, and Engineering Education. Page 23.345.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Course-Related Undergraduate Projects for DynamicsAbstract:The Engineering Technology (ET) program at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) hasapproximately 450 students. Our Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) concentration wasstarted in 2004 fall and currently it has 220 majors. The author teaches Dynamics every springand all MET students are required to take this course. Dynamics is a lecture course and we coverkinematics and kinetics of particles and rigid bodies in this calculus-based
Paper ID #26059Development of Curriculum in Technology-related Supply Chain Manage-ment ProgramsMs. Panteha Alipour, Purdue University Panteha Alipour is a PhD student at Purdue University. Her background is in industrial engineering with a focus on supply network analysis. Her research interests are optimization, network analysis, data analysis and predictive modelling.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the
AC 2007-919: STEM-RELATED K-12 OUTREACH THROUGH HIGH-ALTITUDEBALLOON PROGRAM COLLABORATIONSClaude Kansaku, Oregon Institute of Technology CLAUDE KANSAKU is an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering Technology at OIT. He is a faculty advisor for the LaunchOIT BalloonSat program and is the primary OIT collaborator in the To the Edge of Space high-altitude balloon program. He has taught or co-taught several BalloonSat workshops, including a NSF Chautauqua Short Course for College Teachers.Linda Kehr, Klamath County School District LINDA KEHR is a fifth grade teacher at Ferguson Elementary School (Klamath Falls, OR) and is the primary K-12 collaborator in the To the Edge of Space program
Paper ID #15535Analysis of Student Preconceptions Related to Telecommunications and Qual-ity of ServiceProf. Mark J. Indelicato, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Mark J. Indelicato is an associate professor in the College of Applied Science and Technology (CAST) in the department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology since 1990. Previously, he was a Large Business Systems Communications En- gineer for NEC America, specializing in large scale deployment of voice and data network switching equipment. He teaches in the Master of Science
insure continued compliance. 8) Finding of Observation. When PEVs see opportunities for the program to improve that are not directly related to the criteria they write an Observation. Although not encouraged by ETAC, PEVs will also use Observations to cite areas of excellence.The author has been a Senior Design Engineer at Eastman Kodak for 25 years and an activevolunteer in both IEEE and ABET. During his seven years on IEEE’s Commission forEngineering Technology Accreditation Activities (CETAA) the author has helped write newprogram specific criteria for several technology programs. As an ABET commissioner of fiveyears he has helped move these changes into the current criteria. As an ABET volunteer theauthor
successfully performed two improvement points regardingABET accreditation. The first improvement is regarding the student outcomes and the secondimprovement is related to the ABET program criteria. The goal of this paper is to share theimprovement to avoid having weaknesses in computer engineering technology programs. ABETevaluators look for these points and emphasis the importance of an efficient assessment process.One main goal of the paper is to propose five rubrics that can be used to assess the ABETprogram criteria (a-e) for any computer engineering technology program.1. IntroductionThe computer engineering technology program at SUNY Poly developed eight student outcomesthat are mapped to both ABET student outcomes (a-k) and the ABET program
AC 2012-3155: USING MODULAR PROGRAMMING STRATEGY TO PRAC-TICE COMPUTER PROGRAMMING: A CASE STUDYDr. Wangping Sun, Oregon Institute of TechnologyDr. Xin Wang, Oregon Insitute of TechnologyMiss Xian Sun Page 25.1432.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Using Modular Programming Strategy to Practice Computer Programming: a Case StudyAbstractIt is important for the engineering and technology students to learn and improve their computerprogramming skills throughout their college education. To make the students’ learning processmore efficient, a Modular Programming Strategy (MPS) was introduced at the last ASEE
Criterion 2. Page 26.801.53.3 Student OutcomesCriterion 3 is Student Outcomes (SOs). They describe what students are expected to know and beable to do by the time of graduation. These relate to the skills, knowledge, and behaviors thatstudents attain as they progress through the program.The IET program, by agreement of the faculty and External Advisory Committee (EAC),adopted the 16 student outcomes composed of 11 standard outcomes of the general criterion 3for Engineering Technology Programs for bachelor degrees (outcomes 1-11) published by theABET ETAC commission for the 2009/2010 Accreditation Cycle; and five additional outcomesadopted from the
