Bachelor of Arts degree in Physics in 1973 also from the University of California, Davis. He has completed executive seminars in International Strategy Development from the Thunderbird University, the Executive Development Program from the University of Iowa, and Contract Finance for Program Managers at the Defense Systems Management College. Mr. Blank has authored or co-authored four technical papers; his article, ”The NAVSTAR Global Positioning System,” was published in Signal Magazine, November 1986 edition; he co-authored the paper ”Putting Engineering Management on the Executive Track”, presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, June 29, 2016; and moderated the Panel Session Translating
TCMT641. Capstone Project II (3)Technical Leaders (2)TCMT636. Persuasive Communications for TCMT643. Contract and RiskTechnical Managers (1) Management (3)TCMT631. Capstone I (3)TCMT634. Value Chain Management (3)Note: Perspective credit hours are marked in parentheses following course names.2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD)Students Demographic Students enrolled in the METM programs are those who have or expect to havemanagement responsibilities, as well as technical leaders at mid-level to senior-level positions.Based on data collected from application records and program exit surveys, these workingprofessionals hold job titles like Lead Industrial Engineer, Project Manager
practice. The details of the methodology are shown in Figure 1. Stage I - Planning the review Phase 0 Identification of the need for a review Phase 1 Preparation of a proposal for a review Phase 2 Development of a review protocol Stage II - Conducting a review Phase 3 Identification of research Phase 4 Selection of studies Phase 5 Study quality assessment Phase 6 Data extraction and monitoring progress Phase 7 Data synthesis Stage III - Reporting and dissemination Phase 8 The report and recommendations
argued that technical competence and leadership alone are not keys to project successoutcomes; team dynamics and personality composition are other indicators that synergisticallyaffect project outcomes. This paper explores the effective management of a large educationalSTEM program that includes multi-departmental projects by harmonizing team dynamics andpersonality strengths. In this study, the team members’ personalities were assessed using animpartial personality evaluation tool that employs the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).This study further examines the team’s dynamics under the spectrum of the members’perspectives, exploring how the team utilizes personality traits and team dynamics to effectivelyadminister a sizable STEM program
Architectural… Journal of Facilities Management Global Journal of Engineering Education Journal of Engineering Education European Journal of Engineering Education Journal of Building Engineering Advanced Engineering Informatics International Journal of Engineering Education Journal of Facility Management Education and… 0 1 2 3 4 5 Figure 3: Facility Engineering Literature by Journal (1993-2022)This study revealed the majority of research associated with facility engineering has been pursuedin North America. Interestingly, only Europe and Asia have
, evaluating all Americanengineering programs since 2001 and recently extending to international universities (Felder &Brent, 2003). The ABET outcomes encompass critical technical and non-technical skills forcollege students, ranging from the ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, andengineering to the ability to function on multidisciplinary teams [4]. The implementation of 3ABET criteria has led to statistically significant improvement in “awareness of societal andglobal issues…group skills… and awareness of issues relating to ethics and professionalism”while maintaining and even improving students’ understanding of the foundations
average, and poor. Section two looks atthe specific interns' discipline question. All engineering management students are rated as betterthan new employees, equal to new employees, and less than new employees. The quantitativeresults for section one are shown in Table 2, and the results for section two are in Table 3.TABLE 2. SECTION ONE OF INTERN EVALUATIONS Intern Final Evaluation Section One Below Total # Excellent Good Average Poor Average Students Interpersonal Skills 41 14
Engineering (Student Enrichment). As depicted in Figure 3, the committeecomprises the Heads of engineering departments as members, whose responsibility is to monitorand provide guidance regarding each department's contribution to supporting the day-to-dayoperations and activities of the center. In particular, departments will assign academic staff toprovide advice on student-initiated projects. Technicians from departments will also collaboratewith the center, forming an interdisciplinary technical expert team for enhancing the hands-on Figure 3. The executive committee (faculty level) and the network of supporting staff in Innovation Wing.competencies of the students [38]. Masters’ tutors will also be hired by departments and trained inthe center
: Student Outcomes and Criterion 4:Continuous Improvement for ABET. Seven student outcomes under Criterion 3 are annuallyassessed to ensure the program’s educational objectives are supported, and graduates are ready topractice engineering. The ‘regular use of appropriate, documented process for assessing andevaluating student outcome attainment’ thus influences continuous improvement actions acrossthe program or within individual courses [2]. The West Point EM program has evolved in themix of direct and indirect, internal, and external assessment tools to evaluate outcomeachievement, and the data feeding the assessment was assembled from multiple internalspreadsheets, USMA knowledge management survey platforms, and EM program-level feedbacktools
content,capturing the essence of the input data to produce novel outputs, such as text, images, audio, andvideo [2]. This innovative capability of generative AI paves the way for applications ranging fromcreative content generation to complex problem-solving, which could apply to engineeringmanagement.The development chronology of generative AI, shown in Figure 1, began with its conceptual rootsin the 1950s with the origin of machine learning and then exploring algorithmic data creation [3],[4], [5]. The 1990s saw the development of neural networks which advanced AI development. Inthe 2010s, deep learning, large datasets, and enhanced computing power further progressedgenerative AI. A landmark moment occurred in 2014 with the introduction of
