Paper ID #14655Sports, arts and concrete canoes: Engineers learning to lead outside the for-mal curriculumDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive
Paper ID #9682From Faculty to Change Agent: Lessons Learned in the Development andImplementation of a Change WorkshopDr. Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Ella L. Ingram is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering and Director of the Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her educational research interests include promoting successful change practice of STEM faculty, effective evolution and ecology instruction, and facilitating undergraduate research experiences. Her teaching port- folio includes courses on: nutrition
DiversityGroup Conference Travel: In 2012, a professor in electrical engineering started an initiative thatwould allow ten undergraduate female electrical, computer and software engineering students totravel to the Grace Hopper Conference for Women in Computing, along with a supervisingprofessor and two graduate students. This internationally renowned conference unites acommunity of women in computing, including those in industry, research and education, andoffers opportunities for networking, learning, and collaboration. With varied conferencelocations and tight student budgets, it was necessary to seek funding to support this trip. TheSSAF committee funded this inaugural trip in 2012, and again in 2013, 2014, and 2015. Becauseof the success and
. He is the Pro- gram Director of the Professional Engineering Management Program. He is a Fellow in NASA’s Center for Program/Project Management Research. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management. He is author of the book Transforming Organizations: Strategies and Methods. He was the Editor of the Engineering Management Journal. Tim Kotnour, Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Timothy.Kotnour@ucf.edu.Dr. Charles H. Reilly, University of Central Florida Charles H. Reilly is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computer Science and a Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering and
: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 173–186. http://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589529[11] Marks, M. (2006). The Round-Robin Mock Interview: Maximum Learning in Minimum Time. Business Communication Quarterly, 69(3), 264–275. http://doi.org/10.1177/1080569906291257[12] Teague, J. (1992). Raising the Self Confidence and Self Esteem of Final Year Female Students Prior to Job Interviews. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Educa- tion. New York: ACM, 67-71[13] Vidalis, S. M. (2012). Preparing engineering students for jobs through mock interviews. Technology Interface International Journal, 13(1), 71–80.[14] Kolb, D. A
engineer, technical lead, business leader and pro- gram/project manager managing many different global projects. Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young Univer- sity. Gregg also does consulting in project management and leadership working with IPS Learning and Stanford University where he provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world.Dr. Randall Davies, Brigham Young University Dr. Davies is currently an assistant professor of Instructional Psychology and Technology at Brigham Young University. His research involves
Paper ID #13341The Touchstone Engineering Leadership Development ProgramDr. Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame Dr. Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Experiential Learning and Community En- gagement. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and previ- ously worked for Intel Corporation. He is also a founder of Emu Solutions, Inc., a startup company that is commercializing research in the area of high-performance computing.Dr. Victoria E Goodrich, University of Notre Dame Dr. Victoria Goodrich is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the
of Powertrain Planning and then Product Development Operations for all Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Mazda and Volvo brands globally. Prior to joining Northeastern, Pitts served as director of the Ford-MIT Research Alliance.Steve McGonagle,Mr. Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University Director of Engineering Leadership Steven Klosterman works in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Pro- gram. Klosterman is also a professor of the practice in Engineering Leadership at Northeastern University. Klosterman teaches leadership, product development and systems engineering. He has over 25 years of experience in the high technology and renewable energy industries. Following roles in computer archi- tecture and design at the
Paper ID #14416How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Anotherfrom a Student Perspective?Dr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing authentic engineering learning experiences for students from grades K through Ph.D. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Another
educationincluding adult education and distance learning practice. He is the member of the International Association for Continuing Engineering EducationIACEE. He holds bachelor of en- gineering from college of mechatronic engineering and automation, and master of military science from college of information system and management, both of them are in NUDT.Dr. Huang Zhang, NUDT in ChinaDr. Tong Wu, Center for National Security and Strategic Studies (CNSSS), National University of DefenseTechnology (NUDT) Tong Wu is Associate Researcher of the Center for National Security and Strategic Studies (CNSSS) at National University of Defense Technology (NUDT). He holds a B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from NUDT. Dr. Wu draws
