academic writing.Dr. Andrew Mark HerbertIris V. RiveroEmily Lazarus ˜ Texas Tech UniversityErika Nunez,Nafisha TabassumXueni Fan, Texas Tech University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Efficacy of Humanities-Driven Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Curriculum on Integrating Empathy into Technology DesignKeywords: Discourse Analysis, Interdisciplinary, Team Teaching, Post-secondary EducationThere have recently been calls to consider the development of student empathy withinengineering coursework. We argue that this goal may be reached by infusing more traditionalengineering coursework with humanities. Our Humanities-Driven Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics
benefit historically-neglected constituencies, such as the Navajoin Southwest US. For final projects, students researched and presented posters in teamsdiscussing technological problems or possibilities they believed to be deserving of more attentionfrom the engineering community. These and other projects were coupled with mandatory yetungraded weekly online forums to which students were asked to exercise their critical thinkingskills by posting responses to the prompts provided and to each other. In-class activities includedconversationally-delivered lectures, discussions with guest speakers, and screening of films suchas Who Killed the Electric Car? and Revenge of the Electric Car.Through such activities, the course specifically aimed to meet
critical thinking, creativity, communication, empathy, and problem-solving abilities, which are allessential for engineers to address complex, real-world challenges [19],[20]. Through exposure to diverseperspectives and ways of thinking, engineers develop a nuanced understanding of the world, including stakeholderand social-contextual factors [21],[22]. This can lead to more creative and effective solutions [23],[24] [25], andfoster a deeper understanding of the social, cultural, and ethical implications of technological design choices. Withsuch training, engineers can also be empowered to have a more significant impact on society [26],[27] [28]. Borregoand Newswander remind us of the role for educators in this process: “engineering faculty can
Paper ID #41503Teaching to Transgress in a Technology and Society CourseDr. Stephanie Hladik, University of Manitoba Dr. Stephanie Hladik (she/her) is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education at the University of Manitoba. She holds BSc and MSc degrees in Electrical Engineering, as well as a PhD in Learning Sciences, all from the University of Calgary. Her research interests lie at the intersections of design, equity, and education. She is deeply interested in the roles that facilitators (informal educators, teaching assistants, parents, and others) play in the
Engineers, India, M.E. (Production Engineering) degree from PSG College of Te ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Using Tutor-led Support to Enhance Engineering Student Writing for AllAbstractWriting Assignment Tutor Training in STEM (WATTS) is part of a three-year NSF IUSE grantwith participants at three institutions. This research project seeks to determine to what extentstudents in the WATTS project show greater writing improvement than students using writingtutors not trained in WATTS. The team collected baseline, control, and experimental data.Baseline data included reports written by engineering and engineering technology students withno intervention to determine if there were variations in
, belonging, connection, and overallwell-being are just as important for personal and professional development as learning subjectssuch as biology or sociology (Way et al., 2018). One potential tool for targeting such outcomes is story-driven learning. Stories can notonly help students learn educational material (Shank, 2006), but harnessing students’ personalstories in the classroom has the potential to powerfully influence students’ outcomes regardingempathy, sense of belonging, sense of self, leadership potential, and well-being. While researchoutside of higher education already supports the use of story-driven learning for such aims(Kellas, 2017; Manney, 2008; Sonn et al., 2014), we wanted to understand 1) the extent to whichstory-driven
Paper ID #43828”Moral Weirdos”: Effective Altruism and Empathy in Engineering EducationDr. Richard A House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard A. House is Associate Dean for Professional Development and Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.A. from Illinois Wesleyan University and M.A. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Irvine. His interests include liberal education for engineers, engineering communication, and the rhetoric of science and technology. With Richard Layton, Jessica Livingston, and Sean Moseley, he is co-author of The Engineering Communication Manual
]. Although theprogram differentiates the term from other approaches to responsible technologicaldevelopment, understandings of, and approaches to technological stewardship are not thesame across all contexts. Other engineering education programs and scholars presenttechnological stewardship in close relation to concepts like social responsibility [3] orresponsible innovation [4], or use the term to describe a process of pedagogical design for theengineering classroom, rather than a practice for engineers to engage in [5]. Within the TSPPitself, ‘tech stewardship’ is defined in relation to a set of behaviors. Different parts of theprogram and related publications describe tech stewardship as a mindset, a practice, and acontributor to cultural change
knowledge.Megan Kenny Feister, CSUCI Megan Kenny Feister is an Assistant Professor of Organizational Communication at California State Uni- versity Channel Islands. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023COLLABORATION PRACTICES AROUND TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE Abstract This paper examines collaborative work involving complex technological infrastructure,and contrasts this setting with other contexts of technologically-mediated collaboration. In doingso, we center the role of problem-solving practices as one of the key determinants of successfulcollaborative work. Data from interviews and observations with scientists indicated that whilethe complexity of