and S. Bērziša, “Use of Chatbots in Project Management,” in Information and Software Technologies, R. Damaševičius and G. Vasiljevienė, Eds., in Communications in Computer and Information Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 33– 43. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30275-7_4.[22] I. Taboada, A. Daneshpajouh, N. Toledo, and T. de Vass, “Artificial Intelligence Enabled Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 8, Art. no. 8, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13085014.[23] S. Aggrawal and A. J. Magana, “Undergraduate Student Experience with Research Facilitated by Project Management and Self-regulated Learning Processes,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
continuousimprovement and expansion. Deepening existing programs, embracing innovative technologies,forging stronger partnerships, and disseminating best practices are key areas on the CoE’shorizon.References[1] E. Krutsch and V. Roderick, “STEM Day: Explore Growing Careers,” U.S. Department ofLabor Blog, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://blog.dol.gov/2022/11/04/stem-day-explore-growing-careers. [Accessed January 15, 2024].[2] X. Chen and M. Soldner, STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEMFields, 2013. [E-book]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf[3] B. N. Geisiner and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding Student Attrition fromEngineering Majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp
specific to theengineering consulting context.Engineering consulting has become an increasingly important sector for engineering graduates.In 2015, technical and engineering consulting services were projected to be the 6th fastestgrowing global industry for the period of 2014-2024 [10]. This follows a global trend in rapidgrowth of consulting in general, fueled by globalization, the externalization of work fromdownsizing of internal resources, and the intensification of knowledge-work [8], [11], [12].Today, globally, the engineering services market is a 1.6 trillion US dollar industry [13]. In theUnited States, engineering services alone generate an annual revenue of 360 billion US dollarsand employ approximately 1.3 million people [14]. In Canada
a 29 year career in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Pharma- ceuticals, and Agricultural Chemical Industries to lead the four School of Engineering Technical Leader- ship and Communication (TLC) Programs – the Gordon-MIT Program in Engineering Leadership (GEL), the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Pro- gram (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Immediately prior to MIT, Reza was the Vice-president of Research, Development, and Innovation for the Specialty Division of the Clorox Company. In that role he was accountable for developing innova- tion strategies for a diverse set of businesses and ensuring robust technology roadmaps and innovation
and faculty workload and the first-hand experience of the international learning experience for the student. West Point’s EMprogram evaluates student outcomes against a similar number of indirect indicators throughsurveys and instructor feedback. However, one distinction is the direct indicator, or culminatingdeliverable in SE123 which is the peer-reviewed worthy technical article students are required towrite. Each student must present an article and associated model artifacts that meet the rigorexpected of an undergraduate research effort and is consistent with the ABET EAC studentoutcomes. ABET student outcome three which is “an ability to communicate effectively with arange of audiences” [3] via the written word and oral ‘in progress
, skills and modern tools of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology (STEM) to solve broadly defined engineering problems appropriate to the discipline SO-2: an ability to design systems, components, or processes meeting specified needs for broadly-defined engineering problems appropriate to the discipline SO-3: an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in broadly- defined technical and non-technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature SO-4: an ability to conduct standard tests, measurements, and experiments and to analyze and interpret the results to improve processes. SO-5: an ability to function effectively as
was to provide an early-career, technology-oriented degree to professionals that addressleadership, management, and technical knowledge. Once completed, the degree will expand thegraduates’ career opportunities and add value to their organizations. [1], [2]Literature ReviewThe origin of the MSEM program differs from many other online master’s programs inengineering management, in that other online programs were often designed around existingengineering management or industrial engineering courses in corresponding degree-grantingdepartments. [3], [4], [5] This originating agency concept is common, though for EngineeringManagement programs, the courses may be interdepartmental or cross-disciplinary. [6], [7]However, Tennessee Tech University
(EPICS), where teams offirst-year students join more senior students on design and research teams. In VIP, teams ofundergraduate students engage in authentic and extended research and design projects related toactive research areas of Purdue faculty members and national, international, and industry-sponsored design challenges. The . Students can participate in interdisciplinary and vertically-integrated teams (first-year through seniors) with faculty and graduate student mentors formultiple semesters to address these real-world research and design challenges.In EPICS, teams of undergraduates from more than 80 majors are engaged with communitypartners to address local and global needs. With guidance from faculty and industry mentors theyidentify
participated in freshman orientation. All incomingfreshman students are required to complete one of the 28 available sessions before enrolling inclasses, of which participants in 8 sessions were part of the experiment. Each session wasassigned to one of two conditions. In one of the eight sessions, a technical issue—a storm thatdisrupted the transmission of electricity to our site—prevented the video from being presented.Hence, participants (N= 260) in that particular session were excluded from the analysis, leaving1,422 total participants, of which 608 were in the relatable role model condition and 814 were inthe unrelatable role model condition. Students in the relatable role model condition viewed a short video on entrepreneurshipin STEM