Engineering Technology (CET) department is growing. Students from bothdepartments collaborate to design new products related to both fields. Students learn how to Page 25.740.4design, fabricate and evaluate mechantronic products. They learn 3D design and modeling,manufacturing processes, material engineering, electrical design, computer control withembedded systems, interfacing and programming. Students from both departments are givenmechatronic/robotic design projects that require them to use actual mechanical,electrical/electronic hardware and software that are currently being used by the industry. Thisenables the instructor to simulate real life
Paper ID #15489ATMAE to ABET Accreditation: An Assessment Transition in an Electronicsand Computer Engineering Technology ProgramDr. Sri R. Kolla, Bowling Green State University Sri R. Kolla has been a faculty in the Electronics and Computer Engineering Technology program at the Bowling Green State University, Ohio, since 1993 in various positions and currently a Professor. He worked as a Guest Researcher at the Intelligent Systems Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000-’01. During 2008-09, he was a Fulbright Research Scholar at the Electrical Engineering Department, Indian
Paper ID #13568Fundamentals for Assessment Success: A Sustainable Data Organization Strat-egy within a Construction Management Technology ProgramMr. J. William White AIA, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis J. William White AIA is a lecturer with the Construction Engineering Management Technology program within the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology in Indianapolis. He is a registered architect who has more than 23 years of varied construction industry experience. Mr. White has undergraduate degrees from Indiana University and Ball State University and a masters degree from Purdue University
. Page 25.65.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Method for Assessing Required Course-Related Skills and Prerequisite StructureAbstractThe curricula in engineering and engineering technology programs should be dynamic with agoal of constant improvement and refinement. Unfortunately, this is often not the case; coursesare developed, altered, and expanded in a piecemeal manner. Rarely is there a holistic top downexamination of desired input and output skills for individual courses and a discussionsurrounding course organization. Namely, as time progresses many programs end up withcourses that developed not a developed curriculum. As part of a strategic
Paper ID #33158Relating Senior Project Time on Task to Student ScoresDr. Jeunghwan Choi, Central Washington University John(Jeunghwan) Choi is a professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology program at Central Washington University. John teaches upper division courses including the Senior capstone course.Prof. Charles Pringle, Central Washington University Charles Pringle is a professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology program at Central Washington University. Charles teaches upper division courses including the senior capstone course. American c Society
Engineering Technology (or discipline specific Engineering Technology) is a critical component of the concerned academic unit and provides additional opportunities for professional and intellectual development at the Masters and Ph.D. level. Thus, several academic departments offering a bachelor‟s degree in Engineering Technology have developed graduate programs. Most of the graduate programs offer a Masters in Technology with concentrations in a specific discipline such as Electrical Engineering Technology, Engineering Technology, Innovation, Energy etc. The number of universities or departments offering Masters programs in Engineering Technology or related field is relatively low (15-20) as compared to the total number of departments
technology degree. This graduateprogram uses a professional, multi-disciplinary, team- and project-oriented approach to graduateeducation. It focuses primarily on the applied aspects of the technological spectrum related toproduct improvement, industrial practices, and engineering technology operation functions. Itmeets the need of graduate students who want to expand their knowledge in advancedengineering technology courses. It also provides the flexibility for graduate students to expandtheir knowledge in a specific technical specialty.The MSET program meets the needs of the state-of-the-art industrial environments and it isdistinct from most graduate Engineering Management and Engineering programs. Specifically,the MSET program offers courses
