Paper ID #5754Entrepreneurship and Technology Innovation Center: Bringing Together In-dustry, Faculty, and StudentsDr. Nada Marie Anid, New York Institute of Technology Nada Marie Anid, Ph.D., is professor and dean of the School of Engineering and Computing Sciences (SoECS) at New York Institute of Technology (NYIT). Dr. Anid is working on several strategic partner- ships between the School of Engineering and the public and private sector, including the creation of the School’s first Entrepreneurship and Technology Innovation Center (ETIC) and its three labs in the critical areas of IT & Cyber Security, Bio
quickly to new situations. • They improved their leadership, design and communication skills.Competition Reflections (Students and Advisors) • The students believed the competition was rigorous and motivated them to do their best work. • It provided both students and staff with a better understanding of the entrepreneurial process, reinforced their interest in entrepreneurship, and increased their awareness of global opportunities. • The students believed it better prepared them for their careers and planned to add the experience to their resume. • The students were impressed with their (competition) competitors from other universities. • The students had a better understanding of the social issues being addressed by their
entrepreneurship faculty membersand instructors, we decided to survey both groups.23, 24 This study had two foci: First, we wantedto examine faculty beliefs and practices in entrepreneurship versus those in engineering design.We asked questions of faculty concerning their teaching practices and the ideal instructor in theirdomain. Second, we wanted to gather faculty beliefs regarding how they felt entrepreneurshipshould be taught to students. Did faculty in both domains feel that entrepreneurship could betaught? Specifically, what attributes of entrepreneurship did they feel were more likely able tobe taught versus those they felt were more inherent to personality?The following three research questions were examined: 1. What are the teaching practices
Engineering Faculty MemberI. Introduction The elements of innovation and entrepreneurship have always been important in theeconomic vitality of the United States. However, in the rapid pace of globalization of industryand commerce, these elements have become not only important, but essential to the continuedgrowth and continued health of the US economy. Innovation and entrepreneurship are the keysto starting new businesses and growing existing businesses in a world awash with commodityproducts because these elements enable the maintenance of a profit margin that permits growthand continued innovation. Without continued innovation and entrepreneurship, businesses andthe economy are faced with a race to the bottom of price competition and
amuch higher rate than students, who again seemed more concerned with starting a business,finding financial success, and independence than their instructors. The recent economic downturn, poor job market, and increases in tuition rates maygreatly influence the current goals of students, giving them a different outlook than theirinstructors (or possibly even previous generations of students) especially in regard to the need tofind a new manner of generating income. In addition, to possible generational differencesbetween the two groups of participants, they may also differ in their level of cognitive and careerdevelopment. Faculty members are certainly at a different stage of their career than students. Amajority of faculty members have
Education, 2016 Promoting the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Faculty DevelopmentAbstractOur university is part of a group of about 20 universities that are seeking to improve ourgraduates’ capabilities by helping them to develop an entrepreneurial mindset while they are yetstudents. While technical knowledge is essential to engineering, engineers will be more likely tofind success and personal fulfillment when they couple these skills with a mindset to createextraordinary value for others.This perspective is not innate to many students, but they can be exposed to these concepts usingthe curriculum, if faculty themselves know how to do this. This leads to the critical issue ofappropriate faculty development. Our program is committed to
requirements, publication/presentationreview, and intellectual property rights. While providing a more holistic experience, thehandling of these issues often presents a further challenge of balancing the primary educationalmission and scope of the projects against sponsor expectations for value from their investment ofeffort and financial resources. Furthermore, Michigan Tech views these project experiences tobe a potential IP generator through student development of new products and technologies thatcould then ideally be commercialized through licensing or new business start-ups. How rights tothis student generated IP are negotiated then becomes a key factor in allowing for this possibility.For industrially sponsored projects, this results in an
teams from Invention and Designsubmitted e-team proposals, and some were funded. The most important consequence of theconference was learning what other schools were doing and meeting the key faculty working onengineering entrepreneurship; Larry Carlson and Jackie Sullivan at the University of Colorado1,Burt Swersey at RPI, Tina Seelig and Tom Byers at Stanford, John Ochs at Lehigh, ElizabethKisenwether at Penn State, and Dani Raviv at Florida Atlantic, and many others. Weincorporated ideas from these programs into our own. The support and advice of Phil Weilersteinalso shaped our ideas on innovation and entrepreneurship.Creativity and New Product Development was initially a third year one-semester course open toany engineering student. It was
studentstraveled to Charlottesville to participate the final presentations.Mixed mode version of Creativity and New Product DevelopmentThis year the senior design option includes both developing ETKs and generating newproducts. Our department’s design review committee issued new guidelines for whatqualified as a capstone design option. The traditional and distance learning versions ofCreativity and New Product Development satisfied these guidelines. The ETK version ofthe class was adjusted to incorporate the missing elements by modifying the coverage inthe second semester. These elements included CAD modeling and more engineeringanalysis.In addition to input from our faculty, I regularly seek the opinions of my students on howthe course is going and what