. Kristina M. Ropella, Marquette University Kristina M. Ropella, Ph.D., is interim Opus Dean of the Opus College of Engineering and Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University. She received her bachelor of science degree in biomedi- cal engineering from Marquette and her master’s and doctoral degrees from Northwestern University. She joined the biomedical engineering faculty in 1990 and served as the chair of the Department of Biomedical Engineering from 2004 to 2013, when she was named the executive associate dean. Ropella has focused her research and teaching career on biosignal processing, bioinstrumentation, computer applications in biomedical engineering, statistics and medical imaging. Current
types of products. Although both can have a relevant impact onsociety, a platform mentality encourages the leadership skill of staying focused on the big pictureand the end result, reinforcing the first tenet, leading with vision, as described above. Like the ERCs, engineering schools can integrate a systems focus into their classroomsand programs overall, encouraging this big picture focus. For example, a computer engineeringprofessor could teach students to develop a protocol for a computer chip (platform) and thendevelop a specific type of hardware using that protocol (product). By participating actively inboth types of projects, students could learn how and why to pursue a platform mentality. Taken astep further, students who present
% words, 38%vocal tone, and 55% body language.24 The construction profession is not excluded from this rule.25Communication skills for civil engineering and construction students can be enhanced throughteam-based and collaborative study. The teamwork approach provides the chance for students tointeract, improves communication, and eventually develops leadership skills. Bowman and Farr(2000) mention that leadership skills are developed when students embarking on a project are―evaluated on their ability to lead a team and tasked to give oral presentations‖ (16).22 In addition,a study by Gunhaan (2014) shows that team-based collaborative learning provides the opportunityfor students to ―interact, communicate, listen and present as a team‖ (6
students in the Iron Range program to enroll in them and then trying to make Page 26.1060.8 them, you know, do project-based learning and use the kinds of pedagogy and teach the kind of content that we wanted for the Iron Range program. But it was not an approved degree program at that point on the Mankato campus.” “It was a problem because there was no department of integrated engineering in Mankato, and we had the classical civil, electrical, mechanical and computer engineering, and where did it go?”A higher education consultant understood the curriculum-level challenges of the new program,as well as the
Paper ID #11738Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocatesfor Gender EquityDr. Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University Dr. Genalo is a University Professor and Associate Chair of the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He is a Fellow of ASEE and has run the NSF Grantees Poster Session for nearly 20 years. He is a former chair of DELOS and the Freshman Programs Constituent Committee (the year before it became a Division).Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the
compare the statedobjectives and learning outcomes of engineering leadership programs9.Engineering leadership programs described in the literature range substantially in theirfocus, delivery channel, and pedagogy. Three recurring foci are entrepreneurship andinnovation10-11, personal and professional growth12-14, and global citizenship15-17.Delivery channels include integration into core courses18, smaller cohorts11, curricularminors19-20 and co-curricular programs21-23. Pedagogical strategies range even morewidely from direct instruction24-26 to problem-based learning27 to case studies28-30.The extent to which these strategies support the development of successful or sociallyresponsible engineering leaders has not yet been determined in any
college’s student leaders to perform at their best (seeFigure 1).Figure 1Process of integrating the X-Matrix into the LDP Engineering Leadership Engineering (LDP X-Matrix) Management Tool (X-Matrix) Relevant Experience (Motivation)The Leadership Development ProgramThe LDP is a rigorous two year training program that teaches students character, interpersonal,team-building, and leadership skills. While there is some classroom based education in theprogram, the program director believes that leadership is best learned when students apply it
the client, interact with the contractor, interact with thevendor”. He had not done any volunteer engagement, and while he had mentored co-op studentshe saw this as helping, not as leadership.Milan’s leadership behaviours match those from the literature and a pattern observed across mostcases: He asked questions, he built relationships to be able to learn technical knowledge fromdifferent disciplines, and he showed initiative in teaching himself several key computer programsthat are crucial to his job but that he had not learned in university. 13Milan shows consistency in his belief that leadership is equated with management and the use ofpositional
Paper ID #16163Developing a Professional and Personal Network as a Method for DeepeningLessons in Engineering LeadershipMr. Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University Mr. Klosterman is a Director and Professor of the Practice in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Program at Northeastern University. He has over 25 years of experience in the high technology in computer architecture and systems design at the Digital Equipment Corporation and at startup Stellar Computer. He joined Sun Microsystems in 1990 as a microprocessor designer. At Sun, he led and managed hardware engineering, product design and systems engineering