Page 23.225.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Assessment of Communication and Teamwork Skills in Engineering Technology ProgramsIntroductionInstitutions of higher education have acknowledged that an effective teaching/learning processmust involve assessing and evaluating what and how much students are learning. Assessmentand evaluation leads to improvements in the educational experiences.ETAC/ABET Criteria 3.B.e. and 3B.g. require that graduates demonstrate effective skills inteamwork and communication.1 Therefore, the goal of this project was to develop consistent andefficient methods for assessment of students’ skills in these areas for different programs
thepotential of computer games for increasing motivation, as effective teaching and learning tools,and enabling different learning experiences other than traditional teaching methods1-5. Theadvances of computer game-based teaching are in the areas of lower education2 to highereducation3, American history, computer fundamentals, computer programming, science andengineering disciplines3-4, and research in the use of this teaching approach5. The rationale usingcomputer games for teaching may include the following facts1-4: 1. many students are lessmotivated in their traditional teaching learning environment; 2. computer related subjects seemmore interesting; 3. many students have been exposed to a game environment and some of themare even computer
AC 2012-3514: PRODUCT AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: CREATINGA NEW FOCUS FOR AN ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TECHNOL-OGY PROGRAMDr. Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Program Director for the Electronics and Telecommunications pro- grams. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering (1987), the M.S. degree in physics (1989), and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering (1993) from Texas A&M University. His areas of interest in research and education include product development, analog/RF electronics, instrumentation, and en- trepreneurship.Dr. Ben Behbood Zoghi, Texas A
Farook is a member of the faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, Nothwest. Farook received the diploma of licentiate in mechanical engineering and B.S.M.E. in 1970 and 1972, respectively. He further received B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. in 1978 and 1983, respec- tively, from Illinois Institute of Technology. Farook’s current interests are in the areas of embedded system design, hardware-software interfacing, digital communication, networking, image processing, and biometrics, C++, Python, PHP and Java languages. He has a keen interest in pedagogy and instruction de- livery methods related to distance learning. He has a deep commitment to social justice and in achieving economic and
Information Sciences (%) Engineering & 5 Engineering Technology 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Employment ProspectsIn addition to teaching responsibilities, I serve as an advisor to incoming freshmen into theMechanical Engineering Technology program at Indiana University – Purdue University FortWayne. Prior to the economic recession of 2008, new students and their parents rarely asked meabout employment and salary levels after graduation, but during and since the recession, thisquestion has become common
Paper ID #21769Selecting Estimating Software: Perspectives from the Construction IndustryDr. Charles McIntyre, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Charles McIntyre is a Professor and Program Director of the Construction Engineering Management Technology Program at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He received a Ph.D. from Penn State in 1996. Prior to joining IUPUI, he was a faculty member and former chair in the Department of Construction Management and Engineering at North Dakota State University in Fargo. Dr. McIntyre’s current research includes sustainable construction, green
Bachelor degree in Electronics Engineering at Feng Chia University and both Master’s de- gree and Doctoral degree in Electrical Engineering at Florida International University. He serves as the program coordinator of the Master program in Network Technology for the Department of Technology Systems and the lead faculty of Digital Communication Systems concentration for the Consortium Uni- versities of the Ph.D. in Technology Management. He is also the point of contact of ECU National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber Defense Education (CAE-CDE). Dr. Chou teaches IT related courses, which include network security, network intrusion detection and prevention, wireless communications, and network management. His
AC 2012-3905: SUCCESSFUL ABET ACCREDITATION OF A TWO-YEARELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM: LESSONS LEARNEDDr. Anca L. Sala, Baker College, Flint Anca L. Sala is professor and Dean of engineering and computer technology at Baker College of Flint. In addition to her administrative role, she continues to be involved with development of new engineering curriculum, improving teaching and assessment of student learning, assessment of program outcomes and objectives, and ABET accreditation. She is an active member of ASEE, ASME, and OSA, serving in various capacities.Mr. James Riddell, Baker College, Flint James A. Riddell is the former Dean of engineering and technology at Baker College of Flint, Mich. He currently