participating programs. To complete the minor, all students must earn ninecredits in three core courses and at least nine credits in cluster-based courses, which providemore in depth coverage within the specific content area that interests the student. The first sixcredits of core coursework are earned in two classes that focus on teaching and developing theentrepreneurial mindset and entrepreneurial leadership. Students then complete their cluster-based coursework followed by earning the final three core course credits in the capstone class,which focuses on new venture creation. The cluster-based course sequences were designed by faculty members in their respectivecolleges to address issues directly relevant to entrepreneurship and innovation
, there had not been an university-wide discussion. Amajor impetus behind the initiative described in this paper was to intentionally unite theserelated elements through creating an innovation ecosystem. An innovation ecosystem isthe result of interactions between diverse stakeholders in a community with a vision ofachieving goals through innovation or targeted creativity. Toward this end, facultyleaders in innovation from diverse disciplines gathered in a workshop to explore tactics tonurture, support and promote these activities and new initiatives. Specifically, this groupof faculty from engineering, management, arts, humanities and social sciences met to: 1. Build an awareness of all of the diverse activities and identify how they tie into
commercialization of an invention. Only by recognizing these opportunities orovercoming these challenges can an invention become a commercialized innovation.Examples of opportunities include identifying the need for a new product or process as a result ofa government-encouraged technological goal or regulation as well as the potential for Federal,state, or local governments to provide needed startup funds or as a possible early market for anew innovation. Challenges include the need to address product-related issues such asenvironmental, health, and safety concerns; field testing; and manufacturing. In some cases, anagency must approve a product before it can enter the marketplace. Issues such as standards,patents, trademarks, copyright, open standard
proceed with the study during the spring semester of 2009.When we combined the strongly agree and somewhat-agree responses in the survey, we realizedthat the student’s entrepreneurial spirit across campus is alive. Students understand that there aremany opportunities to create new businesses in their majors. Also, it reflects that they areconstantly thinking about the creation of new products and business opportunities.Implications for Future ResearchSince very little research has been done that explores interdisciplinary GTEC, we encourageprofessors, and students from different colleges to start analyzing what has been done at theirdepartments and what is taking place concerning entrepreneurship. Further research involvingall the colleges at TTU
infusedthroughout the curriculum. One of the interviewees expressed concern over that lack of progresson teaching design effectively and stated: “I don’t see [changes in teaching design]. I think we’re still to the stone’s edge of the traditional with very little emphasis on design only because faculty do not understand design. I think we can look forward to the time that will change. I don’t know how long a time we’re talking about, because obviously it takes academia a while to make those changes.”14 The need for a “new” engineer is gaining widespread acceptance15-17 and details ofinnovative experiments in engineering entrepreneurship education have been published.18-22Organizations such as the
. Todd et al. observed that, “Manydepartments involved in Capstone-type courses believe that obtaining industry sponsoredprojects is an excellent way to bring industry and academia closer together” (p.171).19 Industrysupport usually helps by providing viable projects and the necessary funding to give hands-onexperience to students. Occasionally, such strong emphasis on industry engagement places aneed for faculty themselves to have such experience or to integrate partners from industry orelsewhere who can provide insights.20 Such a strong focus on working with industry canhowever restrict the course projects to solving known real-world problems in the industry, ratherthan focusing on creating innovative solutions and capitalizing on new market
two membersof our team had approximately 80% overlap in our original inputs to the template, each personhad items with different areas of focus, and due to past experiences, each had unique knowledgeof the proper decision makers for certain issues. For example, while ongoing funding for thecourse was a clear concern for the team, one team member focused on operating expenses forcourse/project materials and supplies, while the other team member focused on expenses foradditional faculty time. Each set of expenses is necessary and each interests differentstakeholders and decision makers on campus.In addition to being conscious about getting multiple inputs when mapping out the key tasks andbarriers for institutionalization, the team found that
AC 2009-766: LEADERSHIP MODELS AND PRACTICES COURSE: STUDENTPERCEPTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERSHIP SKILLS ANDINCORPORATION OF A NEW LEADERSHIP COURSEAndrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, and serves as chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee.Melissa Grunow, Lawrence Technological University Melissa Grunow is the Coordinator for the Leadership
2006-526: STUDENT-GENERATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A RESEARCH INSTRUMENT USED TOCAPTURE STUDENT, FACULTY, AND INDUSTRY PARTNER PERSPECTIVESAND EXPECTATIONSCraig Silvernagel, University of North Dakota Craig Silvernagel is Entrepreneurship Director at the University of North Dakota (UND) College of Business and Public Administration. Craig came to UND from the University of Minnesota-Crookston (UMC), where he helped develop a new program emphasis in entrepreneurship while serving as a marketing faculty member. For the eight years prior to his time at UMC, Craig owned a full-service advertising agency he co-founded in 1994. The agency served several regional and
