations into a matrix
and technologically trained workforce,1—3 which necessitates thedesign and implementation of novel curricula, methodologies, and paradigms for STEMeducation. Thus, the recently released Next Generation Science Standards4, 5 (NGSS) offer aunified framework, which explicitly (1) integrates engineering design in K-12 science standardsand (2) draws connections to the Common Core State Standards for Math6 (CCSSM). Although today’s students effortlessly interact with modern technological artifacts, theyoften lack an understanding of the underlying engineering, technology, and business processes.As technology continues to impact our daily lives, it is essential that all students receivecomprehensive, quality STEM education. Offering
, reflection,articulation, and exploration.17 A summary of activities for the student teams is shown in Table 1together with the appropriate instructor- student interactions. The shaded activities form thefocus of this study. The project is introduced in 2-3 lecture periods, where the instructor presentsthe project task, the framework for the project, general technical background about the industrialcontext and some of the relevant engineering science, and the project deliverables and timeline.At this time, the students are also provided a design notebook and asked to record activity,keeping track of the run parameters, data analysis, interpretation, and conclusions and decisionsfrom the interpretation. This reflective activity is intended to help the
(Mathematica, MATLAB, Maple, and LabVIEW). This willprovide an opportunity for all CSET-STEM participants to learn technical skills improve theirperformance in their classes, in their jobs, and in their future careers. These activities are estimated torequire an average of about 1 hour per week.Professional Development ActivitiesIn order to enhance the educational performance and retention of CSET-STEM Scholars, the followingactivities are planned. These activities are estimated to require an average of about 2 hours per month:(a)Monthly Seminars -- All Scholars will be encouraged to attend a monthly seminar. Talks will begiven by faculty and industry guest speakers. In addition, students will share their experiences. Thisinteraction will aid the
*Group 1 0.32 0.32 0.52 0.49Insights gained from a students’ focus groupWe have also conducted a student focus group at the end of the semester to hear feedback fromstudents. Regarding the assessment protocols, students indicated that the number of surveysconducted during playing the games should be reduced, and that students should be asked to stayin the class after the lecture for long enough time to complete the surveys thoroughly. Theystated that the game was relevant to learning in general in the course, which was good.Compared to a “virtual stock exchange” game they played in another engineering course, thisone was “very relevant to the class,” and they were more motivated to do the
transfer process. Completed 3 papers based on the qualitative research. Created and presented a research poster on the qualitative research, which was awarded second place in the symposium. Attended training session on qualitative coding and memo-writing and generating theory for qualitative research. Made 4 conference presentations and contributed to 1 workshop. Three of the conference presentations were on the above papers.Quantitative analysis of MIDFIELD databaseOur analysis used records for 94,732 undergraduate students from the Multiple-InstitutionDatabase for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD). MIDFIELDcomprises a census of undergraduate students who attended 11 public institutions between
partners OP-TEC and Indian Hills Community College.The latter has been offering a very successful Lasers and Electro-Optics Technology program formore than 25 years, with graduates working in photonics all over the United States incommercial companies and national labs.The new AAS PLT program includes general education, mathematics and science, electronicsfundamentals, and photonics and laser technology courses as described in Table 1 below. Pleasenote that Baker College operates on a 10-week quarter schedule while the majority of collegesand universities have 15-week semesters. Table 1 shows the number of credits at our institutionand also what these convert to for an institution operating on a semester schedule. An internshipor co-op experience
Sciences (EECS). Dr. Liu’s awards include the DARPA Significant Technical Achievement Award (2000) for development of the FinFET, the UC Berkeley Electrical Engineering Outstanding Teaching Award (2003), UC Berkeley Distinguished Faculty Mentoring Award (2010), and the Intel Outstanding Researcher in Nanotechnology Award (2012). She has authored or co-authored over 450 publications and holds over 80 patents, and is a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Her research activities are presently in energy-efficient integrated-circuit devices. Page 24.1276.1