AC 2011-2810: EET NATIONALLY-NORMED ASSESSMENT EXAM: FIRSTEXPERIENCES AND THEIR RELATIONS TO ABET OUTCOMESIlya Grinberg, Buffalo State College Ilya Grinberg graduated from the Lviv Polytechnic Institute (Lviv, Ukraine) with an MS in EE and earned a Ph.D. degree from the Moscow Institute of Civil Engineering (Moscow, Russia). He has over 30 years of experience in design and consulting in the field of power distribution systems and design automation. Currently he is Professor of Engineering Technology at Buffalo State College. He is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ASEERonald E. Land, Pennsylvania State University, New Kensington Ronald (”Ron”) Land is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Design
. Page 15.329.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Course-Related Activities for Mechanical Vibration in the Absence of a Formal LaboratoryAbstractThe Engineering Technology (ET) program at Middle Tennessee State University hasapproximately 350 students. Our Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) concentration wasstarted in the fall of 2004 and currently it has 120 majors. All MET students are required to takeseveral senior level courses including Mechanical Vibration. The author started teaching thiscourse formally in the fall of 2006. Although Vibration is a lecture/lab course currently we donot have a lab due to budget restrictions and therefore, the author decided to include a relevanthands
2006-197: COST EFFECTIVE MECHANICAL DESIGN IN RELATION TOMATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL RIGIDITY AND DESIGN ALTERNATIVESGary Drigel, Miami University Page 11.363.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cost Effective Mechanical Design in Relation to Material and Structural Rigidity and Design AlternativesAbstractThe integration of cost effective design techniques into Engineering and EngineeringTechnology programs is necessary in order to provide graduating Engineers the necessary skillsto become more immediate contributors to the goals and profits of their chosen companies.Example teaching and analysis techniques are discussed which will allow faculty
AC 2011-56: LONG TERM ALUMNUS PERFORMANCE AND EVALUA-TION AFTER GRADUATION FROM A DISTANCE LEARNING HYBRIDWEEKEND MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAM IN TECHNOLOGYMitchell L Springer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer, PMP, SPHR Dr. Springer is an Associate Professor in Technology Leadership & Innovation and currently serves as the Director of the Purdue University College of Technology, Academic Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR) located in West Lafayette, Indiana. He possesses over 30 years of theoretical and industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: Software Engineer- ing, Systems Engineering, Program Management and Human Resources. He
one disagreed. Fifty-six percent of respondents agreed that T5/B5 competencydata received from self-assessment provides important feedback related to the studentcompetency achievement ratings (n=9). Seventy percent agree (6) or strongly agree (1) thatT5/B5 competency data received from supervisor assessments provide important feedbackfor student competency achievement ratings (n=10). When asked if overall COE data forindividual key actions is useful information for determining strong and weak competencyareas, 67% of respondents agreed. Conclusion The purpose of this study was to learn how engineering programs are currently usingdata obtained from workplace competency assessments toward the
Paper ID #14394Applied ABET Student Outcome Continuous Improvement ProcessProf. Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University BYRON GARRY is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator in the Department of Construction & Operations Management in the College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. He has been a member of ASEE since 1998. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Applied ABET Student Outcome Continuous Improvement ProcessAbstractA sustainable continuous improvement process was desired for use in the ABET
Successful Use of Performance Indicators to Assess Student OutcomesIntroductionWell-written Student Outcomes (SOs) are a vital part of a successful improvement process.However, the SOs are relatively broad statements on what students are expected to know.Performance Indicators (PIs) provide more specific actions that may be used for directmeasurement of SOs, and they are useful tools for assessing the degree to which studentssuccessfully achieve subsets of each SO. During a recent reaccreditation by ETAC/ABET,several engineering technology programs demonstrated successful use of PIs for outcomesassessment and improvement processes.Rubrics have been developed as tools to provide direct measurement of student performance ineach of the SOs. The rubrics