Paper ID #37847Hybrid engineering: An auto-ethnographic story of hybrid curriculumdevelopment, learning, and teachingProf. Eunjeong Ma, Pohang University of Science and Technology Trained in Science and Technology Studies, my teaching and research areas include intersections between technology/engineering and society. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Hybrid pedagogies in the making?: A case study of hybrid engineering discipline and cultureEunjeong Ma, Pohang University of Science and TechnologyAbstract: This is an auto-ethnographic account of encounters with
Paper ID #38652Highlighting Gaps in Engineering Education through Emotional Safety inStudent StaffKylee Shiekh, Colorado School of Mines Kylee Shiekh is a student at the Colorado School of Mines. She has a degree in Computational Applied Mathematics and Data Science and is working towards a Masters in Quantum Engineering. She hopes to enter a PhD program for Engineering Education at the next step of her education. Her primary research in- terests are in engineering as enculturation, and the experiences of underrepresented students as compared to their peers.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Colorado School of Mines Dean Nieusma is
Engineering Education, 2024 Design Iterations as Material Culture Artifacts: A Qualitative Methodology for Design Education ResearchAbstractStudying design processes requires the researcher to move with the designer as they negotiate anaction-reflection cycle comprised of a multitude of relationships, including the designer’srelation to themselves, to human and more-than-human others, and to the beliefs, values, andassumptions that design us every day. This paper’s goal is to introduce a qualitative methodologyfor studying the complex relationality of design, particularly (but not exclusively) in anarchitectural design education context. This methodology has theoretical and methodologicalunderpinnings in Process Philosophy and
intended for first year students, it is optional for certain majors, who areable to take it in later years if they desire.Researcher PositionalityWe identify as middle-class women who are interested in supporting and studying justice-oriented engineering education from elementary through undergraduate levels. Both of us haveengineering degrees followed by engineering education degrees and have taught undergraduateengineering courses. The first author, Chelsea Andrews, is a white American early-career facultymember, has been a part of this research project from its inception, and leads the researchcomponent, including overseeing data collection. She designed many of the sociotechnicalactivities for the course, including the lesson analyzed in this
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
challengesbrought about by the paradigm shift toward advanced manufacturing. The literature in Chineseindicates that engineering education researchers in China have noted the importance of resiliencein the training of engineers. Nonetheless, the literature in Chinese has not examined the processthrough which young engineers develop resilience at work. This study investigates the process ofresilience development.3. Method3.1 SamplingWe used homogeneous sampling method, which is a purposive sampling technique that aims torecruit research samples similar in characteristics relevant for the study. Based on Kovalchuk’(2017) study and the actual working situation of Chinese engineers, we created three inclusioncriteria for participant recruitment: (1) the
feelings of belonging in modern science. Her research specialties include histories of women, gender, and sexuality in modern science and technology; the interplay between engineers and engineering practices and the infrastructure of everyday life; and the relationship between design, technology, and justice.Dr. Avneet Hira, Boston College Dr. Avneet Hira is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program and the Department of Teaching, Curriculum and Society (by courtesy) at Boston College. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Engineering as Conflict: A Framing for Liberal Engineering EducationIntroductionIn this paper we use the framing of “engineering as conflict” to
Paper ID #42737Navigating Epistemological Borders: Considerations for Team Teaching atthe Intersection of Humanities and STEMXueni Fan, Texas Tech University Xueni Fan is currently a graduate student in the Doctor of Education program, specializing in instructional technology at Texas Tech University. Holding a Master’s degree in applied linguistics, Fan’s research focuses on qualitative research methods, interdisciplinary studies, online learner engagement, and interprofessional education in the medical field.Dr. Joshua M. Cruz, Texas Tech University Joshua Cruz is an assistant professor of education at Texas Tech
Education, 2023Beyond Uncritical Blindness: How critical praxis about engineering for community development could lead to socially responsible and just projectsAbstractThis paper explores how using concepts and frameworks from Science and Technology Studies(STS) to think and practice critically about engineering for community development (ECD) is anecessary precondition and preparation if engineering educators hope to instill sociallyresponsible behavior in our students and social justice in their community projects. With thesignificant surge of community engagement projects in US engineering programs, there is agrowing need for developing critical lenses for engineering students involved in communitydevelopment, so
education should teach, whom it should serve, andthe ideology and value system behind it.To achieve the goals, it is not enough to simply learn Western textbooks and knowledge.Instead, we should use non-Western experiences, research, and perspectives to re-understandthe impact of the Cold War and neoliberalism on East Asian technological development,national governance, and labor structures. A dialogue-based classroom, as this paper argues,would be a possible pedagogical approach for teaching global engineering competency,especially in a non-Western context, and only then can we prevent engineering education inEast Asia and globally from becoming a tool of capital and colonialism, and cultivate ourengineer-to-be with critical thinking skills