years as a Director of Instructional Technology, Computer Science Faculty, and Research Assistant Professor. He is presently an Associate Professor and Program Coordinator of the Electronics and Com- puter Engineering program in the Engineering Technology department of New Mexico State University. His research focus is developing and teaching Android App development to engineers and entrepreneurs with innovative tools that can be utilized by programming novices. He is also an instructor and course developer for his college’s Freshmen Year Experience. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Teaching Lean LaunchPad to Transfer Students to Increase
. Because at theoutset there were no routine reporting mechanisms in place, the working group was slow torecognize these divergences from the MOU.Once the issues were brought to light, it was necessary to make some quick adjustments to alignwith the donor’s wishes. President Williams was quick to make the necessary corrections so thatthe program would be in complete alignment with the MOU. Compliance to the requirements ofthe MOU is an important element of success of a new program in start-up mode and thus an earlylesson learned was the importance of creating systems and processes early. Vigilant reportingmechanisms are critical to any program’s success and, ideally, systems should be in place beforeprogram start-up.The MOU is silent about the
, and additional modules will be deployed progressively. All modules will be fully deployedby Spring 2017. Students in all engineering majors will complete 13 of the online modules through requiredcourses. Only students who take the elective Business Fundamentals for Engineers course willcomplete modules 8-12. Each module will take 5-9 hours to complete. The modules are designedto standalone and do not have any particular prerequisite structure.Development and Deployment of Modules and Faculty Training Requests for proposals are issued to faculty at UNH, those at other institutions and industryconsultants who have relationships with the TCoE for the development of the online learningmodules. Potential developers submit their proposals
Paper ID #11772Creativity, Innovation, and Ingenuity Summer Enrichment Program – Col-laborating with a Cultural Institution and Assessment ResultsDr. Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN
innovation, there is a clear need for tools that help studentsintegrate opportunity exploration and ideation, marketing, financial considerations, andoperations issues with technical knowledge to develop and implement effective new productsand services.The Innovation Canvas (IC)3 is a solution-development framework that guides teams through thedesign process. While technical solution development is a key component of the IC, it alsoincorporates the concept of the value proposition, along with an understanding of feature spaceand marketing. As engineering educators, we are interested in developing educationalexperiences that build both technical and entrepreneurship skills. To examine how the IC couldbe used in in undergraduate engineering education
, college freshman-level course forthose interested in learning about innovative idea generation and new venture creation. The keycontrast is that the non-credit MOOC is open and free to anyone worldwide and the mini-MOOC is a tuition-based, three-credit course exclusively for University of Marylandundergraduates.Both the MOOC and the mini-MOOC are multi-disciplinary courses to help students to learn thebasic business, strategy, and leadership skills needed to launch and manage new ventures. Topicsinclude learning how to assess the feasibility of a new venture, as well as how to apply bestpractices for planning, launching, and managing new companies. Students discuss a wide rangeof issues of importance and concern to entrepreneurs and learn to
• Test concepts quickly via customer engagement • Identify supply chains distribution methods • Assess policy and regulatory issues • Protect intellectual property Figure 1 Entrepreneurial Mindset FrameworkThe engineering statistics course in which the EML activities were incorporated is a junior levelcourse at the University of New Haven. The course aims (1) to equip students with statisticsliteracy which includes understanding of statistical concepts and terminology and being able touse basic statistical tools and methods and (2) to introduce them to the fundamentals of statisticalquality control. Topics include data representation, descriptive statistics, probability, modelfitting
the transport and fate of contaminants in groundwater and surface water systems, as well as engineering education reform.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion
American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrated e-Learning Modules for Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset: Direct Assessment of Student Learning AbstractIn an effort to develop an entrepreneurial mindset in all our engineering and computer sciencestudents, the University of New Haven is embedding entrepreneurial concepts throughout the 4-year curricula in their majors. This is done with the use of several short e-learning modulesdeveloped by content experts. The modules are integrated into engineering and computer sciencecourses by faculty who reinforce concepts through a related activity, project, or assignment. Thee-learning modules, available online through course
, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is
Education at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined the Bioengineering faculty at Northeastern University and be- came the Director of Life Sciences and Engineering Programs at The Roux Institute (Portland, Maine). Dr
hands-on engineering activities for high school students. In 2009, he joined the faculty of Western New England University where he currently holds the position of Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering. He currently teaches undergraduate courses in bioinstrumentation, physiology, lab on a chip, and global health. Dr. Rust is a member of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). His research interests involve the development of point-of-care medical technologies, including bioinstrumentation for use in low-resource settings.Dr. Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Mansoor Nasir received his B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the