component of these practices will be to provide opportunities to interact with industrypartners via our Industrial Leadership Board. For example, through the academic semester,students in the technology leadership pathway will interact through informal, social activities,such as industry tours, as well as formal opportunities such as internships and team projects.A Virtual Learning Community (VLC) will be an important component of the pathway program.A virtual learning community is a learning community, which includes several types of digitalcommunication. These include electronic networks, chat rooms, tele- and videoconferences, andonline communities. There are advantages to the variety offered by non-face-to-face interaction
high-GPA, honors track, or other special categories. It has beendesigned with the goal of transforming typical engineering transfer students into graduatescapable of rapidly assimilating into high performing professional environments. The programdesign was informed by an industry/community needs assessment as well as the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) standards. Program design addressesleadership, professionalism, and communication skill with equal importance to the engineeringskills. The sets of tools applied include leadership development tools such a personalityassessment, a proprietary strength finder tool, and curriculum tools such as active learningstrategies, learning communities and technical presentation
University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue
need to teachleadership within an integrated learning experience, to help students have more confidence inthe technical application of their leadership skills.IntroductionEngineers are no longer only involved with the technical project details, but must alsounderstand the broader picture as they are often acting as team leaders1. Consequently, thereis a need to educate engineers not just in physics and mathematics, but also in many non-technical areas, including globalization, communication, and leadership2. One of thedifficulties in the field of engineering leadership education is the need to clearly define theterm engineering leadership3. A stronger understanding of this term will help institutions todevelop and improve engineering
opportunity and an understanding of the importance of guiding people, but also tointroduce a unique culture being created in the Engineering Leadership program and provideleadership models for incoming students to learn from second year students. These second year students, also called Mavericks, worked closely with EngineeringLeadership faculty, as well as faculty from Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering (Needham,MA), throughout the summer in order to develop curriculum for the incoming cohort of studentsin the fall of 2014. The goal of the course was to create an immersive learning environment thatwas also social, relatable, and inspiring to the instructors and the students. In order to achievethat goal, the Mavericks were given the
leader. Framing the list aroundinfluential members broadened the scope of analysis and facilitated the investigation ofleadership development across the team rather than the development of students who werealready considered leaders.Respondents worked individually. For each person they listed as influential, the respondent useda 5-point Likert scale to indicate the extent to which that person influenced them personally, andthe extent to which the team relied on that person for leadership (following the method proposedby Carson and colleagues3). These ratings were used to compute several social networkmeasures. One of these measures, indegree centrality, was used to identify potential interviewparticipants.A brief explanation of indegree
Paper ID #12789Developing Personal Case Studies as a Method for Deepening Lessons in En-gineering LeadershipMr. Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University Mr. Klosterman is a Director and Professor of the Practice in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Program at Northeastern University. He has over 25 years of experience in the high technology in computer architecture and systems design at the Digital Equipment Corporation and at startup Stellar Computer. He joined Sun Microsystems in 1990 as a microprocessor designer. At Sun, he led and managed hardware engineering, product design and systems engineering
, electrical, and industrial engineers being themost sought after engineering disciplines. On average, study participants recruited for fivedifferent engineering disciplines. Half of the study respondents recruited between one and fourengineering disciplines and half recruited for five to 16 different engineering disciplines. Table 1: Percentage of study participants recruiting for each engineering discipline. Engineering Discipline Percentage (%)* Mechanical 88 Electrical 73 Industrial 67 Computer
Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is
education focused curriculum. Twoparticipants (i.e., 20%) reported a component related to coursework. Each of the followingcomponents were reported by one participant (i.e.,10%) respectively: joint five-year engineering-business degree program, professional education component (tailored for working professionals),an internship co-op with local companies, certificate program, and hands on learning throughpeer collaboration on projects. One participant (i.e., 10%) did not provide an open-endedresponse.Table 4Engineering Leadership Components Offered Degree Minor Certificate Coursework Other Response Freq. % Freq. % Freq. % Freq