engineers more competitive in themarketplace? Do engineers adopt purely technological solutions, or do they participate in co-defining problems and co-producing answers to those problems, which may de-emphasizetechnological innovation?This distinction can be seen in the way different programs described the role of technology, andthe engineers’ role vis-à-vis technology. Programs that emphasized an “engineering for” © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Annual Conferenceorientation typically used language that indicated a leaning toward technological solutionism,framing engineering as a way of solving problems, and sociotechnical thinking as a way ofdeveloping better solutions
is often described as “horrific” and “living hell” (Godfrey & Parker, 2010, p.12). Mental health impacts of such a culture merit further study.The limited research on mental health completed specifically in engineering education used quantitativemethods (Cross & Jensen, 2018; Danowitz & Beddoes, 2020; Jensen & Cross, 2020) and shows thatengineering students experience higher rates of mental health issues like panic disorders, PTSD, anxiety,and depression compared to students in other majors regardless of identity. However, rates of mentalhealth disorders climb substantially for both white women and women of color, but also for bisexualwomen, who have panic disorder at eleven times the national average (Danowitz & Beddoes
curricula sustain itself despite the varied political sensibilities of participants?The social reproduction accomplished by education under industrial capitalism is too broad atopic for discussion here, but we can start to specify the character of such reproduction inEngineering fields. In the United States, from the profession’s nineteenth-century origins in themilitary context and mechanical training objectives of the Land Grant movement, a goodengineer has been formally defined as one who accepts the role of technology in the “empire-self-making” of the United States, as la paperson puts it [28]. In the succeeding generations, thedefinition of human welfare has continued to pivot in these settings on the notion of Americanexceptionalism (using
criteria related to safety. Next, we will review engineering education and STSliterature for discussions of worker safety related to engineering education and engineeringstudies. Lastly, we will focus on the case of the growing offshore wind industry in the US tohighlight different actors’ responses to safety compliance through an analysis of public webinarsand documentation provided by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (US) andthe Health and Safety Executive (UK) relating to offshore wind.Through this work, we seek to synthesize safety insights in an industry that is new in the US withscholarship around safety in engineering as a sociotechnical endeavor. By connecting notions ofsociotechnical engineering to a case in worker
Paper ID #41048Meta-Activity Theory as a Conceptual Tool for Supporting TransdisciplinaryCurricular Experimentation in Undergraduate Learning ContextsDr. Todd Nicewonger, Virginia Tech Todd E. Nicewonger has a Ph.D. in Applied Anthropology and his work focuses on the ethnographic study of engineers and designers in the US, Europe, and Kenya.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education and Deputy Executive Director of the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT) at Virginia Tech. ©American Society for
Paper ID #42134Poetry, Creativity, and ChatGPTProf. Craig J. Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. He integrates communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical Engineering program. He has co-authored a number of text books on communication and recently edited a compilation of poetry written solely by engineering students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Poetry, Creativity, and ChatGPTWhen working with young
Paper ID #44542Expanding the Audience for the Discourse on Diversity by Recognizing theFraming Power of Implicit MessagesDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Annual Conference Expanding the Audience for the Discourse on Diversity
Paper ID #38205Engineering Is Personal: Interpersonal Communication for the21st-Century EngineerDr. Joanna G Burchfield, University of South FloridaApril A. Kedrowicz, North Carolina State University, Raleigh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering is Personal: Interpersonal Communication for the 21st Century EngineerAbstractIn 1996, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) adopted EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000). EC2000 was revolutionary for its time and its implications forengineering education paradigms rocked engineering programs around the United
theme, the Engineering and Humanities SIG hosted a roundtable“collaboratorium” consisting of four discussion topics related to transdisciplinary modes ofthought and practice in engineering education. These topics were: Sociotechnical thinking, whichis an approach to engineering work that recognizes engineering as simultaneously social andtechnical (e.g. [4]); Sociotechnical leadership, which acknowledges the opportunity forengineers to embrace positions of leadership to positively configure the technology-societyrelationship (e.g. [5]); STEAM, which is an educational paradigm that integrates arts practice intoscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics instruction (e.g. [6]); and Decolonization,which calls for radical transformations of
applications. She is passionate about creating positive change within her communities and being a compassionate scientist and leader.Meredith Hooper, California Institute of Technology Meredith Hooper is an Aeronautics PhD student studying under Professor Mory Gharib and Co-Director of the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching (CPET). Her PhD research uses a combination of machine learning and experimental techniques to investigate optimal modes of propulsion, spanning interests in both bioinspired propulsion and classical aviation. In her role as Co-Director of CPET, Meredith works closely with the Center for Teaching, Learning, and Outreach to coordinate and lead a variety of workshops, speakers, discussions, and more
. Waidzunas, “Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM,” Sci. Adv., vol. 7, no. 3, p. eabe0933, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[11] J. B. Yoder and A. Mattheis, “Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers,” J. Homosex., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632.[12] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed., in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Dordrecht