well as organizations.Alanna K. Moravetz JD, Alanna Consulting LLC Alanna K Moravetz JD Alanna Consulting LLC 651/260-9399 amoravetz@comcast.net Alanna Moravetz, JD, is a senior leadership consultant and executive coach who has worked in human and organizational development for over 35 years as an educator, consultant, and coach. She designs and delivers experiential leadership development programs based on cutting-edge work in leadership. She assists individuals, work teams and organizations to manage change and maximize effectiveness. In addition to her work with engineers, Alanna works with lawyers, judges, professional associations and court systems throughout the United States. Alanna is a Certified
student leadership programs in the College of Engineering. Previously, she coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope (SOAR) Outreach Program in the Department of Bi- ological Sciences, where she worked for 10 years and led 175 workshops for K-12 teachers. Prior to her positions at LSU, Adrienne was the Science Education Curator at the Louisiana Art and Science Mu- seum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology, and an Education Specialist Certification in science education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Fostering a Relationship with a Corporate Sponsor to Grow an Engineering Leadership Development ProgramIntroductionIn an apparent nod to the
followed thepattern of the capstone course. A mandatory pre and post course survey for student self-assessment related to the graduate attribute outcomes was also instituted. Coursesimprovements were identified and implemented after each subsequent iteration of the course.Team development and conflict management learning activities and learning modules wereintroduced in 2017 and integrated with the capstone course (Jamieson, 2018). Program based continual improvement processes are intended to support studentachievement of graduate outcome performance as they progress through their programs,graduate, and develop life long learning skills that facilitate ongoing development andcompetence maintenance during their careers. The accreditation board
engineering, also addresses the need for engineering leadership intheir most recent syllabus update [6, p. 69]. The Canadian book, Fundamental Competencies forthe 21st Century Engineers, has also recognized this need, and has added leadership as anessential competency for engineers in their most recent edition [7]. The attribute of leadershiphas also been included in the new student outcomes for ABET (Accreditation Board for 1Engineering and Technology), which will become effective in the 2019-2020 accreditation cycle(replacing the “a-k” outcomes). Students must be able to “function effectively on a team whosemembers together provide leadership, create
described this experience this way: “I think the whole singing component of the program was crucial for us to acquire the type of comfort level with each other and ourselves that we needed for other activities to be impactful. Some of the activities we did throughout the program were not designed to be comfortable, so everyone needed to be comfortable enough with each other to take those activities seriously and learn from them. Beyond that, it is important as a leader to be able to move through uncomfortable situations, conversations, and interactions without hesitation…”The first retreat is heavily focused on community building based on voluntary sharing of lifestories and other personal
with software training for 3D Printing, CAD/CAM design and Manufacturing, as well as providing mentorship and guidance for the Gaia Maker Space. Fernando is also part of Tech-E, a hands-on, Project-Based Learning program which exposes at-risk k-12 students to emerging technologies to prepare them for future STEAM careers.Mr. Sabastian Moncayo c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress UTEP Edge: A Student Success Initiative for Developing High-impact PracticesAbstractThe objective of this contribution is to share how, through the integration of leadershipdevelopment, undergraduate engineering education is
record of service. As a result, engineers and engineering educators may beunfamiliar with or misperceive the principles of leadership within the Army because 1) they haveno affiliation with the Army or 2) they have gained a perception of military leadership throughwhat they see in Hollywood.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of Army leadership throughthe lens of the United States Military Academy at West Point (West Point). Leadershipprinciples, education, and training are reviewed from guiding doctrinal principles through aninstitution-level leader development system, and into specific coursework that focuses on leaderdevelopment. Finally, the paper situates these leadership principles in the capstone
beyond. He is actively engaged in different projects at the department focusing on teamwork and leadership competencies in engineering.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of K-12, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include
–14.Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Holcombe, K., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002Rehman, S. U. (2020). Impact of inclusive leadership on project success. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 10(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeppm-2020- 0011Sensoy, Ö., & Diangelo, R. (2014). Respect differences? Challenging the common guidelines in social justice education. Democracy and Education, 22(2), 1–10.Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K
Champaign. Her current research is in engineering education with a focus on curriculum development and retention of female and minority students in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Development of Leadership and Communication Skills in an Experiential Learning Project Management CourseAbstract Engineering students are equipped with technical knowledge and skills in order to solvereal-world problems. However, it has become increasingly clear that engineering students alsorequire training in non-technical skills beyond the technical knowledge and analytical skillstraditionally taught in engineering undergraduate
- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Dr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering and molecular biology approaches to
beenoperationalized into a survey instrument [22]. However, the national dataset used in this studyprovided specific questions that investigate portions of this model summarized in bullets 2 – 5above. Specifics of these measures are discussed in methods.MethodsThis work seeks to better understand the relationship between engineering identity and leadershipself-efficacy as a component of leadership identity. This relationship is explored throughsecondary analysis of a national dataset. While the nature of secondary analysis prevents anexplicit exploration of all items of interest in the two identity constructs discussed above, theselimitations are outweighed in many ways through the scale of the available data and theconsistency of questions with portions of
the real-world, faculty assign students toteams. However, there are varying levels of commitment and skills regarding effective teamworkamong students. To address this disparity, the faculty developed a student regulated learningreflection (SLR) assignment which asks each student to define leadership and teamwork, tocomplete a confidential peer-evaluation by assessing each team member’s performance andanswering a psychological safety questionnaire. The criteria looked at leadership, collaborationand inclusivity, responsibility, work quality, meeting deadlines, and communication. First, eachstudent shares their opinion regarding each criterion through a SLR, where faculty review theirreflections and provide instruction to improve gaps
involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is a Professor of Engineering at Olin College of Engineering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic motivation, and gender. She speaks and consults on curricular design, student-centered learning, and gender and STEM.Dr. Kate Roach, UCLMrs. Emanuela Tilley, University College LondonDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Associate Professor at James Madison University (United States) in the Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) and the Director of the Madison Engineering Leadership Program
leadership andmanagement by ASCE, combined with the large volume of publications associated with thediscipline, provides ample opportunity for a pilot study to address LEAD’s strategic initiativefour. Through this alignment, the research questions associated with this study include: 1. How has engineering leadership been operationalized or assessed in the discipline of civil engineering? 2. What methods have been used to teach or train leadership within the civil engineering discipline?MethodsA systematic review of engineering leadership literature was completed using the guidelinesdefined by Borrego, Foster, and Froyd (2014) [4]. The authors mirrored the structure of Watsonand Barrella’s systematic review of sustainability assessments
engineering leadership potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional com- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Dr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and
potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional com- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Dr. Alisha L. Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Dr. Alisha Sarang-Sieminski is an associate dean and a professor of engineering at Olin College. They have taken a winding career path, starting with a BS in chemical engineering from MIT, moving to a PhD in bioengineering from University of Pennsylvania followed by postdoctoral work in the Biological Engineering Division at MIT. They have been at Olin College
engineering leadership potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional com- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Dr. John Jongho Park, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Park is an assistant research professor in the Engineering Leadership Program at Penn State Uni- versity. There is four interrelated areas of inquiry characterize Dr. Park’s scholarship: psychological attributes, professional identity development, group processes, and engineering leadership development. Particularly, he examines how possible future-self
innovationstarts. Good leaders help actors see deeply what is happening, and then help these actors on areturn to fundamental organizing principles that cut through defensive behaviors. Reconnecting(or perhaps connecting for the first time) with organizational purpose, mission, vision, and goalsenables individuals and groups to move beyond defensive behaviors to profound and deepimprovements.Course Impact on Students and Their Leadership It is worthwhile to consider how students react to the immersion in systems thinking andtheir perceptions of its usefulness. For this purpose, we used a qualitative approach to analysis ofstudent comments [42], [43]. Student comments were collected and evaluated from 2018. This approach was taken to berepresentative
design and implementation of a student-driven laboratory method which supports the development of authentic leadership skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 But how do you Feel?Authentic Leadership Development for undergraduate students through a student-driven,experiential, and emotion-laden course using a laboratory method addressing the whole person.AbstractBased on 324 reflections written by 27 undergraduate students from two independent cohorts,this study examines the effectiveness of a semester-long authentic leadership developmentcourse which is based on a student-driven, student-centered, and experiential laboratory method.This study shows firstly